TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. This is devastating. This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published.

Had it been the unvaccinated, it had two point five times the rate of chronic disease. Two hundred fifty percent increase rate is what that means. Six times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. If they'd have shown that that was the unvaccinated group, Jimmy, you know they would have rushed this thing onto the market. They would have rushed it to publication. We've received a cease and desist letter from Henry Ford Health accusing us of defamation, saying the data is not good science. Marcus Zurbos, world-renowned virologist and head of the study, also led the Moderna vaccine trial for Henry Ford. He says it's a good study and would publish it as it is, but he's worried about losing his job. Why has that study never been done? Why has our government not said, look, compare vaccinated and unvaccinated; the vaccinated are healthier, with no autoimmune or neurological disorders.

A doctor studied every patient born into their practice over ten and a half years, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The study, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, included over 500 unvaccinated children and over 3,700 partially vaccinated children. The doctor claims the data showed that the more vaccines a child received, the worse their health outcomes were regarding infections, ADD/ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, and anemia. The doctor states that within five days of the study's online publication, the Oregon Medical Board suspended their license, deeming them a threat to public health. The doctor says they have allowed parents to decide about vaccines, emphasizing informed consent.

Leading up to 02/2013, the Institute of Medicine was commissioned by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to review the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule as a whole. The IOM concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted" and "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe." It noted it is "possible to make the comparison" through large databases, but to date the government has not conducted this comparison. Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 02/2017, ICAN pressed for this exact study; Dr. Marcus Servis at Henry Ford Medical Center agreed to conduct, recruiting a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. The study (2000–2016) found vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma (4.29x), atopic disease (3.03x), autoimmune disease (5.96x), and neurodevelopmental disorders (5.53x; including developmental delay 3.28x, speech disorder 4.47x). ADHD occurred in 260 vaccinated vs none unvaccinated. Ten-year: 17% unvaccinated vs 57% vaccinated with at least one chronic issue. The study was not submitted for publication because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe: "The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe." It is claimed this reflects selection bias and corruption of science; conclusion: "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

The largest in US history comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated. At the Henry Ford Hospital system in Detroit, Michigan, they followed about 18,018 kids from birth to age 10 for ten years. They found that among the vaccinated, there was 300% to 600% more asthma, autoimmune disease, neurodevelopmental disorders, skin disorders, and speech delays, indicating higher chronic disease. After ten years, 57% of the vaccinated had chronic illness, compared with 17% of the unvaccinated. The study is described as historic and is not published; the authors reportedly refuse to publish it to avoid losing their jobs. It is claimed as the strongest study of its kind, and that it will be in the nightmares of the vaccine cartel.

The speaker asks if there has been a study comparing the health outcomes of children following the CDC vaccination schedule and those who are unvaccinated. The other speaker says they are not aware of such a study and suggests it may be considered bad malpractice not to vaccinate a child. They discuss the possibility of a retrospective study using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, but note the need to control for confounders. The speaker presents an exhibit showing higher rates of health conditions in vaccinated children and suggests the need for larger studies to confirm or refute these findings. The other speaker agrees.

Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.

The speaker claims epidemiological studies are easily manipulated and that proper studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are lacking, except for a CDC study in 1999. This CDC study, led by Thomas Verstraten, allegedly compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. The speaker asserts the study found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism in vaccinated children, which "shocked" researchers. The speaker alleges the CDC then kept the study secret and manipulated it through five iterations to bury the link.

An outside expert analyzed data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in a medical practice. The study found that vaccinated patients had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. The speaker claims that vaccines can shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The medical board responded by revoking the speaker's license. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and health issues is not a coincidence, citing other studies and mechanisms of action like aluminum toxicity and immune activation from too many vaccines.

The CDC has not conducted studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children over time. In my practice, we analyzed data from all patients over 10.5 years, comparing those who followed the CDC vaccine schedule with those who did not. We included over 500 unvaccinated children and around 3,700 who received some vaccines. The findings were surprising; unvaccinated children experienced significantly fewer health issues, including infections and chronic conditions. The data showed a clear trend: the more vaccines a child received, the worse their health outcomes, including conditions like ADHD and allergies. Shortly after publishing this data, my medical license was suspended, with claims that I posed a threat to public health.

"Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now." "72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program." "There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children." "But we don't know because they've never done the study." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities."

The speaker hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 variably vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in their practice, age-matched for comparison. The speaker claims the data, available at doctorsandscience.com, reveals significant differences in health outcomes. According to the speaker's slides, unvaccinated children had lower rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, other infections, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD/ADHD. The speaker states there were no cases of ADD/ADHD in unvaccinated patients over 10 years. The speaker suggests vaccines shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and negative health outcomes is not coincidental, citing multiple studies and mechanisms of action, including aluminum and immune activation from too many vaccines too soon. The speaker states that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study.

02/2013: The Institute of Medicine, commissioned by HHS, reviewed the safety of the CDC’s childhood schedule and concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted." Lacking safety evidence, the IOM could only say, "There is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," and noted it is "possible to make the comparison" using data like the vaccine safety data link, though "to date, the government has still not conducted this comparison." In 2017 ICAN pressed for such a study. Dr. Zervis at Henry Ford recruited a team; a 2000–2016 study of 16,000 vaccinated vs 2,000 unvaccinated found higher rates in the vaccinated for asthma (4.29x), atopic disease (3.03x), autoimmune disease (5.96x), neurodevelopmental disorders (5.53x), including developmental delay (3.28x) and speech disorder (4.47x). After ten years, 17% unvaccinated vs 57% vaccinated had at least one chronic health issue. The study was not published, "shoved in a drawer" because it did not fit beliefs; "doctor Zervos ... doesn't wanna lose his job" and "doctor Lemoretta ... does not wanna make doctors uncomfortable." "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

The documentary follows a growing concern: the rise of chronic illness and neurodevelopmental disorders in American children, with speakers outlining striking statistics, personal stories, and contested science around vaccines. Key facts and patterns: - A shift from decades ago to today: more than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition; estimates cited include that over fifty-four percent of kids have a chronic disease, up from twelve point eight percent in the 1980s. One speaker emphasizes that in forty years there has been “the greatest decline in human health ever recorded.” - Autism rates have surged: just a few decades ago, one in ten thousand children had autism; today, one in thirty-one. Other listed conditions include ADD/ADHD, tics/Tourette’s, narcolepsy, sleep disorders, IBS, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s), eczema, asthma, seizures, and various neurological issues. - The central question raised: what is causing this epidemic of chronic illness in kids? The film argues that rapid increases in incidence cannot be explained by genetic change alone, which would take generations. Story and study arc: - The narrative centers on a scientist who was willing to conduct a study into vaccine safety and vaccine injury, but who faced career-risking consequences when attempting to publish or disseminate results. - The film’s narrator and investigators say they compiled hidden-camera testimonies, interviews, and raw stories from parents whose children experienced serious adverse events after vaccines (eczema, seizures, chronic GI issues, sleep apnea, language loss, autonomic and neurological symptoms, and death in some cases). Stories include a child who lost language after vaccination, triplets who regressed into severe autism after their pneumococcal shot, and families describing chronic, ongoing medical crises following vaccines. - The film frames a broader debate: vaccines are safe and effective, with extensive global use and long-standing public health endorsement. Yet it argues that the vaccine safety narrative lacks certain types of trials, particularly double-blind placebo-controlled trials for childhood vaccines. It claims that, in some cases, no such trials exist prior to licensure, and that post-licensure safety surveillance is limited or incomplete. Vaccine safety testing and regulatory claims: - The film argues that none of the 72 vaccine doses on the childhood schedule has ever been subjected to a pre-licensure double-blind placebo-controlled trial, which is presented as the gold standard of safety testing. It asserts that safety assessments and post-licensure surveillance often rely on observational data rather than randomized trials. - A critical example is the hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB): the FDA-approved trial cited shows safety monitoring for only five days after each dose, with no placebo control. The film argues this is insufficient to detect autoimmune or neurodevelopmental issues that could emerge years later. - Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a leading vaccine expert, is interviewed regarding whether five days of safety monitoring captures potential autoimmune or neurological adverse events; the dialogue suggests concern about the adequacy of such safety windows and controls. - The documentary presents the notion that the absence of a placebo-controlled vaccine safety trial is used to argue safety, while retrospective studies and unblinded cohort analyses hints at potential signals that would merit more rigorous testing. Henry Ford Health System and the “vaccinated vs unvaccinated” study: - Dell and others pursue a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study using Henry Ford Health System data, with the aim of comparing health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. They argue that this kind of retrospective cohort study can reveal safety signals when randomized trials are unavailable. - The study reportedly found that vaccination exposure was associated with higher risks of several chronic conditions, including asthma, atopic diseases, autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, Guillain-Barré syndrome), and neurodevelopmental disorders. They summarize that by ten years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children; overall, two to four times higher risks across several categories were reported, with notable differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reportedly found zero chronic conditions in the unvaccinated group for several categories, though the vaccinated group showed higher incidence in many categories. Autism did not reach statistical significance in this study due to small numbers. The presenters emphasize that retrospective studies have limitations (confounding, follow-up length, healthcare-seeking behavior), but argue that the signal deserves publication and replication. - The Henry Ford study reportedly faced professional and institutional barriers: a threat of defamation, failed attempts to publish, and internal resistance. The documentary showcases a dinner meeting where Dr. Marcus Zervos expresses willingness to publish but ultimately faces career risk, leading to discussions about “Galileo moments” and whether data should be released despite pushback. Industry and public health responses: - The film juxtaposes the public health consensus—vaccines save lives, the schedule is well tested, and billions of people have been studied—with dissenting voices from physicians, scientists, and parents who argue that independent, large-scale vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analyses are necessary to truly assess safety outcomes. - It includes testimonials from doctors who faced professional pushback after expressing concerns about broader vaccine safety questions or demonstrating adverse effects in patient populations. - The documentary frames a call to replicate the retrospective study in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to determine whether the Henry Ford findings hold across populations, and whether impaired health outcomes correlate with the breadth of vaccination exposure. Conclusion and call to action: - The film asserts that if the data are valid, this would constitute a sea-change in our understanding of off-target and nonspecific effects of vaccination and would necessitate reconsidering how the vaccination program is designed and implemented. - Viewers are urged to consider the evidence, demand replication, and reflect on the moral and ethical implications of vaccine safety research, balancing public health benefits with potential risks, and exploring alternate strategies to protect child health.

"Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study." "18,468 subjects." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent" "more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities." "None. It's a big difference." "This is devastating." "This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis." "We are systematically making kids sick, and not just a little bit sick, very sick." "This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published." "He knows. If he puts his name on this, his career is over." "Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this." "This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda."

Leading up to 02/2013, the IOM was commissioned by HHS to review the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule. The IOM concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects..." have not been conducted and "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," adding that "it is possible to make the comparison" using databases like the Vaccine Safety Data Link. "Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No." In 02/2017, ICANT pressed for a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study; Dr. Zervos at Henry Ford agreed to conduct it. The Henry Ford study followed births 2000–2016, finding vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma (4.29x), atopic disease (3.03x), autoimmune disease (5.96x), neurodevelopmental disorders (5.53x), including developmental delay (3.28x) and speech disorder (4.47x). ADHD: 260 cases vaccinated, none unvaccinated. After ten years, 17% unvaccinated vs 57% vaccinated had a chronic issue. The study was not published because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms.

- "Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated." - "When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions." - "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." - "They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease." - "Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders." - "Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities." - "We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination."

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis. This may be the most important study that has ever been done and it needs to be published. Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this.

Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase. Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities. None. It's a big difference. This is devastating. This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda. If he puts his name on this, his career is over.

The speaker discusses various studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. One study found that vaccinated children had higher rates of nasal allergy, allergic rhinitis, autism, pneumonia, and ear infections compared to unvaccinated children. Another study examined medical records and found that vaccinated children had more developmental delays, asthma, and ear infections. The speaker also mentions the challenges faced in getting these studies published and the scrutiny they faced from fact-checkers. Additionally, the speaker highlights the impact of breastfeeding on vaccination outcomes, noting that not breastfeeding for at least 6 months increased the risk of asthma, allergies, eczema, developmental delays, and autism in vaccinated children.

02/2013, the Institute of Medicine, commissioned by HHS, reviewed the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule and concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted." It also stated, "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," and noted, "The IRM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote." Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 2017, ICAN sought this study; Del Bigtree met Dr. Marcus Zervos, who agreed to conduct it at Henry Ford. The study found vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, atopic disease, autoimmune disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders; ADHD occurred in the vaccinated but not unvaccinated; about 16,000 vs 2,000. After ten years, 57% vs 17% had at least one chronic health issue. It was not published because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe; "we can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

Study: Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. 'The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.' 'Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections.' 'Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.' 'Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase.' 'Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays.' 'Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities.' 'This is devastating.' 'This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda.'

"This study was based on actual medical records." "What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder." "After ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue." "The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe." "We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."

I hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in my practice. The results showed that vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD and ADHD. Surprisingly, there were no cases of ADHD in the unvaccinated group. Despite this significant study, my medical license was revoked. The argument that association does not imply causation is often used to dismiss vaccine injury stories, but there are multiple studies and mechanisms explaining how vaccines can cause problems, such as immune activation from too many vaccines too soon.

I conducted a study using data from my practice, encompassing every patient born within a ten-and-a-half-year period. This real-world patient data compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Unlike the CDC, we didn't exclude anyone and looked at every office visit, stratifying patients by the number of vaccines received. We found striking differences. Over 500 patients had zero vaccines, while over 3,700 had some vaccines. The data clearly showed that the more vaccines a child received, the higher the rates of infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, and even anemia. These conditions were significantly worse compared to the unvaccinated group. The data was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. However, within five days of publication, my medical license was suspended due to supposedly being a threat to public health.