TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We will lie to you when we meet, saying we don't care about you or remember you.

Speaker 0 references an email exchange between Jeffrey Leeds and former Secretary of State Colin Powell in which Powell allegedly acknowledges that Israel “has 200 nuclear weapons” and that “the nuclear non proliferation treaty has not been signed by Israel,” and asks whether under US law the United States should cut off support to Israel because it is a nuclear power that has not signed the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Speaker 1 declines to engage: “Shouldn't you ask Colin Powell that? I I'm not gonna speak to this particular traffic, and I'm certainly not discuss doesn't have nuclear weapons? I'm certainly not going to discuss matters of intelligence from the from the podium, and I'm not I have no I have no comment.” Speaker 0 reiterates: “the email says the boys in Tehran know Israel has 200. All we targeted on Tehran, and we have thousands. I mean, that that seems to indicate that that there's a knowledge of an Israeli nuclear program, which would make USA to Israel illegal.” Speaker 1 responds: “I think I've answered your question.” Speaker 0 asks again whether the understanding is correct: “am I do I have the correct understanding of US law that that we are we are not allowed to support a nuclear power that has not signed the nuclear nonproliferation treaty?” Speaker 1 says: “Look, we obviously support the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. I'm not a I'm not a legal expert on all the tenets of it, and I'm certainly not going to speak about the the details that you've revealed here in this email traffic. That would be inappropriate for me to discuss one way or the other. I'm not gonna There do” Speaker 0 notes that sanctions have been imposed on North Korea and Iran for nuclear proliferation, and asks why Israel is not facing any consequences in light of Powell’s alleged email. Speaker 1 reframes: “That's a very colorful way of getting back to the same question you just asked me, but I'm going to refer you back to the transcript when you see it this afternoon to what I said before to your question. So you're familiar with this email. Right? I'm not. Oh. I have not seen it. I'm not I can't speak to the email. Frankly, even if I'd seen it, Zurich, I wouldn't engage in that kind of a discussion from the podium.”

I have the floor and expect to be heard. I changed the topic to cause conflict, which is not appropriate. As a member of parliament, this committee used to be peaceful until you arrived. You need to speak respectfully to your colleagues and not try to intimidate us. Canadians want to hear from the witnesses, and we demand that. Dr. Lewis and Miss O'Connell should be allowed to speak. Let's all show respect for each other, as is the standard practice in this committee. We should not bring the issues from other committees into this room.

How can you deny everything you've said and done? You can't even look me in the face. Kenya, just look at all the evidence. You have two of those. Please, I don't think you're going to get any more responses from the commissioner. Is there anything else?

Your mandate wasn't investigative, so why issue a report? Can you clarify the distinction between information and evidence? We're not discussing evidence that would hold up in court. We did not collect or retain any materials, such as raw footage or photos, related to this matter. We have no such materials.

Come on, let's get started. I’m frustrated with the situation. Fool me once, shame on you. Now, let’s bring Kamala in here.

I don't understand why the committee skipped over 30 years of my career and focused on a past incident from graduate school. We should be looking at the last three and a half years because people were killed in a terrorist act. The special agent found that I was involved and I apologize for lying to the committee. I was fired for it.

This is unbelievable. You want to be the archivist of the United States, yet you lied under oath and in your QFRs. Just moments ago, you lied to me again and are now stonewalling, refusing to answer questions about your own public posts. Mister chairman, this is the most extraordinary situation I have encountered in my time in the Senate. I have never witnessed a witness so blatantly lie under oath as Dr. Shogan has done today, consistently avoiding questions from this committee.

Byron Thedford? That's me. Oh, we received a report that you were pushing DEI in defiance of the state law and seeking loopholes to get around the law. Is that true? It's not. No, sir. You've never talked about pushing loopholes to get around the law? I haven't. No. What about this video?

I would like to reclaim my time and address the chairman. It seems that Hunter is afraid of what I have to say. It's unfortunate that I burst their bubble.

You are not being honest with this committee. We asked for all memorandums from the Secret Service on July 15th, have you provided them? You are dodging important questions that the American people want answers to. We had to subpoena you to be here, and you still won't answer. These are not difficult questions.

I admitted to being aggressive with staff but avoid using bad language in notes. I found out Ketamine Girl's mom committed suicide through a text. I expressed feeling bad about it but also said we did the right thing. When asked if I have remorse, there was an objection.

We are members of Congress here to meet with the acting secretary. We notified her in advance. You're denying us entry. What authority do you have to prevent members of Congress from fulfilling their oversight role? You claim we need an appointment or to be on a guest list. That's not how it's always been. Ninety-four members of Congress signed a letter requesting a meeting to ask a simple question. Your claim that she's unaware of the meeting is unacceptable. We should be allowed access to the Department of Education. We'll proceed to the visitors' entrance.

I am deeply troubled by your responses today. You need to acknowledge that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. You avoided answering that question when asked by Senator Durbin. Additionally, you should clearly state that those involved in the January 6th insurrection who committed violence should not be pardoned. I don’t have to say what you want me to say. I speak the truth and won’t say anything just to gain confirmation. I will answer questions to the best of my ability.

I broke the law, and you've been posting concerning things. Are you going to let me talk? You won't let me talk. It's in the notes. Do you want me to explain? There's been concerning behavior with no explanation at my house. I'm just telling you what's happened. We've had no explanation of the concerning things. There was a leak of flames. I tried to get in my house before it's clear. That's my supervisor; don't talk to her like that.

Are you saying parents cause problems? Should someone in charge of family outreach be complaining about parents? I don't know what you're talking about. Is that me in that video? I have no idea. I have no comment, so stand back. You can keep your hands off me.

Doing business this way is very difficult, and I can tell you who to thank. Thank you, I've said it many times. To the American... Except when there are disagreements, let's litigate those disagreements rather than fighting it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know that you're wrong. But you see I...

Here we go. Watch your legs; you keep kicking them out. How many children are you talking to? Just this one. I don’t do that. When you’re fasting, does that make you speak to children? No, I don’t do that. Explain what you don’t do because I know you speak to children online. This proves you can do that. Why were you going to meet a child? I can’t do that. You’ve asked this child to delete messages, haven’t you? No. I have all the messages you sent, including asking for pictures. You even talked about marrying the child. Are you married? No. You’re sick in the head for finding children attractive.

I will not call on you if you yell, and you're wasting time because Dr. Fauci has to leave soon. I'm not engaging in a back-and-forth. It's not your turn. Don't look at me; it's your first question. You should call on people across the room. She has a valid question about the origin of COVID. I hear the question, but we're not proceeding as you wish. This is disrespectful. I'm done with this. Simon, I'm finished with you right now. Go ahead.

You told the child you would meet him, but you claimed you wouldn't because you would be at work. You mentioned meeting at 1 o'clock, but there seems to be confusion about your intentions. You deny knowing the child's age, despite him saying he was in school. When asked about your past actions, you insist you haven't done anything wrong. There's a discussion about your former role as a veterans minister, which raises concerns. You are confronted about your plans with the child, and despite your denials, it’s clear that your intentions were questioned. Ultimately, you are told that the only reason you aren't meeting the child is because of their presence.

I do not regret my role in the lab leak conspiracy. I do not believe censorship occurred. The senator questions my actions, but I stand by them. Thank you. Translation: I do not regret my involvement in the lab leak conspiracy and deny any censorship. The senator challenges my decisions, but I stand by them. Thank you.

Speaker: Is it a conflict of interest? I don't understand your question. Are you suggesting it's okay for a speaker to accept a favorable stock deal? We did not. Translation: The speaker questions if it is a conflict of interest and denies accepting a preferential stock deal.

You all need to resign. If you don’t step down, I will be the loudest voice against you when election time comes. This situation is unacceptable, and I will hold every one of you accountable.

The speaker expresses disbelief and disappointment towards the person being addressed. They accuse the person of being aware of a certain issue and receiving previous communication about it. The speaker criticizes the person for refusing to answer questions and implies that their behavior is disgraceful. The speaker concludes by stating that the person's unwillingness to provide answers to the committee is unacceptable.

Let's take a tour of the building to understand what's happening here. What are all these files for? This is the conference room, and we could have sat here instead of out in the den. You need to treat us with respect. We expect our payment today before we leave, and we won’t go until we get your signature confirming our complaints. You need to provide the communication lady's number now. Don’t lie; bring it back. We’re not done discussing this. You need to sit down and engage with us respectfully. If you don’t, we’ll escalate this situation. Now, pull out a chair and sit down so we can resolve this.