reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the next administration will definitely face challenges related to infectious diseases. This includes managing existing chronic infectious diseases, which already pose a significant burden. However, more importantly, be prepared for a surprise outbreak. It's not a matter of if, but when, so pandemic preparedness is crucial.

The speaker discusses a website called DiseaseX on the World Economic Forum site. They express surprise at not having heard of this disease before and not finding it in various medical textbooks. The speaker highlights the need for global collaboration and funding to improve pandemic preparedness and mentions the possibility of producing something, possibly a vaccine, to target a novel virus before it emerges. They mention a deleted video about a virus that caused brain disease in mice and emphasize the potential for viruses to spillover from animals to humans. The speaker suggests that research on vaccine development for known viral families could give humanity an advantage against future diseases. They express concern about DiseaseX and hope that the World Economic Forum doesn't know more than they do.

I have served in 5 administrations and want to emphasize that the next administration will face challenges in infectious diseases. There will be both chronic diseases and surprise outbreaks. History shows that these challenges are inevitable, so it is crucial to be prepared. Many have underestimated infectious diseases, but they remain a significant threat.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

In 2019, preparations began for a new pandemic by searching for viruses globally. The aim was to create crisis situations for global management, rather than being limited to the United States or specific technologies.

"There's the transformative, if I might use that word, experience that we've all had now in year five of COVID." The speaker says, "The thought that we won't have another pandemic, I think is naive at best and just not completely unrealistic at worst." They add, "I'm convinced that there will be another pandemic and that's the reason why we have to be perpetually prepared to prevent the terrible impact of a pandemic."

There will be another pandemic; it's just a matter of time. The annual risk is around 2% to 3%, and we must prepare for future outbreaks, including unexpected ones, often referred to as "black swans." The work we do now is crucial for readiness, as we will inevitably face new challenges and different types of viruses. It's essential to acknowledge that surprises will arise, and we need to be equipped to handle them.

We must remain vigilant about current diseases, but an even greater danger is focusing too much on the last pandemic when preparing for future threats. Emerging infections can arise from various sources, and we are still vulnerable to intentional spread by those seeking to cause harm. Our global community's health faces numerous potential threats. It's crucial to consider a wide range of possibilities to effectively safeguard public health.

I have served in 5 administrations and want to share my perspective on pandemic preparedness. Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the coming administration will face challenges in dealing with infectious diseases. This includes both chronic diseases and unexpected outbreaks. The history of the last 32 years as the director of NIAID shows that there is no doubt the next administration will have to confront these challenges.

There will likely be a deadly airborne disease in the future, so we need to establish a global infrastructure to quickly detect, isolate, and respond to it. This was emphasized by multiple speakers. A document from 2010 predicted a pandemic similar to what we are experiencing now, with China being better prepared and implementing strict measures. The document also foresaw increased government control and oversight, which has become a reality. A simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, accurately predicted the coronavirus outbreak. The speakers discussed the importance of managing misinformation and disinformation. They believe that controlling access to information is necessary to combat the pandemic. Some speakers expressed skepticism about the coincidences and the level of control being exerted.

There is a consensus that appears in the World Health Organization’s ten-year plan, which has been in place for a long time. The plan states that people should prepare for the coming ten years because a major infectious crisis is anticipated. In other words, the plan foretells that over the next decade there will be a significant infectious-health emergency. The speaker notes that “this was year 1,” indicating that the current year is the first year of that ten-year horizon outlined by the plan.

The speaker, who has served in 5 administrations, discusses the issue of pandemic preparedness. They emphasize that the coming administration will face challenges in dealing with infectious diseases, including both chronic diseases and surprise outbreaks. The speaker highlights the importance of learning from past experiences, such as HIV, and stresses the need for substantial resources, involvement of communities, cross-sector collaboration, and engagement of leaders and policymakers. They assert that infectious diseases are a perpetual challenge that will not go away, and confidently state that such challenges will be seen in the next few years.

The UN general assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, eroded trust, and highlighted inequalities. The next pandemic is inevitable, so WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to the cycle of panic and neglect. Our world needs to be stronger for future generations.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document predicting a pandemic like COVID-19. It described a scenario where governments imposed strict measures, citizens gave up privacy for safety, and misinformation spread. Event 201, a simulation hosted in 2019, eerily mirrored the pandemic. Experts warned of a highly infectious virus causing global catastrophe. The current situation is seen as a result of long-term planning.

In this video, the speakers discuss the need to prepare for future pandemics and the importance of taking action to address global warming and climate change. They also mention the possibility of a surprise outbreak and the need for global cooperation. The speakers touch on topics such as vaccine distribution, lockdown measures, and the impact of COVID-19 on the economy. There are also mentions of censorship and the importance of seeking out reliable information. Overall, the speakers emphasize the need for continued vigilance and adaptation in the face of ongoing health challenges.

In the future, there might be a deadly airborne disease. To effectively handle it, we need a global infrastructure that enables us to detect, isolate, and respond to it swiftly. This infrastructure should be in place not only in our country but worldwide. By investing in this infrastructure, we can be better prepared to tackle future outbreaks, such as a new strain of flu similar to the Spanish flu, that may emerge in the next five or ten years.

I will discuss pandemic preparedness today. Based on my experience, I can say that the next administration will face challenges with chronic infectious diseases and unexpected outbreaks. In my 32 years as NIAID director, history shows that these challenges are inevitable for the new administration.

The transcript discusses a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation document titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, focusing on a scenario called Lockstep. In this scenario, a pandemic strikes in 2012, overwhelming even the best-prepared nations. Approximately 20% of the global population becomes infected and about 8 million people die within seven months. The pandemic devastates economies as international travel and global supply chains collapse, and even developed countries struggle with containment. China is highlighted as having greater success due to rapid, mandatory quarantines and near-closed borders, which saves millions of lives and enables a faster post-pandemic recovery. The account notes that highly intrusive real-time tracking of a largely compliant population was key to lifting lockdowns in Wuhan. The document also asserts that during the pandemic, leaders worldwide imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from mandatory mask-wearing to temperature checks at entry points to communal spaces. Even after the pandemic fades, there is a lasting shift toward more authoritarian control and oversight, with citizens accepting reduced sovereignty and privacy in exchange for safety and stability. In developed countries, biometric IDs and a suite of new regulations are introduced to restore order and economic growth, with the overall message that increased oversight helps achieve stability. The transcript then shifts to Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise held on October 18, 2019, organized by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The exercise simulated the consequences of a pandemic and the societal and economic challenges it would pose, using a coronavirus-like pathogen codenamed Caps. Participants describe how a significant portion of identified cases require hospitalization, causing strain on health systems. They note that some individuals with mild symptoms can still spread the virus unknowingly, and emphasize that disinformation and misinformation undermine the response. There is discussion about how governments, international organizations, and businesses should counter misinformation and ensure reliable information reaches the public. It’s noted that social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook have identified and removed a large number of accounts spreading disinformation about the outbreak. Some participants argue that strong measures to manage information are necessary, even if it means restricting access to information, to prevent misinformation from jeopardizing the pandemic response or causing political instability. The video then intersperses commentary questioning the coincidence that the 2019 exercise apparently anticipated the 2020 outbreak, with a skeptical tone about whether the scenario was preplanned or predictive. Additional voices from public health organizations warn that an epidemic—whether naturally caused or intentionally—could cause massive harm, with the possibility of ten million excess deaths. A final note reflects on the sense that the world was already prepared in many ways before 2020, suggesting that the pandemic response was part of a long-standing preparation.

Speaker 0 raises a question about the pandemic: Has it, perhaps, reminded the world of the power of medicine and the power of science? And has it reminded the industry of its responsibility to the whole world rather than only to rich countries that can afford great medicines? Speaker 1 responds that, in his view, both propositions are true to a very high degree. He states that the world realized the value that the vibrant life sciences sector can bring to society. At the same time, he emphasizes a caution tied to the presence of powerful tools: when we have these weapons in our these tools, we must find ways that they reach all and not only those that they can afford them.

The WHO has announced a global police force to control and censor opposition. They plan to use medical tyranny to take over and are pushing for a world treaty. The head of WHO, Tedros, openly talks about using disease x for total control. However, people are waking up to their agenda. It is important to expose this for our own survival. On the other hand, Speaker 1 discusses the need for a pandemic agreement to better prepare for future outbreaks. They emphasize the importance of a shared response and hope that member states will deliver this agreement by May 2024. Speaker 2 promotes Infowars as a source of truthful information.

We must take action to prevent future pandemics as they are inevitable in the lifetimes of our grandchildren and great-grandchildren. The exact timing of the next outbreak is uncertain, but we need to be prepared.

The speaker believes another event similar to the COVID-19 pandemic could occur. While an invisible pandemic might not be successful again, the WHO's list of potential pandemics includes hemorrhagic viruses. The speaker believes that if a pandemic involved people bleeding from the mouth, nose, eyes, and ears, it would terrify the public.

The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, and eroded trust. The next pandemic is inevitable, so WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to the cycle of panic and neglect. Together, we are stronger.

The transcript discusses a narrative that connects Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and a global, pre-planned approach to pandemics, presenting a sequence of alleged events and structures designed to profit from health crises. It begins with a claim that new vaccines and health services could be improved and costs reduced by ten to fifteen percent over the next five to ten years, and that a future pandemic will occur regardless of current efforts. It is stated that the pandemic risk is two to three percent per year and that attention to preparedness will continue, noting that the pandemic was predictable and could be far more severe in the future. One speaker asserts they had predicted the risk of a pandemic and that it came true. The brand-new Epstein files are then introduced, claiming they show Epstein planned the whole thing from the start and expose a financial system designed around pandemics that operated long before COVID-19. The documents allegedly reveal a hidden network directly connecting Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, and other powerful individuals. Epstein is said to have helped design the financial apparatus that later secured over 100 million dollars in funding for the Gates Foundation, advising JPMorgan executives on pitching a Gates Anchored Donor Fund to attract vaccine investments under the guise of philanthropy but designed to generate profits. It is claimed Gates had already invested in vaccines from the early 2000s but faced controversy over mass vaccine distribution and promises of disease eradication, which allegedly sometimes worsened problems. Gates is also quoted as saying vaccines could reduce the global population by a significant amount. There is a point-by-point timeline: the world’s population is described as 6.8 billion, headed toward about 9 billion, with a suggestion that great work on vaccines and reproductive health could lower that by ten to fifteen percent. In 2013, the Gates Foundation allegedly created the Global Health Investment Fund, allowing private investors to fund drug and vaccine development with a stated health purpose, while offering a 60% guarantee of principal, meaning investors would risk only 40% while the remaining 60% of potential losses would be covered by philanthropic and public money. This structure is said to convert global health issues into profitable opportunities with low risk, securing funds and enabling subsequent actions. Epstein’s role is described as expanding Gates’ influence in pandemic preparedness. The 2011 funding groundwork allegedly paved the way for broader governance, with Gates Foundation discussions in 2015 about pandemics and global responses, involving groups like the International Peace Institute, World Health Organization, World Bank, MSF, and UN officials. It is claimed Epstein acted as a back-channel intermediary to spread Gates’ influence, maintaining contacts even after funding refusals, by forwarding Gates’ articles on pandemic preparedness. The timeline continues with 2017 being a turning point, where pandemics were discussed as business opportunities rather than disasters, and Epstein was said to broker specialists into Gates’ office for pandemic simulations. A doctor’s text is cited indicating pandemic simulation as a key credential, with Epstein recommending a connection to Gates. That year also saw the World Bank launch the first emergency financing facility, raising $320 million in bonds named to cover coronavirus risks, implying planning for a coronavirus-style outbreak years in advance. In October 2019, six weeks before COVID-19, Event 201—a pandemic simulation modeled on a novel coronavirus—was co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Gates Foundation, focusing on government policy during a viral outbreak, distribution of drugs, media messaging, social media management, public compliance, and unified global response. Six weeks later, the real outbreak began. While the documents are not proof, and other evidence such as patents and gain-of-function funding are cited, the narrative suggests a pattern of pre-planned preparation, money, simulations, networks, vaccines, and elite alignment. The closing question asks readers to consider who benefits when such world-stage events occur, proposing that identifying beneficiaries clarifies the situation.