TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the CDC leadership, confirming 'we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday' and that the agency is 'a very troubled for a very long time' with 'bizarre recommendations that were not science based' during the COVID pandemic. They say 'Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines.' They add, 'There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term in order for us to change the institutional culture and bring back pride and self esteem and make that agency the stellar agency that it's always been.' They conclude, 'I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency.'

During the measles outbreak, I promised governor Abbott to send money and aid to Texas, but this individual blocked that money for a month. We then sought the vaccine safety data link—the data CDC supposedly uses to assess vaccine harms—but for seven months he stonewalled us. He also runs VAERS, the surveillance system for injuries, which, according to CDC's own study, captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. This is malpractice. These people are the people who ordered our children to walk around in mass. They're the people who closed our schools, imposed social distancing with no science, and shut down our businesses, and they need to go. The Trump administration is gonna make sure that happens. You know, secretary, you

- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

You mentioned wanting to eliminate 600 NIH workers on day one and 2,200 from HHS. Which departments will you cut from? There are 200 political appointees that change with each administration. If you remove those, will you replace them with your appointees? President Biden changed 3,000 employees at HHS. As a potential top health official, will you commit to not firing federal employees working on food safety or cyber protection? There are 91,000 employees. So, will you ensure those working on food safety and cyber security keep their jobs? I commit not to fire anyone doing their job. Will this commitment be based on your opinion or political agenda? It will be based on my opinion. So, it seems those with differing views on vaccines may be at risk of losing their jobs.

On firing of the CDC director. The White House said that she did not align with the president's agenda. Doctor Menards' attorney say that she refused to rubber stamp unscientific reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts. Her lawyer's statement made it abundantly clear themselves that she was not aligned with the president's mission to make America healthy again. The secretary asked her to resign. She said she would and then she said she wouldn't, so the president fired her. It was president Trump who was overwhelmingly reelected on November 5. A replacement will be announced by either the president or the secretary. The president and secretary Kennedy are committed to restoring trust and transparency to the CDC by making leadership more public facing and accountable, restoring its core mission of protecting Americans from communicable diseases, and investing in innovation to prevent, detect, and respond to future threats.

Secretary, the CDC director was fired after refusing to resign as her lawyers accuse you, sir, of putting millions of American lives at risk as a CDC vaccine chief slammed in a resignation post. “I'm not gonna comment. It would be inappropriate for me to comment on a personnel issue.” “What I will say is, you know, there's president president Trump Trump has has very, very ambitious hopes for what for CDC right now.” “The CDC has problems.” “You know, we saw the misinformation coming out of COVID.” “They got the testing testing wrong. Wrong.” “They got the the social distancing, the masks, the the school closures that did so much harm to the American people.” “Oh, today on CDC's website right now, they list the 10 top top advance the the 10 greatest advances in medical science, and one of them is abortion. The other is another is floridation.” “Another is vaccines.” “So we need to look at the priorities of the agency if there's really a deeply, deeply embedded, I would say, malaise at the agency.” “And we need strong leadership that will go in there and that will be able to execute on president Trump's broad ambitions.”

Dr. Dimitri Dascalakis resigned as director of the National Center on Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, greeted by clapping from hundreds of colleagues and public health workers. He described leaving an environment where the CDC is treated as a tool to generate policies that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve public health. He recalled learning about Secretary Kennedy’s directive to change the childhood and adult immunization schedules for COVID-19 via Twitter, noting that CDC data supporting the decision were not provided. He said, seven months into the new administration, no CDC subject matter expert from his center had briefed the secretary, calling that situation extremely abnormal. He warned of eugenics rhetoric in the movement and referenced statements about beef tallow and avian flu, insisting this showed dangerous beliefs. He and colleagues raised red flags about dangerous developments in the country.

Speaker 0 asks why the president hasn't acknowledged the shooting at CDC headquarters that took place earlier in August where a police officer was killed, and it was reported that the motivation for the shooting was somebody who was really unhappy with the effects of the COVID vaccine. Speaker 1 responds: "We absolutely were very much aware of that shooting. The secretary of health and human services put out a statement immediately. He was in touch with the CDC, and he actually traveled to Georgia, to assess the situation and to mourn, with the the people who work in that building there. So"

Speaker critiques the CDC’s ranking of medical advances, stating: "Today on CDC's website, right now, they list the 10 top advances the 10 greatest advances in medical science, and one of them is abortion." He continues, "The other is another is flirtation, another is vaccines." He argues that we need to "look at the priorities of the agency" because there may be "a deeply, deeply embedded, I would say, malaise at the agency." He calls for "strong leadership that will go in there and that will be able to execute on president Trump's broad ambitions." Yeah. The overall message centers on agency priorities, alleged malaise, and the call for leadership to advance President Trump's broad ambitions.

Paul Offit said that I'm going to do everything I can to make vaccines less available and affordable, which will hurt the vaccine infrastructure in this country. I'm supposedly joining hands with Donald Trump to march into measles land. But I'm not going to take away anyone's vaccines. People should be able to get them if they want. I want to give people good science. We don't have good safety studies on almost any of the 72 vaccines mandated for children. HHS admitted there are no pre-licensing safety studies for any of them, except the COVID vaccine. We need to know the risk profiles of these products. We also don't have good data on adverse effects from the COVID vaccine, which is a crime. The CDC's surveillance system captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries. Congress and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly ordered the CDC to put together a better vaccine. We will do that right away.

We aim to reverse the chronic disease epidemic and restore the nation's health. The very people dictating our food production and healthcare are those who instigated the crisis in the first place. Many defending this system and pharmaceutical profits are heavily funded. I was asked to clean up corruption and conflict. If confirmed, I recognize the CDC's critical role for Georgia, our country, and global health. Concerns have been raised regarding my previous promotion of "junk science" and potential conflicts of interest due to book deals and vaccine-related lawsuits. People need assurance that I can be independent and science-based. I will support vaccine development and distribution if the evidence supports it. I am aware of vaccine safety data resources, but question the accessibility and integrity of the data.

The speaker is questioned about the Health Secretary pulling funding for mRNA vaccine research, claiming the risks outweigh the benefits, putting him at odds with the medical community. The speaker responds that Operation Warp Speed was considered incredible, regardless of political affiliation, citing its efficiency and distribution. While acknowledging that Warp Speed was "a long time ago," the speaker states that they are "on to other things" and are looking for answers to other sicknesses and diseases. They mention upcoming meetings to determine the next steps.

The speaker states that vaccine policy will change due to better information. They claim that none of the vaccines given in the first six months of life have been tested, except for the DTP vaccine, which a study linked to issues, but was dismissed due to problems with the CDC's surveillance system. The speaker asserts the CDC lacks a functional surveillance system to capture vaccine injuries, with their own study showing it captures less than 1% of injuries. They plan to fix this by implementing a functional surveillance system, using data management, and providing answers to the public. The speaker promises to follow the science, use gold standard science, publish all datasets, replicate studies, and publish peer reviews, which they claim the CDC has never done, to provide real answers.

"Roll back in the time machine to August 2014, that is when Bill Thompson made the admission that the CDC had lied and hid the fact that the MMR vaccine was associated with autism." "Doctor Thompson freely admitted that he had covered it up and his associates at the CDC also covered it up." "Thimerosal causes autism like features and that's the way I would say it." "I'm completely ashamed of what I did." "Colleen is the center director. Frank is the director of immunization safety, and Marshall is the branch chief." "Doctor Julie Gerberding was head of the CDC at the time. Coincidentally, she went on to a lucrative career at Merck, the manufacturer of the MMR vaccine." "I'm like, oh my god. I cannot believe we did what we did. But we did."

"we'll we'll find an incredible nominee. I'm not worried about that at all." "the CDC's credibility was shattered during the COVID era." "This is now widely understood and widely acknowledged." "CDC used to be, of course, or seen widely around the world as a premier health agency." "Secretary Kennedy, one of the world's foremost voices, advocates, experts on public health, is working hard to restore the credibility and the integrity of CDC." "It is an honor to be able to work with secretary Kennedy as he tackles these issues on behalf of president Trump." "Secretary Kennedy has been a crown jewel of this administration who's working tirelessly to improve public health for all Americans and, again, to deal with the drivers of the chronic health crisis in this country."

I'm preparing to shake up the Department of Health and Human Services by dismissing vaccine advisors with conflicts of interest. The medical industry has undue influence over regulators and government policy. We aim to remove conflicts of interest from committees and research partners or balance them with other stakeholders. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is a clear target, and their meeting was recently postponed indefinitely. Medical professionals have urged me to preserve the meeting, emphasizing the importance of vaccines in responding to public health threats. Panels advising the FDA are also being targeted. I've vowed to reassess the childhood vaccination schedule and suggested that certain vaccines, like the COVID-19 vaccines, could be taken off the market. The CDC has already withdrawn its "wild to mild seasonal" campaign for the flu vaccination.

Speaker 0: Bouncing off the CDC sit the situation with CDC. I'm curious if if administration officials are pushing back on the president's agenda privately, publicly, however, should they fear to lose their jobs going forward? Speaker 1: Look, I think if you're doing your job well and if you are executing on the vision and the promises that the president made to the public who elected him back to this office, then you should have no fear about your job. Just do your job. That's what this president wants to see. He wants to see people solving problems. He wants to see the the people who have the privilege of serving the American taxpayer and the federal government abiding by the wishes of the American taxpayers who overwhelmingly reelected him, in this cabinet, to make America great again or, in this case, make America healthy again.

HHS is reportedly undergoing massive cuts, with a quarter of its employees leaving or expected to be terminated, impacting vaccine and drug research, HIV/AIDS research, AI, services for the elderly and low-income, STD prevention, and rural health. These changes are defended by arguing that voters wanted change by putting Bobby Kennedy Jr. in a position of power. The claim is that existing health authorities, specifically the NIH, oversaw the creation of a pandemic and a devastation of American health over the past twenty years, with skyrocketing disease rates. The FDA is allegedly stifling innovation with small pharma, and CMS is controlled by a pharmaceutical lobbying group. It is argued that cutting 20,000 people and taking HHS back to 68,000 employees is not slashing, but a necessary correction. The speaker suggests that Bobby Kennedy should make dramatic changes to the leadership and personnel at these authorities. The claim is that these authorities have overseen an abject devastation of American health, and that people voted for Bobby Kennedy to reform these agencies.

HHS is reportedly undergoing massive cuts, with a quarter of its employees leaving or expected to be terminated, impacting vaccine and drug research, HIV/AIDS research, AI, services for the elderly and low-income, STD prevention, and rural health. These changes are defended by citing voter sentiment that the existing health system is failing. The NIH is accused of overseeing the creation of a pandemic and a decline in American health, with rising chronic disease rates. The FDA is criticized for hindering small pharma innovation due to high costs, and CMS is allegedly controlled by pharmaceutical lobbying. It is argued that the cuts are not slashes but a return to 2017 levels, reducing HHS to 68,000 employees. The speaker believes that dramatic changes are needed in health authorities and personnel, and that Bobby Kennedy should appoint reformers to agencies like the FDA. The speaker cites Peter Marks as an example of someone who went against FDA advisory opinions and should be replaced.

Speaker 0 argues that 'the trustworthiness of the information that we actually receive from the news media' is a major problem and notes that 'the easiest thing for our democratic colleagues to do is to scare people.' He asks, 'COVID nineteen was politicized?' Speaker 1 answers, 'the whole process was politicized' and says 'we were lied to about everything... the vaccines would prevent transmission' and 'they prevent infection'—claims he says are contradicted by 'the animal studies and the clinical trial showed.' He accuses the CDC of letting 'the teachers union' write school-closure orders that 'hurt working people all over the country, and then pretend it was science based.' He adds examples: 'Martin Koldor from Harvard' was 'ejected [from COVID]... because he wasn't in the orthodoxy'; 'FDA during COVID' officials 'Gruber and Krausz' criticized Biden mandates; Biden said, 'I would never take that vaccine, the Trump vaccine' then mandated it and fired top FDA officials who said it had not been properly tested.' The exchange ends with 'Yes.'

Congressman Robert Garcia claims Donald Trump is causing chaos and doing something dangerous in DC. According to Garcia, the Health and Human Service Secretary, RFK Junior, fired all 17 vaccine experts at the CDC who were essential to the vaccination program. Garcia states that replacing them with anti-vaccine conspiracy theorists is dangerous, especially considering the 1.3 million American lives lost during the pandemic. He emphasizes the importance of vaccine safety and expresses alarm over the firings.

Speaker 0 says that with Secretary Kennedy as head of HHS, we have a unique opportunity to investigate the sins of the past, hold accountable all individuals responsible for cover ups not just this one, and clean up the mess left behind based on the lies about vaccines promulgated throughout society. We not only need to prevent this from happening in the future, but we also need to take care of the many families that suffered and continue to suffer losses at the hands of CDC fraudsters, some of whom are still employed by the agency. As a parent of an adult son who sustained lifelong, easily preventable, yet debilitating vaccine injuries, the speaker states that jail time is too good for these criminals who knowingly killed and maimed a generation of children. But if jail time is as good as it gets, the speaker says, let’s roll and they’ll break out the orange jumpsuits.

- "After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." - "BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500,000,000 To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate." - "I'm still waiting for Robert Kennedy Jr. To say that we're going to wipe out mandates and everyone will have a choice, but this is a great step in the right direction." - "Half a billion dollars, 22 projects in the pipeline for mRNA vaccine technology." - "KFF Foundation did a survey on really what Americans are still going to want this vaccine going into the fall, the COVID vaccine."

The speaker discusses internal resistance to RFK Jr.’s policies and the idea that “deep staters” have been entrenched in government. They mention being forwarded an anecdote from a “good career employee.” They point to the FDA, noting that when Marty Makary came in, he had only about 10 political appointees he could choose. Jay Bhattacharya at the NIH allegedly had one political appointee. The speaker claims that every government employee is a “deep stater” who has been there a long time and that an email from a good employee circulates a CIA manual called How to Be a Bad Bureaucrat and Subvert an Institution from Within. The email supposedly asserts that 90% of employees at HHS, which has 70,000 employees, are talking in lunchrooms about the manual and telling each other that their job is to save America and save science from the agenda of President Trump and RFK Jr. The speaker asserts this reflects how people think across major departments and asks how to get rid of them, suggesting firing them as a solution, and mentions SIOP in this context. The CDC is presented as a case study of failure, described as a public health disaster in its COVID-19 response. The speaker alleges that the CDC’s guidance on school lockdowns copied directly from a teacher union document with which they were aligned, reproducing paragraphs from the teacher’s union advocating for two years of school shutdowns. It is claimed that the CDC also said that cloth masks were fine. The speaker says the CDC led the response and that the NIH funded the entire pandemic, including gain-of-function research, asserting that this constitutes “the creation of the pandemic.” In contrast, RFK Jr. is said to have fired three employees, and this action is described as national news. The overall narrative emphasizes a view of pervasive internal opposition within federal agencies, a controversial and sweeping critique of the CDC, NIH, and HHS responses to the pandemic, and a framing of RFK Jr.’s personnel decisions as transformative and newsworthy.