reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It was all just a test to see if we would comply. The World Economic Forum has revealed that COVID-19 served as a test of our obedience to a rapidly forming new world order. According to their website, COVID-19 was described as a test of social responsibility, where billions adopted significant public health restrictions. This included social distancing, wearing masks, vaccinations, and accepting contact tracing applications. These actions demonstrated individual social responsibility. It was all a test.

This is one of the worst case scenarios for an infectious disease outbreak, and the public's cooperation is crucial. Noncompliant individuals can be quarantined through laws and public health measures. Tracking and monitoring people with bracelets and involving police can ensure quarantine is followed. It's better to be proactive and face criticism for being overly cautious than to risk the severity of the situation. Taking decisive early action is key. In the city, police checkpoints are established on bridges, and proof of vaccination is required for anyone leaving. Those who refuse to cooperate are taken to temporary detention centers.

In a pandemic simulation called event two zero one, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control government criticism. They aim to flood communication channels with trusted sources and ensure access to specific information. These simulations have been conducted since 2001, with the intention of executing a coup d'etat against American democracy and the bill of rights. This raises concerns about the CIA's actions and their potential impact on society.

China's response to the pandemic was initially seen as extreme and aggressive, but it has now become the new norm. Lockdown measures have been implemented, raising concerns about individual rights. However, the balance between individual rights and public safety is constantly evolving. After 9/11, airports worldwide introduced strict safety checks, and people accepted them in exchange for greater public good. Similarly, China imposed the largest and most extensive quarantine in history, shutting down factories, halting public transport, and enforcing stay-at-home orders. This approach helped flatten the curve, preventing millions of cases and tens of thousands of deaths. However, it also strained hospitals over a longer period. Europe and America should take note of China's experience.

In 1993, the World Economic Forum’s Global Leaders program, specifically the Young Global Leaders, began, with Bill Gates among the first into the camp. The speaker notes that about 4,000 individuals have progressed into senior positions since 1993, implying a broad pipeline of influence over time. The argument presented is that this setup helps explain why events around 2020 unfolded in a coordinated way. In 2005, the World Economic Forum hosted a large gathering of these Young Global Leaders for the so-called 2020 initiative. They brought them together and had them brainstorm what they would do, informing them of what they should do. The claim is that when 2020 arrived and a big pandemic emerged, these leaders were already positioned and had already discussed how to respond to misinformation and lockdowns, implying a premeditated or preplanned approach. The speaker characterizes this as “Pavlov’s dogs,” suggesting predictability and rehearsed responses. The speaker then references the Global Risk Report from 2006, produced by the Rand Corporation in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and the World Economic Forum. The report allegedly identified pandemics as the big risk for the world around 2020, even noting this risk “for zero reason whatsoever.” It is asserted that the report also identified misinformation as a major problem, predicting that ordinary people might start talking and spreading fear, which would hinder whatever outcomes were anticipated. The speaker asserts that those involved were aware that ordinary public discourse could decrease fear and undermine the “scam,” hence their stated need to stop the spread of fear by censoring information. This is presented as the rationale behind censorship measures described in the 2006 context. Key points emphasized: - The 1993–present pipeline of Young Global Leaders through the World Economic Forum, including Bill Gates, with roughly 4,000 reaching senior positions since 1993. - The 2005 2020 initiative to brainstorm and direct actions for 2020, implying foreknowledge of potential misinformation and pandemics. - The 2006 Rand Corporation Global Risk Report, in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and WEF, identifying pandemics as a major risk and misinformation as a key problem, and arguing for censorship to prevent public discussion from inflaming fear.

In 2010, a plan was devised to introduce martial law and gain complete control over the population by infecting them with a devastating pandemic. This plan, known as Lockstep, aimed for tighter government control and limited innovation. In 2012, a new influenza strain caused a global pandemic, infecting 20% of the population and killing 8 million people, including healthy young adults. The pandemic also had severe economic consequences, halting international mobility and breaking global supply chains. The goal was to isolate people and keep them at home, glued to their TVs. Even local businesses and offices remained empty for months. This plan was written in advance, and its implementation remains uncertain.

This is one of the worst case scenarios for an infectious disease outbreak. Cooperation from the public is crucial, and noncompliant individuals can be quarantined through legal measures. Tracking and monitoring may be implemented, including the use of bracelets and police involvement. It's better to be proactive and cautious, even if some perceive it as an overreaction. Taking decisive early action is essential in such a serious situation. In this case, police checkpoints have been established on all bridges, and individuals leaving the city must provide proof of vaccination. Those who refuse are taken to temporary detention centers.

The speaker discusses the ruling establishment's desire for control and the addition of quarantines and curfews to their toolkit. They mention a document from the Rockefeller Foundation that outlines scenarios for future national development. The pandemic overwhelmed even prepared nations, causing economic devastation and halting international mobility. China's quick imposition of mandatory quarantine and sealing off of borders saved lives and is presented as an example to follow. National leaders worldwide imposed strict rules and restrictions during the pandemic, such as mandatory face masks and temperature checks. These measures have continued even after the pandemic, leading to increased control and oversight of citizens.

The speaker argues that the war in Iran and associated U.S. and Israeli actions are presented as a complex, intractable crisis, but in reality follow a simple pattern of a “controlled collapse” already underway. The collapse is said to be visible in everyday life, such as rising gas prices after the Strait of Hormuz being effectively closed and tensions around the conflict; the war is described as having caused thousands of deaths and sending energy markets into upheaval, with oil at a four-year high and inflation fears resurging as the Fed is expected to raise rates. Key events cited include the February 28 to March 1 strikes launched by the United States and Israel, the 48-hour ultimatum from President Trump demanding Iran reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and the deployment of thousands of Marines to the Middle East. The speaker asserts Iran’s threat to respond by closing the Strait of Hormuz and targeting U.S. linked energy infrastructure and IT networks, including desalinization plants and data centers, stating that this represents not de-escalation but the architecture of a broader war. The narrative challenges conventional claims that Iran is degraded or cornered, noting that Iran has fired long-range missiles toward the U.S. base on Diego Garcia and conducted strikes near Israel’s Demona nuclear facilities, contradicting the idea that Iranian military capability has collapsed. The speaker argues that war messaging routinely declares the enemy weakened while the conflict expands, and asks why thousands of Marines are being deployed if victory is close and missiles are supposedly diminishing. The broader thesis is that this is part of a larger, premeditated shift toward centralized control. War and energy shocks are said to destabilize prices and justify intervention, with examples of strategic petroleum reserve releases and sanctions easing to calm markets. The speaker links this to a longer-running plan to install emergency governance and digital control systems: surveillance, mobility restrictions, and a move toward digital money, identity, and movement management. They point to developments such as China’s digital yuan expansion, Europe’s digital euro, and the push toward “15-minute cities,” arguing that these are precursors to a digitized, programmable money system. The speech asserts COVID-19 demonstrated how governments can impose sustained fear and centralized control, with digital gatekeeping and state-corporate coordination seen as a live test. It is argued that the “rollout” is not about a temporary crisis but a permanent, durable control grid, with airports adopting faster digital processing and biometric scanning, and the public gradually accepting reduced freedoms and increased dependence as a solution to emergencies. The speaker concludes that the conflict is not as complex as claimed; it is about control and the expansion of a surveillance, monetary, and movement-management system under the guise of crisis management, and invites audience feedback on this perspective.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document predicting a pandemic leading to authoritarian control and surveillance. China's quick response was praised. The document also mentions Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus outbreak in 2019. Misinformation was highlighted as a major issue during the pandemic. The World Health Organization warned of a highly lethal respiratory pathogen causing a global catastrophe. Bill Gates previously warned of a major pandemic causing millions of deaths. The current situation is seen as a result of long-term planning.

There will likely be a deadly airborne disease in the future, so we need to establish a global infrastructure to quickly detect, isolate, and respond to it. This was emphasized by multiple speakers. A document from 2010 predicted a pandemic similar to what we are experiencing now, with China being better prepared and implementing strict measures. The document also foresaw increased government control and oversight, which has become a reality. A simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, accurately predicted the coronavirus outbreak. The speakers discussed the importance of managing misinformation and disinformation. They believe that controlling access to information is necessary to combat the pandemic. Some speakers expressed skepticism about the coincidences and the level of control being exerted.

In a pandemic simulation called Event 201, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control communication. They aim to prevent criticism of government policies and discussions about a lab leak. The CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001, practicing how to execute a coup d'etat against American democracy and the bill of rights. This raises concerns about their intentions and actions.

"In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation had published a report about technology in the future, and one of the scenarios was a flu pandemic. And what we followed in 2020 was exactly what was written out for that script." "fall twenty nineteen, the Johns Hopkins, the Gates Foundation, and the World Economic Forum put together a three and a half hour event online called event two zero one." "Critical really critical a so called tabletop exercise." "Nothing about health. Nothing about vitamin d, good nutrition, repurposed available drugs." "It was all about suppressing dissent. It was all about militarization of society." "It was led by Averell Haynes who had been with the CIA." "In my view, clearly, explicitly, Operation Warp Speed was a military operation." "Department of Defense was over health and human services and over the pharmaceutical industry."

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document predicting a pandemic like COVID-19. It described a scenario where governments imposed strict measures, citizens gave up privacy for safety, and misinformation spread. Event 201, a simulation hosted in 2019, eerily mirrored the pandemic. Experts warned of a highly infectious virus causing global catastrophe. The current situation is seen as a result of long-term planning.

The transcript presents a wide-ranging discussion surrounding alleged global control schemes, pandemic responses, and political voices that challenge mainstream narratives. Key points repeatedly asserted across speakers include: - Quarantine camps and mandatory isolation: Several speakers describe unvaccinated people being quarantined in regional facilities or camps, with police enforcing removal from homes and controlling movement. Quoted moments include claims of being told “from higher up where to take you” and references to being sent to Howard Springs, with entries about bracelets, police checkpoints, and long-term confinement in small cells. One account describes the experience as “inhumane,” like being imprisoned. - Legal authority for quarantine: Speakers contend there are laws and public health powers allowing mandatory quarantine in noncompliant populations, and note that states or authorities could isolate people against their will, sometimes with penalties for noncompliance. - FEMA camps and the “new world order” (NWO): There are persistent claims that FEMA camps exist or were planned as part of a broader agenda to detain large numbers of healthy people, with rhetoric about a “new world order” that would be permanent and tyrannical. The dialogue connects these ideas to a coordinated global power structure. - The “new world order” narrative and global elites: Multiple speakers describe a group of wealthy elites who allegedly seek to depopulate the world and establish a top-down authoritarian regime. References are made to depopulation schemes, the Georgia Guidestones, and statements by Rockefeller and Gates-adjacent figures. The idea that the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, and the World Bank are part of a coordinated effort to impose a new global order recurs. - Warp speed vaccines and public health policy: A central claim is that the vaccine rollout was rushed (warp speed) to enable a broader economic reset and to justify lockdowns; vaccines are described as instruments used to control populations, with assertions that they would be administered under emergency use authorization unless fully FDA-approved. The defense of vaccine mandates is rejected by some speakers, who instead celebrate Trump for opposing mandates and for providing an option to refuse vaccination without being forced into quarantine camps. - Trump’s role and political realignments: Trump is portrayed as opposing mandates, opposing the military–industrial complex, and opposing censorship. Speakers credit him with halting or slowing the NWO’s preferred timeline and with defunding or challenging global institutions seen as part of the plan. Trump’s promotion of hydroxychloroquine and other early treatment considerations is discussed as part of his resistance to a mandated, centralized approach. - Media control and “fake news”: The transcript alleges that mainstream media are a propaganda arm (“mockingbird” operations) used to push state narratives, suppress dissent, and manipulate public opinion. Trump’s confrontations with the press are framed as part of dismantling this control. - COVID-19 lockdowns, surveillance, and social control: The dialogue claims lockdowns created a controlled, surveilled society, with contact tracing, restricted movement, and the normalization of authoritarian measures. The supposed transition to a “new normal” is described as a gradual, incremental shift toward permanent restrictions and biometric tracking systems. - Public activism and awakening: Speakers claim that the pandemic and related policies awakened large portions of the population—particularly conservative, Christian, and Republican sectors—to the alleged conspiracy. They suggest that open discussion, social media, and political action have expanded, reducing fear and encouraging resistance to mandates and censorship. - References to sources and figures: The conversation cites a range of sources and personalities, including Chad Vivas (an artist whose work is presented as revealing or countering the NWO narrative), General Michael Flynn, and Donald Trump. It also mentions broader associations with organizations like the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and the World Economic Forum as part of the alleged framework of control. - Historical and hypothetical mechanisms: Several speakers compare contemporary events to past episodes (e.g., Patriot Act, surveillance state) and to imagined blueprints (e.g., “lockstep” scenarios, digital IDs, vaccine passports, biometric tattoos). They discuss potential future crises as opportunities to solidify control, while asserting that public awareness and resistance have disrupted or weakened those plans. - Closing notes and visuals: The transcript closes with references to art and media promoting the narrative, including paintings and social media posts linked to the movement, and emphasizes ongoing themes of awakening, resistance, and civic engagement against what is portrayed as an ongoing global plan.

In a pandemic simulation called event two zero one, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control communication. They aim to prevent criticism of government policies and discussions about a lab leak. The CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001, practicing how to use a future pandemic to undermine democracy and individual rights. This raises concerns about their intentions and actions.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." One scenario, called "lockstep," predicted a pandemic hitting in 2012. It described how even prepared nations were overwhelmed, economies suffered, and global supply chains broke. China, however, fared better due to its quick imposition of quarantine measures. The document also mentioned that other countries imposed strict rules and restrictions, leading to increased oversight and control. The video then discusses a pandemic simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, which predicted the coronavirus outbreak. It raises questions about the coincidence and the ability to control information. The video suggests that everything was planned and in place before 2020.

This wasn't spontaneous; it was planned in plain sight, a war footing. A Marshall Plan-like approach could rapidly stimulate change. The science was bought, controlled via philanthrocapitalism to mandate vaccines globally. A worldwide lockstep approach amplified the alleged danger of a new virus through mainstream media, using horrific images. USAID manipulates news economics to enforce censorship. They own the science and expect platforms to comply. These actors can be prosecuted for fraud and racketeering. Withholding scientific data is fraud, but the mouthpieces spewed talking points like "nobody will be safe until everybody is safe". Departments rewrote rules, governors washed away rights, and politicians passed laws restricting freedoms. The vaccines aren't working, and should not be forced.

This event simulates a pandemic emergency board meeting where global businesses and governments collaborate to solve emerging problems. Conspiracy theories arise, blaming pharmaceutical companies or the UN for releasing the virus. Arrests and penalties are suggested for spreading falsehoods, even if it means controlling information access. Protests and riots erupt, causing public distrust in government and economic turmoil. Linguistic genomics identified coronavirus patents as early as 1999. The CDC patented the virus in 2003, controlling proprietary rights and profiting from it. Gain of Function Research on coronavirus was later offshored to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Some believe the virus was lab-designed, not a natural occurrence. Google's search engine and fact-checkers like Snopes and PolitiFact are accused of manipulating information. The WHO is criticized for inaccurate advice and being influenced by the Communist Party of China. Event 201, a pandemic simulation, occurred months before COVID-19. The Rockefeller Foundation's "Lockstep" scenario predicted authoritarian control. The "Great Reset" is seen as a coordinated agenda stripping away liberties. Bill Gates and his foundation are scrutinized for their influence on global health, vaccine initiatives, and investments in controversial technologies. Concerns are raised about vaccine safety, liability protection, and potential harm in developing countries. The COVID-19 vaccine is being developed and distributed rapidly, but there are concerns about safety testing and potential side effects. The pandemic is seen as a test of humanity's liberty. Medical freedom is emphasized. The need to reclaim humanity and avoid tyranny is highlighted.

The speaker asserts that the pandemic was not simply a health crisis but an experiment framed as an emergency and a crisis. Behind the veil of fear, there was claimed to be a global-scale rehearsal, with unprecedented alignment as many countries accepted the same rules at the same time. The speaker contends that entire populations gave up their freedom in the name of collective action. What appeared to be a response to a health problem was described as, in fact, an experiment—a test to measure obedience and to determine how far humanity would follow orders without questioning. The speaker mentions lockdowns and asks, “Lockdowns, work again?” while suggesting that the next rehearsal might not involve masks or vaccines. The prediction is that future rehearsals could come through channels such as energy, food, or even faith. The central claim is that the significance lies not in the crisis itself but in how people react to it, with the reaction said to have already been observed or noted. The closing question posed is, “What do you think about that?”

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." One scenario, called Lockstep, predicted a pandemic hitting in 2012. It described how even prepared nations were overwhelmed, with the virus infecting 20% of the global population and killing 8 million in 7 months. China's quick response and strict measures saved lives and enabled a swifter recovery. The document also foresaw increased authoritarian control and oversight, with citizens willingly giving up privacy for safety. It mentioned biometric IDs and enforced cooperation with new regulations. The document highlighted a simulation called Event 201, held in October 2019, which predicted a coronavirus outbreak. It emphasized the need to manage misinformation and disinformation. The video suggests that these events were planned and executed with confidence.

In an infectious disease outbreak, the public's cooperation is crucial. Non-compliant individuals may face quarantine in mandatory settings. Tracking, bracelets, and police enforcement could be used to ensure quarantine compliance. Preemptive and precautionary measures are better, even if perceived as an overreaction. Decisive early action is key due to the seriousness of the situation. Police checkpoints may be set up, requiring proof of vaccination for those leaving the city. Non-cooperative individuals could be taken to temporary detention centers.

I accurately predicted the use of a virus by the Rockefeller Foundation to establish global governance and a worldwide medical identification system. They also mentioned the creation of a social credit score and the implementation of more mask usage out of fear. Additionally, I foresaw the shutdown of sporting events as part of this new form of control. I repeatedly made these predictions.

In preparation for a new pandemic, the United States has begun searching for and applying various technologies for global management purposes. This includes creating crisis situations of a global nature.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document called "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." One scenario, called Lockstep, predicted a pandemic hitting in 2012. It described how even prepared nations were overwhelmed, with the virus infecting 20% of the global population and killing 8 million in 7 months. China's quick response and strict measures saved lives and enabled a swifter recovery. The document also foresaw increased authoritarian control and oversight, with citizens willingly giving up privacy for safety. It mentioned biometric IDs and enforced cooperation with new regulations. The document highlighted a simulation called Event 201, which took place in October 2019 and predicted a coronavirus outbreak. It raised questions about the accuracy of these predictions and the control exerted by those in power.