TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Svetlana Lekova, described as an encyclopedia on accountability, has spent about ten years studying the subject and working with the Durham investigation. She says she has read every document, every note in every annex, including documents that were declassified by President Trump, then reclassified by Joe Biden after he “stole the election,” and then declassified again by Trump when he came into office. She rejects the claim that President Trump gave her classified documents. Despite ongoing accusations, she notes that they have not stopped pursuing her and she has not stopped fighting. Lekova requests the audience to consider the Florida case she views as significant and to explain what it is about. She asserts that accountability is finally, hopefully, happening, but she remains cautious because of what she has seen in other high-profile cases, such as Jim Comey, where she believes the judiciary, juries, and prosecutors have been compromised. After ten years of involvement with the Durham investigation, she had been told there would be prosecutions. She recalls that prosecutors had Hillary Clinton under oath and John Brennan under oath, and that it was a criminal investigation. Then, according to her, it “disappeared,” and nothing happened. Lekova describes a sequence where authorities raided the president’s home, and he was “almost assassinated,” with attempts to jail him. She says the result appeared to be that not only would the “bad guys” not go to jail, but the “good guy” trying to bring them to account would end up jailed for the rest of his life, at least in their perception of the situation. She notes that President Trump, through what she calls “amazing” grace, managed to come back and that “you guys somehow managed to vote him in” in such large numbers that there was no alternative for the election. She asserts that the first thing he did upon returning was to promise accountability. Speaker 0 clarifies the context by noting that the Florida case is “so significant” and asks Lekova to describe what it is really about. Speaker 1 reiterates that accountability is being pursued, acknowledging historical concerns about the judicial system, including the perception of brainwashed juries and corrupt prosecutors, and explains that, after a long period of inertia in the justice process, President Trump’s reelection framed the possibility of accountability and that he, as president, has the responsibility to hold the bad guys accountable because he is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States.

The transcript alleges that 51 former intelligence officials, including active CIA contractors, colluded with the Biden campaign to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation and rig the 2020 election. According to the transcript, Anthony Blinken initiated the effort by contacting Michael Morell, a CIA contractor, to create talking points for Biden. The report claims that CIA officials, including then-Director Gina Haspel, were aware of the statement prior to its publication and that the CIA's internal review board approved it. The transcript asserts that Morell and David Buckley, another signatory, were active CIA contractors at the time, earning taxpayer money while engaging in political activities. The report suggests that the signatories leveraged their intelligence titles to lend legitimacy to their claims. The speaker concludes that the CIA paid, housed, and approved the letter, interfering in the electoral system.

The speaker claims John Brennan, Clapper, and Comey pushed the fake Steele dossier into intelligence assessments, forming the basis for Crossfire Hurricane. According to the speaker, underlying intelligence, soon to be declassified in the Durham Report annex, will show Hillary Clinton and the FBI amplified the fake Russia collusion claims. Brennan, Clinton, and Comey testified within the last five years, and their testimonies are allegedly inconsistent with the soon-to-be-declassified intelligence. The speaker suggests there's an opportunity for indictments and prosecutions of those who may have lied under oath, and that referrals have been made. The speaker believes the individuals discussed conspired against President Trump and the American people. The statute of limitations may not apply because the conspiracy is ongoing, as those involved haven't admitted wrongdoing in 2016 and 2020.

The transcript states that documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. These emails quote a Clinton campaign adviser saying, "it will be a long term affair" and to "demonize Putin and Trump," and that, "later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire." Other emails reportedly reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, describing it as a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. The documents purportedly provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the information they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. The transcript adds that, despite these alleged disclosures, the Obama intel community forged ahead with a 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.

Speaker 0 states that sources claim Brennan used "reverse targeting" to entrap Trump advisors Carter Page and George Papadopoulos via Halper and Mifsud. Papadopoulos told former Australian ambassador Downer about Russian offers to help Trump. This appears to be how Russiagate started. Speaker 1 believes John Brennan is a dark figure. Speaker 1 was arrested in 2012 and charged with espionage for blowing the whistle on the sea ice torch program. Speaker 1 claims to have found memos where Brennan told Holder to charge him with espionage, even though Holder's people didn't think he committed it, and then to make him defend himself. The espionage charges were dropped after Speaker 1 went bankrupt from legal fees. Speaker 1 believes Brennan was responsible for the origin of Russiagate. Speaker 1 claims the FBI isn't capable of such operations, but the CIA and John Brennan are. Speaker 1 claims Brennan and his contemporaries devise operations to get from point A to point C, ruining people along the way, and discusses potential tactics.

Newly declassified material reveals handwritten notes by former CIA Director John Brennan from July 2016. According to the notes, Brennan briefed Obama and senior officials, suggesting Hillary Clinton's campaign approved a plan to tie Trump to Russian interference in the election, allegedly to distract from her email scandal. The notes outlined concerns about Russian knowledge of this strategy. The speaker claims that in 2016, Brennan, Obama, and their advisors knew Hillary Clinton was running an operation and were worried about Russia finding out about it. The speaker suggests that officials knew early on there was no evidence that General Flynn had done anything wrong, but talked about continuing to investigate him anyway.

Svetlana Lokova recounts a years-spanning, shadowy influence operation that she says began long before the public Russiagate narrative took hold and continued to unfold through high-level intelligence and political circles in the United States and the United Kingdom. She argues that a coordinated conspiracy, involving American and British intelligence figures, political operatives, and foreign partners, was designed to undermine Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, demonize him in the public sphere, and ultimately reshape U.S. politics in ways that persist to today. She explains that the conspiracy starts with the idea of weaponizing Russia as a pretext to derail Trump. In September 2015, Hillary Clinton’s circle tied to Strobe Talbott and to London-based figures including Richard Dearlove and Christopher Andrew decides to dust off “the old Russian handbook” and pursue a plan to run with Russia as the central smokescreen. Svetlana notes that General Michael Flynn, then head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) under Obama, was already engaging with Russia on matters of security and terrorism, and that Flynn’s Moscow trip in December 2015, arranged through the DIA, became a focal point of later accusations. She emphasizes that the trip was conducted under normal security procedures, with defensive briefings and debriefings required for someone of Flynn’s level of clearance. A key tie-in is the Cambridge operation she herself experienced. In 2015 she was an academic at Cambridge University, where she formed connections with MI6’s Richard Dearlove, Cambridge-based MI6-linked figures, and CIA asset Stefan Halper, who had Cambridge cover as a professor. She describes what she calls “bump” encounters—unexpected introductions that later produced routine reports. One such meeting introduced her to John McLaughlin, then acting CIA director, who allegedly expressed admiration for Russia and who later became a conduit for information within the FBI and CIA. Alan Collar, a London-based FBI liaison (Ligat) and a contact to Cambridge, also emerges as a pivotal figure; Svetlana recalls that Collar later sought to have Halper’s help in various capacities, including a potential PhD placement at Cambridge. Svetlana underscores how the operation leveraged a web of relationships: Christopher Steele in Britain, Halper in the U.S., McLaughlin, and MI6 heads like Dearlove, all part of what she describes as a “newsroom-to-FBI-to-CIA” loop. She explains that Steele and Halper acted as confidential informants for the FBI and CIA, with Steele’s dossier and Halper’s reports forming the backbone of what would become the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. She contends that the plan was not simply to accuse Trump of wrongdoing but to create a narrative of foreign interference—Russian involvement used to undermine Trump’s legitimacy and to give cover for the political takes of the Clinton-Soros alliance. The narrative continues with the infamous 2016 timeline. Svetlana recounts how the Hillary Clinton campaign, with Soros backing and with John Podesta’s circle, leveraged a “two-pronged” approach: demonize Trump through a public narrative of Russian interference and simultaneously seed a parallel set of claims about Trump campaign contacts with Russian intelligence. The plan, she says, was documented in internal emails circulated through Soros-linked channels and high-level Clinton aides. An August 2016 Oval Office meeting reportedly included Barack Obama, Susan Rice, James Comey, and John Brennan; Brennan allegedly noted that Hillary’s plan to distract from her email scandal involved tying Trump to Russia and ordered or supported steps to surface contacts between Trump advisers and Russian intelligence. This, she says, culminated in the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, justified by Downer’s May 2016 meeting with George Papadopoulos in London, which fed the FBI’s launch of an overarching inquiry into the Trump campaign. Svetlana emphasizes the mechanics of the operation: a cascade of “two-source” corroboration that failed to exist in reality but was manufactured through coordinated reporting. Stefan Halper and Christopher Steele allegedly provided separate but harmonized lines to the FBI and to journalists (for example, Washington Post and New York Times), with Fusion GPS coordinating research and payments, and with journalists feeding stories into the media while the FBI used those articles as cover to justify surveillance. She notes that the Steele dossier and Halper reports described contacts with Russian figures and asserted Kremlin orders, even while evidence mountains suggested the opposite or were non-existent. The operation allegedly relied on “ambiguous” or “dual-source” reporting to maintain plausible deniability and to keep multiple actors downstream of a single fabrication. Svetlana also describes internal institutional dynamics. She recounts that the Cambridge network included Gina Haspel (then head of the London CIA station) and Mike Morell (a senior CIA official) who allegedly used Cambridge as a front to pursue operations with university cover. The effort, she says, involved the use of “color revolutions” metaphors and methods—funding, organizing demonstrations, and controlling media narratives—through a transatlantic network that included British intelligence (MI6), American agencies (CIA, FBI, DHS), and at times Ukrainian actors. She asserts that the aim was not merely to affect the 2016 election but to create a “fog of war” (as she calls it) to obscure the truth, with the ultimate objective of removing Trump from power or preventing his influence in foreign policy. Two focal consequences are highlighted. First, the emergence of the Russia-collusion frame itself, built on forged or misrepresented evidence about Trump’s alleged ties to Russia and to Russian elites. Second, the use of this frame to drive real-world investigations, media coverage, and political pressure—culminating in the Mueller investigation and attempts to impeach or remove Trump from office. She contends that the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, and later the intelligence community assessment that purported Russian interference and Trump’s supposed collaboration, were built on manipulated or false premises, with the principal architects’ fingerprints on the evidence and the dissemination of the narrative across intelligence and media channels. In her discussion of the Mar-a-Lago documents and the Florida case surrounding John Brennan and other co-conspirators, Svetlana asserts that declassification by President Trump of Crossfire Hurricane documents demonstrated both the existence of the conspiracy and government overreach. She repeats a central point: the documents show a plan written down by Brennan and other aides to tie Trump to Russia, demonize him, and justify an ongoing investigation to undermine his presidency. She notes that the same players who orchestrated the scheme—Halper, Steele, Downer, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and others—were allegedly involved in a broader pattern of off-the-books operations, funding, and information leaks designed to influence U.S. politics and foreign policy outcomes, with foreign allies in Britain and elsewhere participating in the broader maneuver. Svetlana’s overarching message is that accountability is possible but contingent on public attention and political will. She points to subpoenas and grand jury activity around Brennan and others as indications that the origins of the Russia investigation are formally being examined. She stresses that, despite the persistence of the conspiracy narrative, documents and testimony could reveal the truth behind the orchestrated campaign to disrupt the Trump presidency. She calls on the American public to demand accountability and to remain vigilant about the institutions and actors involved in what she describes as a continuing conspiracy, from Crossfire Hurricane to the later narratives surrounding Mueller and impeachment efforts, and into current political disputes. The dialogue closes with a personal appeal from Svetlana to the audience and to Lara Logan: the need to push for transparency and for due process, to scrutinize the roles of the people who allegedly manufactured and propagated the Russia collusion claims, and to insist on accountability for those who oversaw or participated in actions she frames as treasonous or seditious. She credits Lara Logan for ongoing coverage and expresses gratitude for the support of viewers and readers who seek an unflinching account of events, urging continued public scrutiny and a demand for principled governance.

The Trump-Russia collusion story was allegedly a hoax known by Democrats, the FBI, the CIA, and Barack Obama. John Ratcliffe approved the release of documents to the DOJ regarding the Obama administration's oversight of the Trump-Russia investigation. John Brennan briefed Obama in 2016 on Hillary Clinton's plan to link Trump to Russia. John O'Connor claims the Clinton campaign, not Trump, worked with Russia. Critics allege abuse of power and potential criminal activity by intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Hillary Clinton and the Democrats were responsible, and Obama and Biden may have known. A CIA memo notes Russians believed Hillary Clinton tried to stir up scandal to distract from her email server. The FBI allegedly shut down investigations into the Clinton Foundation and illegal contributions to Hillary's campaign from overseas. James Comey allegedly pushed to spy on the Trump campaign. The Obama administration allegedly prevented investigations into Hillary and greenlit fake investigations into Trump. Obama allegedly lied about not discussing pending investigations with the Attorney General or FBI director. The Biden administration allegedly obstructed the Durham report. The New York Times allegedly had meetings with the Clinton campaign. The Durham report is considered devastating to the FBI and exonerates Donald Trump to a degree. Some believe those involved should be prosecuted for misusing the CIA and FBI.

Speaker 0 states that sources have indicated Brennan used "reverse targeting" to entrap Trump advisors Carter Page and George Papadopoulos via Halper and Mifsud. Papadopoulos then told former Australian ambassador Downer about Russian offers to help Trump. This appears to be how Russiagate started. Speaker 1 believes John Brennan is a dark figure. Speaker 1 was arrested in 2012 and charged with espionage for blowing the whistle on the sea ice torch program. Speaker 1 claims to have found memos where Brennan told Holder to charge him with espionage, even after being advised against it. The espionage charges, carrying a potential death penalty, were later dropped after Speaker 1 went bankrupt from legal fees. Speaker 1 believes Brennan was responsible for the origin of Russiagate and that the CIA, under Brennan, devises operations to ruin people, cause suicides, or entrap individuals.

I bribed Hillary Clinton $18,000,000 on behalf of the FBI in 2016. The FBI wanted to set her up in a sting operation. They told me to facilitate a bribe from another government. I did this on January 14, 2016. The FBI later told me to forget about it because Hillary was going to win the election. They said Obama's people were controlling things. This was part of a plan called Operation Snow Globe to control Hillary for 8 years. I realized I was being used to manipulate her. The whole situation was a coup against Hillary that turned into the Russian collusion delusion when Trump won. I knew in 2018 they were planning to hijack the 2020 election.

Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign manager Robbie Mook testified that Clinton herself approved the idea of giving the Alpha Bank story to a reporter as part of the Trump-Russia narrative. He described a moment when the campaign told Clinton they had information alleging a link between the Trump Organization and a Russian-based bank through a back channel, and that she agreed to let it be shared with the media. To provide background, the report involved an allegation about the Trump Organization, via a back channel to a Russian bank named Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin and Russian oligarchs close to Vladimir Putin. In 2016, campaign attorney Michael Sussman went to James Baker, the FBI’s general counsel at the time, informing him that he had information linking the Trump Organization to a Russian bank through a back channel and via a computer server. James Baker took the information to the FBI, which investigated and found nothing substantial. The Clinton campaign also learned about the information, and Robbie Mook later stated that Clinton was briefed on the allegation and gave the approval to disseminate it to the media. Sussman faces one count of providing a false statement to the FBI. The moment described by Mook—that Clinton personally approved sending the story to a reporter—was presented as surprising in court, especially since the information later turned out to be baseless. During coverage, a reporter quotes Mook: “we told her, Hillary Clinton, we have this, and that's the information about this bank allegedly having this communication or at least the server suggested so with the Trump Organization. We told her we have this, and we wanna share it with a reporter. She agreed to that.” The discussion also notes that the information was ultimately false or lacking evidence. Questions are raised about why the information was given to reporters, including a claim that they did not have the expertise to judge the information and were briefed by Mark Elias about it. Mook says they decided to give it to a reporter so the reporter could run it down more. It’s argued that reporters may not have done due diligence to verify with the FBI or other sources, and that the story was amplified despite its lack of substantiation. Speaker commentary emphasizes the perceived strategic value of the release and critiques the media’s coverage, suggesting that the Russia narrative was intensified by those opposed to a Trump presidency. The discussion also references Mark Elias, who led the law firm that funded the Steele dossier, tying the episode to broader assertions about campaign desperation and attempts to influence the political outcome.

- Speaker 0 states they believe certain people are dishonest and crooked and that they may have to pay a price; they insist they are truly bad and dishonest people, and imply consequences may follow. - Speaker 1 discusses a criminal investigation into James Comey and John Brennan related to the so-called Russian collusion hoax, asserting they tried to ruin Trump’s life and that he prevailed. - Speaker 1 notes that for years, ranking members of Congress, the intelligence community, and the FBI claimed Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, and that this was continued through his first presidency. - Speaker 2 references emails suggesting Donald Trump Jr. was willing to collude with Russia, questioning how to know what happens when Trump and Putin meet, and suggests Trump’s repeated denials of collusion may have been truthful. - Speaker 3 asks if there has been any evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and Speaker 2 disagrees, saying there is plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. - Speaker 1 cites a recently declassified CIA “lessons learned” document from John Ratcliffe noting that the investigation was messed up, aimed at preventing Trump from winning and then hampering his agenda, and mentions multiple procedural anomalies in the preparation of the ICA (intelligence community assessment). - They walk through the timeline: Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 officer with Russian intel expertise, was hired by Fusion GPS, which was paid by Perkins Coie for Hillary Clinton’s campaign (notably Mark Elias) to produce opposition research on Trump; this unvetted dossier was used to bolster the case and was shopped to media to create a narrative of Trump-Russia ties, then used as a legal hook to push a narrative. - Speaker 1 argues Hillary Clinton leveraged influence to funnel the unverified dossier into the FBI and into a FISA warrant for Carter Page, noting it was not disclosed that the dossier was funded by Hillary Clinton, which they view as a major omission. - Ratcliffe’s document is cited as saying including the Steele dossier in the ICA undermined credibility and ran counter to tradecraft principles. - A second parallel element involved Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer paid by Fusion GPS and Clinton campaign, who met Don Jr. at Trump Tower; Don Jr. texted during the meeting that he was unsure what was happening, and the meeting was publicly used to support the Steele dossier claims about Trump’s ties to Russia. - The Speaker covers Hillary Clinton’s classified server issue, including the use of BleachBit and hammers, and notes DNC servers were hacked by Russia; they frame these events as being used to shift focus to Trump collusion. - They describe Crossfire Hurricane as the investigation into Trump, calling it an “insurance policy” to deflect attention from Clinton’s classified server issues and to portray Trump as guilty, describing the investigations into Trump associates (Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Manafort, Flynn) as efforts to keep the narrative alive even after Trump’s election victory. - Speaker 1 asserts Mueller’s appointment was scope-limited but later expanded, allowing broad access and substantial taxpayer cost; Brennan and Comey are accused of feeding initial information for a political purpose, with high-level agency involvement and misrepresentation in Congress. - They claim there was never any actual evidence of Russian collusion charged against the Trump campaign. - They mention Charles McGonigal, a former FBI counterintelligence official, as someone charged in connection with Russia, implying the broader narrative was invalid and asserting that those involved lied. - The speakers conclude that the entire setup was a scam and express a desire for accountability.

The Durham report allegedly reveals the Trump-Russia collusion story was a hoax known by Democrats, the FBI, the CIA, and Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton allegedly started the collusion story to distract from her email scandal, including a fabricated "pee tape" lie pinned on a Russian, conceived by DNC operative Charles Dolan. The FBI allegedly shut down investigations into the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's campaign taking illegal foreign contributions. James Comey allegedly pushed to spy on the Trump campaign, instructing people to not put anything in writing. Obama allegedly lied about his involvement in these investigations. The New York Times allegedly colluded with the Clinton campaign on stories, even seeking approval on drafts. The Biden administration allegedly obstructed the Durham report. While CNN acknowledged the report is devastating to the FBI and exonerates Trump to a degree, MSNBC claimed the report is a "big fat nothing." The speaker suggests the media believes they won because no one was jailed.

War over Ukraine and Western support 'was an extension of Russiagate,' desensitizing the Democrat party to hate Russia. 'Cambridge Analytica' was the first attempt, and 'the Russia narrative came ex nihilo.' 'Tulsi is getting to the bottom of it.' 'Putin became an acceptable villain for the Democrat party' and 'That all goes back to Russiagate' and 'the lie of the dirty dossier.' 'Our intel services are supposed to gather intelligence and defend the homeland' but are 'actually more about picking winners and losers' and 'thwarting the will of pop popular sovereignty.' 'Obama personally ordered an intel report' concluding 'Russia was not behind this election' (December 2016, now declassified). 'FBI and the CIA' seem to be on the same page and 'the insurance policy' leads to 'Rosenstein' 'running the entire DOJ.' Perp walks are called for to address the 'fourth branch of government'—'unaccountable' and 'unelected.'

Hillary Clinton paid Perkins Coie, who hired Fusion GPS, who paid Christopher Steele, who hired Russians to create a fake dossier. The FBI used this dossier to undermine a presidency and overturn an election. When we questioned it, we were labeled as Russian bots. Then, during the election, the Hunter Biden laptop story broke. The FBI dismissed it as Russian disinformation, but it turned out to be true. If we talked about it, social media silenced us. On election night, suspicious votes for Biden flooded in, but questioning it led to losing social media accounts. The Durham report reveals that top government officials, including Obama and Biden, knew about the hoax. Yet, we're still called Russian bots. The Biden DOJ removed the IRS investigative team from the Hunter Biden laptop case. No one will be held accountable. We're living in a world of absurdity.

In early 2016, two Open Society Foundations officials allegedly held confidential talks with the Clinton campaign and the DNC, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Their objective was to promote the Trump-Russia collusion narrative and distract from Hillary Clinton's email and Clinton Foundation scandals. According to the transcript, Open Society executive Leonard Bernardo outlined a plan for strategic media manipulation using CrowdStrike, ThreatConnect, and Intel channels. CIA and FBI analysts reviewed the evidence and deemed the emails likely authentic. Despite this confirmation, the FBI allegedly did not follow through, allowing the trail to go cold. The speaker claims this was not a mistake but a cover-up.

Hillary Clinton started the Tulsi narrative because Tulsi was a rising star. She was a woman, a minority, and combat vet. Tulsi began 'to be kind of open minded to what Bernie Sanders was saying' and spoke up, making enemies in the party. She was outraged when she learned the DNC 'cheated on behalf of Hillary to try to make sure she got the nomination and screwed Bernie.' Hillary Clinton allegedly called her a 'Russian asset,' part of the 'Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.' 'Her campaign made up the all the stuff about there being a server in Trump Tower Right.' Don Junior was using it to commute. Tulsi left the party. She argued the Russia-Ukraine war 'didn't have to happen' if Putin's views on NATO expansion had been listened to. She met with Bashar al Assad; Trump opened negotiations with Kim Jong Un; 'Diplomacy means you talk to your enemies.'

Fox News alert: Tulsi Gabbard releases a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election. There is irrefutable evidence detailing how Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win, selling it to the American people as true. Gabbard obtained a House Intelligence Committee report locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials, and it shows the Obama administration doctored intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Obama wasn’t satisfied with intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed; none knew what the others were doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting the report. It was not routine, and it was rushed to publish before Trump’s inauguration. Nothing was coordinated with other intelligence agencies. Basically, this was “home cooking” for Barack Obama. Four key elements were repeated to form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took action to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of this was ever true; there was no reliable intelligence to support these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but were overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted they be pushed without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, lied about sources, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed intelligence counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA admitted violations of tradecraft standards; a massive pressure campaign came from the top, with unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Donald Trump knows that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Putin hated Hillary Clinton, with a noted preference for the opponent he disliked least. It was Russia in a systematic effort to interfere in the election and advance Trump’s prospects. The report notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked voting machines to help Trump win, but the report shows Russians sought to create chaos and undermine democracy; solid intelligence suggested Putin had no preference, and expected Hillary to win, holding compromising dirt on her that he never released. If Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn’t he drop the dirt? There were high-level DNC emails detailing Hillary’s psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and a daily regimen of tranquilizers; Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to create a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump, though Obama and intelligence leaders knew Putin did not collude with Trump and did not direct his people to help Trump win, yet they published it anyway. Obama and his intel spies purportedly cooked intelligence to look like Putin preferred Trump, undermining faith in elections and causing chaos. Do you believe this implicates Obama in criminal behavior? There is a referral of documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate criminal implications. Evidence points to Obama leading the manufacturing of the intelligence assessment. Even two years after the election, Obama pushed a hoax he knew wasn’t true. Brennan, Comey, and others may have liability. Trey Gowdy claims Brennan committed perjury for lying to Congress. When asked who commissioned the Steele dossier, responses indicate the CIA did not rely on it; it was not part of the intelligence community assessment. The broadcast concludes with the assertion that what happened to these officials is not revenge, but accountability, while noting ongoing questions about potential criminal action.

The transcript discusses a set of emails and intelligence claims regarding the 2016 U.S. election and the narratives surrounding Russia, Hillary Clinton, and the Trump campaign. It states that documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. One email quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, “it will be a long term affair” and to “demonize Putin and Trump,” and adds that, “later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire.” Other emails are said to reveal that Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, describing it as a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. The documents are presented as providing clear evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign was behind the Russia hoax, and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the information they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. Despite these claims, the transcript asserts that the Obama-era intelligence community proceeded with a 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard unveiled new evidence alleging that former president Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. The private actions contrasted with publicly presented peaceful transfer of power, as Obama allegedly sought to sow discord and sabotage his successor. The released evidence purportedly confirms that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence that was later used to justify baseless smears against President Trump in an effort to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. The speaker asserts that President Trump never had anything to do with Russia, and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud perpetuated from the start, with Obama and others allegedly knowing the truth. The speaker names several officials as part of the alleged scheme: former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and other officials. The report is said to corroborate that there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, but rather wrongdoing by Barack Obama and the weaponized intelligence agencies at the time. The Russia hoax is described as a blatant lie, devised by Democrat political operatives, approved by Obama, and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump and his first administration. Allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some having their lives destroyed due to the allegations. The speaker notes that the first two years of Trump’s presidency were overshadowed by this fake distraction, with extensive resources, time, and political capital spent debunking the lies from the highest levels of government. Nearly ten years later, declassification of documents by the director is said to reveal the truth, vindicating Trump, his family, and allies who were smeared. The speaker claims there is now damning evidence implicating those who attempted to sabotage a duly elected president and harmed the republic. Thanks to work by CIA Director Ratcliffe and committee Chairman Rick Crawford, a newly declassified 2020 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, declassified by DNI Gabbard, allegedly finds that the intel community did not have direct information that Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016; rather, Russia was preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but was allegedly steered by Obama’s unusual direction to publish implausible intelligence suggesting otherwise to sabotage the incoming president. The speaker describes this as one of the greatest political scandals in American history and criticizes reporters from legacy outlets, including the New York Times and Washington Post, who allegedly continued to propagate the hoax, saying they were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for disinformation. The call is made for those awards to be stripped from journalists who produced disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and certain intelligence officials.

According to the speaker, Gina Haspel, as CIA station chief in England in 2016, authorized intelligence operations related to Russiagate. The speaker claims that Haspel is a leading architect of Russiagate who has remained behind the scenes. They allege that Haspel's authorization was necessary for US FBI and IC officials, and possibly other intelligence allies, to conduct bumping operations in England. The speaker also asserts that Haspel blocked the release of a report on John Brennan's ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment) regarding Russian interference in the US elections. This report, created by Devin Nunez and others, supposedly detailed the corruption involved in the ICA's creation. Despite requests for its declassification, Haspel, along with others, allegedly used national security concerns to keep it secret, effectively covering up their own corruption. The speaker believes the report's release is crucial to exposing the extent of IC involvement and corruption.

The Durham report is out, confirming the Trump-Russia collusion story was a Democrat-led hoax, with the FBI, CIA, and Obama knowing it all along. Hillary Clinton initiated the collusion narrative to deflect from her email scandal, fabricating the "pee tape" story involving a DNC operative in Russia. The FBI shut down investigations into the Clinton Foundation's foreign money laundering and illegal campaign contributions from overseas. Comey was eager to spy on the Trump campaign, instructing his team to avoid written records. The Obama administration obstructed investigations into Hillary while pushing fake investigations into Trump. The New York Times colluded with the Clinton campaign, even allowing them to review and approve stories. The Biden administration obstructed the Durham report, with FBI agents refusing to cooperate. Despite all this evidence, the media downplays the findings, as no one is being held accountable.

The transcript discusses the Pizzagate conspiracy, stating that it claims Hillary Clinton and her former campaign manager John Podesta ran a child sex ring at a Washington, DC pizzeria. It asserts that this is a lie. The speaker adds a satirical remark about Chuck E. Cheese robots being the only ones trapped in a pizza place, and it references a Westworld-like scenario where robots might rise up, framing it as part of the broader, unfounded fear. The origin of the conspiracy is traced to alt-right readers who examined Clinton campaign emails hacked by Russia and published by WikiLeaks. They noticed more references to pizza and pizzerias than expected, and concluded that this signified a secret sexring. The speaker notes that “a lot of uninformed gullible people” believed the theory, providing Michael Flynn as an example of someone who amplified it. Flynn, who was Trump’s pick for national security adviser, tweeted: “new Hillary emails, money laundering, sex crimes with children, etcetera, must read,” as part of introducing or endorsing the narrative. The transcript emphasizes that the theory spread despite lacking corroborating evidence, highlighting the role of hacked emails and sensational interpretation by alt-right figures. The speaker adds a concluding retort: “Introducing it, you decide. Okay? Then I decide a guy who spreads this bull shouldn't be in charge of national security.” This serves as a final judgment within the dialogue on the appropriateness of promoting the conspiracy in a position of national security leadership. Key points highlighted include: - Pizzagate claims that Hillary Clinton and John Podesta operated a child sex ring at a DC pizzeria. - The assertion that this is a lie. - A satirical aside about robots at Chuck E. Cheese and a Westworld reference. - The alleged origin in hacked Clinton emails with increased pizza references found by alt-right circles, as published by WikiLeaks. - The spread of the theory among uninformed followers, with Michael Flynn cited as a notable promoter who linked “new Hillary emails, money laundering, sex crimes with children” to read. - A concluding stance that a promoter of this conspiracy should not hold a national security role.

The FBI's politicized hacks aimed to bring down Donald Trump, with the help of Hillary Clinton's campaign. The report revealed that Trump's political opponents provided leads for the investigation, relying on a fabricated dossier. While we reported on this, other media outlets downplayed it. Unfortunately, there were no consequences for those involved in the Crossfire Hurricane operation. In fact, they were emboldened and repeated their actions in 2022, this time protecting Hunter Biden.