reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A citizen journalist is recording buses at the San Antonio Airport. He states he is exercising his first amendment rights and recording the drop-off of "illegals." He asks for Corporal Perez and the night duty manager, Frank Constantino. An officer asks for the journalist's name, explaining that someone matching his description has a criminal trespass. The journalist refuses to provide identification, stating he is not breaking any laws and that he is in a public place. He claims he is like paparazzi and does not want to be harassed. Another officer, Price, arrives and asks if the journalist was issued a criminal trespass warning for the airport, to which the journalist says he doesn't want to answer any questions. Officer Price states the journalist is being detained and asks for a driver's license, which the journalist refuses to provide. The journalist claims he is being detained for reporting in a public space.

At a migrant center in San Antonio, Texas, a reporter confronts two police officers who are allegedly being paid by NGOs to guard the facility. The officers refuse to comment on whether they are being contracted by the NGOs and deny being on duty. The reporter accuses the NGOs of facilitating human smuggling and questions why the police officers are not investigating the matter. The officers repeatedly respond with "no comment" and ask the reporter to leave. The reporter also observes the officers checking wristbands and providing security at the facility. The video ends with the reporter being given a trespass warning by one of the officers.

The video features a group of people discussing the presence of military personnel assisting migrants crossing into the US illegally. They are in a public area near the Texas border and express concern about undocumented immigrants entering the country, including women and children. They suggest talking to the migrants to find out where they come from, and someone asks if they can speak English.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 are at a location in Florida, discussing the presence of noncitizens on federal property. Speaker 1 asks why noncitizens are allowed in the US while American citizens are not. Speaker 0 questions who is prohibiting them from being there and thanks Speaker 1 for their question. Speaker 1 reiterates their question and Speaker 0 explains that as Americans, they have the right to be on a public bridge under the first amendment.

At San Antonio International Airport, a bus arrived carrying 60 "illegals" with tickets to travel into the country. One speaker identified a bus driver who allegedly trespassed him and began filming. He claimed the location was a public space and compared his actions to paparazzi. An individual named Elise told officers that the speaker was harassing immigrants and had been previously warned about trespassing. The speaker requested to be arrested and asked for the officer's badge number. He then filmed people disembarking the bus, asking their destinations. Some passengers stated they were going to Minnesota, Miami, Boston, Maryland, Dallas, Atlanta, and California. The speaker asked some passengers if they were "illegal aliens," and apologized when they said they were not.

The video features a speaker expressing frustration over what they perceive as an open border policy and the mistreatment of American citizens. They criticize the media for not covering the situation and accuse the government of prioritizing illegal immigrants over American citizens. The speaker questions the effectiveness of the immigration system and expresses concern about the country's future. They also criticize Governor Abbott for not taking action to stop the influx of illegal immigrants. The video concludes with the speaker calling out what they believe to be human trafficking and the suppression of information by the global elite.

The speaker confronts law enforcement, demanding their name and badge number. They mention FirstNet and whistleblowers inside the facility. They express their intention to obtain and publish body cam footage. They point out a bus filled with illegal immigrants and question the officer's knowledge. The officer responds that they are unsure. The speaker accuses the officer of lying and insists they know about the bus. The officer ends the conversation, stating they will leave it at that. The speaker expresses disbelief at the situation.

In this video, the speaker and his team visit a Ramada Hotel in San Diego that has been converted into a facility for illegal immigrants. They try to gather information about what is happening inside the facility and speak to security officials. The speaker confronts the guards about the conditions inside and questions their actions. They also encounter Chinese migrants who crossed the border illegally and interview them. The video ends with the speaker discussing their mission and the importance of transparency.

The speaker encounters someone from Haiti and questions why they are going to America. The speaker expresses frustration with people disrespecting the country and suggests that those who only want free benefits should not come. The speaker criticizes the lack of vetting and implies that the person from Haiti is seeking free stuff. The video ends with the person from Haiti asking not to be killed as they enter America.

Speaker 0 is frustrated about receiving two tickets in one week for helping people in need. Speaker 2 joins in, expressing anger towards the feds and border patrol. Speaker 1 tries to calm the situation, warning not to damage equipment. Speaker 0 questions the treatment of his people and asserts his American identity. Speaker 1 emphasizes freedom in America. Speaker 0 urges them to go home, while Speaker 1 explains they are showing what's happening in El Paso. Speaker 0 insults someone named Perez. Speaker 1 blames illegal entry for disrespecting the country and criticizes Joe Biden's policies.

The exchange centers on filming rights and the status of the location. Speaker 0 challenges whether they are allowed to film, asking, “Oh, turn off the camera? Yeah. Do I not have a right to have the camera? I’m not giving you permission to check my face.” They then inquire about authority, asking, “Are you a public servant? Or United Nations against the city. Okay. Does because this is my city, and so I have a right to film.” This line underscores Speaker 0’s insistence on their right to record within the space, coupled with a demand for clarity about the other party’s authority to restrict that right. Speaker 1 responds by questioning the premise of the filmed area, asking, “This is United Nations compound?” and clarifies the location’s status by confirming whether it is a compound. The conversation shifts to the status and sovereignty of the area, with Speaker 1 asserting control and jurisdiction over the space in question. A pivotal point in the dialogue arises when Speaker 1 provides a long claim about the compound’s ownership and territorial status. They state, “Since Sunday evening, we took over this compound. This is international territory.” They further elaborate the contrasting jurisdictions, stating, “When you step outside, it’s US. Here is international territory.” This statement frames the location as international territory within the compound, implying a distinct legal or political status compared to the surrounding area. Overall, the interaction is a brief confrontation over visual documentation and the governing authority of the space. Speaker 0 emphasizes the right to film and presses for clarity on who can permit or deny that right, while Speaker 1 asserts that the space is an international territory under their control since Sunday evening, differentiating it from the surrounding US jurisdiction. The dialogue highlights tensions between individual or press rights to film and a claimed change in sovereignty or control of a contested compound.

An individual questions the presence of the army at a public hotel. They ask if the army has taken over the hotel and inquire about the reason for their presence. An individual states the army is there at the request of the state of New York. The questioner expresses disbelief that the state of New York would place the army in hotels. They attempt to record the interaction but are told they cannot. The individual then questions whether the army's presence is beneficial to the public.

The speaker and another person are having a conversation about not being able to take a video. The speaker asks why they can't take a video and the other person tells them they are not allowed. The speaker insists they are already there and asks again why they can't take a video. The conversation becomes heated and the other person asks the speaker to leave, accusing them of forcing their way in. The speaker is then asked to leave again and the conversation ends abruptly.

Mister Smith is asked about his intentions and he explains that he wants to ensure proper documentation for people being transported. He clarifies that they are being taken to various destinations within the US from different countries. When asked why he is inquiring, he mentions his concern about human trafficking and wants to make sure everything is legal. The conversation then shifts to a volunteer who helps released ICE detainees. The volunteer expresses fear for those who are left without assistance. Mister Smith asks if they can enter and film, but the volunteer declines, stating that it is not allowed.

A person is videotaping what they claim is an active law enforcement scene and refuses to leave when asked by an officer. The officer threatens the person with arrest for interfering. The person states they are a citizen and will continue videotaping, claiming what is happening is illegal and not welcome in the community. The person states they are getting the officer's license plate number. The person claims that ICE is taking people off the street in their community.

Speaker 0 asks for an ID from Speaker 1, insisting, “Do you have an ID on you, ma'am?” Speaker 1 replies, “I don't need a ID to walk around in in my city.” Speaker 0 presses for IDs, warning, “If not, we're gonna put you in the vehicle. We're gonna ID you.” Speaker 1 refuses, saying, “I don't need to take out you take out your ID.” Speaker 0 presses again: “Hey, ma'am.” Speaker 1 asserts, “It's ma'am. Am US citizen. I am US citizen.” Speaker 0 asks, “Alright. Can we see an ID, please?” Speaker 1 repeats, “I am US citizen. I don't need to carry around an ID in my home. Well, where were born?” Speaker 0 questions, “Where were you born?” Speaker 1 responds, “This is my home,” and then, “Minneapolis is my home.” Speaker 0 clarifies, “Ma'am, that's not that's we're doing an immigration check. We're doing a citizen check. We're asking you where you were born.” Speaker 1 insists, “This is where I belong. This is my home.” Speaker 0 pushes, “Ma'am, can belong here, but where were you born? Not gonna give you a ID.” Speaker 1 repeats, “I belong here. I should be walking around here at three. I shouldn't be afraid in my life at this point.” Speaker 0 presses, “Ma'am, do you have an ID to give us? Skirt? Yes. You're correct.” Speaker 1 protests, “You're making me a skirt. You're making me a Do you have an ID?” Speaker 0 again asks for an ID, and Speaker 1 repeats, “This is my home.” Speaker 0 states, “Ma'am, where were you born?” Speaker 1 responds, “I am US citizen. I am US citizen. I don't think so. You have a right to picture me while I am in my home or walking around in my home. This is not acceptable.” Speaker 0 continues, “You guys, you terrorizing people.” Speaker 1 emphasizes, “Ma'am And it's not.” Speaker 0 asks again, “Where were you born?” Speaker 1 states, “It doesn't matter where I was born. Belong here. I am US citizen.” She adds, “What else can I say? I am citizen. This is my home.” Speaker 0 warns, “Menia realize that if… [you] lie,” and Speaker 1 reiterates, “Menia, but this is my home.” Eventually Speaker 1 declares, “I am US citizen. I am not gonna take out anything. What the fuck?”

This video shows footage from the Arizona-Mexico border, where there is concern about illegal entry into the United States. The speaker highlights a tent with 150 fighting-age men from West Africa, Muslim countries in Africa, the Middle East, and India. The border patrol is frustrated and wants to expose the situation. They mention a large number of people coming from Syria, potentially forming sleeper cell groups. The speaker also mentions the involvement of Hezbollah, the Chinese Communist Party, and Mexican drug cartels. The overall message is a call to action for Americans to protect their country and families.

A person with a camera is confronted by security while filming. The security guard asks if the person has approval from the school to be there. The person admits they usually don't get consent from people they film. The security guard says someone complained, and this happens all the time. The security guard states that they can't stand there, even on the sidewalk, and demands they leave the property. The person filming says they are doing it for the public's right to know. They are escorted off the property by officers and state the officers should be escorting the president off the property instead.

A person is documenting an encounter, anticipating the arrival of "Corporal Perez." They state they are documenting potential job displacement and refer to their X account. They mention a previous incident where they received a written warning on a public street near hangars, despite not knowing it was public. They claim their lawyer confirmed the street's public status, and they returned to "prove them wrong." The discussion shifts to videotaping immigrants, with the person asserting that those being filmed are aware and willing. They clarify they were following a bus, not breaking traffic laws. They share that the police officer was given their information and criminal report number. They state they are doing this for god and country and that they have footage of their old neighborhood in Queens, detailing prostitution and drug use.

The speaker questions why they are being detained at an immigration checkpoint and asks for the grounds of their detention. The other speaker explains that it is an immigration inspection and justifies the detention based on Supreme Court cases. The speaker argues that they should not be detained if they are a citizen and questions if they need to prove their citizenship. They express concern about discrimination and refuse to answer the question. The other speaker states that they will stay detained until they answer and the speaker agrees to stay and see what happens. The conversation ends with the speaker expressing their opposition to being detained and comparing it to historical events.

Speaker 0, a citizen journalist, encounters Officer Trapp at the San Antonio Airport. Speaker 0 asks for Officer Trapp's name and badge number, and mentions recording the situation. Speaker 1, Officer Trapp, asks if there is an issue, to which Speaker 0 responds that they are just recording. Speaker 0 asks about Corporal Perez and requests to speak with a supervisor. Officer Trapp confirms they have a supervisor but is unsure if it is Corporal Perez. Speaker 0 mentions being a concerned citizen and asserts their right to record on public property. Officer Trapp questions this, and Speaker 0 argues that taxpayers fund the airport. The conversation continues with Speaker 0 expressing concern about potential harassment and Officer Trapp mentioning a criminal trespass warning. The transcript ends with Officer Price joining the conversation and Speaker 0 refusing to provide identification.

The speaker is frustrated because they just want to get a coffee but there is a camera in their face. They express fear about being in a red zone and ask if they can go for a coffee. The speaker is told they are being arrested and cannot go for coffee. They continue to argue and are warned that if they don't leave, they will be arrested. The speaker walks away but is told to take their camera and leave. The video ends with the speaker expressing frustration and hoping the other person can sleep at night.

Speaker 0 expresses frustration about the influx of illegal immigrants in Tucson and Dallas Fort Worth. They criticize Joe Biden and Mayorkas for allowing this to happen. Speaker 0 observes that the majority of people boarding flights to Atlanta are also illegal immigrants. They highlight the unfairness of citizens needing proper documentation while illegal immigrants can simply make up names and stories to gain entry. The speaker emphasizes that this is the worst situation they have seen and expresses concern for a woman who thanked them but was afraid for her daughter's job.

The video discusses the situation at the McAllen airport in Texas, where illegal immigrants are being allowed to pass through security and board flights to their chosen destinations within the United States using a border patrol packet instead of a passport or government ID. The video also mentions that busloads of illegal immigrants are being transferred onto unmarked planes and flown to Midland, Texas, where they are taken to undisclosed facilities. The speakers express concern about the lack of deportations and the financial burden placed on American taxpayers. They also mention that Alex Jones has arrived in McAllen and will be visiting immigration facilities. The video footage shows envelopes containing cash and flight information that are given to the illegal immigrants. The speakers question who is funding this and express frustration with the situation.

The speaker confronts a law enforcement officer, demanding their name and badge number. They discuss the presence of illegal immigrants and whistleblowers in a facility, with the speaker threatening to obtain body cam footage. The officer warns that trespassing will result in arrest. The speaker questions if the officer is blindly following orders and accuses them of lying about a bus filled with illegal immigrants. The officer denies knowledge of the bus and the conversation ends.