reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The transcript centers on a confrontation in Miami Beach with Matthew Tiermond, a former Project Veritas board member, who is discussed as having been on the board during a controversial period including the February 6, three-year anniversary of the termination of James O’Keefe from Project Veritas. The exchange, captured by an undercover journalist working with James O’Keefe, reveals a web of explosive claims and repudiations about Tiermond’s conduct, his relationship with federal agencies, and his stated ambitions. Key allegations and admissions about Tiermond: - Tiermond is described as having said he would “carve my heart out and eat it,” a claim tied to a repeated assertion that he wanted to kill James O’Keefe. He later characterizes the statement as metaphorical, saying “I would kill James O’Keefe… it’s metaphoric.” - He asserts he has “a thousand sources in the DOJ and CIA I talk to all the time,” and that he has “fed the Southern District tons of shit to try and get him in prison.” He claims to have spoken with multiple law enforcement and intelligence contacts, including mentioning the SDNY, the FBI, the IRS, and other agencies, and asserts that he has discussed Tiermond’s activities with them. - He acknowledges involvement with the SDNY and the FBI as an informant, stating that he has talked to many people who called him from law enforcement agencies and that he answered questions truthfully and honestly. He is pressed to identify who he fed information to, with the interviewer demanding specifics and identifying him as an FBI informant on tape. - Tiermond asserts that he has used insider information to target various conservative figures and organizations, including claims about Donald Trump Jr. and Don Jr.’s alleged insider trading and crypto schemes intended to influence foreign governments. He states his mission is to ensure Don Jr. ends up in prison and describes Don Jr. as “stealing billions.” - He describes a plan to “weaponize money” through investment banking to influence the system, stating, “I am going to weaponize the entire system the way Paul Singer does, but my way,” and expresses a goal of making $100,000,000 to weaponize money better than anyone. - He says he has advised and solicited investments for companies in the pharmaceutical space, including entities such as Cathayed Incorporated, Matt Tiermond LLC, and a company called Petragen Petrogen. He notes that some deals were discussed while on the Project Veritas board and mentions NDA constraints and the risk to his licenses if he discloses more. - He references conflicts of interest policies with the board, including disclosures about investments in Petragen or related entities, and implies that some discussions were restricted or confidential. - He discusses the media landscape, acknowledging that he’s worked with legacy outlets like the New York Times and National Review, and says he would work with the New York Times if they pursue the truth of what’s going on. Additional context and implications: - The conversation situates Tiermond as both a participant in Project Veritas’ internal dynamics and as someone who claims intimate, ongoing access to federal agencies. He describes the SDNY as “all about power” and asserts that there are no “bad FBI agents,” contradicting the interview’s insinuations about the FBI’s conduct based on his prior alleged stance during FBI raids on Veritas journalists in 2021. - The interview recounts a confrontation where Tiermond was approached to discuss his statements, with the undercover journalist verifying that Tiermond’s claims included admission to informing the SDNY and to wanting to kill O’Keefe, while denying certain other accusations. Setting and purpose: - The narrative is presented as the “rest of the story” about Matthew Tiermond, culminating in a live encounter in which Tiermond’s admissions and threats are publicly documented. The segment ends with James O’Keefe reporting from Miami Beach, framing Tiermond as a controversial figure whose allegations involve murders, informant activity, and high-stakes financial ambitions.

The discussion centers on lawsuits against media outlets, specifically "60 Minutes," for alleged deceptive editing of an interview with Kamala Harris. One speaker claims the show deceptively edited Harris's answers, while the other expresses concern about the chilling effect of lawsuits on media freedom, regardless of any one case. One speaker argues that if media organizations make defamatory and factually incorrect statements, lawsuits are a valid recourse, especially when bias is suspected. The other speaker counters that powerful figures suing media can intimidate them, pointing to Trump's criticisms of media outlets and threats against judges. He suggests using platforms to rebut incorrect information rather than resorting to lawsuits, as Trump himself often does. The speaker also notes that rebuttals may not reach the same audience as the original claims.

In this video, Alex confronts Oliver Darcy, accusing him of being a censor and a liar. Alex criticizes Darcy's affiliation with CNN and accuses the network of being fake news. He also insults Darcy's appearance and calls him a sociopath. Darcy denies the accusations and claims that Alex is spreading falsehoods. The confrontation becomes heated, with both individuals trading insults and accusations. Alex asserts that Darcy is trying to silence conservative voices and destroy the First Amendment. The video ends with Alex expressing his belief that he will ultimately prevail and that Darcy's actions will be seen as dishonorable.

The discussion centers on shadow banning, referencing a Project Veritas video where a Twitter engineer claimed that machine learning algorithms target Republicans. One participant questions the validity of this statement, emphasizing that the engineer was not officially representing Twitter and was speaking in a casual setting. The other participant asserts that the claims made by the engineer are false, stating that Twitter does not use political ideology or party affiliation in its internal processes. They maintain that the practices described do not reflect Twitter's actual operations.

No one openly discusses certain truths, but they are evident. Leads lead. Twitter permanently suspended an account after exposing CNN's hypocrisy. Project Veritas, known for controversial conservative views, has been accused of spreading misinformation. They recently won a defamation case against the New York Times. James O'Keefe is also suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. He argues that Twitter made false statements about him. Critics label O'Keefe as despicable, noting that some news articles inject personal opinions rather than sticking to facts. This situation reflects Project Veritas's ongoing strategy of promoting misinformation. Ultimately, the truth is not determined by opinions or biases.

James O'Keefe is deposing remaining board members and executives under oath regarding his ouster from Project Veritas, after Project Veritas sued him in 2023 and he countersued in 2024. Barry Hinckley, who criticized O'Keefe's use of black car services, filed a protective order in Florida federal court to prevent his deposition from being video recorded, arguing O'Keefe will use footage to falsely portray him as lying or participating in a fraudulent ouster, harming his and his family's safety and reputation. O'Keefe argues this request violates First Amendment principles, as the truth is a defense and the public has a right to know what happened. He claims Project Veritas is judge shopping, as a New York federal judge already denied a similar request. O'Keefe states the lawsuit is not a private matter, given the public audit and leaks to media outlets. He asserts the public has a right to know about confidential FBI informants within Project Veritas and potential board conflicts of interest. FBI agent Kyle Sarifen's deposition is scheduled to be video recorded.

James O'Keefe shares a video of someone banging on his front door. He opens it to find a stack of documents, which turns out to be a federal lawsuit filed by Project Veritas against him. O'Keefe expresses surprise and questions what the lawsuit aims to achieve. He mentions that Project Veritas had a significant amount of money when he left but has apparently spent it all without raising much more. O'Keefe also reveals the names of the lawyers involved in the lawsuit, expressing his confusion and concern about their efforts to silence journalists.

The transcript describes a dispute surrounding Candace Owens and a lawsuit that mentions her in connection with attacks on Jane Doe. It states that Candace Owens spent an entire YouTube episode in 2023 smearing Jane and Mary Doe and repeated the claim that Jane was responsible for Dustin Milner. It also says Candace repeated one of the Tate family’s allegations that Jane Doe had previously falsely accused a man, Keith Fox, who is currently serving a prison sentence for male two minors, one of which was Jane Doe. The transcript notes that Milkbar TV edited Candace’s video to beep out Keith Fox’s name to protect his identity while she repeated Jane Doe’s full legal name over more than 100 times during the video. It adds that Milkbar edits out Jane’s name when Candice mentions it in this edit. It mentions an unrelated line about a yoga instructor under arrest charged with having an inappropriate relationship with a student. In the first case described, a man is unnamed in the transcription for ethical reasons because the allegations involved a minor at the time. The transcript explains the man was a yoga instructor who had a 15-year-old student, and that the teen’s mother hired a private investigator to follow her daughter and Fox. The investigator observed the teen at Fox’s home engaging in “the touching one another in a manner.” The teen talked to detectives and provided details; Delray Beach police indicated the relationship began with a close relationship between a teen student and her yoga instructor, with Fox making a few inappropriate comments, escalating to serious allegations. Police stated Fox touched her in his car and offered a Thai massage, and there was concern about other potential victims. The courts found that the teen was having relations with him, and he was sentenced to twenty-four years in prison. Delray Beach police arrested Fox on a charge of battery on a victim over 12 years old; he remained in jail after a judge denied him bond. The transcript reiterates that the first case involves a man not named due to the minor involved, and asserts that the courts found the relationship occurred. It also emphasizes that Candace Owens named Jane Doe extensively while protecting Keith Fox’s identity in the cited video. The closing line asserts, “Candace Owens is a vile, disgusting freak.”

We sued CNN for defamation after they falsely reported that Twitter suspended Project Veritas for spreading misinformation, when it was actually for publishing private information. CNN argued in court that there's no difference between promoting misinformation and revealing private information, but the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. A circuit judge even noted his disbelief that a major news organization would downplay the importance of truth. This legal victory is overshadowed by Project Veritas firing me, in part, for spending the money to fight these battles. It's difficult when the organization is now celebrating a victory that they were against, and suing me for the actions that led to it.

Elon Musk accuses Media Matters of fabricating a story about corporate ads appearing next to Nazi content on Twitter. According to Musk, Media Matters created fake accounts that followed Nazis and took screenshots of ads next to the content. Musk plans to file a lawsuit against Media Matters, calling it a "fraudulent attack." If successful, this lawsuit could be a significant win for free speech and conservative media.

James O'Keefe is suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. He highlights a video showing CNN engaging in similar actions. The lawsuit claims that Twitter made false statements about O'Keefe and his organization, Project Veritas, which is known for its conservative activism.

James O'Keefe stated that a girl who works for him recorded someone. The person recorded was at Meta and was talking to someone else. After O'Keefe said "oh," the person hung up the phone.

No one openly discusses it, but it's clear that Project Veritas has faced backlash after exposing perceived hypocrisy at CNN. Their controversial approach has led to accusations of misinformation. Stanford researchers labeled their footage as part of a coordinated disinformation effort. Veritas is currently suing the New York Times for defamation and has reportedly achieved a significant victory in that case. James O'Keefe is also suing Twitter for defamation after confronting a Facebook executive. Despite challenges, Veritas maintains that their factual statements about their work as a conservative activist organization are valid and that the truth is not determined by external opinions.

Robbie Starbuck is suing Meta for multi-millions, alleging its AI falsely claimed he pled guilty to disorderly conduct and was at the January 6th Capitol riot, which he denies. He says the AI falsely linked him to extremism, advised against hiring him or advertising on his show, and suggested authorities should consider removing his parental rights due to his views on DEI and transgenderism. Starbuck claims Meta's AI stated he filmed inside the Capitol on January 6th and that his footage was used by the House Select Committee, which he also denies. He says Meta's AI admitted that spreading such lies could be seen as evidence of actual malice. Starbuck alleges that after he reported the issue, Meta blacklisted his name on its AI, but it still defames him if his name isn't directly used in the initial query. He also claims a Meta official asked him to promote their ending of fact-checking. Starbuck believes biased AI is a weapon that threatens reputations and could manipulate elections.

The speaker claims that individuals from the Biden administration would call and berate their team about certain documents. The speaker says that emails related to this are published. The speaker states that their team refused to take down content that was true, including a meme about potential class action lawsuits related to COVID vaccines. They also refused to remove humor and satire. The speaker alleges that President Biden made a statement suggesting "these guys are killing people," after which various government agencies began investigating their company, which they describe as "brutal."

James O'Keefe confronts an NIH employee about a video where he allegedly discusses changing the word "race" to "ancestry." O'Keefe questions if this is deceitful and suggests ancestry isn't the same as race for clinical trials. The employee defends the change as scientifically accurate, claiming expertise. O'Keefe disputes this, accusing him of avoiding accountability. The employee states he believes in good science and protecting people. As the employee drives away in his Tesla, he claims O'Keefe doesn't care about people. O'Keefe finds this ironic and asserts his organization cares deeply about informing the public.

The release of the "Twitter files" had serious consequences for both the speaker and junior employees at Twitter. They faced doxxing, threats to their families, and had to deal with online harassment. The speaker had to sell their home after their address was published. Another speaker criticized Twitter for censoring COVID information, including the opinions of well-educated doctors. They shared personal health issues they believe were caused by the vaccine. The speaker questioned Twitter's authority to censor medical experts and accused the platform of being influenced by the US government. The video ends with gratitude towards Matt Taibbi and Elon Musk for exposing Twitter's alleged connection to the FBI.

A leaked, edited undercover video posted by O'Keefe Media Group features Hayden Kirkpatrick, formerly VP at State Farm, discussing the Palisades fire victims and Bay Area residents. Kirkpatrick claims the footage was from a Tinder date. The video, potentially lacking context due to splicing, is controversial. The outlet that published it was founded by James O'Keefe, formerly of Project Veritas, which has faced lawsuits over misleading undercover content. The controversy arises as State Farm continues to drop policies, prompting questions about orchestration.