TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

New Zealand whistleblower Barry Young has been arrested after exposing data that correlates COVID-19 injections with deaths in the country. The data, which has been confirmed as valid by the New Zealand government, shows a clear link between the doses administered and deaths. Young, a former government employee, now faces potential imprisonment. The arrest raises questions about the government's response and its attempt to suppress the information. Independent journalist Liz Gunn, who worked with Young, highlights the importance of transparency and holding leaders accountable. The revelations add to growing concerns about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.

Former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza is being investigated for homicide after emails revealed that he knew the COVID-19 vaccines were causing deaths and serious side effects. He allegedly ordered local health authorities to conceal this information in order to maintain public confidence in the vaccination campaign. The investigation is based on complaints regarding internal emails from the Italian Medicines Agency. Speranza and the former director of the agency, Niccolo Magrini, are accused of knowingly exposing the Italian population to the risks associated with the vaccines. The investigation includes charges of murder and serious bodily harm.

Detective Helen Groos of the Ottawa Police faces a discreditable conduct charge for initiating an investigation in January 2022 into a possible connection between 9 sudden infant deaths and the mothers' vaccination status. Her evidence included Pfizer documents showing 31 of 32 pregnancies followed by trial investigators resulted in spontaneous abortion. Groos was suspended and formally charged after opening the investigation. Evidence suggests police colleagues leaked confidential information to a CBC reporter, impacting the investigation. The Ottawa police then made a financial settlement with one of the parents of the deceased infants. A wiretap on Groos yielded nothing. During the tribunal, defense counsel Blair Ector reported a threatening email sent to Groos, calling it witness tampering. The adjudicator, Chris Randwick, ruled the defense must provide questions in advance and that Groos couldn't review her notes from the day of alleged misconduct. All five defense expert witnesses were denied. The prosecutor, Vanessa Stewart, was also the sister-in-law of the primary prosecution witness. Supporters claim the case is politically motivated and are asking for public support and donations to Groos's legal fund.

No successful coronavirus vaccine has been made. Gene-based vaccines were tested on animals, leading to sickness and death. Despite concerns about safety and lack of long-term data, Canada continued vaccine rollout. A doctor raised safety concerns, was reprimanded for causing vaccine hesitancy, and saw neurological issues in patients post-vaccination. Questions to health authorities went unanswered, leading to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

A Michigan jury awarded a woman $1 million for being fired over vaccine refusal, highlighting a need for accountability in vaccine manufacturing. It's concerning that vaccine makers have blanket immunity from lawsuits, unlike other businesses. This immunity, granted by Congress in 1986, shields pharmaceutical companies from liability, which is unjust. Everyone else faces risks in their professions, yet these companies operate without accountability. Transparency in government and vaccine trials is crucial to restore trust and eliminate corruption. If information is being withheld, it likely indicates wrongdoing.

A forensic pathologist in Alberta, Dr. Adeagbo, faces allegations of inconsistent credentials, impacting thousands of autopsies. Concerns arose after discrepancies in his academic qualifications were revealed, casting doubt on his expertise. His role as an expert witness in homicide cases and his conclusions on deaths have raised questions about the justice system's oversight. The resignation of Alberta's chief medical examiner in 2014 due to alleged political interference adds to the suspicion of systematic issues within government ministries. The public is left questioning the trustworthiness of his autopsies and the potential influence on judicial decisions. Further investigation is needed to address these concerns.

The government says it has been in close contact with Ottawa's mayor and municipal and provincial officials, and that the RCMP has mobilized nearly 300 officers to support the Ottawa Police Services, with readiness to do more. A second speaker says Trudeau is using police against the public, and describes officials and others with terms such as “globalist players and thugs.” The transcript centers on Peter Slowly, portrayed as a former deputy police chief who allegedly argued that being Black made him a suitable candidate for Toronto's next police chief, and who resigned after not being chosen. It is claimed he joined Deloitte, whose CEO sits on Pfizer’s board and who was awarded money by the CDC to build a vaccine-management system, and that Slowly was made chief of the Ottawa police a few months before the COVID-19 pandemic. The text links these claims to alleged international private-sector connections.

After 20 years of service, Detective Helen Bruce faced an unprecedented challenge when investigating the deaths of 9 infants, uncovering potential links to their mothers' Pfizer vaccination status. A fellow officer's failure to follow protocol regarding vaccine inquiries compounded the issue. When Bruce's findings were ignored by senior officials, she became a target, facing charges of discreditable conduct for her investigation. This case, unprecedented in Canadian history, raises concerns about political influence on policing. As her tribunal concludes, all eyes are on adjudicator Kris Renwick, whose decision will impact the future of policing in Canada. The case symbolizes the struggle between moral integrity and political pressure, with the potential to set a significant precedent for law enforcement.

Detective Helen Groos faces biased disciplinary tribunal charges for investigating infant deaths related to vaccination status. Despite suspension and legal challenges, she remains steadfast. The tribunal, led by an untrained adjudicator, restricts her defense and witnesses. The prosecutor, linked to a key witness, obstructs questioning. The case appears politically motivated, aiming to silence Helen's dedication to justice. Supporters rally behind her, recognizing her bravery in upholding police integrity. Helen's fight symbolizes the importance of police autonomy in preventing political interference. Show support at the tribunal or donate to her legal fund. Stand with Helen Groos in her pursuit of truth and justice.

A Kingston doctor, Elaine Ma, has been ordered to repay over $600,000 for COVID-19 vaccination payments from the Ontario government. In December 2021, she set up mass vaccination clinics, using undergraduate medical student volunteers, which violated Ontario's rules requiring that vaccine administrators be employees and that vaccinations occur at the doctor's registered office. The financial incentives for COVID vaccines were significantly higher than for other vaccines, creating a scenario where speed and volume were prioritized over compliance and patient care. This situation raises concerns about the balance between incentivizing vaccinations and ensuring proper healthcare delivery. With over 100 million doses administered in Canada, the financial implications are substantial, leading to questions about trust in healthcare institutions when financial incentives overshadow proper care.

New Zealand whistleblower Barry Young has been arrested after exposing data that correlates COVID-19 injections with deaths in the country. The data, which has been confirmed as valid by the New Zealand government, shows a clear link between the doses administered and deaths. Young, a former government employee, now faces potential imprisonment. The arrest raises questions about the government's response and its attempt to silence those who bring forward evidence of harm caused by the injections. The data has been analyzed by experts who have found alarming safety signals. The case highlights the importance of whistleblowers in exposing the truth and holding leaders accountable.

New Zealand whistleblower Barry Young has been arrested after exposing data that correlates COVID-19 injections with deaths in the country. The data, which has been confirmed as valid by the New Zealand government, shows a clear link between the doses administered and subsequent deaths. Young, a former government employee, now faces potential imprisonment for his actions. The arrest highlights the government's attempt to suppress information that contradicts the official narrative surrounding COVID-19 vaccines. Independent journalist Liz Gunn, who worked with Young, emphasizes the importance of transparency and holding leaders accountable for potential criminal behavior. The revelations underscore the need for whistleblowers to come forward and expose the truth about the COVID-19 pandemic.

Speaker 0 notes a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 says their own government told them a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2 states they have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 1 says doctors made extra money to push vaccines and were given a billing code to do it, and she has pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 3 asserts they’ve purchased the vaccine that hasn’t been approved and distributed it to the provinces, so the second it’s approved they can start jabbing themselves and pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4 asks why vaccinations were necessary, noting that when going to the hospital for birth, you expect to go home, and then you don’t. Speaker 0 suspects criminal negligence by the government and public health officials. Speaker 2 agrees, saying “Possible.” Speaker 0 contends they pushed a narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 recalls wiretapping, harassment, and charges, and that they didn’t allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1 says Canadian babies died, and police are trying to cover it up by stopping detective Helen Graves from testifying about it. Speaker 3 comments that dominant individuals maintain subordinates’ place through constant aggression. Speaker 5 argues that choosing not to vaccinate is one thing, but being unable to fly or ride trains with vaccinated people and thus putting them at risk is another issue. Speaker 2 says CBC started with a story to implicate her and paint her in an uncomplimentary light to the public. Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of CBC, describing it as a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 3 declares this is the most significant health matter affecting children today, and they are still not investigating. Speaker 2 asserts that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, and how they work together and censored information; all of it ties to this one case, making it dangerous.

The speaker discusses examples of travesties that have eroded public trust, such as the case of detective Helen Bruce investigating COVID-related child deaths and facing disciplinary action. They also mention Dr. Kovind Kaur, a physician facing repercussions for speaking out on Twitter. These instances highlight a pattern of corruption and suppression within various regulatory bodies, undermining their intended purposes.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

Dr. Kavinder Kargil, a practicing physician in Ontario, faced backlash and persecution for advocating against lockdowns and sharing scientific information about immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite being a respected doctor and leader in the medical community, she was labeled as an anti-vaxxer and faced numerous complaints to her professional regulator. The Canadian press published hit pieces on her, further damaging her reputation. Dr. Kargil filed a defamation lawsuit to clear her name but was ordered to pay $1.2 million in legal costs. She is now facing a deadline to pay nearly $300,000 and may have to declare bankruptcy. A public campaign has been started to help offset her legal costs.

The Chief of Defense Staff is accused of sacrificing the military and their families for political gain. They were used as guinea pigs for an experimental medical treatment, with the damage being hidden. This is seen as a war crime and a dangerous act by leaders who consider themselves above the law. The military, already weakened and lacking personnel, lost 1,000 members due to the vaccine mandate, with more expected to be affected. In Canada, the military serves the King, not the Prime Minister, giving the King power over the government and police. There is strong belief that the vaccine mandate came from the Prime Minister's office, based on a pattern of removals and promotions tied to sexual misconduct allegations.

I find the case of Detective Bruce intriguing from a professional perspective as a former police officer. He is charged with launching an unauthorized investigation, which is something I have never encountered in my 45 years in law enforcement. During my 15 years with the Toronto Police, I never sought permission to investigate; I would request assistance or resources, but not permission. Law enforcement officers are designed to operate independently under the law and their oath of office. This structure is in place to prevent outside influences from interfering with police work.

In January 2022, a colleague alerted Speaker 0 that there had been a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 states that “Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies.” Speaker 2 says she has “lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuinely for the best interests of Canadians.” Speaker 3 alleges that doctors “made extra money to push vaccines” and were given a billing code to do it, and that she has “pulled all the billing codes.” Speaker 4 asserts that “They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved,” distributed it to the provinces so that once it’s approved, they can “start jabbing ourselves with it” and “start jabbing pregnant mothers with it.” Speaker 3 questions the necessity of vaccinations: “Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, and then you don't.” Speaker 0 speculates on criminal negligence, saying, “I would suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials.” Speaker 3 notes that it is “highly recommended that pregnant women get their vaccine as soon as possible.” Speaker 0 contends that a narrative was pushed to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 claims wiretapping, harassment, charging, and barring expert witnesses: “They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify.” Speaker 1 accuses police of trying to cover up Canadian babies’ deaths “to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it.” Speaker 4 observes that “The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression.” Speaker 5 discusses vaccination choice versus public risk, remarking, “If you don't wanna get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk,” and claims CBC initially “started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public.” Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of what the is, describing it as “a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada.” Speaker 4 calls this “the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective,” noting that authorities are “not investigating.” Speaker 2 concludes that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, “how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.”

Detective Helen Groos faces a biased disciplinary tribunal for investigating infant deaths linked to vaccinations. Despite facing charges, evidence showed high abortion rates in vaccinated pregnancies. Media leaks and witness intimidation tainted the case. The tribunal's unfair rules and biased decisions hindered the defense. The case is seen as politically motivated to silence police autonomy. Support for Detective Groos is urged, as she fights for justice and police integrity. Prayers for her strength and resolution are requested.

Jennifer, a former police officer, shares her experience investigating child deaths attributed to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). She reveals that she noticed a pattern where many SIDS cases occurred within hours to a week after immunizations, particularly at the 6-month mark. Jennifer also highlights that medical examiners often left out the information about recent vaccinations on the death reports. This led her to question the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers and sparked her journey into investigating vaccines. Ultimately, Jennifer and her husband decided not to vaccinate their own children. Due to potential repercussions, Jennifer refrains from disclosing her full name and agency.

New Zealand whistleblower Barry Young has been arrested after exposing data that correlates COVID-19 injections with deaths in the country. The data, which has been confirmed as valid by the New Zealand government, shows a clear link between the doses administered and deaths. Young faces potential imprisonment for his actions. The arrest highlights the government's attempt to suppress information that contradicts the official narrative on vaccine safety. Independent journalist Liz Gunn, who worked with Young, emphasizes the importance of transparency and holding leaders accountable for potential criminal behavior. The story underscores the need for whistleblowers to come forward and expose COVID-19 crimes for the sake of humanity.

Anita Krishna, a former control room director at Global News, discusses her termination and the biased coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. She criticizes the constant focus on unvaccinated individuals and the lack of accountability in reporting. Anita attended a rally in North Vancouver where she unexpectedly spoke about her concerns. The speech was recorded and shared online, leading to her suspension for allegedly violating journalistic principles. Anita questions how she violated these principles when Global News failed to report on community events and important hearings. She believes that Global News is the one violating journalistic principles by withholding information from the public.

100 Canadian children have died after receiving Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, but this information is being covered up. Many kids were mandated vaccines to play sports. No one is taking responsibility for these deaths, with Health Canada, public health officials, and medical organizations all denying any deaths from the vaccines. The speaker has reported on these deaths on social media, leading to attempts to shut down their accounts.

A physician recounts being attacked for offering alternative COVID treatments and questioning vaccine efficacy. Despite treating thousands of patients and being proven more accurate than public health authorities, she is still fighting to keep her medical license. The physician describes treating a sheriff's deputy with COVID in February, following the vaccine rollout, when ivermectin was difficult to obtain. She notes primary care doctors often did not treat viruses, leading to catastrophic outcomes. After President Trump touted hydroxychloroquine, the Texas State Board of Pharmacy restricted its prescription. The government then launched a PR campaign against ivermectin, influencing hospitals to mandate vaccines. The physician observed more vaccinated individuals contracting COVID with similar or worse symptoms. Monoclonal antibodies, which worked effectively, were removed as an option, allegedly to promote vaccination. A urology department considered refusing unvaccinated patients. The physician faced obstacles in obtaining emergency privileges to administer ivermectin to the sheriff's deputy, who ultimately survived but suffered long-term health issues and later passed away. The Texas Medical Board is pursuing charges against the physician for recommending COVID therapy. The expert witness against her is a Planned Parenthood lab director. She highlights the politicization of medicine, the loss of power for doctors, and the influence of corporations and insurance companies. She expresses concern over COVID shot injuries, the shots being added to the childhood vaccine schedule, and the potential for long-term immune system damage.