reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Ronald Lauder, the Estee Lauder heir who convinced Trump to pursue Greenland in 2017, is increasingly moving from talk to action. Through a Delaware-registered company called Greenland Development Partners, Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in Greenlandic companies. The broader claim is that this is economic infiltration disguised as investment, with Lauder’s business partners in Greenland described as some of the country’s most influential people with close ties to Greenland’s foreign minister, Vivian Motzfeldt. Greenland Development Partners is portrayed as an opaque Delaware investment consortium. Delaware is described as “the Shell company's capital of America, where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny.” Danish newspaper Politikens Investigation is cited as labeling Laura (Lauder) as a key participant in the consortium, which has bought stakes in two Greenlandic firms, including Greenland Water Bank. Greenland Water Bank is owned by Svein Hardenbair and Sverdrupijn. Hardenbair is a former civil servant adviser to Greenland’s prime minister until recently and was also the director of Greenland’s national energy company. Jan Beboj Johansson is highlighted as particularly interesting. He is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and chairs the governing Ziomoot party in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital. Ziomoot is one of the four parties in Greenland’s current coalition government. The crucial point is that Johansson’s wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland, who handles foreign relations, including relations with the United States. The alleged linkage is that Ronald Lauder, described as Trump’s friend and advisor on Greenland, is now in business with Johansson’s wife’s husband, i.e., the Greenland Foreign Minister’s husband. The narrative asserts this is not merely investment but influence at the highest level. Greenland Water Bank may appear small and harmless. Its 2024 accounts show minimum staffing costs of about $5,500 and a modest financial loss. The company bottles water from the Lingmar Spring in Krakataswak on Disko Island, selling locally under the brand Emilik. Up to 2024, ownership was shared between Hardenbair and Beboj Johansson, before part of their shares were sold to Lauder’s investor group. Hardenbair explains to Pulchikung (Poltikken/Politiken) that the investment is not primarily about the money, but about gaining better access to the luxury market where their water should be a natural part. They believed the water was among the best in the world. The stated expectation is that Lauder’s involvement would grant access to the American luxury market for Greenland Water Bank’s premium water. The question raised is what Lauder receives in return: a pressure point and a foothold into Greenland’s top elite, enabling direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. The narrative suggests funds could flow to Sven and Jorn (Johansson) through Greenland Water Bank as salaries, bonuses, or in Forms such as business trips, luxury offices, boats, or cars, all paid by investments from Lauder. The scale of Lauder’s wealth is mentioned as $5,000,000,000 USD, with Lauder reportedly able to mobilize $10,000,000 for ventures. The central controversy remains the connection to Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt, who previously served on Greenland Water Bank’s board. Her husband’s involvement via Johansson’s alliance with Lauder is presented as a potential conflict of interest, given Lauder’s influence on Greenland’s political and economic landscape.

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

- Speaker 0 expresses a core problem: how to support the Donald Trump presidency when the figures associated with his circle (Alex Jones, Owen Shroyer, Ian Carroll) embody traits they oppose, prompting questions about alignment with their side. He asks how to reconcile supporting Trump with these associations, calling it an objective problem. - Speaker 1 responds that he has not researched certain controversial items (Eric Prince’s phone) and notes that Eric Prince is a polarizing figure from the military-industrial complex world. He argues that involvement in war fighting does not automatically make someone evil and that a full picture requires digging beyond initial impressions, acknowledging he hasn’t done all the research. - Speaker 0 challenges this, citing his own video: Eric Prince has three CEOs for Blackwater, all with intricate ties to the IDF. He questions coincidence between Palantir Technologies and the surveillance state, Israel’s influence, and three IDF-affiliated Blackwater CEOs, referencing USS Liberty and suggesting Eric Prince’s past atrocities and a lack of accountability. He asks whether such a figure could ever be considered a good person and whether repentance is possible, noting he hasn’t seen Prince acknowledge past wrongs. - Speaker 0 adds BlackRock as another easy target, claiming BlackRock, with help from the Trump administration, bought two ports in the Panama Canal for $22.8 billion, and contends Trump mentioned a company would buy the Panama Canal during the State of the Union, but did not name BlackRock. He challenges the listener to consider whether Trump is on their side given this nugget of information. - Speaker 1 says he was not endorsing a specific device or action, calling the “phones” comment offhand and irrelevant. He reiterates he isn’t waiting for Trump or Elon Musk to act in the interest of people, and states he’s intentionally not waiting for them to do so. He emphasizes starting change bottom-up, and encourages starting conversations rather than trolling, suggesting Seven Seas could help. - Speaker 0 shifts to a broader miscommunication problem: there’s a gap where people misread each other, treating allies as enemies. He advocates filling this gap through dialogue with diverse figures like Seven Seas, Ian Carroll, Joe Rogan, Whitney Webb, Derek Brose. He mentions a planned March sit-down interview between Derek Brose and Ian Carroll, hoping for a productive exchange, while noting past heated exchanges where ad hominem attacks diminished constructive dialogue. He cites Clint Russell and redheaded libertarian as examples of contentious interactions. - They discuss disagreements over Trump’s ideology and policies, including concerns that Trump still praises the VA, pharma, and large-scale spending, which confounds libertarian critiques. He cites a national debt comparison between Obama and Trump era spending, arguing that debt devalues the dollar and harms Americans, regardless of party. - Speaker 0 reiterates suspicion that the criticism of Trump and Elon Musk coexists with perceived support for them, labeling it an inconsistency. He promises to withhold calling someone a shill until there is clear intent to deceive. Speaker 1 suggests focusing on good-faith arguments, mentioning Glenn Greenwald with respect, and invites Seven Seas to share their take on Ian Carroll’s reaction to Seven Seas’ post.

Speaker 0: An early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton to her campaign manager, John Podesta, states that ISIL ISIS is funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This email is described as the most significant in the collection. Speaker 1: The discussion notes that Saudi and Qatari money is spread widely, including to many media institutions. While some analysts and even the US government have mentioned that some Saudi figures have supported or funded ISIS, the typical explanation has been that it’s rogue princes using oil money with the government disapproving. The email, however, asserts that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been funding ISIS. Speaker 1: It is claimed that Saudis, Qataris, Moroccans, Bahrainis—particularly the Saudis and the Qataris—are giving money to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton is secretary of state, and the State Department is approving massive arms sales to Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0: Hillary Clinton says, “I’m Hillary Clinton,” and emails reveal a significant discussion about it. The email asserts that the largest ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia, more than $80,000,000,000. It states that during her tenure as secretary of state, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value doubled. Speaker 1: The consequence noted is that the notorious terrorist jihadist group ISIL or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation. The implication highlighted is that this is extraordinary.

Edgar Barja runs Kioskos, the El Salvador chain selling Bitcoin wallets, with Grupo Barja’s old money from energy and real estate now funneling into crypto kiosks. Brock Pierce, Tether’s cofounder, didn’t just move HQ to Bukele’s El Salvador; he bought Barja’s silence with 30,000,000 through a Maltese shell, then defaulted on a hotel deal the same week. The Knights of Malta act as the glue: Pierce was knighted in 2019; Barja’s uncle was a lifelong member, and they knighted Bukele quietly in 2021 right after he greenlit Tether’s license. The bottom line given is that it’s a human trafficking pipeline disguised as fintech. Kiosks scan IDs for onboarding, but half those scans end up in Barja’s databases, sold to traffickers who ship kids through El Salvador’s ports. Tether cash is said to grease the bribes. Knights pray over it like it’s holy work. Bukele gets his Bitcoin headline, Pierce pockets laundering fees, and Edgar keeps the kiosks rolling. All legal on paper, all filthy underneath. Expanding on the DEN trafficking network: the DEN ring is not a back-alley hustle but a polished pipeline built on crypto and fake charity. Edgar Borges’ kiosks aren’t just Bitcoin ATMs; they’re ID harvesters. Every poor Salvadoran scanning a wallet uploads their passport, photo, even fingerprints. That data is sold straight to traffickers in Tegucigalpa or Mexico City. One case cited: a 16-year-old girl from San Miguel scammed last month, vanished two days later in a container truck headed north. Price tag cited as $8, paid in tether. Brock Pierce ties it tight as the money man. After Disney kicked him out for an underage party scandal, he pivoted to crypto freedom in Bukele’s Bitcoin Utopia. Tether’s reserves are described as half backed by sketchy bonds, the rest by dark pools; he wired 20,000,000 to Barja’s shell last year for kiosk upgrades. It’s framed as kickbacks; Knights of Malta sanctify it. Their El Salvador chapter runs orphanages that recruit volunteers, but half those kids end up as mules or worse; Bukele knows, with his brother’s cousin running the chapter, and the scheme funnels cash to his reelection machine. Victims are mostly migrants, Ecuadorians hopping flights, Indians with tourist visas. Kiosks flag them; Pierce’s bots wash the coins; Borges taxis drive them to the border. US arrests? A six-person bust last month; 45k seized. But the bosses are untouched. It’s described as Epstein’s old playbooks, but digital now. It’s framed as engineered, not random. Names are said to be ghosts, yet tether wallets are urged as the path to follow.

Speaker discusses a list compiled by Benjamin Netanyahu and his political office naming individuals considered funders of his campaign. One name here, “who I think everybody should be interested in is Rupert Murdoch, and he's given the designation of two.” Murdoch is described as “an oligarch that controls much of the British media, owns The Sun, owns The Times, owns Sky News, and others.” It is stated that Murdoch “historically has funded something called the Jerusalem Foundation, which builds illegal settlements in Sheikh Jarrah and Silwan.” It is also noted that Murdoch “had a subsidiary called the NDS Group, which was run by former Israeli intelligence and military personnel, which was accused of hacking the communications of its opposition at the time, other media companies.” It adds that Murdoch is “the owner and the founder of Talk TV, Meaning that Talk TV, has the cartoonishly evil James Whale and his sidekick, also employed Piers Morgan for a period of time.” “And the time when I went on the channel, the show was on talk TV, owned by Rupert Murdoch, who is on a list here from Netanyahu's political office, considered to be a funder of Benjamin Netanyahu.”

In the transcript, the speaker describes a situation in Argentina where fires are spreading around Patagonia. They claim there is speculation that Israeli tourists are starting the fires to purchase land at cheap prices. The speaker asserts that Argentina’s president, Javier Milei, is allegedly in cahoots with this idea, because he repealed a law that formerly banned the sale of land immediately after a fire, arguing that laws like this are important in Patagonia due to the land’s beauty. The speaker notes another action attributed to Milei: an executive order in 2023 that repealed a law limiting foreign ownership of rural land, allegedly removing any cap on how much land foreigners can purchase in Argentina. They argue that this, combined with fires and the opening of the market to foreigners, could create a scenario where land is purchased cheaply after fires, potentially attracting Israeli buyers. The speaker claims Milei is so focused on Israel that he is described as selling what they call one of the most beautiful places on Earth—Patagonia, Argentina—to Israelis, with the Argentine people supposedly having no say in the matter. They relay watching domestic Argentine news, describing the fires as horrible for those affected, including a viral video of a crying woman who says they’re burning Patagonia and selling the land to Israelis. Another similar video is mentioned, with a man remarking that people are unsurprised that Patagonia is being set on fire for a real estate interest. The speaker alleges that there is no aid from the government, asserting that the country has realized that Patagonia is being destroyed potentially for large financial interests to purchase land and create a “colony” for Israel, or some similar outcome. The overall claim remains that the fires are purposeful real estate-driven acts tied to foreign ownership changes and pro-Israel policy under Milei, with Patagonia’s destruction framed as a consequence of these political and economic moves.

John and Mario discuss the breadth and implications of the Epstein files, asserting that Epstein was an access agent connected to Mossad and deeply embedded with various intelligence actors. - Epstein as Mossad access agent and broader intelligence ties: - John asserts that Epstein’s status as a Mossad access agent is correct and that Epstein sought contact with the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Council, MI5, MI6, and even Russia’s Putin. He notes emails from Epstein’s side asking for private meetings with Putin, which were granted in a restricted form, while Epstein’s attorneys reportedly filed FOIA requests with the CIA and NSC about any association with them. - The conversation expands to consider broader pressure on the DOJ and the Trump administration to redact or withhold documents, with Congresswoman May mentioned as observing DOJ monitoring of her and colleagues. - The two discuss the idea that the “movers and shakers” in American culture and the billionaire/political class are driving the cover-up, with the implication that releases mandated by law have not been fully honored. - Death of Epstein and questions about the death/mortality: - Both speakers repeatedly state “Epstein did not kill himself,” noting the belief that he was murdered and cremated, preventing body examination. - They list several anomalies surrounding Epstein’s death: attempted suicide on July 23 with deleted footage, six days of suicide watch followed by removal from watch contrary to protocol, guards’ missed rounds, an empty cell with a removed cellmate who had been violent, an unmonitored call the day before death, and camera malfunctions on the day of death. - They discuss a decoy body used in the autopsy process and discrepancies in the autopsy report (ear shape, nose, and penis appearance) and a DOJ report dated a day earlier than publicized. The discussion includes the possibility of a decoy body to mislead reporters. - A forensic expert is cited, noting that the autopsy description described a normal penis, conflicting with accounts from a victim about a deformed penis. - Redactions, sources, and the release of documents: - They argue the released files overwhelm audiences and muddy facts, with millions of documents, of which only a fraction has been released; the rest remain redacted. - John explains FOIA processes and redaction rules (sources/methods, unindicted co-conspirators, victims’ privacy), emphasizing that there is little justification to redact content about Epstein himself since he is deceased. - They compare the redaction situation to the torture report, where redacted material obscures critical findings, and point out inconsistencies in what names are redacted (e.g., Les Wexner redacted as “Les” but not his full surname). - Libyan assets, Ukraine, and other financial angles: - A memo shows Epstein plotting to loot Libya’s frozen assets, with Greg Brown (former MI6 and Mossad connections mentioned) proposing to identify recovered assets and take 5–10% as compensation, with Libya’s reconstruction spending potentially exceeding $100 billion. - The discussion notes that the U.S. Treasury rewards those who facilitate repatriation of unfrozen assets, creating incentives for private actors with intelligence ties to pursue such recoveries. - A separate thread cites a 2014 Ukraine-related discussion where Epstein allegedly said the upheaval could provide opportunities; the Rothschilds are reported to have emailed Epstein about Ukraine and asset management strategies, implying Epstein represented the Rothschilds in asset opportunities. - They discuss the possibility that events like regime changes could be exploited for personal gain, with Epstein’s reputation management and potential money-motivated exploitation of geopolitical upheavals. - Honeypots, blackmail, and sex as an intelligence instrument: - The discussion covers claims of victims receiving death threats in Hebrew, and whether this indicates Mossad involvement or a private group using Hebrew phrasing to threaten. They argue Mossad has historically used threats and spying, and Epstein’s network could include others who leveraged sexual exploits for leverage. - They examine emails describing sexual activity in a transactional manner, with grainy surveillance footage capturing some redacted sexual content, suggesting a blackmail operation rather than simple perversion alone. - They consider whether Epstein’s sex life served as a bargaining chip for intelligence services, with Epstein’s protection and coercion potentially enabling illicit activity to be used for intelligence purposes. - Notable connections and individuals: - Fergie (Sarah, Duchess of York) is discussed as having close ties to Epstein, including emails referencing “marry me” and a period after his conviction; Prince Andrew is noted as heavily implicated in the broader Epstein network. - Howard Lutnick’s name appears in the documents; his denial of involvement with Epstein is highlighted as a potential discrepancy given the surrounding evidence. - The possibility that redacted materials could still reveal high-level connections or be weaponized against political figures is considered, with the overarching view that information could resurface or be released later to influence politics. - Final stance and ongoing investigation: - John maintains that Epstein’s role as an intelligence asset is supported by the files released to date and that more documents remain to be disclosed. He emphasizes that the situation involves intersecting intelligence communities, financial opportunism, and political exposure, with ongoing questions about the true extent of who knew what and who protected whom. The conversation closes with an acknowledgment that more files will likely be released, more information will emerge, and expert analysis will continue to evolve.

Kostak Konomi said that when he approached what he claims is his land on the seafront in southern Albania last month, he found a barbed wire fence and men in black uniforms refusing him entry. He was told he could not access the area, which he later learned from news reports had become part of a luxury resort planned by international investors, including US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Konomi said the guards of the security company did not allow him to go to his own land, even to rest. He said they refused him entry “here,” and that he felt imprisoned. He stated that the guards “took my freedom, they took my livelihood, they took my land,” and asked why he should not leave it as an inheritance to his children.

The transcript claims that Jared Kushner is not buying an island in Albania to turn it into a luxury resort, despite a story that it is a luxury resort project backed by the Saudis and facilitated by the Albanian government. It says the island is Sazanne, located at the point where the Adriatic Sea becomes the Ionian Sea, about 56 miles from Italy. It asserts that whoever controls Sazanne controls the Strait of Otranto, described as the only maritime gateway between the Adriatic and the Mediterranean, and that historically navies seeking to dominate the area or trade through it have had to occupy and fortify Sazanne. The transcript further alleges that the island already contains 3,600 nuclear survivable bunkers and about 10 miles of underground tunnels connecting command posts, ammunition stores, submarine pens, and hideouts. It adds that Soviet submarine pens and deep-water anchorages are already present and ready for use. It claims that militarization for nuclear war preparation was carried out during the Hoxha regime. It outlines a chain of control as passing from the Ottomans to the Italians to the Albanians to the Soviet Navy back to the Albanians, and now being sold to a private American cartel, with an “exception at the end” that it is now being sold to Jared Kushner. The transcript says it is “not technically correct” to say Kushner and Ivana are buying the island, and instead identifies the buyer as Delaware corporate entities: Atlantic Incubation Partners LLC, with an associated entity listed as Affinity Partners. It states that the Delaware corporate registry lists Atlantic Incubation Partners LLC, formed on April 5, 2023 (EN 9233-29707). It claims that Atlantic Incubation Partners LLC is linked to Kushner’s company Affinity Partners and that Asher Abashira, CEO of Affinity Partners, is also listed as chairman of Cezanne Real Estate Development Company, LLC. It then introduces people connected to Affinity Partners. It names Chad Mizzell as Senior Legal Counsel and says he served as Chief of Staff to the U.S. Justice Department in 2025. It names Nick Butterfield as a former Deputy White House Policy Coordinator (Aug 2019–Jan 2021) under Donald Trump and says he interned during George W. Bush’s administration. It claims a search for Lauren Key yields correspondence from the U.S. Finance Committee expressing concern about “99% of the investment funds” managed by her coming from the Saudi Arabian government, and says the letter says Middle Eastern governments are using funds managed by Affinity to pay millions of dollars in fees to the president’s son. It names John Rader and says a Hoover Institution bio confirms he is also senior counselor at Palantir and chief of staff to U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty, with four years in the White House. It describes a “global research and geoeconomics” team including Major General Miguel Correa, a retired two-star Green Beret who it says coordinated a 2017 special forces rescue in Yemen and helped coin “Abraham Accords,” and Kevin Hassett, described as head of global research and currently director of the White House National Economic Council. It also names Cale Klingenpeel, former chief economist at the America First Policy Institute, and Asad Nayavi, named as a partner at APIS Partners and Wolfensohn Fund Management. It names Brett Perlman, said to have been Blackstone’s first undergraduate hire in 1989 and to co-found Elevation Partners, Avi Berkowitz, described as working on Trump’s peace plan and Abraham Accords, and Tom Storch, described as holding multiple roles related to the National Economic Council and international economic affairs. The transcript ends by stating it will be a two-part discussion.

The speaker states the Clinton Foundation acted as an agent of a foreign government, giving the example of Mozambique in 2002. According to the speaker, a memorandum of agreement existed between the foundation and Mozambique to work on their behalf through their Ministry of Health program. Emails suggest this was not a Clinton Foundation program, but rather support for the Mozambique Ministry of Health. The speaker claims the foundation brokered money and pharmaceuticals, taking a vague fee. They negotiated relationships with pharmaceutical companies. The speaker concludes the Clinton Foundation functioned as a closely held family partnership, not a charity.

Together because they are completely interlinked. Epstein is linked with Howard Lutnick, our commerce secretary whose firm manages the treasuries that back tether, the largest stable coin. And Brock Pierce, who was Epstein's crypto adviser, who was a cofounder of Tether and was the head of the Bitcoin Foundation before it collapsed, and then MIT took over the developers is right in the middle of this. So in essence, the endgame of this is what they have figured out as a way to have a backdoor CBDC where they specifically profit. I'm starting to call this now the creature from Epstein's Island because in the end, what are we getting out of this? We have something called USAT, which is the new official stable coin that complies with the genius act. So we have a situation where it's a digital token backed by fiat, backed by treasuries that can be programmed, tracked, and censored. And the biggest financial beneficiary is Howard Lutnick's firm. They managed to create so think about it this way. He's managed to create a central bank digital currency where only one firm profits from all of the fees for managing the treasuries. This is the biggest financial heist probably in human history. And it is connected directly to Epstein and Brock Pierce and the hijacking of Bitcoin. That's how they're linked. Now, do I think were they playing five d chess and this is what they thought was gonna happen? I don't know. May be if so, it's very clever or were they opportunistic about it? But make no mistake about it. These government regulated stablecoins are backdoor CBDCs in not in the sense that they're issued by the central bank, but in the sense that they are controlled and surveilled by the government and tracked by the government, which after all is the thing that people are worried about with CBDCs. The concern isn't really so much about the central bank. Of course, the central bank is complete unnecessary third party, but financial surveillance comes from Congress. All of the bank secrecy laws, all of the tracking and the suspicious activity reports, this is Congress. This is not the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve does not initiate any of that. So this is in many respects worse than the creature from Jackal Island. This is worse than the creation of the Federal Reserve itself because what it's done is created a digital dollar where one political member of a cabinet, his family and his company is the biggest single beneficiary. One of the things that came out of the Epstein file is Lutnick's claim that he was disgusted by Epstein and had nothing to do with him after 2006. The emails show Lutnick emailing Epstein coordinating to visit Epstein on Epstein's Island with his yacht and with his family. There's another email showing Lutnick contributing $50,000 to an event that Epstein was running. Lutnick flat out lied, and I will have to check whether that was under oath about his relationship and association with Epstein. He was a next door neighbor of Epstein and bought his house from Epstein. The connections here are overwhelming. It's so much data to map that I'm using AI to start making initial connections, then humans correct. How do these pieces fit from a timetable perspective? This is game changing. Epstein's hijacking of Bitcoin has not been widely acknowledged, and some Bitcoin Maxis resist this information. I urge people to do their own research, not to rely on spin. Look into Epstein's emails via Jmail and other sources. The information is out there, including the Epstein files, and the article I wrote for Brownstone at brownstone.org with screenshots of emails. Do your research. Don't accept a single influencer's take. Epstein literally funded changing the Bitcoin protocol to make it digital gold, yet there is no indication he actually held Bitcoin. This warrants investigation. Roger Ver, once a prominent Bitcoin advocate, has described hijacking in his own book, and his later treatment suggests suppression. The broader point is that there are deeply interwoven connections among Epstein, Lutnick, Pierce, Tether, and the Bitcoin ecosystem, with implications for who profits and how governance and surveillance could unfold.

The discussion centers on corruption and on people who profit from the war. Reporting is mentioned that a MOD plant linked to Zelensky was hit by Russia, which is said to weaken Ukraine’s ability to respond if they advance into cities. A colleague who reads Russian and speaks Russian fluently is described as reviewing Russian press releases over many weeks. The comment is said to have been made three or four times that Kushner and Witkoff are present for reasons familiar in Russia, with Kushner positioned as the son-in-law and Witkoff described as an old business crony of the president. The transcript highlights a call in Russian-language papers for serious people to address ending the war in Ukraine, finding a way out, with side deals suggested after talks. The transcript emphasizes a “huge problem with this corruption business,” citing BlackRock as trying to buy hundreds of thousands of acres of Ukrainian farmland. It also mentions proposals to turn Western Ukraine into a “new Israeli destination” by denuding it of Ukrainians and bringing people from Israel. It links these developments to money sources, claiming they involve the same people who pushed for war in the Persian Gulf and have pushed for war against Russia. The speaker describes this as frightening and adds that the Russians know it, suggesting that Russia will increasingly select targets representing Western—particularly U.S.—investment.

The discussion centers on claims drawn from “Epstein files.” Speaker 1 says they found information “nobody else found,” highlighting Catherine Rumler, described as Barack Obama’s White House counsel and later general counsel for Goldman Sachs. Speaker 1 claims Rumler was “very, very close to Jeffrey Epstein,” with “constant” email exchanges. They cite emails in the latest tranche where Rumler tells Epstein that John Brennan, director of the CIA, “gave me the CIA’s highest honor this morning,” and where she tells Epstein she will arrange for him to be in Washington next Tuesday and sets up a meeting with Brennan. Speaker 1 asks whether there was contact between Jeffrey Epstein and John Brennan, noting Brennan “is not talking,” and states that “3,000,000 more documents” have not yet been released, and “of the ones that haven’t been deleted possibly” suggests permanent deletion may have occurred. They say people are expected to “take their words for it.” Speaker 0 suggests focusing narrowly on portions of the files involving sex trafficking and billionaires abusing kids, but Speaker 1 argues that zooming out shows “arms deals” and “collaborations across intelligence.” Speaker 1 says the theme everyone should focus on is that Epstein was “an Israeli access agent,” claiming certainty about this position. Speaker 1 says the next tranche (described as “3,000,000,” “like 2,700,000 documents”) shows Epstein trying to work for the CIA and possibly doing something with the CIA. They state they “don’t know yet” and that Epstein “didn’t authorize that.” Speaker 1 adds that Epstein was also working with MI5 and MI6 in the UK, “possibly the Germans,” and “definitely the Israelis.” They claim Epstein repeatedly tried to secure a one-on-one meeting with Vladimir Putin, was denied repeatedly, and eventually was offered a meeting with Putin and three others; Epstein declined and wanted only Putin alone, after which “the Russians walked away.” The conversation concludes with discussion of “Israeli connections,” including Speaker 0 saying that when they asked Congress people about it “today and yesterday,” they “run screaming from the room.” Speaker 0 also notes that the topic is sometimes turned into a Democrat-versus-Republican issue rather than something broader, and Speaker 1 replies: “And it’s not. They’re both corrupt.”

An early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton to her campaign manager, John Podesta, is described as stating that ISIL/ISIS is funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The discussion emphasizes that this is considered the most significant email in the collection because Saudi and Qatari money is said to be spread across many media institutions. It also contrasts this email with what is described as the longstanding “dodge” that funding comes only from “rogue princes” using their oil money, while claiming the government disapproves; instead, the email is said to indicate that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding ISIS. Speaker 0 additionally states that Saudis and Qataris, along with Moroccans and Bahrainis, are giving money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia. Speaker 1 says that under Hillary Clinton, discussion revealed in the emails includes the largest ever arms deal in the world made with Saudi Arabia—more than $80 billion. Speaker 1 also says that during her tenure as Secretary of State, total U.S. arms exports doubled in dollar value. The transcript concludes by linking these claims: it states that ISIL/ISIS is created largely with money from the same people who are providing money to the Clinton Foundation.

Shahzad Nasir shares an interesting discovery about two Ukrainian brothers, Boris and Serhey Shafir, who own luxurious yachts worth millions of dollars. The yachts were purchased from Italian manufacturers and are believed to be proxies for President Zelensky. A leaked document reveals Zelensky's ownership in a shell company, which he later transferred to Serhey. The My Legacy Yacht was even referred to as Zelensky's yacht during its signing. As a government employee, Serhey Shafir couldn't afford such purchases, but with the US providing large sums of money to Ukraine, it's possible for Zelensky to embezzle funds and have his trusted friend buy the yachts on his behalf.

The transcript outlines a string of alleged connections between Jeffrey Epstein, Ukraine, and Zelensky, tied to broader themes of modeling, trafficking, and political upheaval. It states that Epstein’s newly released files reference two Kyiv-based modeling agencies described as the best in Kyiv and as providers of cheap escorts, with one contact suggesting access to around 400 girls. The files also document travel routes from New York to Kyiv, arranged apartments, extended stays, and logistics, along with real estate dealings including a 2017 discussion of a mansion purchase in Lviv and large money transfers tied to the deal. A key claim is that Epstein was prepared to take advantage of Ukraine’s upheaval. An email from 2013, before Ukraine’s CIA-facilitated government change, purportedly shows Epstein writing to the head of the Rothschild banking group that “Ukraine upheaval should provide many opportunities. Many.” The transcript claims the emails indicate Epstein worked directly with the Rothschilds on capitalizing on the chaos in Ukraine, and asserts that Rothschild-linked interests moved into Ukraine after the 2014 upheaval to acquire assets in land, energy, and infrastructure. It also mentions the transfer of major financial assets during Petro Poroshenko’s presidency, with an assertion that oligarchs “simply changed hands.” The narrative then moves to 2019, noting Poroshenko’s ouster and Zelensky’s rise. Epstein allegedly wrote to a Ukrainian-born woman urging her to study Ukrainian politics, Zelensky, corruption, and parliament, adding, “it is funny, but sophisticated corruption. Huge amounts of money will be made. I’d like to see you as a female oligarch.” The transcript claims Epstein and Zelensky had lunch together multiple times. It also asserts Zelensky was accused of being complicit in human trafficking in Ukraine, citing a redacted email that reportedly states Zelensky “allowed modeling agent Jean Luc Brunel to traffic girls out of the country.” Jean Luc Brunel is described as someone Epstein used to traffic girls; he was found dead in a prison cell in 2022 while under investigation for rape of minors, sexual exploitation, and trafficking. A further twist claims Zelensky invited performance artist Marina Abramovic, a central figure in the original Pizzagate narrative, to serve as Ukraine’s ambassador in September 2023, to help rebuild schools and support children affected by the war. Abramovic is described as Serbian, not Ukrainian, and her art is noted for themes involving ritual blood and cannibalistic imagery. The transcript suggests Abramovic’s involvement as ambassador raises questions given her association with Pizzagate figures from the Podesta emails. Overall, the content asserts that several names linked to Epstein and Pizzagate appear in connection with Zelensky and Ukraine, including claims Zelensky’s regime and associates are involved in trafficking and corruption, while noting Abramovic’s ambassadorial role and historical links to the Pizzagate narrative.

The speaker landed in the Netherlands and conducted further research into the Albanian wetland destruction they had been covering. They say the company behind it—linked to seven consecutive days of protests and a criminal investigation—is registered in Amsterdam. The company is named Svernet South Adriatic Development, which they identify as the company behind the Cushner Resort that is bulldozing one of the last wild coastlines in Europe. The speaker claims Svernet South Adriatic Development is owned through a chain of Dutch shell companies managed by a trust office on Stravinsky Lane in Amsterdam. They state that Dutch corporate law allows owners to remain hidden as long as no single person holds more than 25% of the shares, so the real owners stay anonymous. According to the speaker, Balkan Insights has found a network connected to the anonymous ownership, including someone linked to the Italian mafia, a disgraced judge, the family of a convicted forger, and one of Albania’s most powerful oligarchs. The speaker concludes that this is not just an Albanian problem, asserting that Dutch corporate structures are being used to obscure ownership of a project that is under active criminal investigation. The speaker says they are Dutch and live in Albania, and they state the Netherlands needs to know about what they found. They say they will share a link to the Balkan Insights article in their bio.

- "This is a war that should have never happened." - "The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine." - "March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000." - "it's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme." - "And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock." - "Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe." - "500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine." - "And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra."

The speaker discusses Epstein-related documents and the implications people draw from them. They claim: - The memo circulated with media suggesting Jeffrey Epstein worked for the KGB, and that Epstein might have had multiple passports, talked to Israeli politicians and Jewish businessmen, and repeatedly invokes his Jewish identity. - In an email with former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, Epstein says he’s totally not working for Mossad. - Former Mossad officer Ari Ben Menashe says Epstein was working for Mossad. - In documents, Mark Iverson states that Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein were working for Mossad; the speaker asserts that Robert Maxwell was not a Soviet spy. - British Foreign Office and Israeli whistleblowers say Epstein was working for Mossad, and he was given a hero’s burial in Israel, not in Russia. - In an actual email with Peter Thiel, Epstein says that he represents the Rothschild family. - The speaker poses questions: If a Russian passport proves he works for Russia, does boarding CIA planes prove he works for the United States? If he has a blackmail list on United Kingdom politicians, does that prove he works for the British? If he talks to Emmanuel Macron and prime minister Nicolas Sarkozy, does that prove he works for the French? The speaker concludes that, regardless, Epstein’s primary loyalties are with his people. - The speaker asserts that Zionists on Twitter claim the Epstein documents are a “nothingburger,” and urge continuing with other topics; they accuse those who disagreed of having low IQ and claim the documents reveal clear content with their own eyes. - Senator Bernie Sanders is described as saying this is a cautionary tale about wealth and power; the speaker counters by saying “your cousins” are helping orchestrate this, and that Sanders has repeatedly criticized Israel. - The speaker accuses proponents of diverting attention from the primary culprit and states that such attempts are not working on anyone.

Speaker 0 says that, based on their time in the area, “they cover stuff up” and that it involves a “global conspiracy.” They cite as examples the release of “the Epstein files,” saying it caused a prince to lose his title, led to the ambassador from Britain to the United States being canned, resulted in the former prime minister of Norway being arrested, and involved the Minister of Culture in France, a “former Minister of Culture,” a group of CEOs, and the head of the World Economic Forum.

The speaker connects Jeffrey Epstein to a broad web of influence and alleged illicit activity across several decades. Key points presented: - Epstein’s involvement is linked to the BCCI network, and to foreign policy activities in the Middle East during the 1990s, plus his alleged ties to high-level officials across Israeli, Saudi, British, and French governments, spanning the Clinton era into the early 2000s. - Epstein was investigated by the SEC in the 1980s and was one of the two people who ran the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history at that time, tied to the Towers Financial collapse. Epstein’s business partner went to jail for twenty-something years, while Epstein allegedly “skates completely free.” - He is said to have been involved in a billion-dollar fraud case in the U.S. Virgin Islands, with allegations that his campaigns funded local politicians there and that prosecutors answered to those politicians. - The speaker suggests Epstein’s pervasive presence—“always in the room” in four decades of American foreign policy and intelligence activity—implies a systemic concern about money sourcing for that activity. - Regarding Epstein’s crimes, the concern cited is the same one discussed with Orlando Massfer: don’t bring the case, and if you do, bring it in a highly limited way. - This culminated in the 2006 indictment, which was described as a “sweetheart plea deal” that limited prosecutions, protected coconspirators known and unknown, and allowed the case to proceed quickly before a full trial could uncover broader lines of evidence about Epstein’s network.

The speaker contends that the real reason for hard efforts to prevent the release of the files for months is to protect billionaires, friends of the speaker and associated political donors. They claim Epstein had close ties to our own intelligence agencies and Israel's intelligence agencies, and argue that there will be attempts to stop this somewhere else, which they believe will backfire.

This transcript documents how high-level U.S. figures and members of the Trump family have intertwined political role, private business interests, and international dealings. - Jared Kushner, though not a formal government employee, participated in peace talks with Iran in Pakistan as part of a U.S. delegation led by Vice President J. D. Vance and Middle East envoy Steve Wittkoff, presenting himself as “a volunteer” rather than an official adviser. His full-time job is running Affinity Partners, a multibillion-dollar venture capital firm that has raised billions from the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. Kushner founded Affinity Partners in 2021 after leaving the White House. - Kushner maintained a close relationship with Mohammed bin Salman, and Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund invested $2 billion into Kushner’s fund after he left the administration. When Donald Trump returned to the White House in 2025, Kushner and Ivanka Trump did not return to Washington. Last summer, Kushner helped work on the war in Gaza, meeting regional leaders and brokered a peace agreement to end fighting and secure hostage releases. He and Wittkoff then traveled to Russia to meet President Vladimir Putin about a ceasefire in Ukraine. - In Davos, Switzerland, Kushner accompanied his father-in-law on a trip to the World Economic Forum. Regulatory filings show Affinity Partners reporting over $6.1 billion in assets, about 99% from non-U.S. investors, with most funds tied to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. Affinity Partners indicated it did not intend to take additional capital while Kushner volunteers for the government, but discussions with Saudi Arabia’s PIF were reported to be about raising new money. Democrats pressed the White House to explain potential conflicts of interest and whether Kushner’s influence benefited his private finances. - Kushner is not alone in expanding business interests; Don Jr. and Eric Trump have increasingly invested in various ventures. Since 2024, they have pursued interests in emerging technologies like cryptocurrency, and in drone technology, with at least three drone company investments. The latest deal involved PowerUS, a drone maker planning to merge with a golf-course holding company backed by the Trumps to create a new publicly traded company. PowerUS aims to develop military drones and pitch interceptors to Gulf nations to counter Iranian drone attacks, potentially aligning with Pentagon drone initiatives. - The Trumps’ business activities extend to nuclear fusion through a merger that would create one of the first publicly traded fusion companies, with PowerUS and other ventures positioning themselves to profit from a conflict environment. The Trump media group also plans to merge with TAE Technologies, a fusion power company valued at over $6 billion, with a plan to construct a utility-scale fusion plant later this year. Don Jr. has joined boards of four companies and advised six others since 2024, while Eric and Don Jr. are not government officials and are not subject to federal ethics rules or disclosure requirements. - Overall, the narrative underscores the rapid expansion of the Trump family’s private sector interests concurrent with geopolitical activity and policy-making, highlighting perceived gaps in ethics rules and potential conflicts of interest.

The current president's family has shell companies receiving money from foreign entities, which confirms previous accusations. This raises many questions and warrants further investigation.