TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

On January 6th, the speaker was not inside the Capitol but was visited by the FBI at their mom's apartment. Simultaneously, the FBI also went to the speaker's own apartment. The speaker had a regular doorbell camera, which captured an FBI agent putting a sticker over its lens. However, the agent was unaware that there was also a camera in the peephole of the door. The speaker questioned why the cameras were being neutralized if the FBI had a legal search warrant. The speaker described the scene as resembling a herd of cattle going through the apartment, raising concerns about living in a police state and wondering if they could be the next target.

In this video, a man in Provo, Utah records a confusing clip of an FBI SWAT team raiding his elderly neighbor's home. The man was wanted for threats against the President and interstate threats. The FBI had been surveilling him since March and had previously spoken to him without aggression. The speaker questions why the FBI chose to conduct a predawn raid and wonders if there was evidence that the man was planning something dangerous. They express concern that this raid may be a show of force and a message to the public. The speaker calls for more information, including body cam footage and all evidence.

The speaker claims the Democratic Party is now in an "open terrorism phase," citing fire bombings, attacks on Tesla dealerships, and attempts to breach the White House. They allege that Democratic mouthpieces are inciting violence against Trump supporters, referencing Carville, Raskin, and Podesta's alleged plans for civil war if Trump won. The speaker reports that Nick Sordor's father and sister were victims of swatting after Sordor received a threatening message. They also mention a similar swatting incident against Chase Geyser and the death of reporter Jamie White. The speaker urges the Justice Department to focus on these incidents. They assert that conservatives would never engage in such tactics. The speaker believes law enforcement is being weaponized against them. They claim these attacks have strengthened Sordor's resolve and that he is "over the target" due to his reach. The speaker warns of potential false flag attacks on migrant demonstrations blamed on Trump. They urge listeners to support those under attack, including Sordor, Infowars, Musk, and Trump, and to recognize the importance of their voices and prayers. The speaker concludes that the opposition is desperate because "we are winning."

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

A creator states they went to the police station because a prominent creator incited mob violence against them, their property, and family due to differing views on pesticide use. The speaker claims their phone and social media accounts were flooded, and they received death threats, which have been reported to the police. The speaker alleges the other creator is targeting them for posting about not using pesticides like glyphosate on their Facebook page. They claim the creator wants the posts removed and has threatened to continue doxxing them and ruining their life and business if they don't comply. The speaker says the creator commented on their appearance in a video. They state they are now working with the police and attorneys and that people are sending them screenshots and emails expressing fear for their safety due to the mob violence allegedly encouraged in the creator's Facebook group.

The speaker says the subject of the interview is not a Democrat and would be offended to be called one. The speaker doesn't believe a political issue would cause the subject to do such a thing. The subject never mentioned the senator or representative who were targeted. He didn't like Tim Walz and would say things like, "I don't like that Tim Walz did this." The subject mentioned a protest, but the speaker doesn't think he said anything about it. The speaker would tell him to surrender himself so he could be taken alive. The subject listened to Infowars, and the speaker told him not to take everything they say for granted. The subject was a Trump supporter, voted for Trump, and liked Trump.

The speaker records a conversation with law enforcement officers regarding online threats they have received. They clarify that they do not advocate violence and are only using words to express their opinions. They mention receiving death threats and express concern for their family's safety. The officers advise them to report the threats and offer to make their house a lookout. The speaker emphasizes that they have no criminal record and do not possess any weapons. They believe that criticism should be allowed for all groups and advocate for peaceful dialogue. They express frustration with being labeled as hateful for expressing their views.

I’m doing my show like normal, and I’m reaching the end of the show when I see an alert from my Ring doorbell: somebody’s at the front door. I’m live, reading super chats and live chat messages, and I see that this guy has a loaded gun. He’s got a motorcycle helmet and a backpack, a gun drawn, and he’s knocking on the door yelling. I didn’t want to tip him off that I knew he was there, so I kept the show going for about a minute, then wrapped it up quickly. My producer runs in and I ask, who is that? What’s going on? He says, I called the cops. They’re here. The guy’s gone. Then I start getting changed out of my suit, and I hear gunshots go off outside. I jumped to the ground, not knowing what was happening. I step outside after the dust settles and there are about 10 cop cars up and down the street, the whole block locked down, the alley shut down. They tell me to get back inside. We’re not allowed to leave until the morning. That’s how late they were there. At the end of the night, after the cops left, I went out in the very early morning. Did anyone come and explain anything to you? No. Nobody said anything. It’s ridiculous. In the morning, I asked the guy what happened, and he told me the story. It turns out the shooter is a 23-year-old white man, a “white nerd,” short guy, who was at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign, about two hours south of where I live. He killed three people earlier in the day: his roommate, killed the roommate’s sister, and killed the roommate’s mother. He then got in his car and drove directly to my house, parked outside, got out a .22 pistol and an automatic crossbow (a weird choice), and knocked on my door. He went around the house, tried the back door, tried the front door. The cops pulled up, he took off running through the gangway, hopped the fence, and ran into the neighbor’s house. I guess he went into the neighbor’s basement because the door was unlocked. He was hiding from the police. He shot two of the neighbor’s dogs, which is devastating. He ran back outside, and the cops spotted him. He shot at the cops. The cops shot him in the face, and he died on the spot. What was his motive? They never told me. To this day, I have no idea. There’s no explanation. There was no contact after the incident. The Illinois State Police came by about a week later to retrieve the Ring camera footage of the whole incident, and I downloaded that onto a thumb drive. That’s it. I never heard from the cops, never heard from the government. Not at all. A guy comes to murder you, kills three others and two dogs, and no one bothers to tell you anything? It’s ridiculous.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 address a viral video about Charlie’s chief of staff, Mikey, and explain why they are discussing it. - The video in question attacks Mikey, Charlie’s chief of staff, claiming based on a few seconds of clips that he allegedly has a nonchalant or calm reaction to Charlie’s murder. They describe this as a “extremely disgusting attack.” - Speaker 1 recounts what happened: they were at the scene when a shooting occurred. The loud crack is heard; they turn and see Charlie has been shot. They realize there is a shooter on the scene. They decide to get out of there rather than be shot, noting Charlie had a security team that leapt into action to get Charlie out. - Speaker 0 notes their own actions: he, too, considered getting into the car, but decided against it. He was ahead of Mikey as they left. He recalls a moment where he paused to assess the situation, then saw Mikey, who was profoundly freaked out. Mikey’s lip was quivering, and he said, “I need to call Erica,” then took his phone and began calling Erica. Speaker 0 also called his own mom, saying there had been a shooting and that he was okay. - They describe Mikey’s later actions: after the initial shock, Mikey took charge like a “general directing a battle,” coordinating hospital transport and information flow, and directing people where to go. When they learned Charlie had died, Mikey told them, “now none of you can say anything that you've heard because it is Erica is not going to hear about this from anyone except me.” - Speaker 2 asks if Mikey could be involved in a conspiracy to murder Charlie. Speaker 1 responds that such accusations are vile and describes how some people online fuel such narratives, comparing the mindset to getting a “high” from dangerous or provocative content. - The speakers emphasize Mikey’s heroic actions: Mikey was distressed but stepped up to direct people and communicate with Erica and others. Speaker 0 notes that he, too, was traumatized after learning of Charlie’s death and rushed to be with Erica and the team. - They address the specific allegation that Mikey was on the phone immediately during the incident; they state he was not on the phone but was taking social videos to share with their group chats. He would send updates to Charlie’s social media during the event while the crowd was changing, then, overwhelmed by the noise and shock, he put his fingers in his ears but his phone remained in his hand as he moved away. - They describe the scene as a cordoned-off area with a narrow gap that people used to exit, where Mikey walked briskly or ran as he processed the trauma and continued to direct actions. They reiterate Mikey “turned into a general on a field marshaling the troops.” - Speaker 1 closes by urging readers who propagate narratives attacking Mikey to reconsider, stating that such narratives are bad and gross and a choice that shouldn’t be made.

A swatting incident occurred where 911 calls were made to the homes of four political leaders in Ohio. The targeted leaders had sponsored or supported legislation against swatting. One caller claimed to have shot his wife with an AR fifteen and demanded $10,000 and an escape car. Law enforcement cleared the homes but found nothing. The lawmakers emphasized the importance of passing the swatting bill to protect officers and the public. One lawmaker plans to reach out to congressional leaders for federal legislation on swatting.

The speaker, Zoe Chase, from the radio show "This American Life," interviews an individual who claims to have a deep state target list. The individual discusses their intention to expose corruption and conduct livestream swatting raids on those on the list. They mention specific names and organizations involved in the alleged conspiracy, including the FBI, DOJ, and various politicians. The individual also talks about their desire to have Elon Musk disclose Twitter direct messages and their plan to work with sheriffs to carry out their actions. They emphasize the importance of county and state involvement and state that they are not dependent on the outcome of any election.

The speaker accuses someone of trying to ruin their life by involving the police and claims to have damaging information about them. They mention a previous incident where someone's dog was killed. The other speaker admits to calling the police on the first speaker, claiming they have knowledge of illegal firearms, alt-right involvement, and drugs. They express hope that the police will visit the first speaker soon. The conversation then shifts to discussing doxxing and swatting, with one speaker supporting the posting of personal information but opposing swatting due to its potential for violence. They mention a case where someone was killed as a result of swatting and highlight its illegality in many places.

Speaker 1 admits that mentioning being armed was to deter threats. They regret their choice of words and clarified their friend never said that. They received threats and harassment online even 14 months later, with a recent influx after a court subpoena.

There was a scary incident at Walmart with an active shooter. The shooter was a tall, young, white guy wearing an army backpack. At first, I thought he had a BB gun, but it turned out to be a long assault rifle. He started shooting after walking past me. I was trying to call 911, but couldn't get through. I'm really shaken up and scared to walk now.

Someone is swatting my house, a hacker is swatting us. This happened last week too. Stop doing this to me. Let's go.

Sergeant Barnes from the Port Township Police Department contacts Lucas, who is experiencing a swatting incident. Lucas cooperates with officers, ensuring his family's safety. He explains receiving fake pizza orders and death threats, recording the situation as a social media influencer. The police verify there are no weapons in the house and uncuff Lucas. The incident is caused by someone impersonating him, making serious threats. Lucas remains calm and compliant throughout the ordeal.

The speaker reports that swatting harassment has escalated, now targeting their entire extended family, including in-laws and those with their maiden name, resulting in dozens of victims. Despite providing information to law enforcement after being swatted over ten days ago, there has been no federal investigation or contact from the FBI. The speaker feels unsupported and expresses frustration that domestic terrorist assaults are not being prioritized by the federal government. Their only recourse is to continue making noise to pressure authorities to act. They are concerned this situation will worsen and are tired of reporting these incidents.

The FBI alerted state police about a potential threat at a temple or synagogue by Angelo Gage. Law enforcement arrived to investigate but found no weapons. The situation was deemed a swatting incident, and further action will be taken to identify the culprit. The YouTuber shared text messages from Twitter users claiming responsibility, which will be investigated. The police assured their support in protecting the YouTuber and documenting the incident for future reference. The YouTuber will provide any relevant information to aid in the investigation. The video recording was stopped to handle the situation and provide updates. Translation: The FBI informed the police about a possible threat at a religious site by Angelo Gage. Law enforcement arrived to investigate but found no weapons. The incident was determined to be a swatting hoax, and steps will be taken to identify the perpetrator. The YouTuber shared text messages from Twitter users claiming responsibility, which will be looked into. The police assured their support in protecting the YouTuber and documenting the incident for future reference. The YouTuber will provide any relevant information to assist in the investigation. The video recording was stopped to address the situation and provide updates.

The speaker is frustrated with repeated false reports to the police, fearing for his safety. He mentions receiving support from online followers and expresses concern about the lack of recourse against these malicious actions. The police assure him of ongoing support and mention escalating the investigation to higher levels. The speaker describes how the false reports are made using fake numbers and tactics to deceive authorities. The police acknowledge the seriousness of the situation and promise to work towards a solution.

The speaker expresses concern that they might be killed if they fully destroy corruption and graft. They mention two separate incidents before they supported Trump where individuals traveled to Austin to kill them. One individual believed the speaker put a chip in their head, while the other had "chief serial killer" in their X profile bio. Both individuals, described as having severe mental illness rather than political motivations, were arrested and held in Travis County Jail simultaneously. They have since been released, though possibly with ankle monitors. The speaker believes the probability of being targeted by homicidal maniacs is proportionate to how often their name is heard.

The speaker states that the Secret Service visited their house because of a social media post saying "8647," which the speaker clarifies means "get rid of Trump." The speaker insists this phrase is a call for impeachment, the 25th amendment, or voting Trump out of office, not assassination. According to the speaker, Trump claimed on the news that "8647" means assassinate him. The speaker denies ever calling for violence against anyone, especially the President. They say the Secret Service agents were friendly and said they were sent by Washington. The speaker claims that right-wing social media accounts used "8646" to mean "get rid of Biden" when he was president. The speaker believes Trump is trying to create a new meaning for the phrase to target those who disagree with him and asserts they will not be intimidated into silence.

Conservative influencers are increasingly targeted by "swatters," with at least a dozen recent incidents involving false reports to draw police to their homes. Aaron Durham described armed officers at her door late at night. The targeted influencers often have a following on X, are pro-Trump, and have interacted with Elon Musk. The swatting calls involve bogus reports of shootings or hostage situations, prompting a large emergency response. Larry Taunton recounted nearly firing on someone trying to open his door, believing it was a home invasion. Many of these influencers are armed, increasing the risk of a deadly outcome. The FBI and DHS are investigating these incidents. The Secretary of Homeland Security stated they will not stand idly by while conservative new media and their families are targeted. The difficulty in investigating stems from the use of technology to spoof phone numbers and voices, sometimes using AI. There is concern about connections to attacks on Tesla dealerships and a cyberattack on X.

Lendell TV reports that two top influencers on X, Gunther Eagleman and Nick Sorter, were swatted. Swatting is described as a prank call to police intended to bring armed law enforcement to someone's home. Gunther Eagleman, with over 1,000,000 followers, posted pictures of his family after armed officers responded to a false report of a hostage situation at his home. Nick Sorter stated that his dad and sister were swatted, with police attempting to kick in his dad's door at gunpoint. He called it literal terrorism and said the FBI should treat it as such. Sorter said the swatter emailed his sister calling him a Nazi and told police his dad was killing his entire family. Sorter vowed not to stop speaking out. According to Sorter, a top FBI official visited his father's home to begin an investigation. FBI Director Cash Patel addressed the swatting incidents targeting media figures, stating the FBI is aware and taking action to investigate and hold those responsible accountable. He said weaponizing law enforcement against any American endangers lives and will not be tolerated.

A popular content creator on the X platform, Dom Lucre, was recently targeted in a dangerous prank called Swatting. An anonymous person with a VPN falsely reported to the police that Dom was holding his girlfriend hostage, even though he doesn't have a girlfriend. Fortunately, the police handled the situation professionally and confirmed Dom's safety. However, this incident is extremely concerning as it puts Dom's life at risk. Swatting, especially when targeting a black man with dreadlocks, can be seen as attempted murder due to potential biases involved. This situation cannot be taken lightly.