reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I was denied entry into the US Embassy in Belize, despite being an American citizen. The highest authority, Hillary Clinton, had ordered it. I had donated laptop computers with spyware to government secretaries after they raided my property and mistreated me. I gained control over the government computer system and discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the Ministry of Immigration in human trafficking. It became dangerous for me, so I left John McAfee's compound.

Svetlana Lekova, described as an encyclopedia on accountability, has spent about ten years studying the subject and working with the Durham investigation. She says she has read every document, every note in every annex, including documents that were declassified by President Trump, then reclassified by Joe Biden after he “stole the election,” and then declassified again by Trump when he came into office. She rejects the claim that President Trump gave her classified documents. Despite ongoing accusations, she notes that they have not stopped pursuing her and she has not stopped fighting. Lekova requests the audience to consider the Florida case she views as significant and to explain what it is about. She asserts that accountability is finally, hopefully, happening, but she remains cautious because of what she has seen in other high-profile cases, such as Jim Comey, where she believes the judiciary, juries, and prosecutors have been compromised. After ten years of involvement with the Durham investigation, she had been told there would be prosecutions. She recalls that prosecutors had Hillary Clinton under oath and John Brennan under oath, and that it was a criminal investigation. Then, according to her, it “disappeared,” and nothing happened. Lekova describes a sequence where authorities raided the president’s home, and he was “almost assassinated,” with attempts to jail him. She says the result appeared to be that not only would the “bad guys” not go to jail, but the “good guy” trying to bring them to account would end up jailed for the rest of his life, at least in their perception of the situation. She notes that President Trump, through what she calls “amazing” grace, managed to come back and that “you guys somehow managed to vote him in” in such large numbers that there was no alternative for the election. She asserts that the first thing he did upon returning was to promise accountability. Speaker 0 clarifies the context by noting that the Florida case is “so significant” and asks Lekova to describe what it is really about. Speaker 1 reiterates that accountability is being pursued, acknowledging historical concerns about the judicial system, including the perception of brainwashed juries and corrupt prosecutors, and explains that, after a long period of inertia in the justice process, President Trump’s reelection framed the possibility of accountability and that he, as president, has the responsibility to hold the bad guys accountable because he is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States.

After a 2012 raid on his property where his dog was shot and property was destroyed over a bogus charge, the speaker donated laptops preloaded with viral spyware to government secretaries. Within a week, he claims to have gained control of the entire government computer system, monitoring their activity. He was looking for information related to the raid. Instead, he says he discovered that the Minister of National Defense was the largest drug trafficker in Central America and the Minister of Immigration was the largest human trafficker.

I hoped Trump would be president because the alternative was unappealing. When I was in Belize, I had connections in the U.S. embassy and knew trouble was coming. The head of security informed me that I wouldn’t be allowed entry, as directed by the highest authority, Hillary Clinton. Despite being an American citizen with no crimes, I felt justified in not voting for her. After a raid on my property in 2012, where they destroyed my belongings and harmed my dog, I became angry. I donated laptops with spyware to government officials, allowing me to monitor their activities. I discovered that the Minister of National Defense was heavily involved in drug trafficking and the Minister of Immigration was linked to human trafficking.

I had arranged to enter the US Embassy but was denied by the head of security, claiming it was from the highest authority, Hillary Clinton. As an American citizen, I was frustrated and felt unwanted in America. I went on the run for a month and a half because the government wanted to arrest me after raiding my property in 2012. In retaliation, I donated laptops with spyware to government secretaries, gaining control over their computer system. While searching for evidence of their setup, I discovered that the Minister of National Defense was a major drug trafficker and the Minister of Immigration was involved in human trafficking. We didn't want to get killed, so we'll likely avoid confrontation.

Speaker 0 describes having friends in the US embassy in Belize and knowing what was coming. He says he arranged with the head of security to enter the embassy, but the head of security told him, “we have it from the highest authority. We are not to allow you entry into the US embassy. Understand me.” He asserts, “Who was the highest authority in the state department? Hillary Clinton.” He emphasizes that he is an American citizen with “a fucking American passport,” stating, “I'm sorry. I'm not wanted in America. I've got no crimes in America. Is it not reason to say, I don't think I'm gonna vote for you?” Speaker 1 notes, “And yet you're here now.” Speaker 0 explains that for a month and a half he was on the run. He claims the government wanted to collect him because, after they raided his property in 2012 in the jungle, they shot his dog, abused him, and destroyed “a half million dollars worth of my property over a bogus charge.” He says he was pissed off and then “donated too many secretaries within the government laptop computers, really nice ones that were preloaded with viral spyware.” He contends that within a week, “the entire government computer system was in under my control. I was watching, monitoring, listening.” He continues that he was looking for information that they had set him up for that raid, and he didn’t find that. Instead, he discovered that “the minister of national defense was the largest drug trafficker in all of Central America, and the minister of immigration, the largest human trafficker.” Speaker 1 responds, “We don't wanna get killed by them either, so we're probably not—” and Speaker 0 agrees, “You're not gonna,” adding, “That's fine.”

The speaker discusses their belief in Trump becoming president and their preference for him over the alternative. They mention their experience with the US Embassy in Belize and their belief that Hillary Clinton was the highest authority in the State Department. The speaker explains their reasons for going on the run, including being mistreated by the government and donating laptops with spyware. They also mention discovering information about drug and human trafficking within the government. The speaker concludes by expressing their fear of retaliation and their decision not to disclose further details.

Speaker 0 explains why they hoped Trump would become president, as the alternative was unappealing. They reveal that when they were on the run in Belize, they were not allowed entry into the US embassy, with the highest authority being Hillary Clinton. Speaker 0 shares their frustration over being targeted by the government and how they retaliated by donating laptops loaded with Spyware to government officials. They discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration in human trafficking. Speaker 1 acknowledges the danger and they decide to leave John McAfee's compound.

I was denied entry into the US Embassy in Belize by the head of security, who claimed it was on orders from Hillary Clinton. Despite being an American citizen with no criminal record, I felt betrayed. I went into hiding for a month and a half because the government wanted to apprehend me for donating laptops loaded with spyware to government officials. I discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration was involved in human trafficking. It was a dangerous situation.

In this video, the speaker talks about his experience being on the run in Belize. He mentions having friends in the US embassy but was denied entry by the highest authority, Hillary Clinton. Despite being an American citizen with no crimes in America, he was not allowed in. The speaker explains that he was wanted by the government because they raided his property and he retaliated by donating laptops with spyware to government secretaries. He discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration was involved in human trafficking. The speaker concludes by saying they don't want to get killed by them either.

Speaker 0 describes a situation where the Canadian government reportedly went onto a private property and rounded up 300 ostriches, killing them. He claims the birds lived mostly under 30 years old and that they slaughtered them for no reason, labeling them dangerous. He asserts the danger lies in their eggs and the antibodies in the eggs, noting that research began when it was realized ostrich eggs could literally cure coronavirus and that a family offered their ostriches for study, hoping the eggs could help humanity. He states the eggs were found to be powerful, capable of curing cancer and tumors, challenging big pharma profits, and suggests there is deliberate obstruction to prevent enough research or widespread cure discovery so people remain reliant on big pharma. Speaker 1 counters by saying the birds are healthy and that their eggs hold a cure for children and grandparents, claiming the birds are being shot slowly and suffering. He asserts the birds are not killed by gunshot to the head but shot on rails, causing slow death, and he implies this is happening to push people to order ostrich eggs. Speaker 0 continues by alleging a broader conspiracy, saying the ostriches were intended to go extinct along with values people hold dear, and complains about foreign government influence, specifically blaming Israel for alleged domination. He asserts that Israel is the root cause of evil globally and claims Israel has no allegiance to any country, arriving, exploiting hosts, feigning victimhood, and draining resources like a parasite. He argues that in the world, only China, Russia, and Iran have stood up against Western manipulation, claiming they ban U.S. citizens from traveling to their countries without permits or a certified tour guide, and that these countries restrict foreign influence and control their governance. Speaker 0 elaborates that in the United States, foreigners are allowed to come and influence politics, leading to the current subordinate treatment of Americans. He references President Trump as once seen as a savior but now claims Trump is working for “them” and taking away freedoms, asserting he is the antichrist due to actions after the public mandate and multiple terms. He states the Canadian government would not have acted this way under Trump, and asserts that Trump would have prevented such actions. He ends by telling the audience to leave Canada, move their wealth to a country like El Salvador, and offers a blessing to the audience.

The speaker claims to have been approached by federal agents who wanted him to set up Hillary Clinton by arranging an $18 million bribe. He states that he cannot confirm if Clinton took the bribe or not. The agents later told him to forget about the incident. The speaker then explains that President Obama has control over the Department of Justice and plans to manage Clinton during her presidency through a plan called Operation Snow Globe. He suspects that John Brennan is the mastermind behind everything.

The speaker claims to have facilitated an $18 million bribe for Hillary Clinton on behalf of the FBI. They state that Clinton accepted the bribe in January 2016 and that the FBI was involved in setting her up. The speaker also alleges that the FBI later told them to forget about the incident because Clinton was going to win the presidency and anyone involved in investigating her would be destroyed. They further assert that President Obama had a plan to control Clinton during her presidency and that the speaker was part of a coup against her. They claim to have known since October 2018 that the election would be hijacked.

Speaker 0 argued that Maduro was not democratically elected and was not cracking down on drug trafficking to the U.S. and other countries, contrasting this with Honduras’ crackdown on drug trafficking supported by agencies like the DEA and Southcom, which earned praise for the Honduran government. The discussion then turned to U.S. policy. Speaker 0 asked whether the interviewee supports what the Trump administration did, or believes there is a line that should not be crossed. They noted that the U.S. military action against Maduro—bombing the country, entering, capturing Maduro, killing members of his government, and taking him to jail—was seen by some as positive, with Maduro described as a criminal who destroyed the country and economy. Speaker 1 responded by focusing on the human impact in Venezuela and other Latin American countries. They stated that a large portion of the population has suffered, with a notable number of people migrating from Venezuela and Honduras. They asserted that elections in Venezuela were stolen by Maduro’s regime, stating that the opposition’s poll results were stored in the cloud and the government did not want to see them because they knew they would lose. They described this as not democracy. They added that, since Hondurans left the country due to trafficking, vessels by sea and illegal flights were bringing jobs to Honduras, but also causing deaths and bloodshed. They argued that if the Trump administration framed Drug Trafficking as terrorism, it was warranted because the drug flow to the United States harmed not only U.S. citizens but also Honduras, which faced the highest death toll in fifteen years due to drugs coming through its borders, largely from Venezuela, and that nothing was done about this by prior administrations. Speaker 0 then asked for the stance on U.S. intervention in general: should intervention be allowed only in certain cases (e.g., Maduro), or should there be no U.S. intervention in Latin America under any president? Speaker 1 shared a Venezuelan friend’s view that there are no options to change Venezuela and that intervention might be necessary if there is no other way to save Venezuela. From a Honduran perspective, they believed Trump’s actions helped not only Honduras but also other Central American and regional countries along the drug-trafficking routes, by reducing corruption, bloodshed, and deaths. They argued that the political machinery Chavez created and used to stall elections in other Latin American countries had previously gone unchecked by the U.S., and that Trump faced Maduro with a confrontation. They concluded that many people in the world do not know what has been happening in Venezuela and its impact on the region. They stated that Trump confronted Maduro, who now has a chance to defend himself in a trial, and emphasized the issue of sovereignty for every country.

In 2012, the speaker's property was raided by the government, resulting in the destruction of their belongings and the shooting of their dog. Angry about this, the speaker donated laptops with spyware to government secretaries. This allowed them to gain control over the entire government computer system. While monitoring the system, the speaker discovered that the Minister of National Defense was involved in drug trafficking and the Minister of Immigration was involved in human trafficking. The speaker concludes by stating that they don't want to be killed by these individuals.

Speaker 0 says the microphone is too big and vows to bring more voices to amplify Americans worried about being priced out of homeownership. He rails against costs—gas, car maintenance, 401(k) withdrawals, and college expenses—and says he voted for cheap gas, accountability, and mean tweets, but got none. He predicts AI will replace about 90% of jobs. He’s traveled to about 20 countries and would pick Australia, France, or Spain over the U.S.; argues many nations have rotten governments and pay-to-play dynamics. He claims a whistleblower provided a hard drive with offshore accounts tied to a former Guatemalan ambassador and other officials, alleging corruption and protection by people in the White House, and that he gave it to the FBI. He discusses US aid, cartel smuggling, and migrant child trafficking; says Trump claimed things were shut down but they weren’t; calls for accountability and political arrests.

There has been no transition since the speaker won the election. After the speaker won, people came after them trying to do a coup and spying on the campaign. From the day the speaker came down the escalator with the first lady, "they" were a disaster and a disgrace to the country. The speaker claims to have caught them all on tape. The speaker alleges that someone gave the idea for the Logan Act against General Flynn and that President Obama knew about it too. Therefore, there was no free transition.

I hoped Trump would become president because I didn't like the alternative. I can't reveal why, but it seems like you want me to. I had friends at the U.S. Embassy in Belize when I was on the run. They were instructed not to let me in by the highest authority, Hillary Clinton. Despite being an American citizen, I wasn't wanted in America. After the government raided my property, I donated laptops with spyware to government officials. I discovered that the Minister of National Defense was a drug trafficker and the Minister of Immigration was involved in human trafficking. It got too dangerous, so we left.

I believed Trump would win because the alternative was not appealing. I fled to Belize, where I hacked the government's computers to gather information. I discovered corruption within the government, including drug and human trafficking. After being hunted by authorities, I left Belize.

The speaker shares their experience of being targeted by the government after their property was raided and their dog was shot. In response, they donated laptops with spyware to government secretaries, gaining control over the entire government computer system. While monitoring the system, they discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration was involved in human trafficking. The speaker acknowledges the risk of sharing this information and suggests that it is better to remain unaware.

The government raided my property in 2012, so I retaliated by donating laptops with spyware to government secretaries. I took control of the government's computer system to find evidence of their setup, but instead discovered the minister of national defense was a drug trafficker and the minister of immigration was a human trafficker. Despite the danger, I'm okay with not pursuing further action.

Speaker 0 hoped Trump would become president because they found the alternative unappealing. They discuss whether or not to reveal something, but ultimately decide not to. Speaker 0 shares their experience of being on the run in Belize and being denied entry into the US embassy by the State Department, specifically Hillary Clinton. They explain that they were being pursued by the government due to a raid on their property in 2012. In retaliation, Speaker 0 donated laptops with spyware to government officials, gaining control over the entire government computer system. They discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration in human trafficking.

The speaker explains that the government wanted to arrest them after raiding their property and causing damage. In response, the speaker donated laptops with spyware to government secretaries, gaining control over the entire government computer system. They were searching for evidence of being set up but instead discovered that the minister of national defense was involved in drug trafficking and the minister of immigration was involved in human trafficking. The speaker acknowledges the danger of sharing this information and suggests that it is best to keep it undisclosed.

The speaker states they would have prosecuted Hillary Clinton and even offered to do so for Trump, but Trump declined. The speaker believes prosecuting Clinton would have been the "greatest honor" of their life. They claim to believe in justice, not disliking people, and even feeling sorry for some they've jailed. The speaker asserts that the only way to end "all the garbage" is to jail the "bad guys." They believe that jailing the "bad guys" will scare them and make them stop their actions, at least temporarily.

I hoped Trump would be president because the alternative wasn't palatable. I've never said this in the six years since I left Belize. When I was on the run in Belize, someone from the US embassy told me, "I'm going to allow you entry into the US embassy." The highest authority in the State Department was Hillary Clinton, and I'm an American citizen. For a month and a half, I was on the run because after the government raided my property in 2012, shot my dog, abused me, and destroyed $500,000 worth of my property over a bogus charge, I was angry. I donated laptop computers preloaded with viral spyware to many government secretaries. Within a week, I controlled the entire government computer system. I discovered the Minister of National Defense was the largest drug trafficker and the Minister of Immigration the largest human trafficker in Central America.