reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker states that MAGA supporters are angered by their video and are trying to "hunt" them down. They say that MAGA supporters are commenting the location of their job on all of their videos, but the speaker no longer works there. The speaker says they were let go from their restaurant job because of the video. The speaker says they didn't even serve the MAGA table at the restaurant and didn't speak to them. The speaker asks why MAGA supporters are so angry that someone told them a certain cuisine isn't for them, that they would try to "dock" someone and make them and their coworkers feel unsafe because the speaker said that since they vote against Latinos, they shouldn't be able to enjoy Mexican food. The speaker asks MAGA supporters to leave their former job alone and to leave their coworkers and managers alone.

Speaker declares 'Perfect working order.' 'That's fucking insane, Walmart.' They accuse Walmart of 'mislabeling this stuff' and 'overcharging us for underweight products.' The speaker adds, 'You fucking greedy bastards.'

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would exclude the provision that caused the harm.

The speaker asserts that pre-planned "no kings" protests were sidelined due to disruption and fear caused by raids. These raids have allegedly devastated the economy and dealt it a "body blow." The speaker believes the president doesn't realize that some economic sectors are entirely dependent on immigrant labor to function.

Speaker vents about Walmart price hikes, citing dramatic price quotes: "They want a dollar and 32¢ for one one neck ring." "About 32¢ for one neck ring, yo." "I'd be better off walking over here and getting a goddamn hunch for 97 freaking cents." "One app oh, apple is 1¢ 8 a pound. But those are each." "Look, lemons, 68 freaking cents." "They went twice as much as they were." "Look at your tomatoes. $1.97. $2 for a tomato." "No salsa for you. Oh, Walmart." "Y'all are raking it. Y'all are raking it, Walmart." "You think I don't see it? Oh, I see it. I see what you're up to." Riley. "Okay, Riley. You got that. Appreciate it." "Time to go."

The speaker states that MAGA supporters are angered by their video and are trying to "hunt" them down. They claim MAGA supporters are commenting the location of their job on all of their videos, but the speaker no longer works there. According to the speaker, they were let go from their restaurant job because of the video. The speaker says they didn't even serve the MAGA table at the restaurant and didn't speak to them. They are asking MAGA supporters to leave their former job, coworkers, and managers alone. The speaker is upset that MAGA supporters are allegedly trying to target them at their job because they said that since they vote against Latinos, they shouldn't be able to enjoy Mexican food.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the criticism and advertisers leaving. Speaker 1 expresses their refusal to advertise and their disdain for being blackmailed with money. Speaker 0 asks about the economic impact and Speaker 1 dismisses it, stating that the advertising boycott will kill the company and they will document it. Speaker 0 mentions that advertisers may argue that Speaker 1's inappropriate comments led to the company's demise, but Speaker 1 challenges them to see how the world responds.

As a Starbucks manager at an airport, I was asked if the protests against Starbucks have affected our stores. Normally, protests don't impact us much due to the large number of international travelers. However, even we are feeling the effects. Our customer numbers are significantly lower than usual, especially during this time of year. The protests are definitely working, as our store is not even making half of what we usually make before noon. This is a clear indication that the protests are having an impact on airport Starbucks locations.

Speaker 0 vents intense anger about the Israel-Gaza crisis and U.S. involvement. He says: we pivoted to the IDF and after two years of war, with brothers and sisters killed and hostages liberated, “for these sick fucks” to turn it into Disneyland and give it to the Palestinians is unacceptable; he cannot pay for it. He notes Qatar and Turkey’s involvement, and a comment by BB that if Qatar can’t come, they’ll bring them; then “Qatar’s on the board of peace,” which enrages him. He proclaims, “We have nuclear missiles,” and threatens North Korea, claiming he will show them a “Jewish North Korea.” He declares “Gaza is biblically ours” and says the new board of peace has pushed him over the edge; he does not want to come back, and wants “full deportation” of Palestinians. He argues for shutting borders for us and our friends only, envisioning Gaza becoming a banking and tax haven, free of wars. He expresses confusion over the Iran situation and asserts that their weaponry is so advanced they can “melt their flesh with our lasers,” yet laments giving Gaza to their enemies and asks, “What the actual fuck?” He ends by saying, “So I’d like to get” before the transcript cuts off. Speaker 1 adds, “to pay for it,” and then, “you forgot about the part where we pay the price tag because nobody else wants to fucking pay for it.”

I work for an affiliate company that exclusively sells Anheuser Busch products. Due to recent cancellations, sales have significantly dropped, which is disheartening because people are not buying this beer. This has resulted in financial difficulties for me and my family. It's sad that Anheuser Busch made a decision without understanding their customers. I want to express my gratitude to Anheuser Busch for potentially putting my family's well-being at risk.

Speaker 0 states the president promised reciprocal trade, but the speaker now feels like a "sucker" because they believe free trade is "awful" for the American worker and the deal was poorly executed. Speaker 1 claims to have spoken with heads of firms in the last 72 hours and asserts that "he" and Bill Poole have "no idea" what it's like, that people are losing their jobs, and firms will go out of business. Speaker 1 says "they're nuts" and "know nothing," and that the Fed is asleep. Speaker 1 hasn't seen a market like this since 1990. Bill Poole is described as "shameful."

First speaker: says "Calcula is cut. I'm unable to work or go to school. I understand. Fraud is bad." Second speaker: says "I'm sure what happened there at the end trade. I admit that she thought that was not supposed to be in there, but fraud is bad, and it's it's a bad issue publicly with the gun types in Minnesota."

Speaker 0: Apology tour due to online criticism and advertisers leaving. Speaker 1: Bob Ives was interviewed today. Stop. Speaker 2: I don't want advertisers who try to blackmail me with money. Go fuck yourself. Speaker 1: I understand. Bob, if you're here, let me ask you. Speaker 2: That's how I feel. No advertising. Speaker 1: What are your thoughts?

"Speaker 0" says: "We're gonna go, James. Yes. We're not gonna go to you people. This is so locked up. You know that." They insist, "We'll not continue to be silenced and ignored while while our beautiful pristine city is taken away from us and handed over to a corporation intent on extracting as many resources as they can regardless of the impact to the people who live here."

A person asks why the speaker called the police on two men at CVS. The speaker explains that it is CVS policy to call the police if someone shoplifts. The person questions if it's worth risking someone's life for a low salary. The speaker believes there was no risk and ends the conversation. The person asks for the speaker's name, but the speaker refuses to give it due to being recorded. The person accuses the speaker of inciting violence against the two black men. The speaker mentions that one of the men had a warrant but was let go by the police. The person reminds the speaker that they work with black people.

The speaker criticizes a business owner's argument against feeding people who have "done bad things," calling it "fucking ridiculous." The speaker asserts that everyone has done bad things. The speaker then addresses concerns about shoplifting, claiming that "everybody fucking shoplifts." They say homeless people are blamed for the problem, but others shoplift too. The speaker recounts asking a class of 37 UVM students how people get things they don't pay for, and one student admitted to shoplifting in front of 107 others.

A franchise owner is facing closures and layoffs due to rising wages. They criticize Gavin Newsom for increasing minimum wage, leading to higher prices and job losses. The owner fears for small businesses and predicts a future dominated by corporations. They express concern about the disappearance of the middle class and the impact on taxpayers. The owner suspects an agenda to replace human workers with AI in fast-food chains. The interviewer acknowledges the owner's passion and insight on California's situation.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss criticisms of the COVID-19 response, focusing on diagnostic testing, treatment, and government actions. Speaker 0 notes that only fourteen percent of PCR-positive cases turned out to be COVID in Germany, and suggests this is a global pattern, including the United States. Speaker 1 responds that there is no surprise, stating that the PCR test was never designed to detect infection. He explains that it detects miniscule particles of the RNA virus and that cycle threshold was cranked up to create positivity. He emphasizes that tests should not dictate treatment and that, in his view, doctors treat patients, not test results. He accuses the government of suppressing effective repurposed medications such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, calling the approach a money-driven scam based on fear, and asserts this was no surprise from Germany. Speaker 0 adds that, beyond money and vaccines, the response was weaponized to keep people at home to influence political outcomes, suggesting it was part of efforts related to the 2020 election. He claims the positives were valued over negatives and asserts that the goal was to keep people in fear to ensure compliance with directives. Speaker 1 agrees, arguing that fear increases compliance with directives. He says he has never seen anything like the government imposing its will on free citizens, including closing churches and mom-and-pop stores, forcing healthy people to stay indoors, closing hospitals, and telling sick people to stay away. He expresses concern about whether the American people learned their lesson and hopes that, if the government acts similarly again, enough people will stand up and say, “hell no.”

Speaker 0: Apology tour, if you will. There was criticism and advertisers leaving. We talked to Bob Ives today. Stop. Speaker 2: Don't advertise. If someone tries to blackmail me with money, go fuck yourself. Speaker 1: It is clear. Hey, Bob. If you're in the audience. Speaker 2: That's how I feel. Don't advertise. Speaker 1: How do you think then?

I won't engage in business with those who support the president-elect. My priority is to ensure a safe environment for myself, my staff, and my family.

My tomatoes are rotting, and I’m not making any sales. It’s been terrible since Trump threatened to deport everyone. Nobody’s coming to the farmer’s market anymore. Look at all this produce—I’m practically giving it away. I’m forced to sell a whole box of corn for just $15. It’s a disaster.

Every grocery store looks like this. I can't even get food for my kids. I feel like an animal. Black people made me feel this way. We're fighting for justice, but now people can't even feed their kids. It's devastating. We need to be honest about what's happening. We're not thieves. We won't let them turn us into animals. Look at all the items on the floor. Tissue is even on the floor now. We had a shortage before. We have plenty of fruits and vegetables, but I won't pick through this mess.

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a particular vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would avoid the provision that led to the negative impact.

The speaker reports an unusually high monthly utility bill of $810 for gas and electricity, noting that neighbors in the same area have similarly expensive bills. They mention that the gas and electric company, which effectively owns the area, has been signaling through the news that bills would be higher. The speaker questions how the situation can be tolerated, expressing concern about protests and the pressure to turn off heating despite personal needs. They highlight a family situation with three children, including two nonverbal autistic children who require ongoing therapy, costing about $10,000 per year. The speaker asks whether they can continue sending their children to therapy if they must pay over $800 per month just to have heat and electricity in their home. They describe their home as a twelve hundred fifty square foot ranch brick house, noting that it is not large. The speaker emphasizes a perceived lack of accountability, asking how the company can be allowed to act this way. They state, "They are price gouging the American people." They express frustration that there seem to be no repercussions and argue that "Something has to change."

The speaker called for a boycott of Tesla, stating a personal desire to bankrupt the company to enhance their resume for future job prospects. The speaker characterizes the boycott as an example of Americans using economic power to send a message to the oligarchy, asserting that the country is not for sale. The speaker criticizes Fox News and Rupert Murdoch, urging them to represent the people's stories instead of working for those trying to buy the country. The speaker claims that the American people are "way scarier than Rupert Murdoch."