TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker was in Israel on October 7 and received a call from President Biden. The speaker claims Biden was sharper than anyone they'd spoken to. The speaker questions whether Biden's actions stem from incompetence, cognitive issues, ignorance, or lying, and states they don't believe Biden is competent. They also question whether Biden's cognitive abilities are sufficient to avoid the 25th amendment.

The speaker criticizes Joe Biden's speaking abilities, claiming that his speeches are confusing and lack clarity. They express a desire for a strong leader and believe that Biden's struggles with the teleprompter make him appear weak. They argue that even their grandparents could outperform him in a debate. The speaker suggests watching press conferences to see Biden's shortcomings and points to the dislike ratio on YouTube videos as evidence that people do not like him. They state that they disagree with his decisions and would prefer mean tweets over his policies.

Biden's meeting with people leaves them in disbelief. They think it's a game, like chess. They question what's happening and can't believe it. They say he can't talk and mention his recent 1 minute and 15 second speech, which is considered significant for him.

A person criticizes Joe Biden, saying that many people have died and more will die unless he becomes smarter. Joe Biden is then challenged about his intelligence and education, with the other person claiming that he did not attend Delaware State University and graduated near the bottom of his class. The person tells Joe Biden not to use the word "smart" with them because there is nothing smart about him. They also mention that Joe Biden has accomplished nothing in his 47 years of public service.

Biden's critics are shocked by his speaking abilities, thinking it's a game. They can't believe he gave a 1 minute and 15 second speech, considering it a big deal for him.

For 4 years, mainstream media denied Joe Biden's cognitive struggles, calling videos fake. In a recent debate, Biden's live performance proved otherwise, showing his difficulties. The speaker thanked Biden for revealing the truth with courage.

Speaker 0: Some people criticize Biden for not being genuine in his speeches. Speaker 1: He admits to not giving credit when quoting others, like Neil Kinnock and Robert Kennedy. Speaker 2: CBS News found another instance of Biden's plagiarism. Speaker 3: Biden also plagiarized John Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, and Neil Kinnock without acknowledgment. Speaker 2: Biden confessed to unintentional plagiarism in law school. Speaker 1: He copied five pages of someone else's work without citation and received an F. Speaker 4: Biden acknowledges his mistakes but admits to doing dumb things. Speaker 1: Critics argue that if Biden's words and visions belong to others, it's false advertising. Speaker 5: Taking personal material from another politician is unwise. Speaker 6: Appropriating someone else's personal material was a stupid move. Speaker 7: Many people now associate Biden with plagiarism. Speaker 8: These clips are politically devastating, making Biden appear like a wind-up doll with someone else's words.

Some criticism of media coverage of President Biden is fair, including of Speaker 1's own coverage. Looking back, some issues were not covered enough. Reporting revealed that starting around 2019 or 2020, there appeared to be two Bidens: one that was workable and serviceable, and another nonfunctioning one who couldn't recall names of top aides and would lose his train of thought to an alarming degree. The nonfunctioning Biden appeared more frequently, and seemed to get much worse in 2023 and 2024.

The speaker was in Israel on October 7 and received a call from President Biden. The speaker claims Biden was sharper than anyone they'd spoken to. The speaker questions whether Biden's actions stem from incompetence, cognitive issues, ignorance, or lying, and states they don't believe Biden is competent. They also question whether Biden's cognitive abilities are sufficient to avoid the 25th amendment.

The speaker accuses someone of incompetence, referencing a prior statement made on PBS where they called Joe Biden competent, which they then had to retract. The speaker objects to being insulted publicly by the chairman and claims this behavior is discourteous and outside the committee's guidelines, characterizing it as a personal shot while also criticizing Biden.

The speaker states that, prior to the election, their personal experiences with President Biden involved him bringing "a lot of good ideas about how to solve problems." They visited the White House to advocate for their state and never witnessed any indication that Biden might need a wheelchair. The speaker clarifies that they never heard any discussion about Biden potentially needing a wheelchair, despite reports suggesting otherwise.

The speaker questions why the media did not report on Joe Biden's alleged incompetence sooner, accusing them of lying to the public. They specifically call out Dana Bash, Jake Tapper, and Chris Wallace for not addressing Biden's cognitive decline. The speaker confronts the journalists about their responsibility to be truthful to the public, but they do not receive a response. The speaker criticizes the media for avoiding questions about Biden's mental decline.

In this video, the speaker compares Joe Biden in 2012, 2016, and today, suggesting that he has declined mentally. They mention instances where Biden seemed to struggle with his words and claim that his cognitive issues are being questioned by foreign news agencies. The speaker criticizes the media for not addressing these concerns and highlights that Biden's staff rarely allows him to take questions from the press. They also note that Biden has not held a press conference since becoming president.

Speaker 0 notes that Biden “may have more explaining to do.” Speaker 1 introduces the topic as arising from taped remarks of Biden during an April campaign appearance in New Hampshire. Speaker 2 recalls self-descriptions Biden offered: that he “went to law school on a full academic scholarship,” being “the only one in my class that have a full academic scholarship,” that he “went back to law school” and “ended up in the top half of my class,” that he “was the outstanding student in the political science department at the end of my year,” that he “graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and a 165 credits, only a 123 credits.” Speaker 1 states that Biden now concedes he did not graduate in the top half of his law school class, that he does not have three degrees from college, and that he was not named outstanding political science student in college. Speaker 0 reports Newsweek’s version: Biden “actually went to school on a half scholarship, ended up near the bottom of his class, and won only one degree, not three.” Speaker 3 adds: “Joe Biden ranked seventy sixth in the class of 85 at the University of Syracuse Law School. I mean, this guy comes off this whole thing as a flyweight.” Speaker 1 repeats that Biden says Newsweek is right and that his memory had failed him. Speaker 2 fires back: “And I’d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you’d like, Frank.” Speaker 1 repeats: “Joe Biden was victimized by the truth.” Speaker 2 concludes with “Bye bye Biden. He may not know it yet, but I think this is very diff going to be very difficult for him to recover it.” Speaker 0 asks: “Is Joe Biden dead meat? Yes or” Speaker 2 responds: “I think so. Bob? He’s” Speaker 3 interjects: “in terminal condition.” Speaker 0 asks for confirmation: “Terminal? Elinor?” Speaker 2 affirms: “Yes. Unless he comes in third in Iowa.” Speaker 0 labels: “Morton. Dying. I say dead.”

The speaker criticized someone for making inappropriate and false personal comments. They mentioned that meeting with President Biden is challenging because he is intelligent, curious, and pays attention to details.

The speaker was asked about a book claiming Joe Biden is in cognitive and physical decline, and whether they ever felt Biden was unfit to run. The speaker stated they thought Biden was a good president, and their only concern was whether anyone could do that job until 86. They had several long talks with Biden and never walked away thinking he couldn't do the job, stating he was always on top of his brief. The speaker said they didn't know anything about the claims in the book and haven't read it, but when they saw Biden recently, they thought he was in good shape. They didn't want to read the book because Biden is not president anymore, and they think he did a good job. They believe some people are trying to blame Biden for Trump being reelected.

Joe Biden is criticized by Speaker 1, who calls him a loser and says he only gained popularity because of Obama. Speaker 1 believes Biden's campaign is focused on attacking him and mentions that the Obama administration's policies have been overturned. Speaker 1 also comments on Biden's appearance and behavior, suggesting he has changed. Despite the criticism, Speaker 1 sees Biden mentioning his name multiple times as a compliment.

President Biden wanted the speaker to be the last person in the room for big decisions, as he was for President Obama. The speaker confirmed they were the last person in the room for the Afghanistan decision. They also stated they feel comfortable with that.

Speaker 0 recounts seeing a man backstage at a benefit who looked dramatically different, noting that at 81 this is not wholly unexpected and that people’s worry was understandable. Speaker 1 responds by saying he sees Joe Biden almost every day and emphasizes that no one has said Biden has an age-related decline in governance. Biden would joke about aging and acknowledge it, admitting he doesn’t speak or walk as well as he used to, but Speaker 1 argues that the mental acuity and ability to govern were evident, with Biden engaging, understanding policy, and putting the American people first, which showed in what he could get done. Speaker 1 cautions against questioning heart or policies but notes that leadership requires more, and during a moment of great pressure on stage, there was a shock and worry that could not be assuaged. Speaker 0 adds that they cannot fault the factual basis of the concerns or the feelings, but emphasizes that the debate performance is what matters downstream. Speaker 1 acknowledges that the debate performance was shocking and disappointing, and describes the disappointment as significant, using Speaker 0’s word “herald” to characterize it. Speaker 0 concedes ongoing disagreement, and both express appreciation for the other’s presence tonight. Speaker 1 asks if there is one more thing to say, and Speaker 0 leaves the closing remark open.

The speaker questions who was really running the country, given concerns about the president's mental acuity. They suggest that if the president was not consistently capable, his ability to do the job day to day should be questioned. The speaker recalls Democrats claiming Joe Biden was extremely fit, despite observations to the contrary. They state that people were told not to believe what they saw, because those around Biden were with him every day. The speaker concludes by stating that this was not true.

The media is in a fight with the Democratic left over the Joe Biden scandal. The Democratic left claims journalists should have reported on Biden's alleged cognitive decline, but journalists say they couldn't get close enough to him due to a guarded environment. Both the Democratic Party, Biden insiders, and the media are allegedly at fault. The speaker notes the lack of questions about Biden's cognitive ability during press conferences. The media has gained influence in the opposition due to the absence of a strong Democratic opposition. The media allegedly uses the strategy of attacking Donald Trump, as that is the only strategy the Democratic Party can come up with.

Speaker 0 wishes for Joe Biden to be interviewed in the same manner as them. They mention seeing Biden walking out of a store with ice cream and being asked about the flavor instead of important matters. Speaker 0 believes Biden is not being held accountable for his actions and suggests ending the interview.

The speaker says that criticisms of Biden go beyond his age, with some falsely claiming he is senile, demented, and out of it. The speaker states that many of these claims are untrue. The speaker believes that Biden is mentally acute.

The speaker was asked if they would have done anything differently than President Biden during the past 4 years. The speaker responded that there is one thing that comes to mind. They added that they have been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact.

The speaker watched a debate with Biden and thought he did not do well, claiming most of the world would agree. The speaker believes Biden was forced out in a coup and replaced with someone who was ranked number 13 online after failing to get the nomination. The speaker spent $150,000,000 to beat Biden and was leading when Biden was replaced. The speaker believes this has never happened before. The speaker thinks Biden hates the new person as much or more than he hates the speaker, which is hard to believe.