reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have shown that voting systems can be tampered with, and hackers with limited resources can breach machines in minutes. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to hacking. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in the US. Many states have outdated and vulnerable machines, and some lack backup paper ballots. The machines often run on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. The use of modems in voting machines also poses a risk, as they can be connected to the internet. The lack of forensic evidence and audit trails further undermines the security of the machines. The vulnerabilities in the voting system could lead to a compromised election and a loss of faith in the democratic process.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have demonstrated that these machines can be easily tampered with and hacked. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to fraud and hacking. There are concerns about the use of modems in voting machines, as they can be connected to the internet and pose a risk. Outdated software and lack of paper trails also contribute to the vulnerability of the voting systems. The potential for hacking and interference in elections is a significant concern, and the need for secure and updated voting systems is crucial.

Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have demonstrated that these machines can be easily tampered with, and hackers with limited resources can breach them in minutes. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to fraud and hacking. Additionally, many states have outdated and vulnerable machines, and some lack backup paper ballots. The use of modems in voting machines also poses a risk, as they can be connected to the internet and hacked. The overall consensus is that the current voting systems are insecure and vulnerable to manipulation.

You're able to register even if and cast a vote if you don't live in the in the country as evident of his brother in Pakistan. I think we have some evidence of two or three other people out of the country that voted. Is that correct? Yeah. Approximately two or three other people out of the country as well as people residing outside the district. Okay. The online voter registration system, it seems to be an honor system. Anybody can put information in there to to register a vote. All you have to do is click a box and say that you're not lying, and then you'll get an email from the secretary of state or something in the mail saying thank you for registering to vote, and there you are. Once you're on the voter rolls, anytime an election comes around, guess what? You get mailed a ballot. Right? You get mailed something to vote. So we found that a little bit problem

Voting machines in the United States are vulnerable to hacking and tampering, according to experts. These machines, including touchscreen and ballot recording machines, have been found to have serious security flaws that can be exploited by hackers. In some cases, electronic voting machines have deleted or switched votes. The use of remote access software on voting machines also poses a significant cybersecurity risk. Outdated software and unsupported systems further increase the vulnerability of these machines. Modems in voting machines, which are used to transmit results, can also be hacked. The lack of proper audit trails and forensic evidence makes it difficult to detect and prove hacking incidents. Overall, the current state of voting machine security in the US is a cause for concern and poses a threat to the integrity of elections.

Our current voting systems are complicated and messy. Votes are not reconciled and verified at the precinct level in many states. Instead, they are sent to third party entities or counted at centralized locations without public oversight. Mail-in ballots are not secure and can lead to fraud. We need to return to hand counting at the precinct level to ensure accurate accounting and transparency. This system worked for years before 2000 and is still used in France because it is secure. Our current system invites fraud and distrust, so we must act now to restore faith in our elections. Demand hand counting at the precinct level to stop fraud and build back trust in our elections.

The speaker highlights the insecurity of the system, mentioning that over 600,000 mail-in ballots have been counted, including some sent to dead people and those who moved out of the state. They claim that 200,000 votes were verified by a machine with a reduced signature verification standard. The speaker also mentions that the machine requires a 200 DPI setting to match signatures, but the photos in the Nevada system fall below this standard. They express concern that 400,000+ votes have not been looked at and emphasize the lack of scrutiny in the mail-in system. Specific allegations include dead voters and over 3,000 people who moved out of Las Vegas but still voted. The speaker acknowledges the difficulty in verifying these claims.

Some voter rolls in swing states contain illegal aliens because they register their address as the processing center. Software integrating property tax records with voting files reveals voters not living at legal residences. These new illegal voters are inundating voting roles, especially in swing states. In 2022, 40,000 phantom voters were exposed in Wisconsin and removed. These are people who were dead, moved out of state, don't exist, or don't live at a legal address. Challenging the address is the most efficient way to get an illegal voter off the voting roll. Certain NGO groups, such as Catholic Charities, are helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These groups don't believe in borders and feel fine registering people to vote. Dark money, evading campaign rules, tends to go to NGOs and other groups. Evidence suggests a lot of dark money is coming from Chinese-controlled groups and is trying to affect the election in favor of Kamala Harris. The Trump campaign and the RNC need to dedicate time, money, and energy to analyzing the voting file in the seven major swing states to find voters using illegal addresses and have those addresses removed.

They go to the New York City Board of Elections office at 200 Varick Street, 10th Floor, in New York, NY, planning to pose as a non-citizen, Canadian green card holder to see how far they can get in the voter registration process. They note that a clerk initially says you must be a citizen to fill out the registration, but another clerk claims they “accept anything that comes over the counter” and that there are people who have legal situations and registered when they weren’t a citizen. The first clerk’s behavior raises concern: he does not tell them it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that he wouldn’t recommend it. The participants press for clarity. The first clerk admits that “we can’t stop you from submitting the application and if it goes through, but most likely because they don’t do like a full background check,” and adds that “once in a while, you know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom, boom, boom.” The participants quote that as a direct admission that non-citizens are in fact registering to vote. One participant asks if they can fill out the form, and the clerk responds: “Up to you. That’s right. I can’t tell you what to do. You wanna fill that, fill it out. But everything is clear clearly stated, especially at this bottom, it says American citizens.” The participant asks if the clerk would report them; the clerk says “No. No. No. I’m not, no. I’m not that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” The clerk adds that they “accept anything that comes over the counter, you know.” Under New York election law, section 17-106, it is stated that “any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony.” The participants note it would be a criminal offense for the worker to process their voter registration after admitting to being a noncitizen. They ask if they can take materials with them and the clerk confirms they can “take one of these.” The participants are told that they can fill out the form, and if it comes back or doesn’t, they will submit it; the clerk reiterates that they “can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it.” On leaving, they decide not to submit any application, since doing so would be illegal. They later return to gather more information, but the worker becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then changes his stance and refuses to accept the application. They observe that at these centers, there is no requirement to show ID, Social Security, or any proof of identification; all you have to do is sign an affidavit stating you are an American citizen. They describe this as a potential threat to the integrity of the U.S. electoral system. They conclude with the implication that non-citizen registrations have occurred and question how many such forms have been processed.

We need to stop mail-in applications and ballots because we don't have the means to control them in the United States. Additionally, drop boxes are causing problems and should be eliminated. Some states will still have drop boxes funded by Zuckerberg for the midterms, while others won't. Georgia, for example, will keep drop boxes but move them inside buildings.

A woman's Venezuelan doctor friend, who came to the U.S. as a refugee during the Trump administration, claims she received emails from the Kamala Harris campaign asking her to register to vote. The doctor is not a citizen or a permanent resident and has never registered to vote in the U.S. She received the emails in an email account she created in Venezuela and used for immigration communication. The woman questions how the campaign obtained her friend's email address and why they would send voter registration emails to a non-citizen. She also notes that her friend only received emails from the Kamala Harris campaign, not from Donald Trump's campaign.

Speaker 0 argues that illegal voting occurs with penalties in place, and asserts that it happens all the time. He contends that the claim of illegality not being widespread is not reliable, insisting that we do not know how widespread illegal voting is because it is not being detected. He describes the California voter registration process, noting on the section where a driver’s license number or the last four digits of a social security number are entered, there is a box underneath each one stating, “I don’t have one,” which allows a person to proceed to vote. He says this demonstrates that the notion of needing to present some form of identification to register to vote is not accurate and is not being implemented in California. Additionally, he states that people are being registered to vote at the DMV, and cites audits indicating that the DMV has improperly registered people, including illegal immigrants. He claims there is immunity in place that says if the DMV registers someone who is not eligible, they are immune from prosecution. Based on these points, he expresses the belief that there are not sufficient safeguards in place to detect and prevent people from committing voter fraud.

Speaker 0 argued that illegal voting occurs and that the penalties in place are not deterring it; “It happens all the time, senator. It happens all the time. You're just saying it's not widespread. But I'm saying we don't know how spread it is because we don't detect it.” He pointed to California’s registration process, noting that on the registration website there is a box under the fields for the driver’s license and the last four of the social number that says, “I don't have one. I don't have one.” He stated that one is allowed to proceed to vote after checking that box, implying that the requirement to present some form of identification to register is not accurate. He added, “So this idea that you're not allowed to register to vote unless you present some sort of identification is not accurate. It's not true. It's not being implemented in the state of California.” Speaker 0 further claimed that people are being registered to vote at the DMV, and cited audits indicating that the DMV has improperly registered people, including illegal immigrants. He asserted that there is immunity in place that says if the DMV registers someone who is not eligible they are immune from prosecution. Based on these points, he expressed the view that there are not sufficient safeguards in place to detect and prevent people from committing voter fraud.

Speaker 0 discusses registering and voting from outside the country, citing Pakistan as an example. He mentions evidence of two or three other people out of the country who voted, as well as people residing outside the district. He describes the online voter registration system as an honor system, saying anybody can enter information to register to vote. He states, “All you have to do is click a box and say that you're not lying,” after which you’ll receive an email from the secretary of state or something in the mail saying, “thank you for registering to vote,” and there you are. Once you're on the voter rolls, anytime an election comes around, “guess what? You get mailed a ballot. Right? You get mailed something to vote.” He concludes by noting, “So we found that a little bit problema.”

The speaker describes a situation in which registration and voting can occur even when a person does not live in the country, citing an example involving a brother in Pakistan to illustrate the point. According to the speaker, there is evidence of two or three other people who are outside the country voting, as well as people residing outside of the district. This is presented as a factual observation about who has voted, including individuals located abroad and not within the local district boundaries. The speaker then critiques the online voter registration system by characterizing it as an honor system. The claim is that anybody can enter information into the online system to register and vote, relying on the promise of truthfulness. The process alleged by the speaker is described as follows: a person would place information into the system and then simply click a box stating that they are not lying about the information provided. After doing so, the person would receive an email from the secretary of state or a similar official channel in the mail, indicating acknowledgment or thanks for registering to vote, effectively confirming their registration. Following this registration, the speaker notes a procedural consequence: once an individual is on the voter rolls, they are mailed a ballot for each election. In other words, the pattern described is that being on the voter rolls automatically leads to receiving a mailed ballot for every election that occurs, according to the speaker’s account of how the system operates. The speaker emphasizes a continuity of this process across elections, implying that the mailed ballot would be a recurring consequence of enrollment on the voter rolls. Throughout the account, there is an emphasis on what the speaker views as the potential vulnerability or problematic nature of the system. The speaker asserts that the combination of an online registration process that relies on an honor system, the possibility of registering with false or unverified information, and the automatic mailing of ballots to those on the rolls creates a situation that the speaker finds problematic. The overall narrative connects the initial observations about individuals voting from abroad and outside the district to a broader critique of the online registration and ballot distribution processes, underscoring concerns about eligibility verification and the integrity of the voting system as described by the speaker.

We compared the voter rolls to identify people who had moved but still voted by mail. We excluded cases where someone with the same last name still lived at the address. This led us to find 23,344 individuals who voted from addresses they no longer resided at. Mail-in ballots cannot be forwarded, so the only legal way for this to happen is if the voter knows the current resident and arranges to pick up their ballot.

The Democratic party needs a new electorate to maintain and expand power, and foreigners will choose US leaders, including in the 2024 election. According to Catherine Engelbrecht, a provision in the US code makes it legal for illegal aliens to vote in federal elections if they believe they are citizens. True the Vote has been concerned about the lack of availability to determine citizenship status. Many videos show people crossing the border who are excited to vote for Joe Biden and claim they are citizens. Title 18 of the criminal code states that non-citizens can vote without penalty if they believe themselves to be US citizens at the time of voting. Engelbrecht is concerned about the mass mail of ballots, unmonitored drop boxes, and third-party election workers. The ballots are anonymous, so once cast, there is no way to trace them back to the voter. It is critical to have a national discussion about this issue.

The Democratic party needs a new electorate to maintain and expand power, and foreigners will choose US leaders, including in the 2024 election. According to Catherine Engelbrecht, a provision in the US code makes it legal for illegal aliens to vote in federal elections if they believe they are citizens. True the Vote has been concerned about the lack of availability to determine citizenship status. Many videos show people crossing the border who are excited to vote for Joe Biden and claim they are citizens. Title 18 of the criminal code states that non-citizens can vote without penalty if they believe themselves to be US citizens at the time of voting. Engelbrecht is concerned that the mass mail of ballots, unmonitored drop boxes, and third-party election workers will lead to lawlessness. Ballots are anonymous, so once cast, there is no way to trace them back to the voter. It is critical to have a national discussion about this issue.

The Democratic party needs a new electorate to maintain and expand power, and foreigners will choose US leaders, including in the 2024 election. According to Catherine Engelbrecht, a provision in the US code makes it legal for illegal aliens to vote in federal elections if they believe they are citizens. True the Vote has been concerned about the lack of availability to determine citizenship status. Many videos show people crossing the border who are excited to vote for Joe Biden and claim they are citizens. Title 18 of the criminal code states that non-citizens can vote without penalty if they believe themselves to be US citizens at the time of voting. Engelbrecht is concerned about the mass mail of ballots, unmonitored drop boxes, and third-party election workers. The ballots are anonymous, so there's no way to pull back a vote once it has been cast. It is critical to have a national discussion about this issue.

I was surprised to learn that there was no signature verification done for the ballots. I questioned how ballots without signatures were handled, and the response was they were just sent back out. This made me uncomfortable certifying the results.

Voting illegally happens frequently, despite penalties. In California, registering to vote online doesn't require ID. The DMV is registering people to vote, even illegal immigrants, with immunity from prosecution. Safeguards against voter fraud are lacking.

42,000 people in Nevada voted multiple times, including 1,500 deceased individuals, 19,000 who didn't reside in Nevada, and 8,000 from nonexistent addresses. Additionally, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. In our state, we prosecute individuals for voting twice, which occurs about 50 times a year. Of the 130,000 instances of potential voter fraud identified in Nevada's 2020 election, there have been no prosecutions yet. It's crucial to enforce voter integrity laws. While building a fraud case can take time, an honest investigation should lead to charges. Losing the principle of one person, one vote risks authoritarianism.

Voting in America is conducted by private companies contracted by the county. However, there are no national security standards for these companies, making it easy to change votes without leaving a trace. Additionally, the votes from Texas and 28 other states are sent to a server in Frankfurt, Germany, owned by a multinational company based in Barcelona, Spain, which controls and reports the votes.

In California and New York, it is illegal to ask for or show ID when people vote. According to the speakers, there is no logical reason for this law other than to facilitate election fraud. To commit fraud, one would eliminate the need for ID and allow mail-in ballots.

Up to 13 states' Board of Elections voter registration roles are coded with secret algorithms that allow for hidden, unreal votes. This coding system is like a national security coding system. In Ohio, there is a mathematical formula embedded within the state board of election voter role that permits someone within the board of election to vote as many mail-in votes as they want to rig and steal an election without it being known. The speaker is in Ohio demanding a proof of concept.