reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims 100 elite families control 8 billion people, dictating every aspect of life. Governments meant to serve the people are instead making the people work for them. The speaker believes the world's problems stem from the 8 billion people falling for "divide and conquer" tactics, fighting each other over scraps while the elite control everything. The speaker states that the Democrat and Republican parties do not exist, but rather a group of elite oligarchs torture men, women, and children worldwide. The speaker suggests that humanity will progress when people unite, love each other, and treat everyone as siblings.

The speaker believes the World Economic Forum (WEF) is a "billionaire's boys club" that shifts wealth upward and imposes totalitarian controls. They claim the WEF influences countries to erode constitutional and civil rights. The speaker states that during COVID, $4 trillion of health was shifted upward, small businesses were closed, and Google colluded to censor those who complained.

The speaker criticizes the World Economic Forum, calling it a billionaire's club that shifts wealth upwards and imposes totalitarian controls. They express disbelief at how world leaders follow WEF's directives, mentioning the wealth transfer during COVID. The speaker condemns the collusion between big companies like Home Depot and Google to censor dissenting voices.

The speaker discusses the control and influence of powerful entities in the world, starting with the masses who believe in democracy but are controlled by governments and corporations. The speaker claims that multinational corporations control governments and the world, using financial power to exploit resources and manipulate markets. They mention the role of central banks, such as the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, in controlling the money supply and imposing their laws on nations. The speaker also implicates the Rothschild family as the most powerful elite, controlling banks, wars, and global agendas. They assert that the Rothschilds are behind the New World Order and dominate the global power structure.

Anyone can see the plans of global figures like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab to reduce the world population, shift wealth to the elite, and establish a world government. They aim to create chaos through pandemics and wars to push for a centralized world bank, digital currency, and total control over the population. Through programs like the Young Global Leaders, they groom politicians like Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron to serve their agenda. This pandemic is not about health but about power and control. It's time to stop these megalomaniacal individuals and their destructive plans. Translation: The video discusses the global elite's agenda to reduce the world population, shift wealth to the elite, and establish a world government through chaos and control mechanisms. It emphasizes the need to stop these individuals and their harmful plans.

Speaker A explains a framework for how the global economy is perceived and controlled. They argue that multilateral organizations such as the World Bank, the United Nations, and the WTO are created to pretend to control the global economy impartially for the public’s benefit, so that people accept the legitimacy of the system while watching shadows on the wall. The media, Hollywood, movies, education, and the school system are tools to perpetuate this illusion, making those who run the system appear as legitimate leaders of a population that is effectively imprisoned. Speaker B asks if they are in the media and if they are controlling the narrative, to which Speaker A confirms involvement but implies ulterior ownership and control. Speaker A clarifies that the ultimate controllers are “the people who control the fire” and identifies the second layer as “the game masters, the financial elite.” When Speaker B asks if the private bankers are the financial elite, Speaker A says no to World Bank as the sole source and reframes: the private bankers control money creation, thereby controlling the media, schools, and cultural systems that shape people’s internalized shadows, values, norms, habits, and even the legal system. Speaker B then asks how this control operates, and Speaker A answers that money creation is central to their influence. The shadows become internalized, dictating what is considered good or bad and how people live. The system’s edifice depends on cooperation; it is delicate, and if cooperation falters, the structure could collapse. The third point is that as the system becomes more unstable, young people increasingly question the shadows and doubt their reality, which makes the system more authoritarian to compel belief and maintain stability because everyone in the system has incentives to keep it running. Speaker B connects this to independent media, noting that independent media are questioning how society functions. Speaker A agrees, stating governments worry about independent media because challenges to the shadows would ripple through society. To counter this, censorship and deplatforming are important, with woke politics and DEI described as enforcement mechanisms to keep the system intact. Across the dialogue, the core claim is that a delicate, incentive-driven hierarchy—centered on private money creation, media, culture, and education—creates and sustains a global system of control, where public narratives mask a hidden structure of power, and dissent is managed through censorship and ideological enforcement.

In this video, Carlin Georgesco, a former high-ranking member of the United Nations, discusses his experiences and observations within the organization. He reveals that the UN is controlled by oligarchs and is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum. Georgesco criticizes the UN for failing to fulfill its purpose of maintaining peace and claims that discussions within the organization are often focused on war rather than peace. He also highlights the manipulation and control exerted by the oligarchs, who exploit natural resources and control political leaders. Georgesco emphasizes the importance of individual sovereignty, connecting with nature, and saying no to the UN and its manipulative agenda.

The speaker discusses the UN and Davos agendas, stating that they are the same and controlled by an oligarchic autocracy. They mention that the unexpected election of Donald Trump was not part of their plan, as they intended for Hillary Clinton to win. The speaker believes that the system is almost down and urges everyone to have the courage to reject the control of the oligarchs. They also mention a connection between the oligarchs and a pedophilia system, highlighting the disappearance of millions of children each year. The speaker refers to this as transhumanism and condemns it as a criminal act.

The speaker discusses the World Economic Forum and its power to influence global decisions. They explain how the Forum brings together various stakeholders, including businesses, academics, and politicians, to plan and conspire outside of traditional oversight. This leads to the implementation of policies like environmental, social, and governance mandates, as well as restrictions on gas-powered cars, vaccine mandates, lockdowns, church and school closures, mask mandates, and even the banning of meat. The speaker argues that these decisions are made without democratic processes and liken the agenda to Chinese authoritarian rule. They emphasize that the Great Reset aims to eliminate individual choice and impose a corporate-government fascist system.

The speaker argues that the World Economic Forum (WEF) represents the core embodiment of globalist darkness, with attention to its “shop window” Davos gathering as the place where anti-humanists display their contempt for humankind. They name the WEF as the center of the globalist movement, alongside the Club of Rome, the Bilderberg Group, the WHO, the UN, and the EU, which they say are equally loathsome and to be feared. The speaker highlights Davos as the source of the mantra that “us slaves should be looking forward to owning nothing and being happy,” insisting that the mood music of our lives reveals that our rights, needs, and wants “are evidently passed their sell by date in the eyes of Davos man and woman.” Klaus Schwab is identified as a protege of Henry Kissinger, with the speaker attributing to Kissinger the line about potential control of the world and its people via control of food and energy. The speaker claims Schwab promoted “stakeholder capitalism,” calling it “weasel words, a bid to disguise the determination to take power away from the people and put it squarely in the hands of transnational corporates intent only on profit.” They label stakeholder capitalism as, by any reasonable definition, economic fascism, and express hope that it might mark the beginning of the end of the WEF. Beyond the WEF, the speaker envisions a future where the globalist chokehold around the necks of the world’s peoples is loosened, suggesting that some wish to see “the literal darkness descend.” They argue that the globalists require “forever war to sustain their wealth,” echoing neocon desires to perpetuate their hold on power and control. Rather than merely ridiculing those at the helm of the WEF, the speaker urges action to stand in the way of all those who, by word or deed, demonstrate that they hold the mass of the world’s population in a position lower than that of the bugs the likes of Schwab would have us eat. The overarching call is to resist and confront the alleged anti-human agenda, to face up to and stop the anti-humanists, and to push back against what the speaker describes as the dark agenda of globalist forces represented by the WEF and its allied institutions.

Forces behind governments, such as the World Economic Forum, the UN, the WHO, the IMF, and the World Bank, are pushing an agenda of control over land, money, speech, and lives, framed as saving the planet and helping the poor. The WEF creates ideas, the UN uses language like equity and sustainability, the WHO creates emergencies, the IMF and World Bank trap countries with loans, and the media controls the narrative. The speaker claims the goal is to break the West by crushing energy independence, destroying the value of money, opening borders, silencing dissent, and instilling fear to make people easily controlled. Digital money, digital IDs, and permanent emergency powers are part of this plan. The speaker suggests that leaders like Donald Trump, Viktor Orban, and Vladimir Putin are fighting back against this agenda by prioritizing national interests and independence from globalist groups. The speaker concludes that this is about survival and urges people to resist being scared, silent, and obedient.

Speaker 0 argues that control is in the hands of unelected officials at supranational organizations, and that they want all of the world’s resources in their pocket. Speaker 1 says the bigger picture is an attempt to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy. Speaker 2 calls this a coup, asserting that “we can control with rules” and “we don’t need currency anymore.” Speaker 3 describes it as an inverted prison, where you are supposedly free to roam about, but “everything you want to access is behind lock and key.” Speaker 1 warns that “the potential for social control is gigantic and potentially irreversible.” Speaker 4 outlines plans to commandeer land, reduce farming, radically change the food we eat, transform the supply of electricity, dictate how we use it, and replace currency with a system of credits, all built on the premise of a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide. Speaker 5 counters with, “I do not think there’s a climate crisis,” basing that claim on climate data sets built to answer questions like that. Speaker 0 states, “The government is very clear that they want a catastrophic story,” and adds that there is no single science paper proving conclusively that humans control all or most of the global climate, while accusing Europe’s net-zero push of being “effectively economic suicide,” arguing politicians are “purposely impoverishing ordinary people” and deindustrializing Europe. Speaker 6 comments on the damage done “in the name of saving the planet” and asks, “what is it we’re actually saving if we’re paving it over.” Speaker 0 calls this a global war on agriculture. Speaker 4 notes that many farms are selling up, leading to fears of food shortages. Speaker 2 states, “If I can switch everybody from real food to pharma food, then 100% of the agriculture industry can go through my publicly traded stocks, and I have complete control.” Speaker 3 terms it “the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world,” but also says it is a blueprint and an action plan. Speaker 0 contends that “All life on Earth is going to be radically changed.” Speaker 4 predicts that “Everything will be monitored,” including the environmental consequences of every human action. Speaker 2 complains that “the general cannot fathom the psychopathy of the vision that they're facing.” Speaker 3 warns that once a digital ID is in place, “it's game over for humanity.”

The speaker discusses the connection between the UN and the Davos agenda, highlighting the control of the world oligarchy over European leaders. They mention that the situation with Donald Trump was an accident, as Hillary Clinton was supposed to be in power. The speaker believes that the current plan was changed, leading to a disaster in 2020 instead of 2016. They express that the system is almost down and urge everyone to have the courage to reject the control of the oligarchs. The speaker also mentions the issue of child trafficking and the need to stop this criminal act. Another speaker talks about the emotional toll of working in this field and the urgency of rescuing children from trafficking.

The United Nations (UN) was established in 1945 to maintain peace. However, it is argued that the UN is controlled by the World Economic Forum and oligarchs. The leaders of countries are seen as employees of the oligarchs, and the World Economic Forum selects and influences these leaders through programs like the Young Global Leaders program. The UN also prioritizes political correctness and controls its members through financial incentives, such as high salaries and free access to various amenities. This lack of power to say no is attributed to the influence of money. Consequently, the UN is seen as indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum, both being controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs.

Speaker argues that "UN agenda is the same with Davos agenda" and that a world oligarchic system controls Europe through its leaders. Donald Trump’s rise is described as a "big shock" and "an accident" not part of their plan. The process with "blandemy and all these liars" was meant for 2016, pushed to 2020 to trigger a food-and-water disaster, supposedly culminating by 2025, prompting a plan change. They claim the system is "almost down" but not yet, and urge courage to say no now. The UN could play a fantastic role, but is "totally under control of the oligarchs." The oligarchs are linked to a "pedophilia system," with "more than eight million children per year disappear"—"8,000,000 does mean the entire population of Austria"—disappearing without information. This is connected to transhumanism; "So this criminal act is"

Speaker 0 asserts that a world oligarchy system holds power over Europe, controlling leaders such as the chancellor, president, or prime minister, and that these leaders are not employees of their people but work for the oligarchs. They claim that the UN is now indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum or Davos because it is being controlled by the same ideas and the same oligarchs, stating, “Totally. 100%.” They further claim that these oligarchs are all related to a system of pedophilia, stating that there are more than 8,000,000 children per year who disappear, equating 8,000,000 to the entire population of Austria, and noting that these children disappear without any information. The speaker links this to transhumanism, labeling it as criminal acts that must be stopped. The conclusion is that the acts must be halted, and the speaker believes the stopping point will occur “in the moment when the people arrive in the consciousness.”

The speaker discusses the influence of globalist elites on world leaders, referring to them as puppets. They claim that these elites do not want democracy because it hinders their agenda. Instead, they use tactics like gaslighting and censorship to control the narrative. The speaker argues that the elites' actions are not about saving the planet but rather about taking away people's freedoms and rights. They believe that the measures being imposed will not achieve their stated goals but will instead lead to the erosion of democracy and the rule of law.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experience and perspective on how the United Nations operates and its relationship with global oligarchic power structures. He begins by noting his initial belief in the UN as a fantastic institution capable of advancing welfare and harmony with nature, informed by his background in environmental protection and sustainable development. However, through field experience, he came to see a different reality: the ground truth reveals how the system serves a small, powerful elite rather than universally beneficial aims. Georgescu argues that the UN functions as a platform and bridge for what he calls the world oligarchic system, controlled by Davos-centered interests and aligned with the World Economic Forum’s agenda, particularly Agenda 2030. He contends that the organization is effectively indistinguishable from, and subordinate to, the same oligarchs who influence the Club of Rome and other major NGOs. He cites his own observations at meetings where participation by a representative from developing regions was stifled or marginalized, while the discussions prioritized consumption and corporate-friendly outcomes over genuine development. A central claim is that the UN and its related NGOs manipulate language and outcomes to mask aggressive aims. Peace and justice are reframed to justify or enable power and war, while sustainable development often ends up accelerating consumerism. Georgescu reports that many in UN circles pursue easy prestige, perks, and funding rather than principled leadership, describing a culture of political correctness and material incentives that ensure loyalty to the system. He asserts that leaders within UN structures and other NGOs are “employees” of the oligarchs, not independently accountable to their populations. Georgescu emphasizes intense exploitation of natural resources and asserts that most sovereign control over resources is lost to global interests. He gives the example of resource-rich but vulnerable African countries, such as Guinea Conakry, where vast mineral wealth is present but political and economic power is effectively centralized outside local populations. He contends that the same dynamics operate across Europe and beyond, with leaders installed or influenced to serve external interests rather than national sovereignty. A recurring theme is the manipulation of fear to maintain control. He links fear to the acceptance of surveillance, digital devices, and the erosion of personal sovereignty, arguing that fear-based governance underpins health, climate, and security narratives. He critiques the World Health Organization as an NGO that operates without democratic elections, arguing that its leadership is appointed rather than elected. He also criticizes the pandemic response and lockdowns as criminal acts against humanity and accuses the system of pushing transhumanist and post-transhumanist trajectories aimed at replacing human autonomy with robotic control. Georgescu recounts his personal turning point in the Marshall Islands, where he witnessed the environmental and human harm from U.S. nuclear testing. He describes attempts to suppress his UN report on the Marshall Islands mission, which reinforced his decision to exit and resist a system that, in his view, prioritizes oligarchic interests over populations. To end, he asserts that true sovereignty and quality life come from harmony with nature, personal consciousness, and authentic human connection, not from UN-led global governance or NGO-driven agendas. He and his interlocutor stress the need for people to say “no” to the prevailing system and to reclaim political agency, recognizing that fear and manipulation are central tools used to maintain control.

- The speaker found their photo name on the World Economic Forum website under the category “Young Global Leaders,” noting that the list includes people from different political parties worldwide and is described as pushing a super globalist agenda with corporate power among the wealthiest. - It is claimed that even president Putin and others were once “young global leaders,” suggesting the WEF and related networks infiltrate cabinets and governance structures. - The idea is presented that the world oligarchic system holds power in Europe, controlling leaders such as the Bundescanseller (German chancellor) or prime ministers, leading to a perception of a global oligarchy. - The speaker states the Global Shapers community was created as a means to shape the common future, implying an organized effort to influence global policy. - There is a claim that attempts are being made to establish a new world order with rules that supersede and undermine national sovereignty and democracy. - It is argued that UN officials and WEF Davos leaders are in effect the same actors, suggesting the UN is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum in practice. - The claim is made that these elites claim to know what is best for the people, and that billionaires are driving the agenda, with the danger being that they set the world’s rules and pursue a utopian future while silencing the voices and sovereignty of nations. - A sentiment is expressed that the situation is controlled by the same oligarchic ideas and actors, with the response labeled as “Total. 100%.” - Some participants concede debates about a deglobalizing world, but others argue for reglobalization of the world. - It is asserted that the World Economic Forum creates leaders who are then elected by the public, suggesting a pipeline from WEF to political office. - In the United Nations, there is a description of scrutiny for political correctness; those who are not 100% politically correct cannot participate, and influence can be exerted through salary and offers to control individuals. - There is mention of a global rules-based order aimed at combating dangerous extremist views online and minimizing misinformation, framed within shaping a great reset. - The claim is made that nobody will be safe unless everybody is vaccinated, and that there is a need to confront a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of the world. - The discussion concludes with the expectation that the world will look different after this transition process.

The speaker attended the World Economic Forum (WEF) to observe and understand its agenda. They believe that the WEF is focused on population control and reducing the global population. The speaker describes the WEF as a gathering of heads of state and corporate leaders who promote corporate fascism and influence policies on various issues. They mention their interactions with attendees and their observations of presentations on topics like human trafficking. The speaker criticizes the WEF's theme of rebuilding trust, stating that the organization itself violated trust during the pandemic. They also discuss the WEF's fear of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin due to their opposition to the globalist agenda. The speaker emphasizes the need for critical questioning and evaluation of the WEF's agenda.

The speaker discusses the UN and Davos agendas, highlighting their similarities. They claim that an oligarchic world order system controls Europe through influential figures like counselors, presidents, and prime ministers. The unexpected election of Donald Trump is seen as a shock and not part of their plan, as they intended for Hillary Clinton to win. The speaker suggests that the current situation was meant to occur in 2016 but was pushed to 2020 due to changes in their plan. They mention the issue of missing children and their connection to the oligarchs and the transhumanist agenda. The speaker believes that the system is on the verge of collapse and calls for courage to resist the control of the oligarchs.

Carlene Georgescu, a former high-ranking UN official, shares his experiences to explain how he views the United Nations today. He says the UN was set up in 1945 with the simple purpose “to keep the peace,” but in his view it has become a platform for an oligarchic system that controls the organization and its agenda. He contends that the UN serves as a bridge for a world oligarchy, sharing the same agenda as the Davos/world economic forum, and that it operates in close alignment with actors like the World Economic Forum, Club of Rome, WWF, Greenpeace, and other NGOs. He argues that the UN’s structure and personnel are increasingly selected for political correctness and loyalty, with incentives such as high salaries and perks used to secure compliance, making it difficult for individuals to say no. Georgescu recounts his personal observations from field work in sustainable development programs, including his roles with the United Nations Development Programme and the International Involvement Programme for Europe. He distinguishes between the idealistic aims of the UN and the practical realities he encountered: while nature provides for human needs, he believes greed—driven by a small segment of society and the oligarchy—drives exploitation and control. He identifies natural resource exploitation as a major issue, citing Guinea Conakry as an example of immense richness that is often exploited by outsiders, with local leadership acting as employees of the oligarchy rather than as representatives of their people. He claims that discussions within UN meetings are manipulated and that the true outcomes usually favor increasing consumption and the interests of the oligarchs, rather than addressing genuine welfare. He notes that the UN’s connection to Davos and elite networks facilitates control over resources, leaders, and policies, and that many leaders are chosen or shaped to align with these interests rather than to serve their populations. The World Health Organization is described as another NGO that fits into this pattern, with him criticizing its governance and questioning how leaders like Tedros Ghebreyesus attained high positions without being elected by the people. Georgescu discusses the role of fear in governance, describing fear as the ultimate instrument of control and warning against narratives like climate change and pandemics that he claims are used to manipulate populations and expand oligarchic power. He asserts that fear and engineered crises enable the prescribing of policies and the extraction of wealth, while ordinary people are kept in a state of dependency and subservience through educational systems, consumer culture, and media. He recounts his own decision to leave the UN after experiences such as the Marshall Islands nuclear legacy, where he says US nuclear testing caused widespread ecological and health damage and was suppressed from reporting. He describes attempts to stop him from presenting his findings and the censure of his press conference, which reinforced his perception that the UN is under oligarchic control. Georgescu emphasizes the need for a “quality life” rooted in connection with nature rather than accumulation and manipulation by global institutions. He argues for personal sovereignty, direct engagement with nature, and conscious living as a political act. He calls for resistance—“say no, no consent”—to the UN’s agendas and the broader oligarchic system. He concludes that humanity should reconnect with nature, reject fear-based control, and redefine life beyond the constructs of political campaigns, NGOs, and transnational governance.

We've found that the World Economic Forum is pushing a super globalist agenda, attempting to create a new world order that undermines the sovereignty of countries and our democracy. This organization, along with the UN, is controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs. They're creating leaders who will be elected by us, but these individuals are not employees of their people. They try to control people by salary and offers, ensuring they are politically correct. They aim to maintain a global rules-based order and compact dangerous extremist views on the internet to minimize the spread of misinformation and shape a great reset, believing nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. This involves a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of our world.

Eight billion people are controlled by 100 elite oligarch families who dictate all aspects of life. Governments meant to serve the people are instead making the people work for them, threatening them into compliance. The world's problems persist because the 8 billion allow themselves to be divided and conquered, fighting over scraps while the elite control everything. The speaker claims that the Democrat versus Republican divide is a false one. The only reality is a group of elite oligarchs that torture men, women, and children worldwide. Unity and mutual love are the keys to humanity's liberation and progress.

Speaker 0 argues that the UN agenda is the same as the Davos agenda, and identifies this as the main topic of the conversation. They claim that the world oligarchic system has power over Europe because they control all the key positions, including Bundescansal or president or prime minister. They state that Donald Trump’s situation was a big shock and not part of the oligarchy’s game plan, calling it an accident. They say the accident was the first time the oligarchy system acted in this way. They assert that normally it would have been Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump. They claim the process they are dealing with—referring to “this blandemy and all these liars”—was supposed to unfold in 2016 and then be pushed into 2020 to be a disaster regarding food and water. They say the disaster was normally expected to arrive in 2025, but the plan was changed, and for this reason, they believe the oligarchy will not succeed. They describe the system as almost down, but note that there are last moments and call for courage from everyone to say no. They suggest that the UN could be fantastic and Ken could have a fantastic role, but that the UN is under the total control of the oligarchs. The speaker contends that these oligarchs are all connected with a pedophilia system, asserting knowledge that there are more than eight million children per year who disappear, equivalent to the entire population of Austria, and that they disappear without any information. They conclude by linking this to transhumanism and labeling these acts as criminal.