TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Investigative reporter Steve Baker has uncovered evidence suggesting that Nancy Pelosi's security chief may have committed perjury in the Oath Keepers trial related to the January 6th Capitol riot. Baker discovered discrepancies between the FBI interviews of a Capitol Police officer and his testimony in court. The officer initially described a positive interaction with the Oath Keepers, but his testimony was later changed to portray a more contentious encounter. Baker also analyzed video footage that contradicted the officer's account of events. This revelation raises questions about the fairness of the trial and the potential manipulation of evidence. The story is part of an ongoing series by Baker and has significant implications for the justice system and the future of the Republic.

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, is accused of perjury in relation to the January 6th attack on the Capitol. The Justice Department has rested its case in the trial against Oath Keepers founder Stuart Rhodes and his associates. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn testified that the Oath Keepers did not protect him, contradicting the defense's argument. Evidence shows that Lazarus, who claimed to have witnessed the encounter, was in a different building at the time. Videos were withheld from the defense, raising concerns about the government's handling of the case. The Capitol Police leadership was more concerned about the story's traction than the agent's false testimony. The investigation aims to uncover who orchestrated this false narrative.

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, is at the center of a controversial story. The Justice Department has rested its case in the trial against Oathkeepers founder Stuart Rhodes and his associates. Officer Harry Dunn, who was allegedly helped by the Oathkeepers, denied their protection. Lazarus, who testified to witnessing the encounter, was proven to be in a different building at the time. CCTV footage contradicted his claims. The defense argues that the government is withholding evidence and setting up American citizens. Capitol Police leadership expressed concern about the story gaining traction. The investigation aims to uncover who orchestrated this false narrative.

Recently, some police officers testified about their trauma during the January 6th events. One officer described being outnumbered and attacked while protecting the Capitol. However, it turns out he wasn't in uniform or acting as a Capitol Police officer; he was an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation challenges the narrative surrounding the events, suggesting it was not as strong or truthful as presented. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real story and identify those truly responsible.

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, is at the center of a controversial story. The Justice Department has rested its case in the trial against Oathkeepers founder Stuart Rhodes and his associates. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn testified that the Oathkeepers did not help him during the January 6th attack. However, Lazarus, who was in a different building at the time, claimed to have witnessed the encounter. CCTV footage contradicts Lazarus' account, showing him in a different location. The defense argues that the government is withholding evidence and setting up American citizens. The Capitol Police leadership was reportedly more concerned about the story's traction than the lie told by their special agent. The investigation continues to uncover the truth behind this incident.

Three years after January 6th, questions remain about the events of that day and the FBI's involvement. Congressman Clay Higgins directly questioned FBI Director Chris Wray about whether FBI assets were embedded among the protesters. Higgins asserts that evidence suggests the FBI had undercover agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol before the doors opened, potentially entrapping attendees. He estimates over 200 FBI assets were present, influencing the crowd and orchestrating actions leading to arrests. Higgins emphasizes the need for transparency and urges Speaker Mike Johnson to release all digital evidence from that day to the public, believing it will reveal the truth about the government's role in the events of January 6th.

The speaker believes the events at the Capitol on January 6th were a setup, pointing to men dressed as Trump supporters inside the building before doors were opened. They question if there were confidential human sources involved. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and denies having such sources present. Additionally, they mention police officers seen changing attire from uniform to Trump supporter clothing.

Recently, some police officers spoke about their trauma during the January events. One officer described being outnumbered, beaten, and called a traitor. However, it turns out he was not in uniform and was actually an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation undermines the narrative presented, suggesting it was not based on truth. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real culprits behind the events.

Two years ago, Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd shot unarmed Ashley Babbitt during the January 6th events. Despite a history of negligence, Byrd faced no consequences and was celebrated as a hero. In contrast, Babbitt's mother was arrested for holding a memorial for her daughter. The narrative surrounding January 6th has been manipulated, with false claims about police fatalities and misleading accounts of events, including the death of Officer Brian Sicknick, who actually died of a stroke later. Questions remain about the involvement of federal agencies and the identity of the pipe bomber near the DNC. Additionally, Ray Epps, who encouraged illegal actions, has not faced charges, raising concerns about accountability and transparency in the official narrative.

The footage reveals that Brian Sicknick was not a victim of violence at the Capitol, contradicting claims made by the January 6th committee. The tape shows him walking normally after the incident, and investigators for the Democratic Party reviewed it but chose not to release it to the public. This decision was made to protect their narrative, as revealing the truth would undermine their political agenda. Their willingness to misrepresent the facts about Sicknick indicates a broader pattern of dishonesty.

The video discusses the case of Ray Epps and his alleged involvement in the events of January 6th. Epps, a former member of the Oath Keepers, was recorded whispering about storming the Capitol the day before the attack. Many have speculated that he may have been a federal informant or undercover agent. However, Epps denies these claims. The video explores Epps' background and his association with the Oath Keepers. It also highlights the reactions of those who knew him and the suspicions surrounding his actions. The video raises questions about Epps' true intentions and the possibility of undercover agents being present during the Capitol attack.

Officer Brian Sicknick's cause of death remains uncertain, despite media claims that he was beaten to death by Trump supporters during the Capitol riot. Video evidence shows Sicknick walking through the building unharmed. However, the media and politicians like Liz Cheney continue to spread false information without correction or apology. The White House, including Press Secretary and Attorney General Merrick Garland, falsely claim that Sicknick and other officers were murdered during the riot. In reality, the other four officers mentioned died by suicide, with no evidence linking their deaths to the Republican mob. While some officers were assaulted, the claim that January 6th was the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War is unfounded.

Private first class Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police is described as acting with courage to defend our institutions and our people. Critics say a Capitol Police officer assigned to Pelosi’s detail appears to have given false testimony, with Missus Percher brought in to corroborate another officer’s testimony. It is imperative that we establish the truth of that day. The officer who testified in the Oath Keepers trial was sentenced to eighteen years in prison. Dunn’s book, Standing My Ground, a capital police officer's fight for accountability and good trouble, is described as one of the first accounts from Capitol Police about January 6, and its tour is unique: 'no other, none other of the Capitol Police officers are allowed to tell their stories.' Pelosi says, 'And it's also our duty to establish and preserve the narrative of that day,' while others allege a concerted effort to manipulate information.

Jacob Chansley, often depicted as a dangerous conspiracy theorist, was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for his role in the January 6th Capitol insurrection. The circumstances of his entry into the Capitol remain disputed, but surveillance footage reveals that Capitol Police did not stop him. Instead, they appeared to assist him, guiding him through the building and even attempting to open locked doors. At least nine officers were in close proximity to Chansley, yet none intervened. Chansley seemed to perceive the Capitol Police as allies, as evidenced by a prayer he offered on the Senate floor thanking them. This contrasts sharply with the narrative surrounding his actions during the insurrection.

Evidence has emerged exposing orchestrated lies about the events of January 6th. A letter circulated by Capitol press pool and Representative Jamie Raskin's office, which called for an investigation into the events, violated Capitol Police regulations. The letter was allegedly drafted by Capitol police officer Harry Dunn, with assistance from the media and Raskin's office. Dunn had disciplinary action taken against him for this matter, but his involvement was not disclosed during the Oath Keepers trial. Blaze contributor Steve Baker believes the disciplinary report should be made public to reveal the truth. Additionally, an internal Capitol Police email suggests concern about Baker's revelations of alleged lies by another officer, David Lazarus. The corruption within the Capitol Police department needs to be addressed and its leadership replaced.

David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, claimed to witness an encounter between Officer Dunn and Oath Keepers on January 6th. However, CCTV footage showed Lazarus was in a different building at the time. The defense argued that the government withheld evidence and set up American citizens for long sentences. The Capitol Police leadership was more concerned about the story's traction than the false testimony. The case raises questions about who orchestrated the false narrative presented in court.

Surveillance footage shows Sicknick walking in the Capitol after his alleged death, appearing healthy and wearing a helmet, which contradicts claims of him being killed by a head injury from the mob. This footage challenges the narrative pushed by the January 6th committee, which had access to it but chose not to release it to the public. The decision to withhold this evidence suggests a deliberate attempt to maintain a misleading political narrative. The committee's actions indicate a willingness to distort the truth about Sicknick, raising questions about their overall integrity and motives.

Two years ago, Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd shot unarmed Ashley Babbitt during the January 6th events. Byrd had a history of firearm negligence but faced no consequences for the shooting. Instead, he was celebrated, while Babbitt's mother was arrested for holding a memorial for her daughter. The narrative surrounding January 6th has been manipulated, leading to false claims, such as the deaths of five police officers, which are untrue. Officer Brian Sicknick, initially reported to have died from violence, actually suffered a stroke later. Key events, like the pipe bomb incident and the role of Ray Epps, have been obscured, raising questions about federal agency involvement. Despite evidence of orchestrated actions, Epps faced no charges, highlighting inconsistencies in the official narrative surrounding that day.

Private first class Harry Dunn, a Capitol Police officer, is being questioned for potentially giving false testimony. He is the only officer allowed to share his story, which he does in his book "Standing My Ground." However, there are concerns about his credibility and mental state. Dunn describes incidents where he lost control and displayed anger issues. He also recounts encounters with protesters during the Capitol attack, but there is no evidence of his heroic actions. Some believe there was a deliberate effort to manipulate and suppress evidence to establish a specific narrative. Despite receiving recognition and awards, Dunn has faced criticism. The speaker hopes to have a deeper conversation with Dunn for more insight.

An individual provided video footage purportedly showing two federal agents attacking the Capitol on January 6th. A defense attorney for the Oath Keepers filed a motion identifying 80 "suspicious actors" and "material witnesses" present at the Capitol on January 6th who have not been arrested or charged. These individuals were concentrated in areas where trouble occurred, including the East Side and the Columbus doors. The attorney alleges some worked in tactical two-man teams and were later seen on the terrace. He seeks to identify them using facial recognition and questions if the events were staged. A radio journalist captured footage of two individuals he believed to be government agents. One was encouraging people to enter the Capitol after a window had been broken, even pulling out a pane of glass himself. When he realized he was being filmed, he blamed a protester and shoved him. The other individual was holding open the Columbus doors with a wooden pole and pushing people inside. The journalist who shot the video said the man shoved him. One person claims that the FBI, not Trump supporters, led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6th.

January 6 was a complex event shrouded in deception. Many instinctively felt that the mainstream media's narrative was false. The extensive surveillance footage from that day contradicts claims of an insurrection, showing people behaving like tourists rather than rioters. Some individuals, like Ray Epps, who encouraged the crowd to enter the Capitol, have not faced charges, raising questions about their roles. The January 6 committee's handling of evidence has been criticized, particularly regarding Epps' testimony. Additionally, discrepancies in communication between Capitol officials and Speaker Pelosi highlight failures in leadership during the crisis. Critics argue that the portrayal of January 6 has been selectively edited to fit a narrative, while the truth remains more nuanced.

On January 6th, a mob breached the Capitol building, resulting in the deaths of five police officers. The Democratic Party and the national news media quickly labeled it a deadly insurrection, a phrase that carried emotional weight. However, surveillance footage from inside the Capitol showed mostly chaotic but peaceful scenes. The media also falsely claimed that Officer Brian Sicknick was murdered with a fire extinguisher, which was later retracted. The video evidence disproves this claim, as Sicknick can be seen walking in the Capitol after the alleged attack. The January 6th committee, aware of this footage, chose not to release it to the public, revealing their dishonesty.

During the Capitol incident, a law enforcement officer recounts being attacked and called a traitor. Another person claims that the officer was actually an FBI plant, not in uniform, and carrying a Confederate flag. They believe the narrative is unraveling and demand the release of FBI files to reveal the true culprits.

January 6th was a complex event shrouded in deception. Initially, I sensed something was wrong with the official narrative. The surveillance footage reveals that those at the Capitol were not insurrectionists but rather sightseers who believed the election was stolen. Some individuals, like Ray Epps, encouraged the crowd but faced no charges, raising questions about their roles. Epps lied to investigators about his actions that day. Additionally, Speaker Pelosi inaccurately claimed she hadn’t spoken to the Capitol Police chief during the incident, despite multiple calls. Many politicians, regardless of party, have shown a willingness to mislead the public about January 6th, selectively presenting evidence to support their narratives.

Never before seen footage of January 6 allegedly shows Jake Lange attempting to stop police brutality. He was allegedly trying to save Rosanne Boylan as she was allegedly being killed by the Capitol Police.