reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In my 30 years as a prosecutor, judge, and DA, I have never seen a witness torn apart like Michael Cohen. He lies constantly, including to congress, judges, and in court. Cohen claimed to have resolved an issue with Trump in 2016, but evidence showed otherwise. This case is a circus led by a liar. A judge should dismiss it before going to a jury.

The speaker questions the witness about the FBI's history of violating people's rights, including fraud in forensic testimony, improper searches of US officials, and spying on activists. The witness claims to be unaware of these incidents and dismisses them as irrelevant. The speaker argues that the witness's initial reaction to the allegations against the FBI was biased and asks if she could have investigated the matter further. The witness defends her belief in a broad conspiracy involving multiple agencies but admits to not conducting any investigation.

The FBI staged a photo of classified documents at Mar a Lago, admitting to mishandling and misrepresenting evidence in court. The lead prosecutor acknowledged tampering with evidence and lying about it, offering no explanation. Meetings with White House counsel and National Archives representatives prior to the case raise suspicions of foul play similar to Crossfire Hurricane. The judge may dismiss the case due to unfair prosecution by the Biden administration.

In December 2020, federal agents approached Jeremy Brown to be an informant, but he exposed them instead. He later got arrested, and his legal team is presenting evidence that the grenades and national defense documents found in his home were planted by the agents. The agents turned off all recording devices during the search, and none of them had body cameras. DNA tests on the grenades did not match Jeremy's DNA, and a dog hair and carpet fiber found on the grenades did not match his dogs or carpet. Criminal counts found on a CD were proven to not be in Jeremy's possession. The government is now targeting people who were in Washington DC on January 6th. Jeremy is fighting for his freedom.

The speaker claims the famous photograph of classified documents was staged and the documents were placed by the FBI. According to the speaker, Jack Smith admitted in court to mishandling the classified documents and misrepresenting them to the court, which the speaker equates to evidence tampering and lying to the court. The speaker asserts that Trump's lawyers caught the discrepancy between the documents presented and the digitally scanned records. Smith allegedly admitted he doesn't know how the tampering happened and has blown the chain of custody. The speaker also alleges that lead prosecutor Jay Bratt met with White House counsel and a representative of the National Archives before Smith's appointment. The speaker compares this situation to Crossfire Hurricane, claiming the Obama-Biden administration fabricated evidence and lied to the court to pursue Donald Trump. The speaker believes the judge hasn't dismissed the case yet because she wants to document it publicly.

In the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case, the media portrayed it as extremist right wing groups plotting against the governor. However, it was revealed in court that the FBI had paid an informant to assemble a group for prosecution. Despite their efforts, the informant failed to find willing participants. It was discovered that out of the 18 people recruited, 12 were actually working for the FBI. While not all of the FBI may be involved in such activities, it is important for us as citizens to expose and hold the corrupt accountable. We should question the reality created by the media and think for ourselves.

New information has emerged regarding internal FBI messages related to January 6th. The messages reveal a demand to edit confidential human source reports and remove agent participation. In a recent court filing, it was disclosed that FBI special agent Nicole Miller compiled her messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was produced to the US attorney's office. However, a closer examination of the spreadsheet uncovered over 1,000 hidden rows of messages. The documents also show an agent requesting Miller to edit out their presence in a CHS informant report. Additionally, there is mention of an FBI boss assigning the destruction of 338 items of evidence. These revelations suggest that the FBI was present during the January 6th events, infiltrating groups and inciting violence.

The speaker points out that the indictment in question includes pictures of boxes filled with classified documents, but in reality, only 102 classified documents were recovered by the FBI. The speaker emphasizes that one box, containing 600 pages, is not representative of the large number of boxes shown in the pictures. They question why these pictures were included in the indictment and shown on television, suggesting it was to create the perception that there was a significant amount of classified material involved. The speaker finds this misleading and highlights it as a major issue.

The Secret Service's handling of the cocaine investigation has raised suspicions. Initially, they claimed the cocaine was found in the library, but later said it was in a cubby near the situation room. The Secret Service redacted where the cocaine was first found, which is questionable. The substance was initially identified as opioids and amphetamines, but later confirmed to be cocaine. DNA was found on the baggie, despite the Secret Service initially denying its presence. They have preserved the DNA sample, but may destroy it in the future. The investigation seems muddled and confusing, leading to speculation of a cover-up. The Secret Service's actions and inconsistencies have raised doubts about their handling of the case.

Headline evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's safe went missing after an FBI raid, according to court testimony in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The speaker, a former federal agent, stated that they don't understand how evidence could be lost in such a high-profile case, given the strict protocols for cataloging and securing evidence in an evidence vault. The only time the speaker recalls seeing evidence lost was during 9/11 when the Secret Service office in 7 World Trade Center collapsed. The speaker also addressed an email regarding Epstein, Clinton, and a plane. The speaker stated that a friend who was on a plane with Epstein and Clinton witnessed suspicious activity. The friend has not provided permission to share the full story or specific details, but did allow the speaker to say that the events were "very odd" and bothered him. The speaker claims the friend's credibility is "unimpeachable."

Where is the body of Thomas Matthew Crooks? A report reveals that the FBI quickly cleaned up biological evidence from the crime scene after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. Congressman Clay Higgins, who investigated the scene, found alarming actions by the FBI that raise questions about the investigation's integrity. Notably, the FBI released Crooks' body for cremation just ten days after the incident, without informing local authorities, hindering the verification of autopsy reports. Higgins expressed concerns that without examining the body, the accuracy of the reports cannot be confirmed. This situation, along with the rapid cleanup of evidence, suggests possible obstruction of justice in the investigation.

Speaker 0 raises a series of pointed questions and concerns about FBI and government actions surrounding the monitoring and reporting of online activity and potential threats, urging a demand for answers: - Why did the FBI present only early pro-Trump posts and hide the anti-Trump phase? Two answers are implied: under Biden, the existence of a narrative, and a need to ask who was involved in that decision and why it happened. - After the election, why did the FBI continue to toe that line, and who made that decision? - The speaker notes that authorities are monitoring people who ask how to build bombs or evade assassination scenes, and asks how such monitoring relates to successful assassinations and the future locations of political actors; suggests an algorithmic tie and notification so someone is watching. - Why did they ignore Crooks’s really unbelievable threats? Why were ordinary Americans arrested for memes, while Crooks’s behavior appeared to be ignored? - Why did intelligence agencies monitoring extremism miss a kid openly fantasizing about assassinations, who connected with a Swedish individual allegedly part of a large Nazi movement in Sweden? - Why was the scene cleaned prematurely? Why did every digital trace of his political shift get kept out of public discussion? Why did authorities claim he had almost no footprint when, in fact, the footprint seemed large but scrubbed? - The speaker notes a pattern: every single mistake by the FBI and government seems to point toward ignorance, negligence, hiding inconvenient data, and shaping a political narrative; questions whether the pattern indicates incompetence or intentional action. - Is this incompetence or something more problematic? The speaker says they aren’t asserting a conspiracy but emphasize something feels wrong and that the official story is hard to believe. They ask why the government that supposedly monitors everything would become blind, deaf, and mute when a presidential assassin emerges on their radar. - The question is posed non-partisan: under different presidents, why would the narrative stay the same if the government can see everything? What does that imply about the FBI, DOJ, and CIA—whether they are lying, incompetent, or selectively monitoring—since any of these possibilities should be unsettling. - The FBI and mainstream media, including MSNBC, are said to have referenced leaks from Crooks’s social media indicating pro-Trump and anti-immigration stances, while being described as having almost no online footprint; Crooks reportedly had Discord, Snapchat, and an active YouTube presence, with violent 2019 YouTube comments about decapitating government officials, followed by a shift. - The speaker asserts the iceberg is deep and suggests a broader pattern of concerns about oversight, control, and the potential overreach or misalignment of intelligence agencies, with a friend claiming the CIA may be completely out of control and implying limits to accountability, while noting it could extend beyond the CIA. Overall, the remarks center on questioning the completeness, transparency, and motivation behind FBI monitoring, narrative shaping, data handling, and the handling of Crooks’s threats and online footprint, while expressing concern about systemic issues within intelligence agencies.

Trump's judge, Eileen Cannon, released unredacted court filings showing coordination between the White House, DOJ, and National Archives in indicting Trump. Documents reveal the GSA demanded Trump's team retrieve boxes of documents, possibly containing classified info, from DC. Biden's White House, DOJ, and National Archives may be conspiring to charge Trump for keeping classified material. Jack Smith tried to hide this info. Biden, accused of mishandling classified info, mocked Trump's legal issues. Biden's administration met with National Archives and DOJ to prosecute Trump shortly after he left office.

Last night, it was revealed that Tony Blinken played a significant role in orchestrating a plan involving 51 intelligence operatives. Their objective was to discredit a laptop that is widely known to be genuine. All evidence points to Blinken as the mastermind behind this scheme. It is crucial that he is questioned and held accountable for his actions.

The speaker claims the famous photograph of classified documents was staged and the documents were placed by the FBI. According to the speaker, Jack Smith admitted in court to mishandling the classified documents and misrepresenting them to the court, which the speaker equates to evidence tampering and lying to the court. The speaker alleges that Trump's lawyers caught the discrepancy between the documents presented and the digitally scanned records. Smith admitted he doesn't know how the tampering happened, allegedly blowing the chain of custody. The speaker also points to prosecutor Jay Bratt's meetings with White House counsel and the National Archives before Smith's appointment. The speaker compares this situation to Crossfire Hurricane, claiming the Obama-Biden administration fabricated evidence and lied to the FISA court to pursue Trump. The speaker suggests the judge in the classified documents case could dismiss it but is waiting to document the situation publicly.

The case against Trump involving classified documents is over. The FBI turned off body cameras at Mar a Lago, brought fake cover sheets, and illegally appointed Jack Smith as special counsel. These actions make a trial impossible.

Headline evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's safe went missing after an FBI raid, according to court testimony in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The speaker, a former federal agent, expresses disbelief, citing their extensive experience processing evidence. They detail the meticulous evidence handling procedures: tagging, photographing, cataloging, sealing in tamper-proof envelopes, and storing in a secure evidence vault with strict sign-in/sign-out protocols. The speaker questions how evidence could be lost in such a high-profile case, implying potential foul play. The only time the speaker has witnessed significant evidence loss was during the collapse of 7 World Trade Center on 9/11. The speaker also acknowledges receiving an email referencing a past discussion about Epstein, Clinton, and a plane.

The speaker claims there is more evidence that was doctored than what was previously disclosed, asserting that they uncovered additional manipulations and suggesting this may come out in the future. Despite winning the case, the speaker accuseS house managers of unconscionable conduct and due process violations affecting the defendant, and says the media should scrutinize this conduct as well. The speaker criticizes media coverage for being biased, stating that different stations show opposite weather forecasts at the same time and calling for reporting to be more like PBS rather than a TV news show with no journalistic integrity. They allege that prosecutors or government officials doctored evidence and that the media have not held them accountable. Specific allegations include a Twitter check-in with a date changed by a year to connect it to the case, which the speaker says is not a minor issue. They also claim that a check mark was added to make something appear as a validated account when it was not, and that there was no explanation given when this was uncovered. The speaker emphasizes that the described actions are not acceptable for prosecutors or government officials, and insists that the media should not let such conduct go unchallenged. They express frustration with what they view as biased media coverage.

I spoke with some of the individuals who were photographed holding "Epstein Files" binders at the White House. It seems it was a PR stunt; the individuals were invited for a meet and greet and were unexpectedly handed these binders with an embargo. The photos emerged likely due to the White House's layout and the influencers' visibility to the press, creating a media storm timed with a letter release. The letter, addressed from the Attorney General to Kash Patel, seems designed for public notification, highlighting the AG's anger at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the FBI field office for allegedly withholding Epstein documents. I believe SDNY is corrupt and defying the Attorney General's orders. This maneuver aims to create public scrutiny, supporting potential actions against the rogue office, preventing evidence destruction, and allowing Cash Patel to investigate. Some believe it's a setup to scapegoat SDNY when the Epstein documents aren't released, blaming a random employee for destroying them.

Prosecutors are accused of tampering with evidence by changing document sequences from Mar a Lago. The attorney general denies this claim, stating it is an ongoing dispute in court. Jack Smith admitted mishandling documents in a court filing, leading to questions about his role as special counsel. The attorney general defers to the court for resolution. The case is now stalled due to errors made.

Fabricated evidence was used and the courts were lied to, to ensure a certain outcome, which should never happen again. The details of the report are worse than imagined. Without a certain important move, things would have been even worse, and they might have succeeded. This was an attempted overthrow of government, and many people were involved. They got caught red handed. The Durham report is coming out soon, and it contains this information, plus more. It's incredible this was caught. This is one of the great achievements because what was found should never happen again.

Authorities claim the shooter's body on the building's roof was staged to look like he shot Trump, but new footage proves otherwise. The video shows the body far left, not close to the ridge as previously portrayed. The New York Times quietly released a documentary shifting the body's position to cover up the shooting angle. The shooter had no clear shot from the building, contradicting the government's narrative of a direct line of sight on Trump's podium. No official explanation has been given for the conflicting angles presented.

The speaker discusses how a story about Donald Trump grabbing a Secret Service agent's neck was fabricated. The driver and others present that day denied it happened. The committee ignored evidence contradicting the narrative they wanted to push. Destroyed material likely went against their agenda. Liz Cheney is the prominent figure in this committee. Translation: The speaker talks about a false story involving Donald Trump and a Secret Service agent. Evidence disproving the story was ignored. Destroyed material likely contradicted their agenda. Liz Cheney is a key figure in this committee.