reSee.it - Related Video Feed

If a genetic sequence is injected that causes the body to manufacture a foreign protein, the body recognizes it as an invasion and launches an attack on cells. This autoimmune reaction can occur anywhere the injection lands, potentially causing myocarditis or a heart attack if it lands in the heart, stroke or neurological conditions if in the brain, blindness if in the eyes, or sterilization if in the ovaries. The body is being made to manufacture something that does not belong in it. The speaker believes the so-called vaccines encode spike proteins, which are acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots, and to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction. The body is forced to make something directly toxic, intentionally. The injectables are wrapped in lipid nanoparticles.

The speaker presents an illustration of clots removed from a 30-year-old man, noting the largest clot came from the femoral artery while two of the smaller clots came from the radial arteries. The footage is described as zoomed in so viewers can see that these clots are not natural and have come from inside the arteries. The speaker emphasizes that these clots are not a normal finding inside a young man of 30 years old, repeatedly asserting that “these are not natural” and “these shouldn’t be inside this young man of 30 years old.” The presenter then remarks that the case is “imprisoned and deceased in The UK,” linking the observation to events or revelations associated with Richard Hirschman. The speaker indicates an attempt to examine the clots more closely, explaining the lack of equipment (no microscope) but insisting on the visible reality of clots sitting inside the arteries, and rhetorically questions whether this is normal. The final claim made is that the individual from whom the clots were removed was a jab recipient, tying the medical observation to vaccination. Throughout, the speaker frames the findings as alarming and abnormal, stressing the combination of young age, arterial clots, and a vaccination context, while invoking Hirschman’s revelations and noting the location as The United Kingdom.

COVID-19 injections are associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, according to an FDA and CDC study. The speaker claims that psychosis is 440 times more likely, dementia 140 times, schizophrenia 315 times, suicidal thoughts 150 times, and homicidal ideation 25 times. Brain clots are allegedly 3,000 times more likely, depression 530 times, and violent behavior 80 times. Cognitive decline is purportedly 115 times more likely and delusions 50 times. The speaker believes psychiatric harm is caused by the accumulation of toxic spike proteins, mRNA, lipid nanoparticles, and other unknown components.

The symposium covers the potential safety and threat of “replicating” vaccines, especially LepriCon (leprecon) vaccines, in the context of Covid-19 vaccines and genome‑editing concepts. The speakers present a chain of claims and concerns, some drawing on reports and others presenting theories about how these next‑generation vaccines could behave in humans and populations. Key points and claims presented - Emerging mechanisms and risks: The panel notes that blood vessel inflammation and thrombosis mechanisms are increasingly observed, including in vaccine contexts, with examples from individuals who needed limb amputation and others who developed severe vascular events after vaccination. One case involved a 70‑year‑old man who, after a third dose, developed embolic events necessitating shoulder joint surgery, and another where a 60‑year‑old man developed acute limb ischemia and died; both are presented as suggesting a serious vascular mechanism linked to vaccination, though causal connections are not established. - Replicating/vector vaccines and their concerns:荒川博士 and others discuss LepiCon vaccines as vaccines that replicate inside the body. The concept involves “replicating viral vectors” where the genome can mutate and evolve during replication. The green‑highlighted segment in a slide (the antigen gene) plus a blue/orange segment (replicating gene cassette) is used to describe how LepriCon vaccines are designed to carry viral genes and replicate, with the assertion that replication, mutation, and recombination can occur, potentially generating new variants inside the host. - Differences from conventional vaccines: The discussion contrasts LepriCon vaccines with standard mRNA vaccines. In conventional mRNA vaccines, messenger RNA is delivered and translated into antigen proteins, then degraded; in LepriCon vaccines, replicating RNA/DNA can persist and continue producing antigen, with mutation and recombination possible. The panel emphasizes that LepriCon vaccines use replicating/copying mechanisms and that the genetic material can be copied in ways that differ from natural human biology, potentially creating unpredictable variants. - Central dogma and exceptions: The speakers reference the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) but note exceptions in viruses, including RNA viruses that can reverse‑transcribe to DNA (retroviruses) and RNA viruses that replicate RNA directly. They discuss how LepriCon vaccines would rely on replicative processes that do not follow the usual linear flow and why this could complicate predictions about safety and behavior in humans. - Potential for unintended spread and environmental impact: A major concern raised is that self‑replicating vectors could spread beyond the vaccinated individual, via exosomes or other intercellular transport, creating secondary infections or non‑target spread. Exosomes could ferry replicating genetic material, raising fears of new infection chains or “outbreaks” stemming from the vaccine itself, and even suggesting the possibility of vaccination‑induced spread akin to an attenuated or modified pathogen. - Safety signals and immunology concerns: The discussion touches on immune system risks, including immune dysregulation, autoimmune phenomena, and unexpected inflammatory responses. IGG4‑related disease is highlighted as a potential adverse outcome post‑vaccination, with descriptions of glandular and systemic involvement and the idea that high IGG4 levels could have immunosuppressive effects that alter responses to infection or vaccination. The panel notes observed increases in certain immunoglobulin subclasses after multiple LepriCon doses and discusses the possibility of immune tolerance or enhanced immune responses that could be harmful. - Historical and theoretical context: References are made to past epidemics and speculative pandemics caused by misused or dangerous vaccine platforms, drawing on central molecular biology concepts and historical anecdotes about how vaccines can be designed and misused. The discussion frames LepriCon vaccines as a high‑risk platform that could, in theory, generate recombinants, escape mutations, or cause unintended immune and inflammatory consequences. - Clinical and regulatory implications: The speakers call for caution, arguing that more evidence is needed before approving or widespread use of LepriCon vaccines. They emphasize the need for long‑term observation and transparent communication about risks, and criticize the potential for insufficient understanding among healthcare workers and the public. They also urge that any future vaccine development should consider the possibility of genome editing, recombination, and exosome‑mediated spread, and stress the importance of not underestimating possible adverse effects. - Real‑world observations and skepticism about hype: Several speakers underscore that the danger is not merely hypothetical; there are reports of adverse events, including stroke‑like conditions, inflammatory diseases, and immune dysregulation in vaccinated individuals. They stress that the evolution and mutation of replicating vaccines could outpace current surveillance methods, and that “information manipulation” or lack of transparent reporting could mislead the public about risks. - Final reflections and call to action: The concluding messages advocate recognizing the potential failures of messenger RNA vaccines and acknowledging that both conventional and replicating platforms may carry risks. The speakers urge ongoing critical analysis, cautious progression, and robust verification of claims through transparent, independent investigation. They close with thanks to the organizers and a hope that the discussion may contribute to broader public awareness and informed decision‑making. Notable emphasis and unique considerations - The core concern centers on LepriCon vaccines’ replication, mutation, and potential to spread beyond the vaccinated person; exosome transport and genomic/cellular integration are highlighted as mechanisms that could generate new risks not present with non‑replicating vaccines. - The discussion stresses that IGG4 responses could become alarmingly high after certain doses, potentially leading to immunosuppressive effects or autoimmune phenomena, and presents IGG4‑related disease as a potential complication to monitor. - The speakers insist that safety and transparency are paramount, and that misinformation or optimistic narratives about rapid vaccine development could lead to harm if new platforms are adopted without comprehensive evaluation. Overall, the symposium foregrounds cautious scrutiny of replicating vaccine platforms, frames potential biological and regulatory risks, and calls for careful, evidence‑based assessment before broader deployment.

Studies show that more people who received the injections are ending up in the hospital and dying. Repeat injections can lead to tolerance issues by the immune system, preventing an effective immune response. The speaker is focused on the damages caused by these products and believes that the voices of the injured have been taken away. They hypothesize that the spike protein in the injections could cause hyper inflammation, especially in people with preexisting conditions. The speaker also mentions that the contents of the injection were supposed to remain at the injection site, but evidence suggests they can travel to the ovaries. They suspect that there is information being withheld from the public.

The speaker discusses how the spike protein in vaccines can lead to clotting issues, immune suppression, and reactivation of latent viruses like mono. This can also weaken the body's ability to fight off other viruses and cancers. An increase in cancer cases post-vaccination is noted anecdotally. The speaker attributes these effects to the spike protein in the vaccines.

Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.

The speaker claims mRNA injections have caused a "catastrophic" level of damage, citing excess deaths, permanent disabilities, and injuries. Worldwide deaths are estimated at around 17 million as of September 2023. In America, estimations for the first year of mRNA injection deaths range between 480,000 and 600,000, based on extrapolations from a recent preprint and VAERS data. The speaker asserts the shots are cardiotoxic and neurotoxic, linking them to myocarditis, cardiac arrests, coronary artery disease, and 86 neuropsychiatric adverse events. Vaccine spike protein has allegedly been found in the brains of stroke patients 17 months post-vaccination. The speaker states the shots induce blood clotting and damage the kidneys and gastrointestinal system. Furthermore, the speaker believes the shots are carcinogenic, with over 100 studies indicating 17 distinct mechanisms by which they may cause cancer.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and immune system abnormalities.

The data indicates that vaccinations have led to serious health issues, including blood clots, strokes, and amputations. A simple d-dimer test can reveal the presence of blood clots, yet the government has not mandated this test for vaccinated individuals. Studies by two cardiologists found that over 80% of vaccinated patients had elevated d-dimer levels, suggesting microemboli, which can cause gradual organ failure and increase the risk of severe thrombosis, particularly in the brain. Cases of thrombosis in young people are rising, likely due to microemboli and the spike protein from the vaccine affecting blood vessel walls. This connection has been established through clinical observations.

"Now, when these genes, packages, enter the cells, then the cells will start making this damn virus protein which is called the spike." "This is going to happen to any mRNA or gene based vaccine." "Those packages are going to cause your cells in the blood vessels to create this protein and this protein is going to be a foreign non self protein that is going to be recognised by any antibodies that you have and these antibodies are going to be there after the first injection." "If any of these vessels is clogged because of a thrombus or because it's injured, the cells that are being supplied by oxygen are going to die." "So if these tiny vessels in the brain or the heart are damaged, you are damaged for life. You will never be the same again."

D-dimers are markers for thrombosis. When analyzing blood samples for suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, the normal range should not exceed 500. However, there has been a significant increase in elevated d-dimers among vaccinated patients. Many patients have levels above 3000, leading to concerns about microthrombosis throughout the body. Despite further examinations, no embolism or thrombosis has been found. Fatigue is a common symptom among these patients. The risk is that these individuals may experience microthromboses, potentially leading to death in the future. This raises questions about the future health and insurability of those with high d-dimer levels. Investigations and studies should be conducted to understand these phenomena, including the occurrence of thrombosis in placentas during pregnancies.

The speaker observed vasculitis, or inflammation of the blood vessels, in the brain tissue of almost all cases examined post-vaccination. Lymphocytes aggregate around small vessels, indicating inflammation possibly triggered by an antigenic structure like spike protein. This was described as one of the most alarming findings. Individuals with this complication may experience transient defects like loss of speech, unconsciousness, or blindness, but the brain can compensate if there is no major inflammation or hemorrhage. The speaker clarified that the individuals did not die from the vasculitis itself. It's possible for vaccinated individuals to experience these symptoms without knowing the underlying cause. Changes in character have been reported in some vaccinated individuals, which may be related to this inflammation.

The spike protein, according to research in South Africa, induces fibrin from fibrinogen, forming the backbone of clotting in a way not previously seen. Unlike normal fibrin clots that are easily broken down, clots formed from COVID or the spike protein from the vaccine are difficult to break down, causing issues for many people. A cardiologist stated that in their decades of practice, they have never treated as many blood clots as in the last five years. These blood clots occur after the virus infection and the vaccine because the spike protein causes blood clots. Therefore, it is reckless to continue vaccinating people and loading the body with spike protein, causing more blood clots. According to a paper in Cell (July 2021), the nucleoprotein, not the spike protein, supplied broad and durable immunity for the prevention of infection. The speaker questions why the vaccine wasn't changed to target the nucleoprotein once this information came to light.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have been proven to cause real side effects in four major categories. Firstly, cardiovascular issues such as heart inflammation, myocarditis, and cardiac arrest. Secondly, neurologic problems including stroke, Gambray syndrome, and neuropathy. Thirdly, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments. Lastly, immune system abnormalities. These side effects are not controversial or theoretical, but rather a reality.

The speaker, a cardiologist, claims that the spike protein in COVID-19 vaccines has been proven to cause four major domains of disease. These include cardiovascular issues like myocarditis and cardiac arrest, neurological problems such as stroke and Guillain Barre syndrome, blood clots that are resistant to treatment, and immunologic abnormalities. The speaker asserts that these adverse effects have been observed in young individuals who received the vaccine without medical necessity. They emphasize that the vaccines are responsible for these conditions until proven otherwise. The speaker concludes by expressing concerns about who might be affected next.

They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns, inflammation, platelets, micro clots weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows, boom. Ischemia. Doctors call vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare, yes, imagined, no. Its indolentacid and negem. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.

Residual effects from one or two COVID shots can include late blood clots and cardiac arrests years later. The mRNA and spike protein from the shots can linger in the body, causing various health issues like heart and brain damage, blood clots, and immunologic problems. A spike detox program is recommended to address these concerns.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

"a systematic review of autopsy findings and deaths after COVID nineteen vaccination, actually proved a causal link between these mRNA shots and death." "A study by Alessandro and colleagues found a thirty seven percent life expectancy reduction in those who received two or more doses." "The first one, ninety nine million people in it. They found, five hundred percent increased risks of myocarditis, about two hundred, three hundred percent increased risks of spinal cord inflammation." "The second largest study with eighty five million people, and it just came out. They found three hundred percent increased risks, heart attacks, strokes, arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease." "And then we had another study last week that came out that showed people with strokes who got mRNA shots are producing spike protein in their cerebral arteries, so in their brains, for up to seventeen months."

The speaker, a cardiologist, claims that the spike protein in COVID-19 vaccines has been proven to cause four major domains of disease. These include cardiovascular issues like myocarditis and cardiac arrest, neurological problems like stroke and Guillain Barre syndrome, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. The speaker asserts that these vaccine-induced conditions have been observed and acknowledged by regulatory agencies. They also express concern about the potential risks associated with the vaccines, including cardiac arrest occurring even in the absence of myocarditis. The speaker concludes by suggesting that people may be worried about themselves or their loved ones experiencing adverse effects after vaccination.

Physician and scientist Sudhir Advakti expresses concerns about the potential formation of blood clots after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. He explains that these clots can be dangerous, causing symptoms like headaches, nausea, vomiting, and paralysis. German doctors have discovered that clot formation is a common occurrence with all vaccines, indicating that getting vaccinated may trigger a potentially lethal reaction. Advakti strongly advises against getting the vaccine, especially for children who are unable to defend themselves. He believes that giving the vaccine to children is a criminal act.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines cause real side effects in four major categories: cardiovascular issues like heart inflammation and cardiac arrest, neurologic problems such as stroke and neuropathy, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments, and abnormalities in the immune system.

The speaker, a cardiologist, claims that spike protein, found in COVID-19 vaccines, has been proven in numerous studies to cause four major diseases: cardiovascular disease, myocarditis, acceleration of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and posterior orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. They argue that young individuals who received the vaccine without medical necessity have experienced cardiac arrests and passing out. The speaker firmly believes that these adverse effects are caused by the vaccine until proven otherwise.

Speaker 1 reports observing massive vaccine injuries following the rollout of mRNA injections, including rapid multi-organ failure resembling sepsis, uncontrollable seizures leading to encephalopathy, and blood clots unlike any previously seen. Radiologists allegedly documented multiple stent placements in patients, and some individuals in their twenties required leg amputations due to clots. Spinal gangrene cases also occurred. Speaker 1 states that the pressure to get the COVID-19 shot led them to research potential effects, referencing vaccine trials and experts who predicted possible outcomes like Guillain-Barré syndrome and strokes. They claim doctors didn't connect these issues to the vaccine, instead diagnosing them as strokes, heart attacks, or blood clots. Speaker 1 concludes that they would never take another vaccination of any kind.