reSee.it - Related Video Feed

During a discussion about the bill of rights, the speaker questions why the person being addressed didn't support medical privacy, freedom from medical coercion, and the right to protest and association during labor's vaccine mandates. The person denies these claims, stating that they did stand for those rights. The speaker then tries to discredit the person by saying they are not from Ipsen, but the person defends themselves by stating their citizenship. The conversation ends abruptly.

Erin Olszewski, a registered nurse and army combat veteran, speaks in support of the Collier Health Freedom Bill of Rights Ordinance and the Health Freedom Resolution. She shares her experiences working in the COVID ICU in New York and witnessing negligence and mistreatment of patients. Erin describes a lack of liability, threats to silence staff, and financial incentives for admitting patients. She also mentions the banning of autopsies and the high cost of ventilators. Erin urges the commissioners to support the resolution and ordinance to prevent such incidents from happening again. She emphasizes the importance of good nursing care and calls for unity in standing against those who betray trust.

A healthcare worker is fed up with mask-wearing and inconsistencies in pandemic treatment across hospitals. They urge fellow healthcare professionals to speak out against government influence and lies in the media. It's time to tell the truth for the sake of their children.

"But, what I'm most excited about is is announcement that we're going to make that we're making now, which is that the Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law." "All of them. All of them. All of them." "Every last one of them. Yeah. Every last one" "Every last one of them, every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and and slavery. K? Who am I as a government or anyone else or who am I as a man standing here now to tell you what you should put in your body? Who" "am I to tell you what your child should put in your body? I don't have that right. Your body your body is a gift from God. What you put into your body what you put into your body is because of your relationship with your body and your God. I don't have that right." "Government does not have that right. They want you to believe they" "have that right. And, unfortunately, you know," " they've been successful. They've been successful."

Someone from a PR agency told the speaker that a government agency wanted to hire them to create a PR campaign against her, framing her as "anti-vaccine." The PR person turned down the job but wanted to warn her, saying the agency would come after her hard, even though she states she has always said she is not anti-vaccine. The speaker claims she wasn't scared initially because she felt she had faith and truth on her side. However, she says things became difficult when she started losing jobs, impacting her ability to provide for her son's therapy as a single mother. She says she relied on writing her books and persevering despite the attempts to "cancel" her. She notes that her son is now 22, and she is still present and active.

Speaker 0: It's a disgusting video, and we're gonna continue to make clear bigotry will get you nowhere. We are fighting to protect the health care of the American people in the face of an unprecedented Republican assault.

Dr. Katarina Lindley, a family physician from Texas, speaks in support of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. She explains that the WHO is seeking expanded powers to address health emergencies and that the treaty would establish a global supply network overseen by the WHO. Dr. Lindley expresses concerns about the potential infringement on national sovereignty, censorship of information, and limitations on freedom of speech. She also discusses the need for a balanced approach to health, including human, animal, plant, and environmental health. Dr. Lindley concludes by emphasizing the importance of open discussion and the potential implications of these documents if passed.

Good morning, commissioners. My name is Erin Olszewski, and I support the Collier Health Freedom Bill of Rights Ordinance and the Health Freedom Resolution. As a mother, registered nurse, and combat veteran, I advocate for patients and families. During the pandemic, I worked in a New York COVID ICU, witnessing troubling practices: patients denied family advocacy, banned treatments, and financial incentives for admissions. Many patients died unnecessarily, and I recorded evidence of unethical behavior among medical staff. The last line of defense for patients is a good nurse, and when nurses are restricted, it leads to tragic outcomes. We need your support to ensure this never happens again. This issue affects everyone, and I urge you to consider the implications for all families. Thank you for your time.

I usually say I'd rather be a quack than a sheep. So you know what? Call me whatever you want to call me. I'm still gonna be roaring at the end of the day. So, and this is a fight. This is a fight for humanity. You know, someone said to me yesterday, you're such a fighter. And I said, you better believe I was born for this. So, you know, that's why I have the lioness hair. So I'm ready to fight. This is our freedom we're talking about. This is our freedom of choice. There is a corruption in medicine. There is an interference with science and research that is going to affect all of us.

Speaker announces that the Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida, Washington. All of them. Every last one of them. Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and and slavery. K? Who am I as a government or anyone else? Or who am I as a man standing here now to tell you what you should put in your body? Who am I to tell you what your child should put in your body? I don't have that right. Your body your body is a gift from God. What you put into your body what you put into your body is because of your relationship with your body and your God. I don't have that right. Government does not have that right. They want you to believe they have that right. And, unfortunately, you know, they've been successful.

I led a 5,000 student walkout to protest invasive laws in Florida. Governor DeSantis demanded universities share trans students' health records, violating their rights. I advocate for diversity and access to healthcare. As a teacher, I can't use students' preferred pronouns, which is absurd. I'm committed to ensuring everyone in the state is respected, healthy, and safe.

I will not apologize for trying to protect women and girls in sports. This hearing was about protecting women, and I am here to stand up for their rights. We have fought for decades to win these rights, and I will continue to protect them. I am a woman, and I will not stop roaring to protect women, because we have rights too.

A nurse is being escorted out of Kaiser Permanente Hospital for refusing to get vaccinated due to her religious beliefs. She expresses frustration at not receiving an explanation for why her religious exemption was denied. She emphasizes the importance of religious freedom and encourages others to consider what matters to them. The nurse has been placed on unpaid administrative leave and is willing to sacrifice her safety and security for her freedom. She has been a COVID nurse since the beginning of the pandemic and is determined to continue her work elsewhere. She urges viewers to think about their own values and the significance of freedom.

Barbara Lo Fisher discusses the historical and current challenges faced by vaccine victims and advocates for informed consent and freedom of choice in vaccination decisions. She highlights the censorship and discrimination faced by those questioning vaccine safety and efficacy, emphasizing the importance of protecting individual rights and autonomy. Fisher reflects on her experiences since founding the National Vaccine Information Center in 1982 and the changes in public attitudes towards vaccine safety over the years.

I was jailed for speaking out, do you agree? I don't want another lockdown. The speaker presents a book exposing research fraud behind vaccine mandates to a senator.

An individual from a PR agency told the speaker that a government agency approached them to create a campaign against her, labeling her "anti-vaccine." The PR agent turned down the job but warned the speaker about the impending narrative. The speaker was initially skeptical, as she claims she had always stated she was not anti-vaccine. Despite this, the speaker says that she experienced the beginning of "cancel culture" when jobs were taken away from her, which was difficult as a single mother trying to pay for her son's therapies. She relied on writing books and persevering, and despite attempts to cancel her, she is still present and her son is now 22 years old.

A nurse injured by the COVID vaccine has spent the last four years building a community of vaccine-injured people. She asks others to join her in taking down "these criminals." Another individual states they will fight for the cause for life, even if they have to do so from a wheelchair, as they currently cannot stand for more than a minute without convulsions. They want to help people of their generation, who they believe are heavily influenced by the media, understand that things can go wrong. They feel obligated to speak up and will never back down.

I received a letter from United denying my patient's overnight stay, and I want to share it fully. My previous statements were honest, and I’m open to questions about the letter. I refuse to be silenced by threats when advocating for my patients and addressing issues in the healthcare system. Speaking out is essential for maintaining my integrity and making a difference. As a woman caring for women with breast cancer, I am committed to this cause. I encourage everyone to share this story and stand up against the powerful healthcare organizations. It’s vital for us all to tell our stories to drive change, and I am dedicated to this mission.

Counselor Lisa Robinson reports that in Nova Scotia, Canada, people cannot go into the forest from now until mid October. Hiking, camping, walking dogs or children on trails are banned to supposedly prevent wildfires. She says this mirrors the COVID-19-era restrictions that limited outdoor activity and saw neighbors reporting on each other, and argues that the same mindset is used again here, this time claiming a fire-season excuse. She notes disobedience can result in fines over 25,000. She questions what kind of country bans walking in nature and warns that people are leaving Canada, with messages she’s received from residents leaving Pickering over the situation. Robinson highlights a contrast: while banning access to woods, Nova Scotia approved glyphosate spraying on thousands of acres of drought-stricken, fire-prone forests. She points out that glyphosate kills vegetation, dries it out, and leaves behind more flammable tinder, while experts say it destroys deciduous trees and shrubs that hold moisture and slow fire. She cites Safe Food Matters, which warns that glyphosate dries down forest growth, creating forest fuel. She questions whether the policy is truly about preventing fires or about controlling people. She notes there are still supporters who call for stricter government control, describing a mindset of wanting governance to be harder and more in control. She contrasts this with her view and says they are not going to pretend the situation is normal. Robinson mentions Tamara Lynch and Chris Barber, who face seven or eight years in prison for a peaceful protest. She states she has spoken up about corruption at the highest levels in her city, losing a year and three months of pay for telling the truth, and asserts that others can burn down a church and get bail, while organizers or truth-tellers are targeted financially. Robinson declares she is an elected official who will not stay quiet, insisting on telling the truth to protect it. She warns that if they can ban people from the woods while spraying chemicals that increase fire risk, one must wonder what they’ll ban next. She identifies herself as counselor Lisa Robinson, the people’s counselor, and commits to speaking openly. She urges viewers to believe real power lies with the people, asking them to follow, subscribe, and share to stand with them. She closes with a call to stand strong, stay fierce, and God bless.

Patriot Nurse discusses what you should never say to a doctor or healthcare provider and which topics require careful handling when interacting with the medical system. She frames these issues within concerns about abuse and corruption in health care, and emphasizes the power imbalance between patients and licensed professionals in the United States, where mandatory reporting creates a fear-based compliance system. Key points she makes: - Mandatory reporting and tattletaling: Health care providers with licenses operate under mandatory reporting, creating a system where “if you see something, say something” can pressure professionals to report patients. This contributes to a power disparity at vulnerable moments for patients. Providers are not gods, and they are human and flawed. - Fifth Amendment-like mindset: Patients should apply a mental filter similar to exercising a fifth amendment right—do not incriminate yourself; you should not feel obligated to disclose information beyond what benefits you. - Mental health history questions: Asking about a history of mental illness can label patients. If a patient has remitted or recovered, there may be little need to disclose, though many clinicians emphasize the need for a good history and physical. A patient has sovereignty to share information at their discretion, and real nurses protect patient confidentiality and trust. - Firearms and weapons questions: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association advocate screenings for firearms in the home. Patriot Nurse argues these are political organizations and cautions that information about weapons in the home can trigger mandatory reporting in ways that could lead to child protective actions. She says you are not required to fill out such paperwork, you can leave it blank, strike through, or refuse; if faced with tech prompts, you can request a hard copy and refuse to answer. Do not incriminate yourself, and do not feel compelled to answer what you do not want to disclose. - Parental dynamics and CPS risk: Interactions in the doctor’s office can influence family court involvement and CPS referrals. Family court is described as a major path for government control over children. Be cautious with statements in front of doctors about parenting, as it can lead to CPS involvement. - Postpartum and pregnancy-related screenings: She stresses the vulnerability of pregnant and postpartum women and notes a trend to refer to pregnant women as “pregnant people.” She warns that postpartum depression screenings can lead to CPS involvement if a woman answers in a way that triggers concern. She argues honesty can be penalized and emphasizes practical support from friends and family (help with meals, chores, errands) and non-drug interventions such as nutritional and hormonal considerations. She calls CPS involvement “evil” when women seek help and are judged by skewed screening results. - “Whatever you think is best” is dangerous: She warns against deferring decisions to clinicians, urging patients to ask questions and delay decisions if there is no immediate emergency. She stresses informed consent and the importance of thinking through options before acting, especially when a patient is ill or medicated. - Self-advocacy and preparation: No one will care for you or your family as much as you do. The more you know, the more you can converse as an equal with healthcare providers, reducing power imbalances. She promotes her online courses (four- and seven-hour medical prep) to build knowledge, reading ability, and self-advocacy, potentially avoiding unnecessary care and enabling better conversations if care is needed. - Caution about political biases in medicine: She references Charlie Kirk’s assassination and notes that some medical professionals, despite credentials, may hold hostile views toward conservatives; she urges care providers to align with your values when possible and to consider location and insurance limitations. - Final encouragement: Reiterate your fifth amendment rights, stay vigilant, and share the information with others who might benefit. She signs off as Patriot Nurse, inviting viewers to use the information to shield themselves and their families from what she describes as a potentially malevolent alliance between government and health care informers.

Dr. Miley Trinh, a GP based in Sydney, Australia, joins Jim Ferguson for her first appearance on the show. She explains she has practiced as a GP for nearly thirty years and has been suspended since late 2021 amid a dispute with the health regulator over her license. She describes her suspension as part of a broader fight with regulators and regulators’ attempts to cancel her medical license. Trinh recounts how her concerns about the COVID-19 situation began in 2019, while following global events and studying debt-based economic systems. She states she became alarmed by reports of Wuhan’s lockdown timing, noting that authorities announced a lockdown five days earlier and allowed travel before it commenced, which she found alarming. She observed what she called unusual global coordination in reporting and policy responses to the pandemic, with early treatment being suppressed and a tightly controlled narrative across countries. Regarding ivermectin, she says she concluded after months of research that it was a key medication for treating COVID-19, particularly when given early. She describes participating in doctor groups and Zoom meetings to discuss how to treat patients and notes she treated a patient by telephone during lockdown who was deteriorating. She reports that the patient improved after her treatment but later faced complications requiring hospital care. She says two complaints were filed against her in September 2021—the first from a patient she had helped, and the second from an individual named John Smith who obtained a prescription that belonged to a family member for ivermectin. She asserts John Smith did not belong to her practice, and that the prescription was allegedly handed to an APRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) agent, a fact she says regulators overlooked when investigating her practice. Trinh emphasizes that she had never before faced a complaint in nearly thirty years of practice and that the suspension hearing concluded with her being deemed a danger to public health, despite her insistence that she saved a life. She has remained suspended for over four years. She describes the regulatory process as involving claims of prescribing ivermectin “below standard” and accusations of professional misconduct for not handing over 20 to 30 patient medical files, which she says she refused to provide because she did not know the patients’ names and because none of the patients had filed complaints against her. She notes that hearings occurred in December, March, and August, with subsequent issues over transcript integrity and requests for recusal of the presiding judge. She says a decision on the main case is imminent, but a cancellation of her license could entail a three to five-year suspension and substantial costs, complicating the possibility of reinstatement. Beyond her case, she argues the fight is about medical autonomy and the right for physicians to tailor treatments to individual patients, not be dictated by politicians or rigid guidelines. She criticizes what she views as a heavily censored environment for doctors who questioned the pandemic narrative or advocated for therapeutics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc. She asserts that the COVID-19 Task Force guidelines opposed ivermectin and other therapeutics, and she contends such guidelines restrict doctors’ ability to provide individualized care. Trinh links the censorship and regulatory pressure to broader concerns about global governance, citing media suppression, removal of dissent on platforms like Facebook and YouTube, and increased control over platforms such as X (formerly Twitter). She mentions public support, including her presence on X and Facebook, as important to her ongoing legal battle and the broader struggle over medical autonomy and truth during the pandemic. She concludes by inviting people to follow her on X and Facebook to learn more and to show support as she pursues potential appeals if the judgment does not go in her favor. She frames her case as about more than COVID-19 alone: it is about challenging what she views as a long-standing, disproportionate control of doctors and a fight for fundamental rights, including the right to a hearing before the tribunal and the right to medical decision-making free from political interference.

I was coerced into getting the COVID vaccine despite being healthy and against it. After receiving the vaccine, I ended up in the ICU paralyzed with a rare neurological disorder. Lack of family visits led to a pressure wound. Despite the benefits of vaccines, they can cause harm. We should have the right to refuse medical interventions without facing discrimination. I urge the committee to vote yes on 83/19.

Speaker 0 introduces a disturbing video about Brandy Vaughan, an ex Merck employee and whistleblower who founded learntherestisk.org, stating she was found dead yesterday. The video documents intimidation tactics used to silence her and ends with her claim that mandatory vaccinations are for profit, not public health. The speaker notes Merck is the vaccine company that makes the MMR vaccine and explains they screened the video due to censorship and disappearing videos, urging sharing to keep the fight going for Brandy. Speaker 1 identifies herself as Brandy Vaughan and explains she has been an activist opposing SB 277 in California and questions how rights have deteriorated. She describes herself getting heat for speaking out, and she documents intimidation tactics used against her to silence her voice. She recounts her background: she worked for Merck in Santa Barbara from 2001 to 2003 selling Vioxx, which was eventually pulled from the market after it was shown to double the risk of heart attack and stroke and cause harm. After losing faith in the healthcare system, she traveled to Europe, returned with a six-month-old son, and faced bullying at a pediatrician’s office in San Francisco when requesting vaccine inserts and questions about vaccines. Four years ago, she began researching vaccines, concluded they were not very safe or effective, and chose not to vaccinate her son. When SB 277 surfaced in California, she decided to raise her voice against it, knowing she would face heat. She then details a series of intimidation incidents beginning with a break-in and home intrusion after returning from a Sacramento rally against SB 277. A key left on the doorstep was found open, despite having been hidden previously. She had recently installed a $3,000 alarm system; the alarm was triggered at 03:45, then the hallway sensor active at 03:46, and the dining room window opened and closed at 03:48. The intruders allegedly re-entered via the front door at 03:49 after disarming the alarm with the master code, which only she possessed. Security experts suggested the house was tapped, implying that everything she says and does could be listened to or watched, and they noted the back window was opened during the incident. After the break-in, the police checked for stolen items, found nothing missing, but two days later her computer, hidden above the microwave, was moved from its hiding spot to the middle of the floor. She left town for two weeks to go off the grid. Upon returning, she found a ladder left in front of the door, used to look into the bedroom window from the garage; a neighbor confirmed the ladder was new. Later, a Buddha statue in the garage was moved from its usual place, pictures were knocked over, and two days after that a duck appeared on her kitchen table, which she interpreted as a message signaling they were watching her due to conversations about staying at her house. Vaughan describes these events as intimidation and fear-inducing. She reiterates that the intimidation is designed to silence discussion of mandatory vaccination bills, which she claims have nothing to do with public health and everything to do with profit. She vows not to be silenced, emphasizes the importance of exposing what’s going on behind the bills, and frames the events as part of a larger ongoing struggle. She concludes that there is evil at play and hopes documenting the intimidation will prevent future silencing of others.

I brought Idaho Medical Freedom Act this past spring; the governor signed it into law on August 5. It's the first legislation of its kind anywhere in the world, certainly in this nation. People thought it was impossible to ban all medical interventions, with only a few exceptions. I've thought about it for fifteen or twenty years. I looked to a bill banning COVID shot mandates in Idaho and adapted it to craft this legislation. I believed I had moral authority: "Who in the heck believes that they can tell me what to put in my body? Who believes that they can tell me whether or not to carry a baby?" If you can be forced to take a medical intervention, why can't they force you to get pregnant for the greater good if there's too little population growth? This is about having control over our own bodies and the insanity of it.

Although I am not a doctor, I’m a nurse. On the front lines we knew what was happening. When we asked for ibuprofen, they said no. When we asked why we weren’t giving steroids, the answer was “we’re just following orders.” Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths in these hospitals. I didn’t see a single patient die of COVID. I’ve seen a substantial number die of negligence and medical malfeasance. When I was on the front lines of New York, I became globally known as the nurse in the break room sobbing, saying they were murdering my patients. Pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice on the minorities, the disadvantaged, the marginalized populations with no advocates, because the very agencies that should protect them were closed while we were sheltering in place. While I was there, pharmaceutical companies rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients, which we all saw was killing the patients. And now, it’s the FDA-approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States. As nurses, we’ve collected a descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors. Doctors do quantitative data; we do qualitative data with a humanistic, phenomenological approach in nursing research. We’ve collected data from patients across the country for which we’ve helped patients through the American Front Line Nurses and the advocacy network so nurses could advocate for these patients. This data pool shows that as these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than twenty-five percent chance of survival if they get more than two doses. Now they’re rolling it out on children as well and into nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities as early intervention, even though doctors Pierre Corre and Merrick have demonstrated that there are cost-effective medications out there, and we are going to see the amplification of death across the country. We haven’t even touched on vaccines, which our expert panels have described; I won’t touch on that since many are far superior to me. Two days ago I flew out my first 10-year-old with a heart attack and had to fight the ER doctor because he said, “ten-year-olds don’t have heart attacks.” I argued for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG and found a STEMI; the 12-lead EKG lit up. He said it wasn’t possible, and I said, “was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible.” People contact me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate, because there’s victim shaming—“it’s anxiety,” “it’s this.” But if they acknowledge it as a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic may not get reimbursed, so it’s labeled as anxiety, neuropathy, or Guillain–Barré syndrome, when it’s very realistically a vaccine injury. I’ve traveled to South America, India, and South Africa, working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus and doing early intervention. Nowhere in developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in the United States. I’m a very proud American citizen from a family of immigrants. Our level of health care has deteriorated to substandard third-world-nation health care. You are better off in South America in a field hospital than in level-one trauma designer hospitals in the United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, water, or basic care. How come a patient hasn’t been fed in nine days? Why do I need a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn’t intubated and who would like food? If they’re on a ventilator, they’re not given water or basic care. We’re not allowed to take a BiPAP mask off to help someone eat. I’ve had patients who haven’t been bathed, haven’t been fed, and haven’t been given water, or been turned. This isn’t a hospital; this is a concentration camp. Nowhere in the United States do we isolate people for hundreds of hours with no human contact; it’s not allowed even in prisons. In hospitals, we isolate patients from their families for days, and you have to say goodbye over an iPhone, or you have to shuttle people in to see them. I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to say the last rites to their family. Thank you, Senator Johnson, for giving nurses the opportunity to represent our patients, because we’re not often thought of as leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. Thank you for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.