reSee.it - Related Video Feed

As attorneys general, we will not yield to the President or Elon Musk. Musk currently operates without accountability, pushing for an ideological litmus test by pausing funds for essential services like Social Security, veteran payments, and state aid. This is unconstitutional and unacceptable. We are prepared to uphold the law against these overreaches of authority. We've already acted when birthright citizenship and NIH funding were challenged, securing temporary restraining orders (TROs). We also acted when funding was paused for agencies, meals on wheels, veteran services and law enforcement grants, securing TROs. We'll continue to challenge these actions in court to protect the Constitution, reminding the President, Musk, and others that our government is not unilateral. Congressional consent is required, and we are confident we'll obtain a preliminary injunction.

We've stopped the $8,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies for Politico subscriptions. The team is working to cancel the payments immediately. Large organizations inevitably miss things. Claims of widespread waste and abuse haven't been substantiated with evidence. We haven't seen proof of the alleged misuse of funds.

I'm demanding refunds for US taxpayers due to alarming financial mismanagement within our federal government. Information from the Department of Government Efficiency reveals that the number of federal employee millionaires has more than doubled since 2021, estimating around 60,000 currently. This is suspicious considering the average federal employee salary is $86,000 annually. Given this, plus a national debt exceeding $36 trillion and a deficit over $2 trillion, I question the trustworthiness of these agencies. With evidence of potential payroll fraud and a lack of oversight from elected officials, I believe taxpayers deserve a refund. Our money has been irresponsibly squandered. Since they have failed to act responsibly with our finances, we deserve our money back.

Speaker 0 expresses a vision to transform government transparency and control over spending. The core goal is to blockchain the entire federal government, and to have every dime of federal spending online in real time, so there is day-by-day, month-by-month visibility into what the Department of Interior and Veterans Affairs (and other agencies) are spending money on. The speaker suggests there could be national security risks with such transparency, noting that some aspects could be “black box” or restricted, but asserts the ideal is real-time visibility into government spending. The speaker argues that the public should know exactly how money is spent, asking concrete questions like what the Department of Interior is spending money on, and whether they are buying items such as “$50 hammers” or “$200 bandages.” The overarching point is that this is “our money” and “we are the sovereign,” because “we create the government,” we earn the money, and “the government extract it from us with our consent.” Therefore, there is a right to know where the money goes.

The speaker discusses the role of the Congress in making constitutional and legal reforms. They emphasize that only the National Congress can make constitutional reforms, while the Executive can only handle administrative matters. The speaker mentions their attempts to communicate with Antonio Gutiérrez and the limitations of the Permanent Commission. They highlight the importance of understanding that the government consists of all branches of power and institutions to combat corruption and impunity. The speaker also mentions that the public's outrage was triggered by the theft at the Social Security institution.

The government has failed to address the high cost of living while attempting to misappropriate taxpayer money. The situation at the Treasury Department highlights this issue. To combat unlawful access to the Treasury's payment system and protect personal and confidential information, we will soon introduce the Stop the Steal Act.

Tonight, we will be filing a complaint against Mrs. Von der Leyen, the European Union, and Pfizer. The complaint is significant because it exposes their complicity in the deception surrounding the Covid vaccine. We have evidence, including a contract signed on November 20th between the EU and Pfizer, where the EU blindly invested €200 million without any knowledge of the product's outcome or nature. This money came from our taxes and was meant to fund Pfizer's research.

It's shocking and unprecedented. I'm announcing a measure to work with Congress, calling for subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchan's daughter's company, which made over $15 million from information coming out of her father's courtroom. I want to see the bank records to understand how deep this goes, how much went to the family, and how much is going to them after this conviction. We need to investigate the FEC violations by the judge and his family because he should never have overseen this trial due to illicit campaign money flowing through it. The unconstitutional due process violations are just the start. America wants accountability in our judicial system, and Congress is the only one who can do it. I hope a couple of brave members of Congress will issue those subpoenas ASAP.

This wastefulness needs explaining. How was such a squandering of money possible when we ourselves are borrowing from financial markets to finance an ever-increasing debt? Why didn't anyone stop this? The answer lies in ideology. If you question those involved in public development aid, they'll accuse you of opposing gender equality, climate change efforts, and being okay with world hunger. There's a moral blackmail and arguments from authority that paralyze my fellow members of parliament.

I'm nearly convinced that our entire national debt of $36 trillion is due to fraud, abuse, and waste. A staggering $2.7 trillion was improperly sent overseas as Medicare and Medicaid payments. How is this even possible? Is there any part of our government that isn't defrauding the American people? We've barely scratched the surface of this audit, and it already seems the answer is no. It feels like every branch of government has been robbing Americans blind while we struggle to make ends meet. People are still freezing. I want to see arrests, and I want the names of those responsible revealed.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

I asked about the border wall funding and suggested redirecting the money. However, they refused to do so. According to the law, they are obligated to use the money appropriately.

Good evening. I have three bills, but I'll focus on one to improve the image of this National Congress. I can't understand how those who have been here for multiple terms tolerate the public calling this place a nest of corrupt politicians. My bill aims to repeal a section of the Constitution that allows subsidies and grants for public utility or economic development. Many lawmakers only show up when there's money involved. Let's do things right and work for the people. We were elected to legislate, not manage funds. My other bills concern an abandoned school building and a road project. Let's wash away the negative perception of this Congress. God bless Honduras.

The US Treasury Department has been flagged for potential waste and abuse of taxpayer funds, with about 23% of entitlements, roughly $50 billion annually, going to recipients without known Social Security numbers or IDs. This equates to about a billion dollars a week in potential fraud. Adding to the concern, the Treasury Department hasn't been keeping itemized records of their payouts, making it impossible to track where the money is actually going. Fortunately, an agreement has been made where the Treasury Department will start itemizing all payments, detailing where the money is going and to whom. It's unbelievable that the Treasury hasn't had to provide accountability for where taxpayer money is being spent, especially when individual taxpayers are held to a much higher standard.

Taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs. If it's a government-funded NGO, it's effectively just the government. A fraud loophole exists because the government can send money to an NGO that is no longer governed by U.S. laws. The money is sent overseas to one NGO, then through others. The speaker is highly confident that some of that money returns to the U.S. and enriches certain people. There are strangely wealthy members of Congress, and it's unclear how they accumulated millions while earning comparatively little. The speaker aims to investigate this and prevent it from continuing.

I believe members of Congress should be investigated for potential ill-gotten gains. There seems to be no other explanation for their consistent support of poor legislation. It's possible their spouses or significant others are employed by the very departments or quasi-governmental agencies that benefit from these votes. Until we investigate these potential conflicts of interest, the American people will continue to distrust Congress, and rightfully so.

I'm calling for an investigation to uncover who in the government has been receiving kickbacks from USAID. Doge's congressional audits reveal that three Democrat senators have each inexplicably gained over $20,000,000 in net worth. When questioned, they claimed the wealth simply appeared. These files have now been handed over to Pam Bondi at the Justice Department. If they're found guilty of using taxpayer money to enrich themselves, what consequences do you think they should face? Share your thoughts in the comments on what actions should be taken against those who steal from American citizens.

We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several individuals in bureaucratic positions with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. We're curious about the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that they are enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers. We are investigating to determine how this occurred.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

There are members of Congress who have become strangely wealthy, accumulating, for example, $20 million while earning $200,000 a year. It is unclear how this is possible. The goal is to figure out how this happens and stop it.

Speaker 0 contends that adopting administrative policies such as FASB 56 effectively means, in their view, that “we don’t have to obey the constitution. We don’t have to obey the laws, and we don’t have to obey the regulations of the financial management laws that apply to us.” They state they do not think it is legal to adopt an administrative policy that supersedes the constitution, the laws, and the regulations, but claim that is what is being done.

We're uncovering massive fraud, waste, and abuse daily. Recently, it was discovered that there were $2.7 trillion in improper payments to Medicare, Medicaid, and overseas. Social Security payments are even going to deceased individuals. We're also seeing contracts where the full amount wasn't delivered. For example, a million-dollar contract might only see $500,000 distributed, and we're working to find where the rest of the money went. This is exactly what I campaigned on, and what 77 million people elected me to do.

We've found some odd things, like bureaucrats with modest salaries somehow accumulating millions while in their positions. It makes you wonder where that money comes from. It seems taxpayers are footing the bill for this wealth. Basic controls that any company would have are missing at Treasury, like payment categorization codes or comments explaining payments. The "do not pay" list, meant for terrorists and fraudsters, takes up to a year to get on and isn't even used. Departments fail audits because of these missing controls. It boils down to complaint minimization. Approving all payments avoids complaints, even from fraudsters. But we need to complain when money is misspent and demand taxpayer dollars are used wisely. It's just common sense. We even see people claiming Social Security who are 50 years old!

We're talking about $2.3 billion saved, but where's the proof? You won't be satisfied until you see the 10,000 pages of evidence. Specifics are needed. If we have to go to Congress, we will show where the money is going. Some details have emerged, like the $59 million spent on luxury hotels, but that was FEMA money abused for migrants. I'm not saying it's okay, don't put words in my mouth. The portrayal isn't factually accurate. I saw what FEMA does, I believe it. These are congressionally appropriate funds.

The speaker claims $5 trillion in untraceable payments exist with no record of where the money went. They allege Social Security sent out $72 billion in bad checks, and the head of Social Security resigned. The speaker finds the resignation suspicious. Speaker 1 asserts there is no waste in the Pentagon, Treasury, or HHS. Speaker 1 asks why Speaker 0 is not celebrating cuts and reforms if they agree there is waste, abuse, and corruption. Speaker 1 claims billions of dollars are being saved. Speaker 0 attempts to calm Speaker 1 down, stating they are not having a debate. Speaker 1 insists they are not trying to debate and will speak freely about saving Americans billions of dollars.