reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The talk discusses a 58-page document from Australia's therapeutic goods administration, revealing widespread distribution of lipid nanoparticles from the Pfizer vaccine. The nanoparticles were found in various organs, including the liver, ovaries, and bone marrow. Despite concerns about potential inflammatory reactions, the expression of spike protein was not studied. The document questions why the vaccine was approved without this crucial information. The data was available before vaccine authorization, raising doubts about the decision-making process.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all batches were from Pfizer and had varying mortality rates. The speaker mentioned that the expected mortality rate is 0.75, but these batches had much higher rates. They clarified that the batches included people of all ages and were not specific to any age group. The speaker highlighted batch number 1 with a 21% mortality rate and batch number 71 with a 4% rate. They concluded that the chances of these batches not being a killer are extremely low, with a statistician explaining that it would require dropping 100 billion people to obtain these statistics.

Some batches of the vaccine may have serious side effects or be degraded. The batch number can be checked to see what to expect. Documentation shows that certain batches have more serious adverse effects. Even the best batches from Pfizer and Moderna had a high rate of serious adverse events in the short term, around 1800.

Speaker 0 asked about a report and how concerning it is, questioning whether “10” is the real number. Speaker 1 said the main concern is that the report “dramatically understates the problem.” They argued that analyses rely on doctors and that it was difficult to obtain autopsies during the pandemic. Speaker 1 stated that medical professors did not want to know, resulting in very few autopsies. They said NIH, CDC, and FDA reviewed 96 autopsies of children and identified about 10 cases they considered possible or probable. Speaker 1 then pointed to VAERS, stating there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They said that of the 39,000 deaths, 24% occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. They acknowledged FDA officials say VAERS does not prove causation, but said that if someone was perfectly healthy and died on that day or within one or two days, they would assign blame. Speaker 1 also said there may be cases where people were already in bad health and vaccination “tipped them over,” with death ultimately caused by something else. Speaker 1’s “bigger revelation” was described as information they said was not covered by mainstream media. They stated that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks, head of CBR within FDA, was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS safety would hide and mask safety signals. Speaker 1 said that 26 days later, Marks ran a new algorithm that unmasked 49 cases of extreme masking and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. Speaker 1 said that in the next three months, similar data runs with the new algorithm showed more safety signals and more types of sudden death. They said the report described not “pin[ning] a badge” on doctor Anna Scharzman (identified as the dad of Speaker 1’s expert), ordering her to cease and desist, and continuing to use the algorithm the briefing warned would hide safety signals “to this day.” Speaker 1 said Peter Marks later went to work for Eli Lilly and claimed that the world is in denial. They stated they could not get the story broadcast or interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MS Now, or CNN, and said they challenged Jake Tapper, sending the report and requesting an additional appearance.

Over 1.6 million adverse event reports have been filed to VAERS for COVID-19 vaccines, with a significant increase in 2021. The underreporting factor is estimated to be around 31 for severe events like hospitalizations and death. The speaker believes the mRNA platform was used to gather data for future gene therapy applications.

The presentation examines the pattern of deployment of toxic vaccine batches using the VAERS dataset. It notes that the Covid vaccine was deployed in batches or lots, each with a number, and the batches are listed in VAERS in the order they were created, with adverse reactions recorded for each batch. A graph was produced with adverse reactions on the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time on the horizontal axis, showing patterns of deployment in 2021. Each dot represents a batch, and the speaker highlights that about 95% of batches lie close to the x-axis, forming a thick line, with 80% of all batches generating only one or two adverse reaction reports and thus considered harmless. In contrast, the “clouds” and spikes above the x-axis represent toxic batches, with all such dots categorized as toxic. The breakdown given is: - 5% of all batches belong to these clouds and spikes. - The truly toxic batches generate 1,000 to 5,000 adverse reaction reports and are found above a red line, causing harm across every state in the USA where deployed. - These very toxic batches comprise about 0.65% of all batches (roughly one in 200). Total batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in VAERS: 28,330. Eighty percent are harmless (1–2 reports) within the x-axis line; the remaining 20% are more toxic, with the most extreme range up to 5,000 reports. Lesson two asks: “Who did it?” It identifies three companies appearing in VAERS: Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson). By filtering VAERS data in Excel, the speaker presents the contributions of each company to the toxic-batch deployment. In the full picture, Moderna accounts for every batch in the first half of the chart except two spikes pre- and post- Moderna, which are attributed to Janssen. Pfizer’s results (from their batches) match the latter half of the chart exactly, suggesting Pfizer appeared to have taken over supply for every USA batch in the latter portion. The deployment is described as carefully compartmentalized, with phases where Janssen, then Moderna, then Janssen again, and then Pfizer dominate in sequence, followed by Moderna exiting and Pfizer continuing. Lesson three describes the purpose behind Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches: Moderna appears to randomly distribute toxic batches, with the intention of harm, possibly to induce fear of a pandemic and justify stronger policies. Janssen’s initial spike is interpreted as a test before Moderna’s deployment. Pfizer is described as carrying out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording effects, and acting as the only company administering batches at that stage to avoid interference from others. Lesson four details the fine art of lethal dosage testing. Pfizer’s deployment is shown as highly clustered in time, forming distinct periods of toxic batches separated by intervals of harmless batches. Toxic batches cluster in discrete ranges (e.g., 3,000–2,500; 2,000–1,500; 1,500–1,000), with abrupt transitions between clusters and harmless periods. Toxicity ranges are not random but follow a stepwise, linear decline across clusters. The speaker concludes that Pfizer deployed highly toxic batches for discrete dosage testing across all states, implying thousands of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths. The presentation ends by contrasting that 80% of batches are harmless, while a minority exhibit wide toxicity ranges, with claims of systematic, non-random deployment designed for testing, and notes an ironic statement about American exposure to what is described as German-led testing.

The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system in New Zealand. They noticed discrepancies in the data, specifically deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They analyzed the top ten batches with high death counts and found that Pfizer's batch number 1 had a 21% death rate. They also examined the vaccinators and discovered that some had higher mortality rates than others. The speaker questions what is being injected into people's bodies and highlights the increase in deaths in New Zealand, even after COVID. They emphasize that these findings are based on government data and raise concerns about the vaccine's effectiveness.

I am Max Melling, the statistician behind this study, with Viveke as the medical expert. The main result of our study is shown on the screen. It displays the number of adverse effects in each vaccine batch, based on official Danish data created for the study. Some batches are small, while others are large. Normally, a good vaccine would show a nearly perfect line, while a very bad vaccine would have scattered points. However, we observe three almost perfect lines, which is unexpected and suggests a problem with the product. Participants were unable to give informed consent due to the unknown risks. This is a concerning safety signal that requires further investigation.

The speaker analyzed data on the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They created a chart showing the batch ID, number of vaccinated individuals, and the number of deaths. The speaker confirmed that all batches discussed were from Pfizer. They specifically mentioned batch number 1, where 711 individuals were vaccinated and 152 of them died, resulting in a 21% mortality rate.

The Dutch paper reveals a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the Pfizer vaccine group compared to the placebo. Despite this, the public was misled about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Adverse reactions like stroke and heart attack were downplayed, making it difficult to link them to the vaccines. The truth is slowly coming to light, exposing the deception by big pharma, governments, and the media. Those responsible may face consequences in the future.

There are four studies indicating significant lot variability in certain batches. Early 2021 batches appeared to be the most dangerous. Some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while others have almost none, essentially being "duds," possibly due to degraded mRNA or manufacturing issues. Some batches decimated people and may be contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids, mRNA, or even heavy metals. No batch appeared to be the same.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. The mortality rates ranged from 21% to 4%. The speaker explained that these batches included people from all age groups and vaccination centers, so it wasn't specific to one age group. They mentioned that the chances of these results occurring naturally by chance are extremely low, indicating that the vaccine may be causing deaths. They estimated that to obtain these statistics, they would have had to vaccinate 100 billion people, while they currently have data for 2.2 million individuals.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. The mortality rates ranged from 21% to 4%. The speaker explained that these batches included people from all age groups and vaccination centers, so it wasn't specific to one age group. They stated that the chances of these results occurring naturally by chance are extremely low, suggesting that the vaccine may be causing deaths. They estimated that to obtain these statistics, they would have had to vaccinate 100 billion people, while they have only vaccinated 2.2 million.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all batches were from Pfizer and had varying mortality rates. The speaker mentioned that the normal mortality rate is 0.75%, while the batches ranged from 4% to 21%. They clarified that the batches included all age groups and were not specific to one age group. The speaker highlighted that the chances of these batches not being a killer were extremely low, with odds of 100 billion to 1. They emphasized that statistically, there is no chance that the vaccine is not causing deaths.

Speaker 0 asks about a report and how concerning it is, suggesting that if the reported figure is 10, there is a “real number” that could be higher. Speaker 1 says the main concern is that the analysis “dramatically understates the problem.” They describe the difficulty of getting autopsies during the pandemic and say medical professors didn’t want to perform them, resulting in very few autopsies. They state that NIH/CDC/FDA reviewed 96 pediatric autopsies and concluded about 10 were possible or probable. Speaker 1 then argues that safety signals were “screaming,” and points to VAERS. They claim there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They say 24% of the 39,000 deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. Speaker 1 also references the point that VAERS doesn’t prove causation, while stating that if a person who was “perfectly healthy” died that day or within one or two days, they would “be blaming” the jab. They add that in some cases people may have been in bad health already, with death tipped over by another cause. Speaker 1 says the “bigger revelation,” which they claim was unveiled three weeks ago and is “still not being covered by the mainstream media,” involves FDA’s VAERS algorithm. They state that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks (head of CBER/FDA’s division approving vaccines and surveilling post-approval safety) was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS would “hide and mask safety signals.” They say that 26 days later, a new algorithm unmasked safety signals, producing 49 cases of extreme masking revealed and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. They claim that similar data runs over the next three months showed more safety signals and more sudden death. Speaker 1 further claims that FDA did not “pin a badge” on Anna Scharzman, referred to as the father of their expert, and instead “shunned her off to the side,” ordered her to cease and desist, and decided to use the algorithm they had been warned would hide safety signals, which they say is still being used. Speaker 1 states that Peter Marks left for Eli Lilly and claims “the entire world” is in denial. They say they have been unable to broadcast the story or get interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, or CNN, and that they challenged Jake Tapper, who they say agreed to read the report but has not invited them back yet.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.

Speaker 0: A brand new peer reviewed study from Switzerland reports that a staggering one in thirty five recipients of the Moderna booster shot experienced vaccine associated heart injury. One in thirty five people who took the shot experienced damage to the heart. The study unpacked the details starting with the hypothesis the researchers were trying to investigate. Going into the study, the researchers, quote, posited that the incidence of vaccine associated heart injury was more prevalent than previously thought following mRNA booster vaccination because of a lack of symptoms or mild symptoms. Essentially, their hypothesis going into the study was that after getting an mRNA booster shot, a lot more people were experiencing vaccine related heart damage than previously thought. And the reason for this was because people's hearts were getting damaged in a way where either there were no symptoms on the surface or the symptoms were mild enough for people to ignore. Meaning that the heart was actually injured, but the recipient of the booster shot was simply unaware. What these researchers did was that instead of just asking people how they felt after vaccination, they actually went in and they tested their blood. In terms of what they were testing for, quote, the researchers defined heart injury as a sharp increase in high sensitivity cardiac treponin T on the third day after vaccination without evidence of an alternative cause. The levels of cardiac treponin had to hit the upper limit of normal, 8.9 nanograms per liter in women and 15.5 nanograms per liter in men. The reason that these researchers decided to use what's known as a treponin test is because it is a very good indicator of whether or not there was damage to the heart. If a person has more of this protein called treponin T in the bloodstream, it means that recently they've experienced damage to the heart.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which may have been changed during production or transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The Vice President of Pfizer admitted to building the plane while flying, and we have shown that one wing has fallen off. There is a safety issue that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and national institutions should have addressed and informed the public about. Our study also suggests a potential link between certain cancers and different vaccine batches. We have observed increased mortality rates in European countries since May 21st. The EMA should have reacted to these findings and halted vaccinations or at least withdrawn the problematic batches. As a concerned citizen and doctor, I expected more action from the EMA. Thank you.

There are four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. The early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. Some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly. Thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which were later changed, possibly due to Pfizer altering the product or during transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The study also reveals a safety issue that both Pfizer and regulatory institutions should have addressed. Pfizer had already informed the European Medicines Agency (EMA) about the safety problem in August 2021. Our data from Sweden indicates that this is a European issue, not just a Danish one. We are concerned about long-term side effects and their potential links to cancer and increased mortality rates. The EMA should have taken action based on the data and informed the public. The vice-president of Pfizer's statement about building the plane while flying is apt, as we have shown that one wing has fallen off.

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.

Approximately 15% of people are injured by COVID-19 vaccines, with around 2.5% experiencing heart damage. The pharmaceutical industry suggests that not all vaccine vials are the same. It has been discovered that 80% of deaths from Pfizer vaccines come from 30% of the lots, while 80% of deaths from Moderna vaccines come from 20% of the lots. These lots may have varying concentrations of genetic material and contaminants, affecting their quality. This issue is currently receiving significant attention.

The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. Batch number 1 had 711 vaccinated and 152 deaths, resulting in a 21% mortality rate. The expected mortality rate is 0.75%. These batches included all age groups, not specific to one age group. Other batches in the top 10 had mortality rates of 17%, 15%, and 4%. The speaker concludes that the chances of these batches not being a killer are extremely low, with odds of $100,000,000,000 to 1.

These batches are different. So yep. So so many people, nobody even really got the same product. The quality control was so bad. Some people got a tiny dose of the mRNA. Some people got a massive dose depending on the batch. And you can check your batch at howbadismybatch.com, which uses the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, and it'll tell you how many people died from this batch, how many reports of blood clots were there from my batch? So that's an important tool you can use to see, what the possible risks you you you might face, regarding your injection.