reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this episode, Megyn Kelly discusses the upcoming trial of Brian Koberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students. Journalist Howard Blum reveals significant developments from a recent pre-trial hearing, including concerns about the prosecution's case. The prosecution initially relied on a small DNA sample from a knife sheath, but it was disclosed that the FBI improperly accessed ancestry DNA websites to match Koberger's DNA, raising Fourth Amendment issues. The defense argues this evidence should be suppressed, claiming it violates due process. Additionally, unknown male blood was found at the crime scene, suggesting potential accomplices, complicating the prosecution's narrative. Eyewitness testimony from a surviving roommate has also weakened, as she struggled to recall details and failed to identify Koberger in subsequent interviews. The lack of blood evidence linking Koberger to the crime scene further challenges the prosecution's case. The trial is set for August, but the defense continues to seek more time.

The Megyn Kelly Show features a discussion on the ongoing legal battles involving Don Lemon and Kyle Rittenhouse. The show begins with Kelly addressing the allegations against Lemon, who is accused of sexual assault by Dustin Hice. Hice claims that Lemon offered multiple settlement amounts, including $400,000, which Lemon's lawyer denies. Hice's attorney, Robert Barnes, argues that Lemon's team has failed to produce relevant evidence, while Hice maintains that he did not hide any texts during discovery. The conversation shifts to the Rittenhouse trial, where Rittenhouse unexpectedly takes the stand. He recounts the events leading to the shooting of Joseph Rosenbaum, claiming he was threatened by Rosenbaum prior to the incident. Rittenhouse breaks down while testifying about being cornered and feeling threatened. The defense argues that the evidence supports Rittenhouse's claim of self-defense, with witnesses corroborating his account. Kelly and her guests discuss the media's portrayal of Rittenhouse, highlighting the bias in coverage that labels him a vigilante. They also touch on the prosecution's tactics, including questioning Rittenhouse about video games to suggest desensitization to violence. The judge intervenes multiple times, criticizing the prosecution for inappropriate questioning. The show also addresses broader themes of government overreach, particularly in relation to COVID-19 policies and the treatment of journalists like James O'Keefe, whose home was raided by the FBI over a diary belonging to Ashley Biden. The guests express concerns about the implications of such actions and the perceived double standards in how different individuals and groups are treated by authorities. Finally, the discussion turns to education and the impact of critical race theory in schools, with Kelly and her guests arguing that the current approach undermines the educational standards necessary for all students, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds. They emphasize the importance of maintaining rigorous academic expectations rather than lowering standards under the guise of equity.

Welcome to the Megyn Kelly Show. The jury is deliberating the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, an 18-year-old accused of shooting three men during a Black Lives Matter riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in August 2020. The defense claims self-defense, which, if proven, would exonerate Rittenhouse. In Wisconsin, the prosecution must disprove self-defense claims, which hinge on four questions regarding the nature of the threat Rittenhouse faced and whether his response was reasonable. Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger argues that Rittenhouse was not facing an imminent threat when he shot Joseph Rosenbaum, the first man he killed, asserting that Rosenbaum was unarmed and chasing Rittenhouse. Binger contends that Rittenhouse became an active shooter after killing Rosenbaum, justifying the actions of those who attacked him afterward. The defense counters that Rittenhouse ran toward police after the shooting and only shot the subsequent attackers, Anthony Huber and Gage Grosskroyd, in response to their aggression. Binger's strategy has shifted to arguing that Rittenhouse provoked the violence, which could negate his self-defense claim. However, provocation can only eliminate self-defense if Rittenhouse intentionally provoked an attack or engaged in illegal conduct likely to provoke violence. The prosecution's claim that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at another individual before the shootings relies on blurry drone footage, which the defense argues is unreliable. The defense highlights Rosenbaum's criminal history, including being a convicted child molester, to argue that Rittenhouse acted in self-defense against a perceived threat. The prosecution's case relies on portraying Huber and Grosskroyd as heroes trying to stop an active shooter, but the defense maintains that Rittenhouse's perception of danger is what matters. The discussion also touches on the political implications of the case, with the defense arguing that Rittenhouse has been demonized due to his presence at the riot with an AR-15. The defense asserts that the prosecution is under pressure to convict someone to appease public sentiment, while the jury faces the challenge of navigating the complex legal standards surrounding self-defense and provocation. In a separate segment, attorney Harmeet Dhillon discusses the FBI's raid on James O'Keefe's home and the homes of Project Veritas employees in connection with Ashley Biden's diary. Dhillon argues that the DOJ's actions are unprecedented and threaten journalistic freedom, as they seized materials that could expose confidential sources and attorney-client communications. She emphasizes the chilling effect this could have on journalists and the broader implications for First Amendment rights. The discussion raises concerns about the politicization of the DOJ and the potential misuse of power against critics of the government.

Palmer Luckey, founder of Oculus, initially turned down a $1 billion offer from Facebook, ultimately selling for $2.3 billion due to the promise of continued investment. After selling Oculus, he pivoted to defense with Anduril, focusing on AI, robotics, and drones to enhance U.S. military capabilities. He expressed concern over tech companies avoiding military contracts, which he believes undermines national security. Anduril's name references a sword from "The Lord of the Rings," symbolizing protection. The company develops advanced technologies, including robotic submarines and drones for military applications. Luckey remains optimistic about VR advancements, anticipating significant improvements in immersion and usability. He also discussed the potential of brain-computer interfaces for AR experiences. Additionally, he introduced a controversial VR headset concept that simulates real-life consequences, sparking discussions on the ethics of virtual reality. Luckey aims to innovate in defense while addressing the challenges of government contracting.