reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The Russian Ministry of Defense has accused the United States of violating the Bioweapons Convention by using dual-use research to create bioweapons under the guise of defensive research. They claim that the US Democrat Party, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and George Soros, were the main ideologists behind this plot. The allegations state that US government entities, non-government organizations, and big pharma companies were involved in a money laundering scheme to fund bio labs in Ukraine. The objective was to develop biological weapons and create pharmaceuticals for profit. Russia believes that these actions have the potential to escalate into World War III if not resolved.

The discussion centers on U.S. involvement in biological research in Ukraine amidst accusations from Russia. A U.S. official claimed that any biological or chemical weapon incidents would be attributed to Russia, which has been accused of using disinformation tactics. The conversation reveals that the U.S. has funded biological laboratories in Ukraine, which study dangerous pathogens. Despite denials from U.S. officials about developing biological weapons, there are concerns about the security of these materials in a conflict zone. The Chinese government has called for inspections of these facilities, highlighting international concerns about biological safety. The need for transparency and accountability regarding U.S. actions in Ukraine is emphasized, as the situation remains precarious.

In Ukraine, there were military biological programs experimenting with deadly pathogens like coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, and African pig plague. They are now trying to hide the evidence, but we believe they were creating components for a biological weapon. This poses a direct threat to Russia's safety. Ukraine and their US supporters rejected these claims, but their actions were bold and brazen.

We received unverified narratives from Ukraine, passed them to John Solomon, who then appeared on Fox News with Sean Hannity. Giuliani started collaborating with Russian agents in May or June 2019, spreading lies for Putin. Mainstream media doubted us, but Fox News and some right-wing outlets promoted the false claims. Politicians like Ron Johnson and Pete Sessions also helped push the Russian agenda against Joe Biden.

The video claims that the conflict in Ukraine is a result of the US protecting its military labs conducting biological experiments. It suggests that Ukraine is controlled by the deep state and that President Zelensky is a puppet. The video alleges that these labs may have played a role in creating COVID-19. It also implicates Joe Biden and his son Hunter in the corruption surrounding these labs. The video highlights leaked phone calls and admissions from the US State Department confirming the existence of bioweapons labs in Ukraine. It accuses the US government of financing these labs and warns of the dangers they pose. The video concludes by blaming the US government for the conflict and calling for justice.

Over a year ago, we knew about the biolabs, their experiments, and related documents. It started in 2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency, which created the Global Viral Forecasting Institute with Nathaniel Wolf, later Meta Biota. Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm headed by Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr., funded Meta Biota. This is a corrupt operation developed over the last decade to generate biological warfare against the Russians. They've been collecting DNA from Slavic people. General Igor Krylyov exposed this as a war crime because it violates the biological weapons agreement. America's 30 biolabs in Ukraine experimented on animal-to-human transmission, which is the origin of COVID-19. The research conducted in Ukraine will be directly connected to COVID-19. The United States created and opened this Pandora's box.

Four days ago, I wouldn't have believed the Biden administration was funding secret biolabs in Ukraine, but Under Secretary of State Nuland confirmed their existence during a Senate hearing. Despite fact-checks dismissing it as Russian disinformation, these labs are real, and Nuland expressed concern about their contents falling into Russian hands. The Russian Defense Ministry claimed the labs were developing military biological programs with US funding, possibly involving deadly pathogens like plague and anthrax. The US embassy in Ukraine has a web page explaining that American and Ukrainian scientists have worked on a whole bunch of different experiments like this. The US government is downplaying the situation, with the Pentagon calling Russian accusations "absurd."

The Chinese State Council Information Office claims COVID originated in the U.S. A special team is investigating COVID's origins, with findings on covid.gov. Work is being done with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy, looking at U.S. funded gain of function research at the Wuhan lab and other biolabs, which has led to health crises. The goal is to find the specific link between gain of function research and COVID-19. If Peter Daszak's research with the Wuhan lab caused the pandemic, then the U.S. funded it, and Anthony Fauci denied it under oath. Gain of function research is ongoing in biolabs worldwide, like in Ukraine. Warning against U.S. funded biolabs in Ukraine led to accusations of being a Russian asset. The intelligence community was reluctant to say COVID came from a lab, possibly due to the politicization of intelligence. This politicization dates back to intelligence used to justify the Iraq regime change war.

Russian state media has been circulating a false story since 2015, claiming that America is running facilities in Ukraine and Georgia that caused deadly disease outbreaks. These claims were debunked in 2020, with the United States clarifying that the facilities are for vaccine development and reporting outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens. However, the story resurfaced recently, with the Russian foreign ministry and social media platforms sharing it widely. It has even gained attention in the United States, with figures like conspiracy theorist Stu Peters and platforms like Infowars promoting it. Russia's false narrative on American biolabs in Ukraine continues to spread.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has accused the United States of violating the Bioweapons Convention by using dual-use research to create bioweapons under the guise of defensive research. They claim that the US has been constructing military bio laboratories near Russia and China's borders to collect dangerous microorganisms for genome-specific bioweapons. The main individuals implicated are Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and George Soros, who allegedly facilitated the plot to enrich themselves and maintain political power. The US Democrat Party, along with various government and non-government entities, were involved in funneling money to bio labs in Ukraine, which then collaborated with big pharmaceutical companies to create vaccines and treatments. Russia claims that Big Pharma ensured profits and financial support for election campaigns. The allegations have been submitted to the UN.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has made serious allegations against the US regarding the production of biological weapons in Ukraine. They claim that the US violated the Bioweapons Convention by using dual-use research to create bioweapons under the guise of defensive research. Russia also accuses the US of failing to implement measures to detect and regulate bioweapon production. The allegations involve government entities, non-government organizations, and big pharma companies. The Russian military claims that the US Democrat Party, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and George Soros, were the main ideologists behind this plot. They allege that money was funneled through non-government organizations to bio labs in Ukraine, which created biological weapons. These weapons were then used by big pharma companies to develop vaccines and treatments, ensuring profits and political power for the US Democrat Party. The allegations have been submitted to the UN.

The war in Ukraine began a year ago when the Russian military invaded the country. The conflict traces back to the 2016 WikiLeaks scandal, where emails revealed the Democratic Party's rigging of the primary process. To deflect blame, the DNC claimed the servers were hacked by Russia. This lie worked flawlessly, as Russia became the perfect villain for both parties in Washington. The Russia collusion hoax paralyzed the Trump administration and justified the expansion of the national security state. The war in Ukraine now involves not only Russia but also China, as predicted by Donald Trump. The US is losing its position in the world order, and Americans are being fed lies about Ukraine. Unconditional support for Ukraine is unsustainable, and the goal seems to be defeating Moscow's armies and building a better world.

We were aware of the biolabs and their experiments over a year ago, tracing back to 2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency's creation of the Global Viral Forecasting Institute, linked to Nathaniel Wolf. This evolved into Meta Biota, funded by Rosemont Fonseca, associated with Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr. This network suggests a corrupt operation under the Obama and Biden administrations aimed at developing biological warfare against Russia, including collecting DNA from Slavic populations. General Igor Krylyov has revealed evidence of war crimes, indicating that the U.S. operated 30 bio labs in Ukraine, conducting experiments related to animal-to-human transmission, which connects to the origins of COVID-19. This research exposes significant violations of international agreements on biological and chemical weapons.

The U.S. intelligence community has officially opened an investigation into more than 120 U.S. taxpayer-funded biological laboratories operating overseas, including 40 in Ukraine. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the probe aims to identify where the labs are located, what pathogens they contain, and what research is being conducted. Gabbard has previously accused officials of misleading the public about the existence and scope of U.S.-backed bio labs overseas, including claims tying the issue to the Biden administration and figures such as Anthony Fauci. The discussion references claims made during the Biden administration by Victoria Nuland, who admitted bio labs are in Ukraine and funded by the United States but said they were only for defensive research, while dismissing accusations as Russian disinformation. Questions are raised about claims of Russian findings, including reported COVID vaccine samples in labs during Russia’s takeover of territory, and claims of AIDS research on Ukrainian military personnel. Senator asks Ukraine-specific questions about chemical or biological weapons and whether there is doubt that any biological or chemical incident in Ukraine would be carried out by Russians. Ukraine is described as having biological research facilities, with concern that Russian troops may seek control of research materials, and statements that efforts are underway with Ukrainians to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands. The exchange asserts that Russian propaganda blames Ukrainians for plots involving biological weapons and coordination with NATO, and that it is “classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they’re planning to do themselves.” Doctor Merrill Nass, a biological warfare epidemiologist and author, says it is notable that the government acknowledges such facilities, including about 40 in Ukraine and over 100 elsewhere, and adds that many countries have studied biological weapons agents, treatments, and vaccines since at least World War II. Nass argues that the law prohibits developing biological weapons and references the Biological Weapons Convention, noting that the treaty has no enforcement mechanism, and that there is no way to send teams to investigate other countries’ labs. He suggests there have been roadblocks to obtaining details, and that labs outside the United States reduce oversight. The conversation also discusses the idea of incentives and loopholes: Nass states that the U.S. has no legal control over private labs and that, in the U.S., it is possible to build high-containment laboratories and have scientists create whatever they like without a prohibition. Nass describes historical U.S. development and stockpiling of biological weapons agents, mentions evasion of antibiotics and vaccines, and argues that international restrictions do not prevent potential development efforts elsewhere. Nass says that specific biological weapon use is not known to have occurred within the United States except that “the potential exception of COVID,” asserting the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine should never have been developed “the way it was developed for COVID” because it included “the most toxic, problematic parts” of the virus. He also recalls work as a consultant to the Cuban Ministry of Health in 1993 regarding illness attributed to cyanide poisoning, describes reports that the CIA sent African swine fever virus to Cuba through Panama to dissidents, and notes that Cuba reportedly had to kill half a million pigs due to that outbreak. When asked whether researchers can be controlled and whether answers will emerge about roughly 120 labs, Nass says accountability and oversight are limited, citing a senate hearing where senators said the intelligence community is not under anyone’s control and is not accountable. He adds that if answers cannot be obtained in the U.S., they would not likely be obtained in other countries. Nass argues that lab-produced viruses could be distinguished from naturally occurring ones by analyzing genomes, describing prior work on reconstructing an epidemic and claiming that attention to whether viral genomes are natural or unnatural will enable future differentiation. He notes that he believes the risk of severe consequences reduces the likelihood of use. The segment ends with plans to bring Nass back as the investigation unfolds.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has accused the United States of violating the Bioweapons Convention by using dual-use research to create bioweapons under the guise of defensive research. They claim that the US Democrat Party, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and George Soros, were the main ideologists behind this plot. The allegations state that the US government funneled money through non-government organizations to bio labs in Ukraine, which then created biological weapons. These weapons were sent to big pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccines and treatments, ensuring profits for both parties. Russia claims that the US Democrat Party and big pharma had a partnership to maintain power and enrich themselves. The allegations have been submitted to the UN.

The video claims that the conflict in Ukraine is actually about protecting US military labs conducting biological experiments. It suggests that Ukraine is controlled by the deep state and that President Zelensky is a puppet serving Western interests. The video alleges that these labs may have played a role in creating COVID-19 and that Joe Biden and his son Hunter were involved. It also accuses the US government of overthrowing Ukraine's government in 2014 and funding bio labs in Ukraine. The video concludes by stating that Russia is not the villain, but rather the US government and its allies are.

The discussion centers on long-simmering claims about CIA programs from the mid-20th century and how those programs may have evolved into present-day operations, with a focus on secrecy, biowarfare, mind-control concepts, and weather- or environment-related tech. The participants reference recently republished unclassified CIA documents on Project Artichoke, described as a Cold War-era mind-control operation that involved injecting and using various drugs to control individuals. They connect Artichoke and MKUltra to a broader history of behavioral science programs, suggesting that the CIA has pursued mind-control and related technologies since its inception in 1947-1948, often under plausible deniability and without public accountability. The conversation broadens to contemporary concerns, notably CIA-linked biolabs in Ukraine. The speakers note that, during the Ukraine conflict, there were “CIA collaborative bioweapons labs scattered across Ukraine,” and that Victoria Nuland testified before Congress about such labs, implying that their existence is not new but ongoing. They recount an NBC News on-camera moment in Kyiv that was later understood to involve burning documents at a lab, rather than a Russian attack, as evidence of covert activity. The implication is that clandestine programs persist and have become more sophisticated than the original Artichoke/MKUltra programs. Dr. Merrill Nass describes the historical development of these programs, linking them to the post-World War II Paperclip era and the involvement of German scientists who worked on chemical warfare and mind control. He references attempts to create Manchurian candidates, multiple personality experimental concepts, and drug testing in various settings, including “safe houses” for blackmail and testing under extreme conditions. Nass also discusses Project SHAD (shipboard exposure of naval personnel to biological and chemical agents) and Operation White Coat (the Vietnam-era program using Seventh-day Adventists as human guinea pigs for chemical and biological testing). He notes the ethical and legal questions surrounding these programs, including cases where vaccines or illnesses were used in non-soldier populations and the long-term health effects. Kevin Ship, a CIA whistleblower who spent 17 years at the agency, emphasizes that the CIA has not changed its core goals or organizational behavior. He argues the CIA remains a “global juggernaut” with “billions of dollars” in off-the-books programs, continuing mind-control and behavioral science efforts, now employing more advanced technologies such as directed energy weapons and potentially telecommunication-like mechanisms (including insinuations about nanotech-based or electromagnetic methods). He maintains that the agency’s secrecy is so profound that it can operate independently of Congressional oversight or presidential intercession, with “upper level compartments” or an supra group within the CIA that conducts programs unknown to the President or Congress. The speakers discuss the possibility of modern-day applications, including “graphene oxide” or nanotech-based methods that could enable clandestine communication or “telepathy” for intelligence purposes, and weather-modification or geoengineering as a tool of strategic influence. They reference public figures such as John Brennan discussing strategic aerosol injection and geoengineering, which they present as evidence of the CIA’s ongoing interest in manipulating the environment for national security and warfare aims. The broader theme is that clandestine, off-the-books programs persist, adapt, and may operate under layers of compartmentalization that obscure their existence from public scrutiny. Towards the end, Nass highlights broader existential concerns beyond bioweapons, such as ecological disruptions, pollinator declines, insect and bird losses, and potential impacts on food security. He connects these concerns to possible geoengineering and electromagnetic field applications, suggesting that the combination of environmental manipulation and surveillance technologies could have far-reaching, harmful consequences for society. The conversation closes with references to the authors’ and speakers’ work: Nass’s Substack, Doortofreedom.org, and sofaf.org; Ship’s Twilight of the Shadow Government and his X (formerly Twitter) presence for ongoing updates.

Russia's Ministry of Defense accuses the US of using virus mutations for its own interests. They claim that the US collects pathogens from biolabs worldwide, which later become pandemics, benefiting American pharmaceutical companies. The ministry suggests collusion between big pharma and USAID through a company called Eko Health Alliance. They also mention an exercise at Johns Hopkins University where scientists transferred a coronavirus strain from bats to humans via a pig, just months before COVID-19 emerged. The US government's contradictory statements about the pandemic raise suspicions. Russia's defense ministry believes the US is preparing to establish biological control and create crisis situations. Concerns are raised about Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement and his alleged financial gains from the pandemic.

Join us as we discuss a significant story involving U.S. government disinformation regarding biological labs in Ukraine. Victoria Nuland's Senate testimony raised concerns about dangerous labs in Ukraine, contradicting the narrative that these claims are false. Journalists often rely on government denials without investigating the truth, which undermines credible reporting. The government has a history of misleading the public, as seen with the anthrax attacks and the manipulation of the coronavirus. The choice of Ukraine for such research raises questions, especially given its medical infrastructure and the U.S.'s long-standing involvement in the region. This situation warrants scrutiny regarding U.S. intentions and actions in Ukraine. Thank you for joining the conversation.

The speakers claim that America is under attack by Russian bots on Twitter, which are part of an ongoing attack by the Russian government. These bots are flooding Twitter, targeting Americans, and attempting to fan the flames of political discord by creating echo chambers and alternate realities. The speakers reference Hamilton 68, a website tracking Russian-linked Twitter accounts, as evidence of this activity. They claim this dashboard shows Russian bots are involved in various topics, from political narratives to school shootings. However, another speaker alleges that Hamilton 68 is a fraud. They claim the list of accounts it tracks are not Russian bots, but rather ordinary Americans, and that Hamilton 68 is misrepresenting organic opinions as Russian influence. Some speakers claim they are personally targeted by Russian bots. A dashboard at securingdemocracy.org is suggested for tracking Russian activity. A video by Matt Orphala is praised. Negative news about vaccines is said to be amplified by Russian bots.

The segment argues that many past ten-year conspiracy theories have proven true, focusing on Ukrainian bio labs that were denied existence as recently as prior years. It cites reports from four years ago claiming new, exclusive information about Ukraine’s bio labs, suggesting the labs studied viruses or diseases and ran underground genetics projects, with staff receiving diplomatic immunity and nearby residents suffering illnesses like cholera and swine flu. The narrative links these labs to broader political events, including the overthrow of Ukraine’s government, noting Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca invested half a million dollars in a San Francisco pathogen research company, Metabiota. It states that Hunter Biden introduced Metabiota to Barisma officials to negotiate the establishment of bio labs in Ukraine, and that Metabiota later received $24,000,000 in Department of Defense funding for Ukraine research projects. The piece asserts that despite public denial by the US government and media that Ukrainian bio labs were a Russian fabrication, Pentagon and other officials later admitted that 46 neutral Ukrainian laboratories exist in the country. It claims Epstein’s emails show heavy involvement in Ukrainian bio labs, discussing do-it-yourself genetic experiments, including embryo implantation, sperm modification, and biohacking with scientists, with questions about the purpose of sperm modification. It highlights a separate email describing a designer baby project with detailed funding needs and development strategies, aiming to move from garage biology to the first live birth of a genetically designed human or even a human clone within five years. It asks why this research was happening in Ukraine, noting it is illegal in the United States and most Western countries, and that it occurred under secrecy, citing another email about ensuring participants could remain anonymous to avoid reputational damage. The transcript recalls a sworn statement by Victoria Nuland, then Undersecretary of State, asking, “Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?” It notes that questions about secret biolab activity were dismissed as Russian disinformation at the time, but now, in light of Epstein’s documented interest in genetic experimentation and his use of bio labs in Ukraine to carry it out, this is no longer considered a conspiracy. The narrator emphasizes that Epstein’s involvement suggests ambitions beyond merely running a criminal pedophile network, pointing to radical human genetic experiments with global implications conducted through Ukrainian bio labs and funded or supported by particular backers.

Russia released evidence linking Hunter Biden's investment fund to funding Ukrainian biolabs, where untested drugs were allegedly used on soldiers. The US is said to conduct such activities abroad due to legal restrictions at home. Ukraine's labs receive US funding for research on pathogens, but they are owned and operated by Ukraine and are part of a program to prevent deadly outbreaks. (Translation: Russia claims Hunter Biden's fund financed Ukrainian biolabs where untested drugs were used on soldiers. US conducts such activities abroad due to legal restrictions. Ukrainian labs receive US funding for pathogen research as part of outbreak prevention program.)

After months of searching through intelligence community holdings and files, Speaker 1 is releasing “new evidence” that the US government has funded more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including locations such as Ukraine. Speaker 1 says the intelligence community previously warned that a US-funded biolab in Ukraine likely housed dangerous pathogens and remained vulnerable to longstanding threats of Russian attack, seizure, or damage. Speaker 1 also says evidence about the full existence and funding of these laboratories had been knowingly withheld from “the American people.” Speaker 1 claims many US government-funded biolabs have engaged in research using hazardous and highly contagious pathogens, and in some cases included dangerous gain-of-function research, with “very little visibility or oversight.” Speaker 1 states that President Trump “clearly understands” the threat posed by dangerous gain-of-function research and took action by signing an executive order on May 25, 2025 to end federal funding of gain-of-function research around the world. Speaker 1 further says that, at ODNI, they issued new guidance directing increased collection on overseas laboratories and facilities, and that increased collection is already producing new details, including clinical trials underway at these facilities that are raising “significant ethical, financial, and security concerns” about the supposed public health initiatives and US national security. Speaker 1 says politicians and “so-called health professionals like Dr. Fauci,” along with entities within the Biden administration’s national security team, “lied repeatedly” about the existence of US-funded and supported biolabs, and threatened those who attempted to expose the truth. Speaker 1 characterizes the release as breaking new ground because information about the existence, history, locations, and funding of the US-funded biolabs had been intentionally covered up by powerful people who claimed the biolabs didn’t exist. Speaker 1 adds that anyone who says otherwise is accused of being foreign assets and traitors to America. Speaker 1 concludes by saying ODNI and Speaker 1 will continue working with partners across the US government to identify exactly where these labs are and what pathogens they contain to end dangerous gain-of-function research that threatens the health and well-being of the American people and people around the world.

Metabiotas founder Nathan Wolf has affiliations with EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA's Defense Science Research Council. He has been associated with individuals like Jeffrey Epstein and Boris Nikolic, who was Epstein's successor executor. Claims have been made by Russia about the Pentagon having over 30 biolabs in Ukraine, while China claims to operate 336 biolabs in 30 countries. Some members of the US government dismiss these claims as a Russian conspiracy and anticipate a false flag attack from Russia. When asked about the possibility of a biological or chemical attack in Ukraine, it is believed by one speaker that the Russians would be responsible.

Over a year ago, we discovered the existence of bio labs and their experiments, along with documents and contractors involved. The Defense Intelligence Agency initiated the Global Viral Forecasting Institute in 2005, which later became Meta Biota. This organization received funding from Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm led by Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr. These connections reveal a corrupt operation developed by the West under Obama and Biden, aiming to create DNA biological chemical warfare against Russia. General Igor Krylyov's findings expose a violation of the global biological chemical weapons agreement, as America's 30 bio labs in Ukraine conducted animal to human transmission experiments, likely contributing to the origin of COVID-19. This reveals a Pandora's box created by the United States.