reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This launch has been disastrous, generating over $1 million in fees while fans were left disappointed. Allegations of insider trading linked to the creator account have surfaced, but the creators deny any wrongdoing. They claim the fees support the project's ongoing operations and cover expenses, including legal fees for establishing a foundation. The project is managed by Hailey Welch, who supposedly owns none of it. The creators argue that their tokenomics are legitimate, despite criticism about the allocation and the potential for insiders to profit at the expense of fans. They insist they are committed to the project's long-term success and reject claims of a rug pull as defamatory.

That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

The term "meme stocks" refers to manipulated stocks tied together through complex financial dealings. Bill Hwang's firm, Archegos, imploded due to trading meme stocks with hidden risks. This led to Credit Suisse's downfall, requiring a bailout for UBS. Meme stocks, like GameStop, saw unusual price fluctuations despite retail investor activity. This volatility is attributed to large capital actors manipulating prices through various means, causing irrational market behavior. The term "meme stock" aims to divert attention from these anomalies.

A developer states they promised never to sell and have kept that promise. They claim there are costs to running a website, and they personally pay for boosts on Dexscreener, which cost between $1,200 and $5,000. The speaker claims to have paid for these boosts at least a dozen times. They state these activities, along with paying influencers, have real costs.

Okay, so you're asking if I was part of the Melania launch, and if it was sniped like Trump's? Yes, I was part of it. The team wanted to snipe it because of the Trump situation, but we weren't the big snipers. We didn't make any money from it, and we didn't take any liquidity out – zero. Regarding the wallet traced to the Portnoy situation that received $1,500,000 of Melania token, and then sold, there's a distinction. We didn't swap liquidity, but we did sell liquidations. Those are two different things. So yes, we sold, but we didn't swap.

We need to expand our support to make a significant impact, even if it means spending millions of dollars. This amount is small compared to the billions at stake in this game. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and talking to the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been easy or smooth.

People are saying Elon is going to steal everyone's money, but that's not what he's doing. He's a super genius who's been messed with by three-letter agencies. Because he helped Donald Trump get into office, he started looking into corruption. These agencies messed with the wrong guy because Elon is going to hunt them down and find out what's going on. This is a good thing for everyone. We have a brilliant mind examining these corrupt systems and bringing in a bunch of smart people to help.

"And from a dev who promised never to sell, which I haven't." "There's a cost to putting a website together." "Who do you think pays for boosts on the Dex screener? That's me." "Those cost anywhere between 1,200 and $5,000." "I did it at least a dozen times." "You know, these things have actual real cost to them." "Along with influencers and from a dev who promised never to sell, which I have."

That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

8% of GameStop's trades are being sold on the Memex exchange, which is run by a former Instinet CEO. This is a significant increase from 0% three years ago. By selling on custom exchanges or off-exchange platforms like dark pools, GameStop can manipulate the order flow and push the price down. This means that the traditional concept of supply and demand doesn't apply, and the market activity is essentially fake.

"People and to combat the volatility, and it worked." "But also the market maker was there to implement strategies like chart support, marketing, advertising, billboards, building the new LP on pump swap." "Yeah, the market maker made some poor trades." "Lost capital." "At first, it was I was a scammer and I ran off with it until it wasn't that anymore." "And then the market maker burned the exact amount just to make up for it." "So it negated it, including an additional $30,000 buy on the chart for support after AK's original Jewish FUD attack." "To use for payments to creators for content, these videos, the music videos, the memes, really good stuff, deck screener trending 500 x boosts." "And the market maker had plans for a whole lot more." "That was a punch in the balls getting sniped by the arbitrage bot."

And from a dev who promised never to sell, which I haven't. There's a cost to putting a website together. Who do you think pays for boosts on the Dex screener? That's me. Those cost anywhere between 1,200 and $5,000. I did it at least a dozen times. You know, these things have actual real cost to them. Along with influencers and from a dev who promised never to sell, which I have.

We discussed the tension between being open and transparent while also protecting ourselves. We agreed to be open and transparent for everything that happened 90 days ago and before, as it's all gone. It's similar to how cryptocurrencies work, where there is no trail if you don't want it.

A person can buy from various identities. We limit the size of the sale to make it easier to disguise. For example, if you're a whale and want a lower price, you can buy 50,000 units to avoid scarcity.

Nobody had advanced knowledge of the launch. I mean, that's what insider trading is. Nobody, absolutely nobody besides myself and Andrew, knew that J Proof was even a thing until after the launch, thereby negating any claims of insider wallets. Anybody can buy these things immediately when they hit the blockchain.

Discussion centers on a claim that "these are the wallets that bought J Approved before Stu announced it on Telegram on April 0 04/12/2025 at 04:48 UTC." The speaker adds "Andrew buys, and the market may have maker buys twenty minutes after that." Stu says he announced after launch; others discuss timing. "Any purchases that were made on April 11 would have been people that saw this thing on the deck screener or other people that I had called and told." "I launched it and then people started buying." "No. Negative. Nope. Not at all." "They didn't buy the day before." "I launched it and then people that were I have no idea who they are. Immediately, people started buying." AK: "the wallets that we're referring to are those that interact with other wallets with the team." "If they interacted with the team wallet, not the burn, but with the team wallet, then yeah. Then that's a problem." "I don't do shitcoins."

A developer states they promised never to sell and have kept that promise. They claim there are costs to running a website, and they personally pay for boosts on Dexscreener, which cost between $1,200 and $5,000. The speaker states they have paid for these boosts at least a dozen times. They also mention the real costs associated with influencers.

We should expand our support to see a different outcome, even if it requires a significant investment. This amount of money is small compared to what those involved in this game have at stake. My goal is to convey this message while fundraising and engaging with the community. We aim to demolish everything, seize their assets, and see what results from that. However, this task has not been smooth so far.

It's not just one thing that indicates if the volume is good at a certain point; it's intuition. It's a combination of socials, volume, holders, how many people have left, who's selling, and who's showing it. Wait, is this for real? Let me double-check... President of Europe... but this is old, from last week. Oh, no way! He just launched his stuff? How is this even possible? No, no, no, no, no!

It's not insider trading unless trading on personal information. Market manipulation is the concern, like promoting a stock. The distinction is unclear. Discuss the tweet's impact on markets and investing. Join the program to explain your actions.

Do my family and friends know I'm in this business? Yes, they do. You think I'm stealing? How? It's not stealing, it's legal. The tokens are real, people buy them. You say the tokens are worth nothing? No, they're worth something. You can still sell. People investing don't know their money will disappear? It's a gamble and they lost. It's a legal way of making money, a legal way of stealing. We wear masks because I'm recognizable. I'm connected with celebrities. It would put a stop to my lifestyle. Do I feel bad about people losing money, like their retirement? I'm just trying to get it. So, no, I don't care.

I think it's one thing to criticize Elon Musk or Doge, but to only do that and criticize the way Elon talks about or uncovers fraud and waste, and not the waste and fraud itself, reminds me of a situation. Imagine you confront someone about cheating with evidence, and they respond with, "You went through my phone? How can we be together if you don't trust me?". Can we not talk about what was found now? It's the same thing here. If you find issues with the way things are being done, but there's no mention of what was found, which should bother you, then we have a problem.

How do I know if the volume is good enough to route? Honestly, it's intuition. It's a combination of socials, volume, holders, how many people have left, who's selling, and who's showing it. Am I missing anything? This can't be real, let me double check... President of Europe? Wait, this is from an old week though. Oh shit, no way. You just launched this? Wait, wait, wait... Profit! Alright, well, it's right in the stream. We're out! Peace out.

"that's not enough supply to lock it, so I had to go back and buy more." "There should be your Coinbase going into your dev wallet." "Where's that evidence?" "I'd like to see the evidence that you're in a $150,000, my friend." "I'm into this project for a collective 100 and some odd thousand dollars." "Between buying out of my own pocket, all of the boosts, all of the Dex ads, all of the website stuff." "But I made the dev buy immediately before and after it insta bonded." "So the first buy bonded it, and the second buy was right after it bonded." "I needed another buy to get the 85% that I needed, and that we wanted for the control structure to set all of this up."

GameStop is blowing up, and I'm holding on with diamond hands for the culture, not money. I won't sell, no matter what. I believe in eternal bravery and God's reward. I'm buying more GME, not for profit. I'm not selling, no matter what. My spending today is a statement against those who try to hold me back. I'm putting $1,000,000 into GameStop and won't sell.