reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Mike Benz discusses the role of NGOs in U.S. foreign policy, likening them to a parallel government that operates alongside traditional state structures. He traces the origins of NGOs back to the establishment of the U.S. income tax in 1913 and the subsequent tax-deductible status of charitable donations, which led to a significant influx of funding into private foundations and nonprofits. Benz argues that these organizations have been used as fronts for U.S. intelligence operations, particularly during the Cold War, to influence foreign governments and control narratives. He highlights the influence of figures like George Soros and the Open Society Foundation, which he claims have become so powerful that U.S. foreign policy has had to align with their objectives. Benz describes NGOs as flexible tools that can operate in conflict zones where the government cannot, providing backchannel diplomacy and financial assistance while maintaining plausible deniability for the U.S. government. Benz introduces the concept of the "blob," a term used to describe the entrenched foreign policy establishment in Washington, which includes the State Department, Defense Department, and various NGOs. He asserts that this blob prioritizes the interests of multinational corporations over the American public, often leading to policies that do not benefit ordinary citizens. He recounts historical examples, such as the CIA's involvement in the 1948 Italian election, where NGOs were used to influence the outcome, and discusses how this model has been replicated in various countries. Benz emphasizes that the intertwining of government, NGOs, and corporate interests creates a system that is difficult to challenge democratically. Benz also critiques the U.S. Institute of Peace, suggesting it operates contrary to its stated mission and has been involved in controversial activities, including supporting the Taliban's opium trade in Afghanistan. He argues that the U.S. government has become reliant on these NGOs for intelligence and operational support, blurring the lines between state and non-state actors. He concludes by discussing the challenges of reforming this system, noting that while there have been efforts to cut funding to certain NGOs, the entrenched nature of these organizations makes significant change difficult. Benz warns that without a clear understanding of the NGO complex and its influence, efforts to restore democracy and accountability in the U.S. may be undermined.

Mike Benz and Shawn Ryan discuss the rapid exposure of corruption linked to USAID and its implications for U.S. foreign policy. Benz notes that the focus on USAID began during the Trump administration, revealing how domestic agencies have been weaponized against American citizens and how this extends to covert operations abroad. He emphasizes that the nationalist movement, which gained momentum in 2016, is now beginning to develop a foreign policy intelligentsia that challenges the established foreign policy norms. Benz highlights the significant budget of USAID, approximately $44 billion, and its connections to the Department of Defense (DOD) and the State Department. He raises concerns about the operations of USAID, particularly its collaboration with military forces and the lack of oversight, citing examples of how USAID has been involved in controversial activities, such as the ZunZuneo scandal in Cuba. He discusses the potential for USAID to continue its operations under the State Department, suggesting that the fundamental issues may persist even if the agency is formally shut down. The conversation shifts to the influence of USAID on foreign elections and political movements, with Benz drawing parallels between the situations in Romania and Pakistan, where USAID has allegedly intervened to influence political outcomes. He argues that USAID's activities often undermine the sovereignty of nations and that the agency has a history of targeting populist movements globally. Benz also discusses the relationship between USAID and U.S. media, highlighting how government funding can create conflicts of interest and influence reporting. He points out that many media outlets receive grants from USAID, which can lead to biased coverage that aligns with U.S. foreign policy objectives. The discussion concludes with Benz advocating for reforms to ensure accountability and transparency in USAID's operations. He suggests that any future iteration of the agency should be subject to strict oversight to prevent it from engaging in activities that could harm American citizens or undermine democratic processes abroad. Benz emphasizes the need for a clear delineation between foreign aid and domestic influence, arguing that the American public deserves to know how their tax dollars are being used in international operations.

Fort Bragg is the setting for a murder mystery that anchors the book. A double homicide on a remote training range—Billy Levine and Timothy Dumas, veteran special operations soldiers—sparks questions about secrecy and accountability. Levine, a Delta Force operator, had earlier killed his best friend, Mark Leshicker, in Fayetteville, an act local authorities and the US Army Criminal Investigation Command allegedly covered up. Levine avoided arrest, while Dumas, a supply officer attached to JSOC, is killed eighteen months later on the same base, invitations of competing theories about who killed whom and why. Levine's trajectory embodies a paradox at the core of this story. More than a dozen deployments, peak physical conditioning, and elite status in Delta Force contrast with a descent into drugs and trauma. Harp notes Levine’s severe PTSD, moral injury, and daily crack use, alongside cocaine in the Green Berets’ circle that many sources described as normalized on base and in Fayetteville. Levine’s ex-wife and others say he was writing a book and believed a film deal was possible, a detail that underscores his preoccupation with legacy even as his behavior deteriorated. The investigation lands amid a web of possible suspects and shifting theories. The CID’s formal theory is that Dumas killed Levine, then another party—or parties—executed Dumas to silence a witness; others suspect rogue Delta Force elements or the command itself. Dumas’s letter purporting to name members of a drug trafficking ring within the special forces circulates as a potential motive. The Department of Justice later accused someone of committing the murders; the accused pleaded not guilty and is set to stand trial in January 2026, a case many sources describe as opaque and controversial. Harp traces a broader shift in American war making: secret orders, night raids, and a growing separation between covert action and accountability. He cites 02/2001 moves by the Bush administration that reversed an assassination ban, implying a long trajectory toward unilateral targeted killings with limited public scrutiny. He suggests a claimed 50% error rate in targeting judgments and notes Delta Force’s capacity to abduct or kill, often under executive orders and with congressional input, yet with limited public verification. The Afghanistan chapter ties the Fort Bragg murders to a decades-long narcotics chain. Harp describes a heroin flood tied to Afghanistan, with production surges following interventions. He asserts that more than 90% of the world’s heroin was produced in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2021, linking drug networks to Afghan warlords and CIA-linked figures, and explains how the Taliban re-emerged in 2023 by eradicating heroin production, reframing prior decades as manipulated by Western powers. He also discusses SIGAR and CIA complicity and how these dynamics fed American addiction. Across this narrative runs a critique of policy continuity—four administrations questioned for tolerating illicit networks, arms trafficking, and the drug trade tied to foreign occupations. Harp is blunt: accountability has been elusive, indictments rare, and the implications extend from Fort Bragg to a nation grappling with addiction, military decline, and the moral costs of perpetual war. The book links war, drugs, and power to argue that reform will require confronting hard truths about what has been tolerated.