reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Mark Changizi discusses big tech censorship, Elon Musk's Twitter changes, and First Amendment violations by the federal government.

In the latest episode of the Rubin Report, host Dave Rubin discusses various themes as 2023 begins, including the ongoing battle against misinformation and censorship. He highlights a tweet from the account covid1984 about the World Economic Forum (WEF) removing Twitter from its follow page, suggesting a coordinated effort by global actors to control narratives. Rubin emphasizes the importance of free speech, particularly in light of the WEF's plans to use AI to censor online content, which he argues infringes on First Amendment rights. He also touches on a Twitter spat between Andrew Tate and Greta Thunberg, noting Tate's subsequent arrest in Romania for human trafficking, which he finds suspicious given the timing. Rubin critiques Bill Gates' advocacy for ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) standards, arguing that it imposes a globalist agenda on nations and corporations, undermining individual rights. The discussion shifts to the importance of effective messaging in politics, with Rubin stressing the need for conservatives to counter leftist narratives. He concludes by expressing optimism for the year ahead, focusing on personal growth and the responsibility of parents to prepare their children for the challenges of the world. Rubin invites viewers to engage with his community on Locals for further discussions.

Dave Rubin interviews Dr. Ron Paul about recent censorship of his Facebook page, the transition from the Trump to Biden administration, and the state of liberty in the U.S. Dr. Paul discusses the power of big tech, emphasizing that it is not a product of free markets but rather government intervention. He argues that monopolies often require government support and stresses the importance of private property and voluntary agreements. Paul critiques the bipartisan nature of government spending and interventionism, noting that both parties often agree on increasing spending and wars. He expresses concern over the current economic situation, likening government financial aid to treating a drug addict with more drugs. Paul remains hopeful about the future, advocating for the spread of libertarian ideas and intellectual discourse. He concludes by encouraging young people to pursue their interests in liberty and politics, emphasizing the need for competition and innovation in the marketplace of ideas.

Tucker Carlson emphasizes that freedom of speech is the defining characteristic of the United States, rooted in the First Amendment. He warns that this foundational right is rapidly eroding due to modern censorship, which is often justified as a fight against disinformation, regardless of the truth of the statements being censored. Carlson introduces Mike Benz, an expert on censorship, who explains how the U.S. government and defense contractors have shifted from promoting internet freedom to enforcing censorship, particularly in the context of foreign policy and military interests. Benz details how the internet was initially used to support dissidents globally, but after events like the 2014 Crimea annexation, NATO began to view media control as essential to maintaining power. This led to the establishment of a censorship industry aimed at suppressing dissenting voices, particularly those associated with right-wing populism in Europe and the U.S. Benz highlights the role of organizations like the Atlantic Council in coordinating censorship efforts, particularly during the 2020 election, where they preemptively targeted narratives around mail-in ballots. He describes the creation of the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which redefined misinformation as a cyber attack, allowing for widespread censorship of dissenting opinions. Benz argues that this represents a fundamental inversion of democracy, where the will of the people is subverted in favor of protecting established institutions. He concludes by discussing the ongoing threats to free speech, particularly in the context of upcoming elections and international pressures on platforms like X (formerly Twitter).

Doctor Mark Changizi's lawsuit claims the government coerced Twitter into censoring dissenting views on COVID policies.

Megyn Kelly welcomes Glenn Greenwald to discuss the current state of free speech, particularly focusing on Elon Musk's platform X being banned in Brazil. Greenwald emphasizes Brazil's significance as a democracy and a testing ground for online censorship, noting that the Brazilian government is pushing extreme measures to control information. He highlights that a single judge's orders are leading to severe consequences for platforms like X, including threats of imprisonment for executives who do not comply. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of censorship in the U.S., referencing Kamala Harris's past statements advocating for social media regulation. Greenwald argues that the mentality of censoring dissenting voices is becoming prevalent in the West, drawing parallels between Brazil's actions and potential future actions in the U.S. He points out that many individuals being censored are not extremists but rather prominent political figures who criticize the government. Kelly and Greenwald discuss the Hunter Biden laptop story, asserting that the Biden administration pressured tech companies to suppress the story, which was later verified as true. They criticize the media's role in perpetuating the narrative of Russian disinformation and highlight the lack of accountability for those who misled the public. The discussion also touches on the Democratic Party's tactics to silence dissent within its ranks, exemplified by the treatment of figures like Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard, who have faced accusations of being Russian assets for opposing party lines. Greenwald points out the hypocrisy in how different political figures are treated based on their affiliations. They conclude by discussing the media's double standards, particularly in how they cover political narratives and the implications of censorship on democracy. Greenwald emphasizes the importance of free speech and the dangers of allowing the government to dictate what constitutes acceptable discourse.

The Sean Ryan Show discusses a cease and desist letter from the Canadian government regarding classified information in an episode featuring Dallas Alexander, a Canadian JTF2 sniper. Alexander was fired for not taking the COVID vaccine. Host Shawn Ryan expresses concerns about censorship and the government's attempt to silence Alexander. Attorney Tim Parlatore, known for high-profile cases, joins to analyze the situation, asserting that there was likely nothing classified in the episode. They discuss the over-classification of information to protect reputations rather than national security. The conversation also touches on the perceived weakness in military leadership and the impact of censorship on public narratives. Parlatore emphasizes the importance of individual accountability within institutions and the need for strong leadership to combat current challenges. The episode ultimately highlights the struggle for freedom of speech against government censorship.

Tucker Carlson interviews Rick Sanchez about his journey to RT and his experiences in journalism. Sanchez recounts how Larry King encouraged him to join RT after he was fired from CNN. Initially skeptical due to RT's Russian affiliation, Sanchez found that he had more editorial freedom at RT than at CNN, Fox, or NBC. He was able to write his own scripts and choose his topics without interference, which he felt was a significant departure from his previous experiences in mainstream media. Sanchez highlights the limitations imposed by major networks, particularly regarding guests and topics that challenge the neocon narrative. He emphasizes that while he enjoyed his time at RT, he faced backlash in the U.S. for working there, including being excluded from opportunities due to his association with the network. He notes that RT was banned in the U.S. following the Ukraine war, which he views as a violation of free speech rights. Sanchez describes a conversation with a former CNN colleague who warned him that he was being monitored by the State Department. Shortly after, the Biden administration's Treasury Department shut down RT's operations in the U.S., threatening legal action against anyone associated with the network. Sanchez expresses frustration over this censorship and the broader implications for journalism and free speech in America. He argues that the U.S. government should not dictate who can report news or share perspectives, advocating for engagement with all countries, including Russia. Sanchez believes that understanding different viewpoints is essential for preventing conflict and fostering dialogue. He concludes by stressing the importance of storytelling and the need for journalists to represent diverse perspectives, regardless of political pressures.