TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asks when Congress might vote on having the whistleblower appear, claiming Speaker 1 is the only member who knows the whistleblower's identity and whose staff has spoken with them, requesting the same opportunity. Speaker 1 denies knowing the whistleblower's identity and affirms their determination to protect it. Speaker 1 states that after the witnesses testify, there will be an opportunity to make a motion to subpoena any witness and compel a vote.

People who refuse to comply with congressional subpoenas should be prosecuted and go to jail, according to the speakers. They emphasize that in America, when subpoenaed, you must show up, regardless of wealth or power. They argue that holding individuals accountable is crucial for democracy and the rule of law. The speakers express their frustration with Steve Bannon's defiance of the subpoena and call for his imprisonment. They stress the importance of respecting lawful orders from Congress and warn of the consequences for those who reject them. The lesson they want to impart is that everyone should comply with subpoenas, whether for Congress or the court. They hope the committee will go after those who defy subpoenas and hold them accountable.

Speaker 0 suggests there was potentially the biggest setup and one of the greatest crimes against the American people in the history of the country. Speaker 1 agrees it's important to get the truth and states they are working to uncover the cover-ups that happened after January 6th. Speaker 0 asks about Republicans involved in those cover-ups, acknowledging it's hard to address one's own party. Speaker 1 responds that they're going to go where the evidence leads, no matter what. Speaker 0 states they will hold Speaker 1 to that.

Congresswoman Pelosi asks, “Are you at all concerned that the new January 6 committee will find you liable for that day? Right here.” The other participant replies, “I can.” Pelosi then asks, “Are you at all concerned about the new January 6 committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you re refuse the National Guard on January 6?” The respondent retorts, “Shut up. I did not refuse the National Guard. The president didn't send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking points as if you're a serious journalist?” Pelosi concludes, “The American people wanna know. We still have questions. Thank you.”

Speaker 0 says that on Friday the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas threatening a criminal indictment related to testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June about a multiyear project to renovate historic Federal Reserve office buildings. They emphasize respect for the rule of law and state that no one, not even the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. The speaker argues this unprecedented action should be understood in the broader context of administration threats and ongoing pressure, stating the threat is not about the June testimony or the renovation project, nor about Congress’s oversight role. The Fed, through testimony and other public disclosures, allegedly tried to keep Congress informed, and the speaker asserts those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges, according to the speaker, arises from the Fed setting interest rates based on what will serve the public, rather than following the President’s preferences. The core issue, the speaker says, is whether the Fed can continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions or whether monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation. The speaker notes service at the Fed under four administrations, both Republican and Democrat, asserting a record of carrying out duties without political fear or favor, focused on the mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Public service, the speaker adds, sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. Finally, the speaker commits to continuing to perform the job the Senate confirmed them to do with integrity and dedication to the American people, and thanks the audience.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about investigating allegations, but Speaker 1 avoids commenting. Speaker 0 expresses concern on behalf of millions of Americans and criticizes Senate Democrats and the media for not addressing the evidence. Speaker 0 asks if the informant who accused Joe Biden of taking a bribe was previously relied upon by the FBI, but Speaker 1 evades a direct answer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of refusing to answer and calls it disgraceful.

The committee expresses frustration over the lack of responsiveness from the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding document requests. They emphasize that other financial regulators have complied with congressional oversight, and the SEC should recognize Congress as a co-equal branch of government. The committee threatens to issue a subpoena if the SEC does not cooperate. The committee questions when a vote will be scheduled to provide the requested non-public documents, but the SEC representative does not provide a clear answer. The committee asks if the representative personally supports providing the information, but the representative avoids giving a direct response. The committee finds the situation ridiculous.

We need more people like you in Washington, not the current politicians. Many Republicans missed the chance in 2022. I'm willing to go to prison to defend the constitutional separation of powers. This case could set a precedent on whether Congress can use subpoena power against a president. Executive privilege is crucial for presidents to receive confidential advice. The J Six committee is undermining this privilege. If I lose my appeal, executive privilege will be weakened. A president needs the ability to act on both sides.

The speaker questions the seriousness of the hearing, criticizing the committee for suddenly caring about subpoena compliance. They highlight the committee's failure to honor their own subpoena for over 600 days, while expecting others to comply. The speaker suggests that if the hearing is a joke, it would be in line with the overall state of Congress. They question the committee's perception of the American people, pointing out the hypocrisy of holding someone in contempt while being out of compliance themselves. The speaker emphasizes their commitment to upholding the law and implies that the committee should do the same.

The speaker thanks the chairman and addresses someone named Hunter, suggesting they are afraid of the speaker's words. The speaker reclaims their time. The speaker says that the House committees should provide relevant information to any legitimate inquiry. The speaker claims their first five offers were ignored. Then in November, a subpoena was issued for a behind-closed-doors deposition. The speaker asserts that Republicans have repeatedly misused this tactic in their political crusade to selectively leak and mischaracterize witness statements.

The speaker expresses their hope that the January 6th committee will pursue and hold accountable those who defy congressional subpoenas. When asked about supporting 10 minutes for the Supreme Court, the speaker responds with a clear "No."

My message to those who defy congressional subpoenas on the January 6th committee is that I hope the committee takes action and holds them accountable, including possible prosecution.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about using a 200-year-old law to circumvent something. Speaker 1 responds that it is not as old as the Constitution, which they still pay attention to. Speaker 0 then asks how many more times Speaker 1 plans on deporting South Capitol Hill. Speaker 1 states they are in trouble.

A friend or colleague approaches Speaker 1 with information about a cover-up that should be exposed. Speaker 1 advises them to pray about it and offers to connect them with Congress, but strongly advises against taking action. Speaker 0 questions how this protects against corruption and misconduct, to which Speaker 1 admits it doesn't solve the problem. Speaker 1 warns that the FBI and the government will crush anyone who tries to expose their wrongdoing, using themselves as examples. Speaker 0 concludes the hearing, acknowledging the gravity of the situation.

Speaker 1 states they are waiting to punch someone and will be happy to go to jail for it. Speaker 1 says, "We're trespassing when the cat will go." Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 said she has been trespassing on the Capitol. Speaker 1 repeats they are waiting to punch someone. Speaker 0 says that if Speaker 1 has been waiting for this, why did she deny Donald Trump's request? Speaker 0 claims it wasn't just negligence in forgetting the request, but that she denied the sergeant at arms from supplying the request.

The speaker urges the chairman to move forward with impeachment, questioning the delay and cost to taxpayers. The other speaker defends the process, stating they are following facts and oversight. The first speaker challenges them to call for impeachment if they truly believe in the evidence. Ultimately, the first speaker believes the impeachment efforts are a show without substance, claiming it will never happen due to lack of evidence and support.

Speaker 1 states they are waiting to punch someone and will be happy to go to jail for it. Speaker 1 says, "We're trespassing when the cat will go." Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 stated, "I've been trespassing on the capitol." Speaker 1 repeats they are waiting to punch someone. Speaker 0 says if Speaker 1 has been waiting for this, why did she deny the sergeant at arms from supplying Donald Trump's request? Speaker 0 claims it wasn't just negligence, but that she denied the request.

You are not being honest with this committee. We asked for all memorandums from the Secret Service on July 15th, have you provided them? You are dodging important questions that the American people want answers to. We had to subpoena you to be here, and you still won't answer. These are not difficult questions.

While on maternity leave, I learned about inherent contempt of Congress, a power rarely used since the early 1900s. The attorney general defied two subpoenas from House chairmen. If the Department of Justice doesn't act in 10 days, I've filed a motion to bring inherent contempt proceedings against the attorney general. This allows the House to detain the attorney general until he complies with subpoenas. It's a necessary step to restore order in the House.

Speaker 0 questions if this could be the biggest setup or crime in the country's history. Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of uncovering the truth and the cover-ups post-January 6th, even if it involves Republicans. Speaker 1 commits to following the evidence, regardless of where it leads. Speaker 0 holds Speaker 1 accountable for this commitment. Translation: Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the significance of revealing the truth and uncovering cover-ups post-January 6th, even if it involves members of Speaker 1's own party. Speaker 1 pledges to follow the evidence, no matter the consequences. Speaker 0 reminds Speaker 1 of this commitment.

Speaker 0 confronts Speaker 2 about how they obtained confidential information. Speaker 2 refuses to disclose their source, citing attorney-client privilege. Speaker 0 threatens contempt if Speaker 2 does not reveal the source within 5 minutes. Speaker 2 mentions statements made by Mr. Copeland regarding a murder. The conversation escalates with Speaker 0 demanding answers and Speaker 2 maintaining their stance. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 insisting on knowing the source of the information.

Speaker 1 admits to leaving a required oversight hearing in order to go on a personal vacation. Speaker 0 finds this unacceptable and questions if Speaker 1 paid for the flight. Speaker 1 confirms they paid for it and agrees to provide receipts to the committee. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 is still capable of doing their job, to which Speaker 1 responds affirmatively. However, Speaker 0 disagrees and believes Speaker 1 should have been removed long ago.

Speaker is asked if they agree with congressional Republicans' call for resignation, but does not respond when pressed by the speaker of the house.

Speaker 0: Reclaiming time from Chairman, Hunter is avoiding my words. Speaker 1: House committees seek relevant info, but GOP misuses subpoenas for political gain, ignoring offers and leaking witness statements. Translation: Speaker 0 reclaims time from the Chairman as Hunter avoids their words. Speaker 1 mentions that House committees are seeking relevant information, but Republicans are misusing subpoenas for political purposes by ignoring offers and leaking witness statements.

Speaker 0 asks if the FD 1023 and the 17 recordings will be provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee to assess the evidence of Joe Biden taking a $5,000,000 bribe. Speaker 1 responds that they will work with the committee and provide the information within the process. Speaker 0 insists on a direct answer, but Speaker 1 repeats that they will take it back and work with them. Speaker 0 concludes that Speaker 1 is not answering the question.