reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly welcomes former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to discuss the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, which resulted in the deaths of 13 U.S. service members and left many Americans behind. General Mark Milley, during recent congressional hearings, described the war as a strategic failure and emphasized the Taliban's ongoing ties to al-Qaeda. Pompeo, who played a significant role in the U.S. withdrawal strategy under President Trump, reflects on his experience leading the CIA and the importance of maintaining national security. Pompeo addresses allegations against Milley regarding a call to his Chinese counterpart, where Milley allegedly assured that the U.S. would not attack China. Pompeo expresses concern over Milley’s comments and the implications of potentially warning adversaries about military actions. He emphasizes that the Trump administration operated under a deterrence model, making it clear that any threats to U.S. interests would be met with force. The conversation shifts to the withdrawal from Afghanistan, with Pompeo acknowledging that the Taliban did not meet the conditions set in the Doha agreement. He explains that the Trump administration aimed to reduce troop levels while ensuring American interests were protected, asserting that the Taliban refrained from attacking U.S. forces during their tenure due to the credible threat of military action. Kelly and Pompeo discuss the aftermath of the withdrawal, including the abandonment of Afghan allies and the chaotic evacuation process. Pompeo criticizes President Biden for not taking responsibility for the withdrawal's execution and highlights the emotional toll on service members who feel their sacrifices were in vain. Jack Carr, a former Navy SEAL, joins the show to provide his perspective on the military's failures and the need for accountability among senior leaders. He argues that the military's focus has shifted away from winning wars and emphasizes the importance of adapting to changing conditions on the ground. Carr expresses concern over the lack of accountability for military leaders and the need for a more effective selection process for generals. The discussion concludes with a focus on raising patriotic children in a climate that often portrays America negatively. Carr stresses the importance of parental involvement in countering negative narratives and instilling a sense of pride in American values and history.

Andrew Roberts expresses concern about the decline of national pride in Britain, noting that pride in British history has dropped from 86% in 2010 to 56% due to a focus on the negative aspects of the British Empire. He believes that a lack of pride in the past affects future aspirations. He critiques cultural actions in the U.S., such as removing statues of historical figures like Thomas Jefferson, arguing it represents a form of cultural suicide. Roberts shares anecdotes from his life, including his expulsion from school and a brief consideration of joining MI6. He highlights the influence of his first history teacher, Christopher Perry, who taught history as a captivating narrative, contrasting it with the more traditional, date-focused methods. He discusses the importance of clarity in historical writing, avoiding hedging phrases like "perhaps" or "maybe," which he sees as undermining trust with readers. Roberts emphasizes the significance of learning from mistakes, citing Churchill's numerous errors and his ability to adapt and grow from them. He describes both Napoleon and Churchill as leaders who felt a sense of destiny, which influenced their decision-making. Roberts believes that charisma and charm play crucial roles in historical figures' lasting impact, while acknowledging that not all influential leaders are positive forces. He expresses concern about the future of history education in Britain, noting a lack of engagement with significant historical periods. Roberts concludes by advocating for the study of history as essential for understanding contemporary issues, citing Churchill's advice to study history for insights into statecraft. He also discusses his latest book on warfare, co-authored with David Petraeus, and his upcoming projects on Napoleon and Disraeli.

Tucker Carlson’s conversation with Piers Morgan unfolds as a sweeping meditation on national decline, cultural change, and the allegedly eroding foundations of free speech in both Britain and America. Carlson frames Britain as a once-dominant imperial power that, after two world wars, has become a “defeated” civilization in the eyes of its own people, a transformation he attributes not only to economic shifts but to a deeper, cultural ceding of identity. The discussion pivots from this diagnosis to a controversial analysis of immigration, abortion, and demographic change, with Tucker arguing that mass migration, birth rates, and the demonization of traditional national symbols signal a self-inflicted decline. Morgan counters with a more nuanced reading of European social policy, the NHS, and the benefits of multiculturalism, pushing back on the notion that immigration alone explains societal degradation. The dialogue then roams across the free-speech frontier, from arrests for praying outside abortion clinics to debates about censorship, “woke” culture, and the limits of what can be said in public or on air. Throughout, the hosts juxtapose American and British experiences of policing language, political correctness, and the rule of law, acknowledging that both nations face genuine tensions around what constitutes acceptable discourse and who gets to enforce it. The interview dips into personal anecdotes about patriotism, national pride, and dignity, with both men admitting that pride in one’s country coexists with fear about its future. The show also delves into broader questions about what makes a civilization endure: self-reliance, family formation, language, and the sense that a people deserve to pass their way of life to the next generation. The discussion occasionally becomes a brutal, provocative exploration of taboos—race, religion, sexuality, and ethnicity—yet it returns to a core argument: if a society loses its confidence in its own culture and its future, the very idea of freedom can feel endangered. The episode ends with a rapid-fire blend of political reflection, cultural critique, and the provocative question of whether modern liberal democracies can sustain a shared civilizational project amid rapid demographic and technological change, a question left unsettled but deeply examined throughout the dialogue.” POTENTIAL-EPISODE-TOPICS CULTURE AND DECLINE FREE SPEECH AND CENSORSHIP IMMIGRATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS MULTICULTURALISM VS. NATIONAL IDENTITY REVIVAL OF PATRIOTISM AND NATIONAL PRIDE MEDIA AND POLITICAL DISCOURSE MODERN LIBERALISM VS. CONSERVATIVE CRITIQUE ABORTION AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE WOKE CULTURE AND ITS OPPONENTS ECONOMIC STRUCTURES OF WESTERN CITIES GLOBALISM AND LOCAL CULTURE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN BRITAIN AND THE U.S.