reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Mystery drums are echoing, and there's a drone in the air. It's been hovering for about 10 to 15 minutes now. I just spotted three of them.

I posted a video about 12 lights falling from the sky, which appeared individually. My boyfriend's coworker also filmed them and shared it on TikTok, but the feds showed up at his door, asking him to delete the video. Additionally, whenever I use Cape Cod as a location tag, I receive a notification that the video is restricted due to an invalid location tag. This confirms my suspicion that these were not shooting stars.

It's been discovered multiple times but suppressed each time. However, this time feels different; there's a belief that it won't be suppressed. I've had both protective and threatening interactions with various agencies. If a government agent hasn't warned me to stop, then I can proceed. There are factions waiting for me to publish, while others are frustrated that I haven't listened to their threats from three years ago. I constantly navigate between encouragement to share my findings and warnings that I could be in danger for doing so.

I made a viral video about New York planning quarantine camps, which was criticized and removed for false information. Recent events show it may not have been false. The mainstream media called me a liar, but now people in New York are concerned about the camps. Maybe conspiracy theorists aren't crazy. The difference between a conspiracy theory and reality is about 6 months. The situation is alarming, and the video might be taken down, but this is why they want TikTok gone. Maybe I'm not a liar after all.

Okay, here's a concise version of the transcript: I'm in Little River, South Carolina, doing DoorDash and I'm seeing something really weird. There are these objects, I don't know what they are, maybe towers, but they're moving in formation. It's freaky! I was driving and doing a delivery when I saw them. Seriously, they're moving, disappearing, and reappearing. It's messing me up! What the heck are they? This is insane.

There are some striking coincidences regarding locations that I've noticed globally, including in Canada. It's interesting how these events are now being given nicknames, similar to hurricanes. I encourage everyone to research this further. Some may wonder why I haven't mentioned this before; I have, but faced significant backlash since 2020. I'm asking for your help to spread this information widely. We are all questioning what's happening, and it's crucial for everyone to wake up to these issues. Today is the day to start that awareness.

Charlie Kirk is described as one of President Trump’s closest advisers who actively advocated against a war with Iran. He was in the Oval Office in the lead-up to the twelve-day war. The speaker notes they weren’t particularly close, but Charlie was very gracious when the speaker was running for Congress and was supportive. The last time the speaker saw Charlie Kirk on Earth was in June in the West Wing, in the stairwell, where Charlie, upon greeting, looked the speaker in the eye and, very loudly in a small, tight space, said, “Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran.” Charlie then walked off and is believed to have entered the Oval Office. The speaker emphasizes that Charlie Kirk, a close adviser who vocally urged rethinking relations with Israel and opposing war with Iran, was suddenly publicly assassinated, and there are questions about the lack of ability to investigate further. The speaker says it’s a data point that needs examination and questions what it means to say that people are not allowed to ask questions about the incident. The speaker mentions that they were part of an investigation involving the National Counterterrorism Center, but they were stopped from continuing to investigate. The FBI stated they stopped and turned everything over to Utah State Authorities because the matter would go to trial and was very sensitive, but the speaker asserts there was still information to look into and linkage for further investigation that could not be pursued. The speaker clarifies they are not drawing conclusions about who was responsible or the exact circumstances, but asserts there were unanswered questions. There is reference to “text messages that have been made public” showing that Charlie was under a lot of pressure from pro-Israel donors. It is reiterated that Charlie was advocating to President Trump against the war with Iran. In summary, the speaker presents Charlie Kirk as a former close adviser who urged restraint on a potential Iran war and a reevaluation of relationships with Israel, describes a sudden assassination with restricted inquiry, and cites a halted investigation by national security entities, noting publicized pressure from pro-Israel donors as part of the context.

I filmed an unexplained object in the sky in New Jersey, and the video went viral before being taken down. Shortly after, the FBI visited me and my neighbors to ask about the video. They were polite and asked questions, but their visit was intimidating, especially since my personal information had been doxxed online. This led to a lot of negative attention, and I had to delete all my social media to protect myself and my family. I didn't intend to claim anything about what I saw; I just recorded it. I'm still processing everything that happened, but that's the gist of my experience.

Did you hear that? There are these random explosions happening. It's really surprising!

A video discussing the deployment of a Pentagon AI to censor videos about the wildfires in Hawaii and other topics is being taken down. A PhD researcher is experiencing the same issue. The sound was removed from the video, claiming copyright violation, even though there was no background music. Six of the speaker's videos about the wildfires were banned simultaneously. This is seen as treasonous and an attack on Americans asking legitimate questions about the Hawaii incident. The Pentagon is paying a New York company to use AI bots to harass people online, which is deemed outrageous and borderline treasonous. Investigations and defunding are called for. This threatens freedom as we know it.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

I filmed an unexplained object in the sky in New Jersey, which went viral online. Shortly after, the FBI visited me and my neighbors to ask about the video. They were polite and just asked a few questions, but it was intimidating since my personal information had been leaked online. The video was removed from all platforms the night before their visit, which was strange. The object appeared orb-like, emitting its own bright light and moving in unusual ways. I still have a copy of the video but am hesitant to share it due to the attention it brought. Overall, the experience has made me cautious about discussing what I saw.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a sudden, unexplained YouTube ban impacting Speaker 1’s entire account, including the ability to watch YouTube, with no violations or warnings on the channel and no explanation given. The channel was deleted for not following community standard guidelines, which Speaker 1 notes is surprising given the channel’s focus on personal experiences, scientific conversations, and lack of strikes. Speaker 1 explains the last interview they did was with Jim Sikala, and mentions frequent contact from Harvard University’s neurology department seeking real experiences to place boxes in homes for real scientific data collection, not ufology. He says the interview with Sikala was “the last thing we did” about a week or two prior, and asserts there was no explanation for the termination and ban from the app. Speaker 2 frames this as part of a broader pattern of suppression since they started filming a documentary and releasing it on November 5. They describe their YouTube presence as minimal in size and influence, yet they’ve observed a lack of visibility across Twitter and other platforms, with posts “invisible” or unseen by audiences. They had expected the Rogan mention to boost visibility, given some discussions around the documentary and agent disclosure, but instead experienced continued suppression. Speaker 0 notes that both their channels and individual accounts are not reaching audiences despite heavy cross-promotion, and they question how to generate interest or reach when content remains unseen. They reference a Rogan appearance last night that mentioned Speaker 1, and then the next day Speaker 1’s channel is wiped out, prompting speculation about a possible connection. Speaker 1 acknowledges that several thousand people think the ban is connected to the Rogan mention and Doctor Michael Masters’ discussions, though he emphasizes he does not monetize his channel and aims to help others share experiences. Speaker 1 emphasizes the documentary’s impact on people who feel unable to discuss certain topics in everyday society, noting that the content has helped many to rediscover suppressed ideas and experiences. He describes the emotional and personal toll of the work, including sleep issues and a period of sleepwalking, which he attributes to stress and exposure, and recounts a recent incident of seeing a face in a kitchen window, which turned out to be himself in a mirror-like reflection. Speaker 2 summarizes the sense of ongoing coincidence and timing that feels significant, comparing it to the sense of the phenomenon experienced prior to their first filming. They acknowledge receiving messages from viewers inspired by the documentary, thanking them for the work.

Are those fireworks? What is that? I see it too. It's getting stranger. We should investigate and find out what it is. We'll be back shortly. Are we recording? What do you think it was?

I filmed this video in my basement to clear up misinformation about the Bayside Mall incident. While shopping, a fight broke out among kids, and chaos ensued. We thought we heard gunshots, but it was actually fireworks. As people rushed for the doors, we saw strange, shadowy shapes taller than me. I can't explain what they were, but they were not human. Some claim it was the police, but I believe there's a cover-up. Spread this video to expose the truth. They don't want us to know.

Oh my god, I just realized something shocking! There was an explosion in a building that wasn't caused by a plane. It happened a couple of minutes after another explosion. It's clear that something else caused it, not a plane. People are unsure about what exactly happened.

I'm shaking after seeing this cylindrical UFO for the third night in a row. It looks so close that I can almost see a figure inside. I've received reports from across the country about a large yellow orb that is stationary over homes. Last night alone, over 1,200 people reached out to say they witnessed the same phenomenon. I’m uncertain if this is an Iranian ship or an alien spacecraft. We need answers from Biden.

Speaker 0 describes that it has been independently discovered four other times, and that it “has been said, it has been suppressed every single fucking time.” He says he doesn’t think they’ll suppress it this time and that “I think you're in the clear.” He asserts they obviously know about you because he has had multiple both protective and threatening interactions with various agency affiliations. He states, “If you haven't had a US government agent come to you and say, stop. Shut the fuck up. Stop. Shut the fuck up,” then they’re going to let you do it. He claims there are people waiting, saying, “there are SSP motherfuckers that are fucking twiddling their thumbs. Like, is Amy not gonna publish soon? God. We've been influencing this bitch forever.” He adds that on the other side, multiple parties are looking at each other wondering, “Didn't we tell this bitch three years ago that we kill people for this? Is she not listening? What is she doing? She's still doing it? What? We told her we were gonna kill her three years ago.” He describes two constant scenarios in his life: one where people are urging, “do it. Do it. You're the one. Do it.” and another where people are warning, “they're gonna kill you. Don't do it. They're gonna kill you.”

Someone claims their discovery has been independently discovered four other times and suppressed each time. They believe this time is different and they are in the clear. The speaker says they have had both protective and threatening interactions with people of various agency affiliations. They claim that if a US government agent hasn't told them to stop, they will be allowed to continue. Some SSP members are supposedly waiting for the speaker to publish, while others are wondering why the speaker is still working on it after being threatened. The speaker feels they are in a situation where some people are encouraging them to continue, while others are warning them that they will be killed if they do.

I'm Moneypenny and I'm British. I don't profess to understand the American legal system, though I know the British system fairly well. It is fairly harsh at the moment. But I know that if a high ranking, somebody who's been awarded a medal in the British military, who used to be a jet pilot, who used to work in the intel sector of the UK military, came to us and said he was aware of a misdemeanor, a crime involving the death of many people, and he had various evidence and other people that would corroborate that, that something could be done about it, it would be investigated. So this is where I'm stuck, and I want to appeal. Pam Bondi and maybe Cash Patel. If a member of the US military who used to be a pilot, who worked in sensitive intel, who had visited the Diego Garcia Military Base, who had a level of clearance such that he was free to explore that base, who was aware of the Black Navy and the operations that would require being signed in or read in at a very senior level. That individual to me sounds as though he would be somebody that would be taken seriously. So this is where I have a problem. This is where I don't understand. I do not understand how somebody of that caliber who has spoken out, who is recorded speaking out, giving evidence corroborating, giving names of other people. Who is able to tell us where a seven seventy seven airliner with two thirty nine souls on board went and who took it and how the whole operation took place down to the mechanics of it, the individuals that took part in it. Why isn't that information being taken seriously? Why isn't that information being investigated? We are talking about murder. I'm sorry to use that word. There are two thirty nine people, souls involved and probably thousands of friends, family and many, many interested parties over the past eleven years. Many people who have dedicated a lot of time to looking at this, myself included. There are videos that potentially are giving away some of the information about what happened. But the person who has those videos, a person called Ashton Forbes, has been given letters from the American military, American department saying in a matter of national security, they cannot confirm any of the detail. So now we have a decorated military veteran, a former jet pilot who flew into Diego Garcia, who was in Iraq, who has done a lot of very impressive military work on behalf of The United States, has spoken out, is on record. I will send you the video. Why? Why is nothing being done? Why is nobody investigating? I do not understand how The United States can overlook this because, frankly, I'm pretty angry. On behalf of all those people on board, predominantly Chinese and Malaysian people and all their friends and families, I demand that something is done about this. And I'm a nobody, and you don't have to listen to me. But I'm gonna put this on social media, and I'm gonna sit here and wait until somebody responds and gives a bloody good explanation as to why nobody is taking this seriously. Because frankly, it's inhumane, and I don't think the Trump administration, amongst anybody else, would allow something inhumane to take place. I hope you agree.

"Raise your hand if you or someone you know personally had a serious adverse event to this vaccine. Raise your hand. Yep. Almost every single hand in this room was raised. 'For the con artists out of the media, it's either what's going on here?' 'Now let's go a step further. ... believe the vaccine contributed to the death of somebody that you know.' Raise your hand. '100%. Yep. Look around the room. Two people.' 'We are we're not even allowed to talk about this.' 'You just saw thousands of hands get raised, and I was very careful with how I asked the question.' 'I mean, it's beyond anything we've ever lived through in our life, and we're not even allowed to talk about it.' 'Thought police' ... 'When we're not allowed to talk about something... They got you then.' Wow. That was great video."

The segment compiles a series of high-profile disappearances and deaths connected to prominent scientists and military-related figures from July 2023 through the present, noting that some cases remain unexplained or lack full public detail while others appear sudden with few answers. The overarching implication presented is that these cases involve individuals tied to advanced national security work, prompting calls for heightened inquiry. Most recently, retired Air Force General William McCaslin vanished in February. He walked out of his Albuquerque home, leaving behind his phone, after having previously overseen some of the Pentagon’s most advanced aerospace programs. In the same month, astrophysicist Carl Grillmeier—who worked closely on NASA missions—was killed outside his home; a suspect has been arrested in that case. Eight months prior to these events, US rocket scientist Monica Reza disappeared while hiking in California’s Angeles National Forest; records indicate she worked on advanced aerospace materials. The report notes that Congress is weighing an FBI involvement: Congressman Eric Burleson is calling for an FBI investigation, underscoring the perceived severity of the cases and the potential implications for national security. In supporting remarks, a statement attributed to Burleson emphasizes the unusual nature of the individuals involved and the seriousness of the situations. Speaker 1 (the reporter’s interlocutor) adds context by describing these victims as not ordinary citizens but “some of the most advanced scientists that are working on our some of our most critical, nation’s secrets.” The speaker frames the situation as having “all of the hallmarks of a foreign operation,” signaling a belief that foreign involvement could be a factor, and stresses the need for investigation. The report notes that, to date, no local authority has publicly connected these mysterious deaths and disappearances. When the inquiry was directed to the FBI, they declined to comment. The segment closes with a follow-up acknowledgment from the host that these cases have heightened curiosity and understanding but remain unresolved in many aspects. Overall, the compilation highlights a pattern involving high-profile scientists and aerospace professionals with missing or violent end-points, the call for federal scrutiny, and the lack of publicly disclosed connections by local authorities, while the FBI maintains silence on the matter.

The speaker lists a range of substances—aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, surfactants, polymer fibers, graphene—as elements allegedly present in breathable air, describing the situation as horrifying and implying widespread dispersion linked to coordinated programs. They claim that, ultimately, all roads lead to those who print the money, and assert that the coordinating entities behind these programs include the Department of Defense (DOD) and DARPA. The speaker states that there are documents proving the existence of these programs, including an 800-page United States Senate document from 1978 that outlines the scope and scale of the programs and calls for intergovernmental cooperation even between otherwise adversarial nations because of the cross-border ramifications of these programs. Regarding which country is the biggest player, the speaker identifies the United States of America, citing the size of the U.S. military. They claim the U.S. military has three times more aerial tankers—described as the primary aircraft used in these operations—than all other militaries in the world combined. The speaker then revisits the condensation trail narrative, labeling it as perhaps one of the greatest lies ever perpetrated on populations worldwide. They argue that all military tankers and all commercial aircraft are equipped with high bypass turbofan jet engines, defined as jet-powered fans, and that 90% of the air moving through those engines is not combusted. By design, the speaker says, this makes the engine nearly incapable of producing condensation trails except under rare and extreme circumstances, and those circumstances are diminishing each day due to warming in the troposphere. The speaker mentions that two former military pilots who fly private aircraft—described as important people—have contacted GongWatch.org. In both cases, these individuals were off the coast of the Pacific Northwest when their aircraft were forced into emergency auto descents because the outside air was 45 to 50 degrees above what it should have been. The air, according to the speaker, was not dense enough to carry those aircraft. The people who contacted GongWatch.org are described as very alarmed but very afraid to speak out.

I'm recording this, and here's one of those drones everyone is talking about. At first, I thought it was a police helicopter, but it's not. It's really loud. What is that?