reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The FDA, NIH, and CDC recommended vaccinating pregnant women at any time, leading to a rise in maternal mortality. A recent paper showed a concerning increase in maternal deaths in the US, erasing decades of progress in obstetrics. Pregnant women are dying with no mention of COVID or vaccines in the report. This alarming trend should be a cause for concern for everyone.

In a hospital setting, we have witnessed the devastating impact of the virus on infants, pregnant women, and young individuals. Some babies have tragically died at birth due to their mother's infection. Unvaccinated pregnant women face a twenty-fold increased risk of premature birth and a three to five-fold increased risk of fetal death in the womb. These statistics highlight the urgent need for pregnant women to get vaccinated.

In the United States, a vaccine equity program was implemented to vaccinate vulnerable individuals in various homes. This led to a significant increase in mortality among 25 to 64 year olds, with a fatality rate similar to that of India at 1%. The peak in deaths in Michigan coincided with the initial vaccine rollout.

CDC child death records are presented as showing catastrophic transgenerational harm linked to mRNA vaccination programs. An analysis of CDC data by Ethical Skeptic reports a seventy seven percent excess in deaths among children born after mothers received mRNA vaccines, equating to nearly eighteen thousand additional deaths in ages zero to four since 2021. The data also show an inflection after thirty years of decline in infant and child mortality, with curve reversing in 2021. The report identifies two signals: teratogenic effects, including rising infant deaths exposed in utero, and transgenerational effects, with sustained excess mortality in children who were never infected or vaccinated but whose parents were. The excess deaths affect multiple systems—cardiopulmonary, renal, neurological, congenital, septic causes—similar disruptions seen in injected adults. The findings are described as not speculative models but derived from government records. If confirmed, the situation would constitute a historic health crisis affecting future generations.

The NIH has confirmed that vaccinated moms have polyethylene glycol in their breast milk, which is causing babies to have failure to thrive. Breastfeeding rates have dropped from 34% to 14% in the last 2 years. Babies who are still nursing from vaccinated moms are ingesting a petroleum byproduct with unknown effects. There has been a 13% to 20% decrease in live births in multiple government databases, with a million missing babies in Europe. Neonatal deaths have doubled in Scotland and increased significantly in other regions. Pfizer's documents suggest a focus on sterilization, as they conducted experiments on rats' reproductive organs. The intentionality behind these investigations is unclear.

Clinical trials are essential to determine a product's safety and effectiveness, especially for vaccines intended for pregnant women. For a vaccine to be licensed for this demographic, specific trials must be conducted. A request was made to the FDA for the clinical trials used to license the flu shot for pregnant women, but after much delay, it was revealed that no such trials exist, as the flu shot has never been licensed for pregnant women. Consequently, promoting the flu shot for this group is considered off-label use, which pharmaceutical companies cannot legally advertise. Instead, the CDC handles this promotion.

The CDC recommended increasing flu shot coverage for babies and pregnant women, despite evidence suggesting it could be harmful to fetuses. The flu shots contained thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative. The CDC's decision was criticized because mercury exposure during pregnancy can have catastrophic effects. Some doctors and patients questioned the safety of the flu shot, especially for pregnant women. Studies showed that thimerosal increased the abortion rate in animals, and it was found to be more toxic to males than females. A woman shared her personal experience of suffering a miscarriage and having her daughter diagnosed with severe autism after receiving a flu shot while pregnant. The government agencies involved defended their recommendations, but some people doubted their credibility.

The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.

Doctors administered untested gene therapy to infants, toddlers, and pregnant women, claiming it was safe. However, the mRNA jab was deemed the most dangerous medical product for pregnant individuals. Traditional medical principles were disregarded, including giving experimental drugs to pregnant patients and assuming any death or injury post-intervention was related. Regulatory authorities worldwide dismissed adverse events as unrelated until proven otherwise, leading to disastrous consequences.

Despite it being treated as an obligation to do so, physicians reportedly do not know these facts. The speaker expresses strong frustration about the situation. The speaker cites a famous medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, describing a study of vaccine researchers and stating that “the 12.6 percent user rate” was reported, and that the paper claimed there was no problem with the vaccine based on that figure. Using that paper as a basis, the San Fujikawa Society or a similarly named organization promoted vaccination for pregnant women. However, the actual content of the data is described as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in the late stage of pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stage (first trimester). For the subgroup limited to those under 20 weeks’ gestation, i.e., the 127 individuals, the reported miscarriage rate was 82 percent. From this, the speaker argues that the vaccine is dangerous, given the result for the early-stage group. It is claimed that the data were hidden or obscured, and that the later report combined the late-pregnancy group of 700 with the early-pregnancy group of 127 to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate, which was then published. The speaker concludes that even a major medical journal could be influenced by external financial pressures, resulting in biased reporting that supports the other side’s interests.

The speaker discusses a New England Journal of Medicine study from April 21, 2021, and an accompanying op-ed by Eric Rubin, Stephen Morrissey, and Rochelle Walensky, alleging they made false and fear-mongering statements about the risks to pregnant women, unborn children, and newborns if they didn't get vaccinated. This was allegedly done despite evidence suggesting pregnancy reduced maternal mortality and data showing the COVID-19 vaccine was the deadliest and most injurious vaccine ever released. The speaker claims the study, authored by 21 federal employees including Tom Shimabukuro, was biased. Out of 827 pregnant women in the study, they highlight a claimed miscarriage rate of 12.6%, which they argue is abnormally high compared to the normal rate of 3% at a normal booking visit. They allege that 700 of the women received the vaccine in their third trimester, but were artificially placed in the first trimester data. This allegedly skewed the miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in the first trimester to 82%, which is the same miscarriage rate seen in the Pfizer post-market data.

The speaker asserts that the Pfizer documents reveal the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history and that the documents focus specifically on destroying reproduction. They claim that Pfizer knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles and that these nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They contend the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure to the vaccine, described as “maternal exposure quote unquote to the vaccine.” The speaker states that vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making the babies sick, citing charts showing thousands of babies vomiting, thousands with edema (swollen flesh), and thousands with convulsions. They claim one baby died of multi-organ system failure from nursing vaccinated moms. They further assert that, to this day, in places like the Netherlands and across Europe and the world, vaccinated moms are not being told they can risk their babies’ lives by nursing them. The speaker alleges Pfizer knew these risks and references a section of the Pfizer documents noting an over eighty percent spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. They further claim Pfizer knows there is something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses, because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing-age women and to use “two reliable forms of contraception.” They assert that the injection doesn’t stay at the injection site but travels throughout the body within forty-eight hours, accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and the liver, crossing the blood-brain barrier to cause brain-damage-type reactions, and accumulating in the ovaries. They claim it is damaging the hearts of minors and reference FOIA documents from the White House, noting a scramble in April 2021 to cover this up. The speaker concludes that the shots were propagated to parents during that summer and into the next year, advocating for vaccinating minors while knowing they were injuring or killing them. They describe the actions as ongoing dissemination and promotion of vaccination for minors despite the asserted harms.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

In the US, a vaccine equity program was implemented to vaccinate vulnerable individuals in various homes. A significant peak in mortality for 25-64 year olds was observed, coinciding with the program. States with this program had a 1% vaccine dose fatality rate, similar to India. A peak in Michigan occurred during the initial dose rollout.

Pregnant women in Manitoba were mandated to receive the vaccine, with severe consequences for those who refused. A woman's doctor refused to attend her delivery because she declined the vaccine, leading her to choose a home birth. However, when she went into labor prematurely, she had to go to the hospital. The obstetrics and gynecology department refused to treat her because she was unvaccinated, leaving her in the ambulance bay for 30 minutes. Eventually, she delivered with the help of a paramedic while her husband waited outside. The pressure on pregnant women to get vaccinated was deemed unethical, as they were told they needed the vaccine or their delivery would be unsupported and their husband couldn't be present.

A clinical trial had an age cutoff, likely around 14, and initially excluded pregnant women due to safety concerns. However, many pregnant women received the vaccine unknowingly, showing no adverse effects. It was argued that young women in healthcare should have access to the vaccine, as it appeared safe. Despite resistance from regulators who insisted on a traditional double-blind trial, it was pointed out that data from millions of vaccinated individuals was more compelling than a smaller trial. After extensive discussions, the regulators ultimately agreed to approve the vaccine for pregnant women.

The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The CDC states that vaccinated people don't carry the virus or get sick. They also say there are no safety concerns for pregnant or lactating individuals and their babies. However, a new paper using government data found a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities after COVID-19 vaccination. Despite this, the CDC claims there are very few safety concerns. There was also a 57-fold increase in another outcome.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate in pregnant women. 236 out of 270 records were lost. Babies in utero were exposed to the vaccine, leading to deaths. Breast milk was poisoned by vaccine components, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns may have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Pfizer knew about this issue 2 years prior.

The speaker says that even for obstetrics and gynecology societies, vaccination during pregnancy has been pursued as a duty, but physicians do not know the actual facts. They reference the New England Journal of Medicine, a famous medical journal, where a study of a vaccine’s adverse outcomes claimed that the user rate was 12.6%. Based on that paper, the Sanpeshikawa (Sanbushikawa) Association reportedly promoted vaccination for pregnant women as well. In reality, the data were as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in late pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stages (first trimester). When restricting to the 127 people who were under 20 weeks, the usage rate was 82%. Therefore, the speaker argues that this data reveals how dangerous the vaccine is, and that the data were hidden and mixed with high-profile 700-person data to produce the 12.6% miscarriage rate that was published. This is presented as evidence of a situation where even in medical journals, information was handled to favor the other side due to money and other influences.

Pfizer documents reveal an 80% miscarriage rate among pregnant women who received the vaccine. However, 236 out of 270 records of pregnant women were lost. The documents also show that Pfizer knew the vaccine was being transmitted to babies in utero, leading to their deaths. The vaccine was found to contaminate breast milk, causing convulsions and deaths. Additionally, the documents from two years prior indicated that newborns could experience respiratory distress due to air sacks between their lungs and chest walls. Despite this knowledge, babies were still being sent home and later returning with the same issue.

The Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, particularly targeting women and babies. We have evidence that they killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm counts, and they were fully aware of these consequences. Internal charts document the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. The data indicated that babies were dying in utero due to the maternal COVID vaccine exposure. Despite this knowledge being presented to Dr. Walensky, she advised pregnant women to get vaccinated before, during, or after pregnancy. Their actions, which included a thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births, demonstrate an attempt to sterilize and eliminate us. Despite the deaths and struggles with fertility that resulted, we survived, and the truth has come to light.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

A new analysis of CDC data by Ethical Skeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a seventy seven percent excess rate. That's nearly eighteen thousand additional deaths in ages zero to four since 2021. The CDC's own death certificate records revealed an inflection point after thirty years of steady decline in infant and child mortality. So two distinct signals emerged, teratogenic effects, so rising deaths among infants exposed in utero, but the most concerning is transgenerational effects sustained excess mortality rates seen in children who were never infected, never injected, but whose parents previously were. These findings are not speculative models. They come straight from the government's records. If confirmed, this represents a public health crisis of historic magnitude, one affecting not those who were injected, but their children, grandchildren, and generations yet to be born.

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate among pregnant women, with 236 out of 270 records lost. Babies exposed to the vaccine in utero experienced transplacental exposure. The vaccine was found in breast milk, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns were known to have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Despite this, babies appeared fine initially but later returned due to air pocket issues.