TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 notes that the last administration was not transparent on the issue, but with the task force created, they have guided members within what they're cleared for. He asserts that they have encountered alien beings and recovered vehicles, with physical proof, and that he was partially cleared into those activities, having read intelligence reports from those programs. Speaker 1 reflects that online discourse about encounters and videos is plentiful, and asks if there is belief that the US government knows about alien beings coming to Earth. Speaker 0 responds that he doesn’t like to characterize where they came from, but they are definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. He claims to have recovered vehicles and physical proof and says he had partial access to the data and to intelligence reports. He confirms seeing with his own eyes according to his account. Speaker 2 says NASA speaks for itself and claims transparency with data, and asks whether to believe David Crush or if he is lying, and where the evidence is. Speaker 0 asserts that members of the current administration are very aware of this reality and the current president is knowledgeable on the subject. He trusts the president’s leadership and believes the president has assembled a team; he says if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3 says he has access and has had meetings with very smart people who believe there is something out there, and it makes sense there could be. He is not convinced himself. He asks if the person believes one, that he knows, and two, that he’s open to transparency on UAPs. Speaker 0 reiterates that the president is very well informed on the issue, and avoids revealing more than the president might want to reveal. He notes a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 1 asks about years of threat and testimony. Speaker 0 says he was physically threatened even before submitting his intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration, and sought legal protection because of professional and personal fear. Speaker 1 asks about recovering pilots or remains and whether that was seen with his own eyes. Speaker 0 confirms there were pictures and says yes, there were remains. Speaker 1 questions whether the origin is from another planet or outer space, and if it is interdimensional, seeking clarification. Speaker 0 explains he has talked to many veterans of the program and keeps an open mind on origin. He acknowledges an extraterrestrial hypothesis but does not usually go there because he did not see the data, and he is not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government has. He is not aware of any remains or signs of extraterrestrial beings or technology by his department. Speaker 3 says the US government knows, but asks whether other governments know. Speaker 0 says they know and have their own programs, and notes that two and a half years ago the US has been in an arms race with peer competitors like Russia and China, who have their own programs. He says he was able to view intelligence discussing adversarial programs and will leave it at that. Speaker 3 states that they’ve recovered things, and Speaker 0 confirms, noting there were bodies and physical remains. They discuss whether the motive or intent of the visitors was peaceful or not, acknowledging a mixed bag of activity and motive. They consider whether Earth’s genetic material could be a reason for visits, even jokingly proposing Jurassic Park as a tourist attraction for genetic material on Earth.

I was concerned by a video of an EPA political appointee talking about tossing gold bars off the Titanic to distribute billions of dollars before inauguration day. The appointee mentioned getting money out fast before the new administration came in, referencing "gold bars" going to nonprofits, states, and tribes. I don't know what grants they were referencing, but they mentioned tossing gold bars off the Titanic to get jobs from recipient NGOs. They claimed to have given out tens of billions of dollars last year, including $50 million, or maybe $50 billion, for a Climate Bank, suggesting they could then go work for one of these organizations. I don't know what any of that's about, but it's concerning. I want to be a good steward of tax dollars.

Speaker 0 presents several claims about aluminum exposure and environmental contamination. First, they state that peer‑reviewed studies show bees have aluminum levels in their systems that are 70 times higher than what is necessary to cause Alzheimer's or dementia in humans, and they find this alarming given the health implications for bees. They emphasize that this is “70 times more” and frame it as a concern for survival. They challenge the idea that aluminum presence is normal because it is a very abundant element. They assert that aluminum is not found in the environment in free form; it must be mined, refined, and sprayed in order to be scattered widely in the environment. They claim this process is exactly what is happening, and that the issue affects more than just bees: “Every single one of us is being contaminated.” They argue that these materials are bioavailable and accumulate in human systems. They insist that this is a fact regardless of belief, and assert that lab tests prove it. They assert there will be no hiding this issue much longer and touch on the chemical signature found in rain tests. They claim this signature matches coal fly ash, a substance the EPA has said is not harmful. They state that the EPA has been trying to get rid of coal fly ash and that it seems to serve purposes in geoengineering, with evidence increasingly indicating that toxic coal fly ash may be one of the base materials used for spraying. They suggest this provides “plausible deniability.” Overall, Speaker 0 links aluminum exposure in bees to greater human contamination, arguing that environmental aluminum results from a deliberate process of mining, refining, and spraying, rather than natural occurrence. They point to lab tests as proof and to rain-chemical signatures that match coal fly ash as part of the evidence. They further claim the EPA has downplayed the harm of coal fly ash, yet the data suggest it may be employed in geoengineering, which would allow for plausible deniability.

We're here to ensure Americans don't wake up needing to boil their water because the EPA's workforce was removed. We provide oversight, especially after reports of EPA employees facing job insecurity. These individuals are already undermining the system. Elon Musk is breaking the law; a federal court ruled against firing people with deferred payments lacking federal authority. We're protecting federal workers, clean air, water, and the environment. This isn't the time to pause climate action. We lost four years and must recover lost ground, so these critical programs must stay intact. Elon Musk threatens essential agencies. Unless the public demands environmental protection, we're here to warn that these changes are coming.

The Trump EPA is committed to total transparency regarding contrails and geoengineering, releasing all available information to the public. The EPA Administrator wants the public to know as much about these topics as they do. Instead of dismissing concerns as baseless conspiracies, the EPA has compiled resources, consulted experts, and reviewed the science to address public questions. These resources cover everything from contrails to solar geoengineering. The EPA shares concerns about potential threats to human health and the environment, especially from solar geoengineering activities. The EPA is raising awareness about concerns with geoengineering and aims to stop its expansion. The administration claims to listen to the will of the people, answer questions honestly, and act with integrity.

As EPA administrator, my top priority is to protect your tax dollars. A disturbing video showed a Biden appointee appearing to waste billions before inauguration day. My team discovered roughly $20 billion of your tax dollars parked at an outside financial institution by the previous administration. This unprecedented scheme awarded funds to eight entities responsible for distributing money with reduced transparency; almost $7 billion went to one entity, the Climate United Fund. We have serious questions about fund allocation and potential conflicts of interest. There is no reason to suspect wrongdoing by the bank, but the financial agreement must be terminated immediately, and the funds returned to EPA control. We will review all expenditures and refer the matter to the inspector general and the Justice Department. The days of irresponsible spending on activist groups are over. We are committed to transparency and accountability. We found the funds, and now we will regain control as we pursue next steps.

The EPA headquarters in DC houses a museum, built and curated by the Biden administration for $4 million, dedicated to environmental justice and climate change. Its annual operating cost is $600,000. The museum's timeline omits any mention of President Trump's first administration. From May 2024 through the previous month, the museum had 1,909 public visitors, costing taxpayers $315 per visitor. Due to low public attendance and high operating costs, the museum will be shut down. This decision aims to be an exceptional steward of taxpayer dollars. The agency will focus on providing cleaner, healthier, and safer land, air, and water without spending over half a million dollars on a museum presenting an ideologically slanted story of the EPA. The speaker claims that under President Trump, the practice of burning tax dollars on pet projects will end.

The Trump EPA is committed to total transparency regarding contrails and geoengineering, releasing all available information to the public. The EPA Administrator wants the public to know as much about these topics as they do. Instead of dismissing concerns as baseless conspiracies, the EPA has compiled resources, consulted experts, and reviewed the science to address public questions. This includes information on contrails and solar geoengineering. The EPA shares concerns about potential threats to human health and the environment, especially from solar geoengineering activities. The EPA is raising awareness about concerns with geoengineering and aims to prevent its expansion. The administration claims it is listening to the will of the people, answering questions honestly, and acting with integrity.

The speaker describes an effort to educate and elevate content. They mention a partnership with Google, initiated after observing highly distorted information at the top of climate change search results. The goal is to be more proactive in providing accurate information. They state, “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it.” They add, “The platforms themselves also do.”

I don't think there's been transparency. Routine announcements are being made about findings, and questions are being invited daily. But providing data for the evidence that is being presented isn't happening. The White House has provided information, but these claims seem to be dismissed. Information is being provided; it just isn't believed.

Governments around the world have been engaging in weather manipulation and geoengineering projects, altering weather patterns and climate conditions. The speaker discusses various historical and modern examples of these projects, as well as the controversy and lack of transparency surrounding them. They highlight the need for further investigation and public awareness. The speaker also explores the funding and influence of organizations like Silver Lining and the involvement of the Met Office and UK Research and Innovation in geoengineering research. They emphasize the uncertainties, risks, and potential dangers associated with these interventions. The speaker concludes by expressing their commitment to uncovering the truth and promoting transparency in government actions.

Speaker 0 reports that the chemtrails task force has achieved its biggest breakthrough, shifting President Trump to support Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in exposing big pharma and globalist corruption. He claims the streaks in the sky are not harmless condensation trails but part of a coordinated chemical assault on Americans, funded by a shadow network of elites. Kennedy Jr. is said to have warned about Bill Gates for decades, and through his task force he has produced lab results from atmospheric samples described as a “smoking gun of the century.” Trump is said to be demanding a full-scale investigation and punishments for crimes against humanity. The segment promotes vp.net as a privacy service with zero logging and invites viewers to visit vp.net/tpv. Trump is said to have shocked the world by posting a Truth Social video featuring EPA chief Lee Zeldin, who allegedly announces an urgent federal investigation into what’s sprayed, who authorizes it, and who funds the operation. Speaker 1 voices concern that Americans deserve honesty about geoengineering and contrails, noting a shift from dismissal of concerns to a commitment to transparency. The EPA is portrayed as sharing concerns about potential threats to health and environment from solar geoengineering, criticizing attempts to pump pollutants into the upper atmosphere. Speaker 0 claims the executive branch is admitting something is deeply dangerous due to the chemtrails task force’s months of work, which RFK Jr. supposedly assembled to uncover black ops funding and secret aerial experiments. The broadcast says the story was broken months earlier, faced fact-checkers, and was confirmed by RFK Jr. on Doctor Phil. Speaker 2 introduces Emily, who expresses concerns about stratospheric aerosol injections with elements like bromium, aluminum, and strontium sprayed daily, and cites Dane Wigington as an expert. Speaker 3 asks a question, and Speaker 4 pledges to stop the operation, announcing an upcoming appointee dedicated to identifying perpetrators and holding them accountable. Speaker 0 describes Trump’s transformation after exposure to hard data, sky samples, and money trails pointing to the global elite, resulting in “white anger.” Speaker 5 recounts Trump’s earlier skepticism about chemtrails, with Bobby Kennedy Jr. presenting data and human stories during a late-night Mar-a-Lago meeting. Alleged victims include Nebraska ranchers losing herds to respiratory failure, Idaho soil test results with aluminum and barium, and widespread bee colony declines. A glass vial containing a sky sample allegedly changed Trump’s view when he realized it showed something previously claimed by Bill as minor or beneficial. Trump is described as furious and motivated, seeking names, contracts, flight logs, and accountability. Speaker 0 notes growing public awareness, urging people to post photos and clips with timestamps to create a geotagged evidence base for future criminal cases to end spraying. Progress is described as slow but ongoing, with flights grounded and shell companies exposed, though spraying persists. Speaker 3 discusses health concerns, linking nano aluminum to neurological conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Speaker 6 presents a conspiratorial persona of a banker and eugenicist seeking control over life and death for profit, under the pretense of climate or health agendas. Speaker 0 teases a breakdown of data, funding, and names behind the operation after a sponsor message. The sponsor segments pivot to a broader narrative of information warfare and global surveillance, including accusations of Israel influencing Congress, feds, and VPN ownership. The message asserts Cape Technologies controls popular VPNs and positions vp.net as a cryptographically verifiable, open-source privacy network that cannot be hacked or logged. Viewers are urged to join at vp.net/tpv and vp.net/gpv, with claims of protecting against state and corporate surveillance.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

Speaker 0 opens by noting the Trump administration recently launched a cyber strategy amid the war with Iran and expresses concern that war often serves as a Trojan horse for expanding government power and eroding civil rights. He examines parts of the plan that give him heartburn, focusing on aims to “unveil an embarrassed online espionage, destructive propaganda and influence operations, and cultural subversion,” and questions whether the government should police propaganda or cultural subversion, arguing that propaganda is legal and that individuals should be free to express themselves. Speaker 1, Ben Swan, counters by acknowledging that governments are major purveyors of propaganda, but suggests some of the language in the plan could be positive. He says the administration’s phrasing—“unveil and embarrass”—is not about prosecution or imprisonment but exposing inauthentic campaigns funded by outside groups or foreign governments. He views this as potentially beneficial if limited to highlighting non-grassroots, authentic concerns, and not expanding censorship. He argues that this approach could roll back some censorship apparatuses the previous years had built. Speaker 2 raises concerns about blurry lines between satire, low-cost AI, and authentic grassroots content, questioning whether the government should determine what is and isn’t authentic. Speaker 1 agrees that it should not be the government’s job to adjudicate authenticity and suggests community notes or crowd-sourced verification as a better mechanism. He gives an example involving Candace Owens’ expose on Erica Kirk and a cohort of right-wing influencers proclaiming she is demonic, labeling such efforts as propaganda under the plan’s framework. He expresses doubt that the administration would pursue those individuals, though he cannot be sure. The conversation shifts to broader implications of a new cyber task force: Speaker 1 cautions that bureaucracy tends to justify its own existence by policing propaganda or bad actors, citing the Russia-focused crackdown era as a precedent. He worries that the language’s vagueness could enable future administrations to expand control, regardless of party. The lack of specifics in “securing emerging technologies” worries both speakers, who interpret it as potentially broad overreach beyond protecting infrastructure, possibly extending into controlling information or AI outputs. Speaker 0 emphasizes that the biggest headaches for war hawks include platforms like TikTok and X, and perhaps certain AIs like Grok. He argues the idea of “securing emerging technologies” could imply controlling truth-telling AI outputs or preventing adverse revelations about Iran. Speaker 1 reiterates that there is no clear smoking gun in the document; the general language makes it hard to assess intent, and the real danger is the ongoing growth and persistence of bureaucracies that can outlast specific administrations. Toward the end, Speaker 1 notes Grok’s ability to verify videos amid widespread war-time misinformation, illustrating how AI verification could counter claims of fake footage, while also acknowledging the broader risk of information manipulation and the government’s expanding role. The discussion closes with a wary reflection on the disinformation governance era and the balance between safeguarding free speech and preventing government overreach.

I requested information on chemtrails through freedom of information laws in 2013. The government provided a report confirming chemtrails, but with redacted information. The report acknowledged the impact of chemtrails on climate but noted different effects in different areas. Governments are hesitant to admit responsibility due to liability. Raising awareness is crucial to mobilize public action against chemtrails. Public pressure is needed to push for transparency and accountability. Awareness will lead to collective action against chemtrails.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

I realized we are poisoning people instead of protecting them through geoengineering. Whistleblower protections are not enforced. Disinformation sites like Metabunk and Contrail Science try to debunk us. Geoengineering, funded by tax dollars, is the biggest issue we face. Overexposure to toxins from food, water, and vaccines is harming us. Our bodies can't handle these toxins.

Speaker 0: Gates argues that our future thriving depends on science and technology. He mentions Beauverre, a feed additive for cows that is supposed to reduce methane but reportedly makes cows sick. Gates is also involved in stratospheric geoengineering via Scope X to dim the sun. A headline notes: “Bill Gates venture aims to spray dust in the atmosphere to block the sun. What could go wrong?” This was reported by Harvard and environmentalists protested, leading to its shutdown. Scientific American reported on this: “High profile engineering experiment shuts down.” Harvard shut it down, but the effort migrated to the UK, where it is described as a “secretive government unit planning to dim the sun.” The UK project is ARIA, the Advanced Research and Invention Agency, modeled after DARPA in the US. The difference is DARPA is military; ARIA is a public-private venture pursuing things “impossible to prove that are safe and effective,” like spraying things into the sky. There is concern about harms and potential climate catastrophe, as they actually implement. ARIA’s funding is reported as £800,000,000 over five years, with £184,000,000 allocated for 2025-2026. In comparison, DARPA in the US was given £4,000,000,000 in the same period. The bottom line is that ARIA is described as “running fast and loose, operating like a speculative venture capital firm with public money” and there is a lack of accountability. The UK government website states ARIA will be “a small body with minimal administrative capacity” and that it will “remove the burden of processing Freedom of Information requests,” i.e., no FOIA access. ARIA is pursuing climate interventions because climate models show warming, but climate models are said to “run hot,” potentially exaggerating impacts of global warming. The idea of stratospheric geoengineering from ARIA rests on a contested premise. Speaker 1: During a conference at Cambridge’s Center for Climate Repair, Robert Chris, an independent researcher, discusses five UK geoengineering trials funded to combat global warming and has written a book on geoengineering policy. He discusses stratospheric geoengineering but notes concerns about failures to control carbon emissions and argues some consider it necessary to avert ecosystem and societal collapse, perhaps solar geoengineering as the price for inadequate climate response. Speaker 2: Others push back, saying climate interventions interfere with nature, and that humanity already interferes with nature. They argue the Anthropocene implies a permanent responsibility to manage the climate system. Another speaker notes that “we now have a permanent responsibility to play God,” criticizing the move to influence Earth and the atmosphere. There is critique of academic authorship and power, and a call to reduce human population to 1800 levels to solve the problem. Speaker 0: A UK petition gathered over 160,000 signatures urging the government to “make all forms of geoengineering affecting the environment illegal,” prompting a government response that “the government is not in favor of using solar radiation modification and has no plans for deployment.” Nevertheless, ARIA reportedly aims to advance such work. ICANN (an organization) has monitored this since it has challenged both UK and US representations on geoengineering. ICANN highlights that unlike other programs that limit to computer modeling, ARIA’s plan “will conduct outdoor experiments to test and validate sun blocking methods.” ICANN has pushed petitions in California as well. Speaker 0: ICANN has pressed the EPA to probe a geoengineering startup, Making Sunsets, which purportedly releases sulfur dioxide. EPA demands answers from the company following legal letters from ICANN. Lee Zeldin labeled the venture as deploying criteria air pollutants to earn cooling credits, underscoring regulatory concerns. ICANN emphasizes vigilance over governments—public or private—attempting to dim the sun and its potential impact on life.

The speaker states that their agency is not involved in a certain activity, which they believe is being done by DARPA and is now coming out of jet fuel. The speaker says that materials are being put in jet fuel. They intend to do everything in their power to stop it by bringing on someone to focus solely on finding out who is responsible and holding them accountable.

Under the Trump EPA, the Green New Deal is dead, and it's possible to both protect the environment and grow the economy. There are 100 environmental accomplishments in the first 100 days of the Trump EPA, which have been released to the media. The Trump EPA is launching the largest deregulatory action in the history of the country. $22 billion worth of grants have been canceled. The House of Representatives is voting on Congressional Review Act bills considering the EPA waivers given to California's tailpipe emissions, arguing there should be one national standard. This speaker claims that this administration has assembled the greatest national security team ever seen in their 27 years associated with the United States Army.

How are we going to address the atmosphere filled with metals and sensors, considering we've been manipulating the weather since the 1970s? I urge the Library of Congress to prioritize honesty and reveal the truth about the information it has acquired.

The EPA called this "the most consequential day of deregulation in US history," representing the "most amount of deregulation ever in the history of America." The previous administration implemented rules and regulations that were "targeting a lot of the energy supply" and jobs, leading to a higher cost of living. President Trump campaigned on "unleashing American energy" and wants "American energy dominance." The EPA aims to "deliver it" and calls this effort "powering the great American comeback." The EPA states that it cares about clean air, land, and water for all Americans and does not believe protecting the environment and growing the economy are mutually exclusive.

Climate change is the biggest threat to the world. Time is running out, and this is a fact. Finally, everyone in America is acknowledging it.