reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Stephen Moore, a renowned economist, attends a press conference on Capitol Hill where some wealthy individuals express their desire to pay more taxes. However, when presented with a pledge to voluntarily pay a 90% tax, none of them sign it. The speaker questions their sincerity and asks if it is their patriotic duty to pay more taxes if they advocate for it. The millionaires deflect the question and avoid committing to paying more taxes themselves. This highlights the hypocrisy of advocating for tax increases while not being willing to personally contribute. Out of the 20 millionaires present, not one is willing to pay more taxes.

The speaker discusses taxation without representation in the US, highlighting how Americans pay roughly 50% of their income in various taxes. They break down the different taxes they pay, including income tax, property tax, and sales tax, showing how it adds up to nearly 50%. Despite this high tax burden, they express frustration at the lack of benefits and services they receive in return, such as affordable healthcare, nutritious food, and quality infrastructure. The speaker criticizes the government for not adequately representing the interests of taxpayers.

The speaker argues that using debt to acquire property reduces tax payments. They claim that taxes are a Marxist concept and that a progressive income tax supports communism. They mention the Boston Tea Party as an example of America being tax-free until the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The speaker believes that the harder one works and the more money they make, the higher their taxes, which they equate to communism.

Speaker 0 outlines a stance of widespread tax resistance among Americans who deem the government corrupt and unrepresentative. He states, “there were so many people, mostly American patriots, who said, I don't care what the consequences are. I will not continue to pay taxes to a corrupt government that doesn't represent me.” He claims the IRS is already down “25% from last year.” He then criticizes those who have “never worked a day in their life but yet wanna make rules for the rest of us,” arguing they “overdo themselves and kill the goose that laid the golden egg.” He describes consequences of the government’s actions as not only crashing the economy but creating a scenario where people “have a choice” between basic needs and paying taxes: “Keep a roof over your family's head or pay taxes. Feed your children or pay taxes. Live a little bit like a fucking human being or pay your fucking taxes.” He asserts that many will be unable to pay taxes this year, and those who “just up and decide fuck them and file exempt on their fucking forms” will “totally overwhelm the IRS,” including “those 80,000 gun toting Nazi motherfuckers who have been harassing us for years.” The message implies a public record of asking the IRS for the law that states a wage earner must pay taxes, and claims they cannot provide it “because it was never legal in the first place.” He elaborates that “when you work and somebody gives you money or some form of compensation, that's not profit. That's an exchange, and it was never intended to be taxes.” The consequence, he says, is that “the government's gonna self destruct. It's gonna totally overwhelm the system.” He uses imagery to argue that people should resist, saying, “let those motherfuckers try driving their car with no gas in it.” In closing, he invites audience participation: “If you like what I'm saying, give me a hell yeah and a fuck you to their paperwork.”

At Davos, the speaker expresses their bewilderment at the hypocrisy of the event. Despite discussions on justice, equality, and transparency, no one addresses the issue of tax avoidance by the wealthy. The speaker suggests that instead of focusing on philanthropy, the conversation should revolve around taxes. They mention the success of a 70% top marginal tax rate in the United States during the 1950s. The speaker emphasizes the importance of discussing taxes and dismisses other topics as irrelevant.

The IRS collected $520 million from wealthy taxpayers with $80 billion in new funding. The speaker criticizes this, saying it's an economic disaster to give $80 billion to only collect $520 million. They express disbelief at the situation.

- Under Trump’s tax plan, taxes rise for lower incomes and fall for higher incomes. The bracket claims include: - Less than $28,000: taxes go up by $790. - $28,000 to $55,000: taxes go up $1,400. - $55,000 to $94,000: taxes go up $1,500. - $94,000 to $157,000: taxes go up almost $1,800. - $157,000 to $360,000: you only pay an extra $610. - More than $360,000: you get a tax cut. - More than $914,000: a $36,000 tax cut. - It literally says poorest to richest, and the poorest get a tax increase, and the richest get a tax cut. It's right there, literally in blue and yellow. - The speaker notes the chart shows poorest to richest with this distribution.

The speaker owns 12,000 rental units acquired through debt, stating that more debt leads to more property and less tax. They believe paying taxes is a Marxist idea and against American principles. According to the speaker, Marx considered a progressive income tax essential for spreading communism. They claim America was founded as a tax-free nation until the creation of the Federal Reserve and the IRS in 1913. They assert that they legally pay no taxes, while those who work harder pay higher taxes, which they equate to communism. The speaker concludes it's an American duty not to pay taxes, citing the Communist Manifesto.

The speaker discusses how the federal income tax negatively impacted Americans by shifting the government's revenue source from tariffs to taxing individuals. They argue that tariffs on international corporations would be a better revenue source, promoting American manufacturing and job growth. The speaker highlights the historical importance of tariffs and criticizes the impact of the income tax on American prosperity. They emphasize the need to educate future generations on these issues.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

The speaker argues against the idea of paying taxes, claiming that a progressive income tax is a tool for spreading Marxism and communism. They point out that America was founded as a tax-free nation, citing the Boston Tea Party in 1773. However, in 1913, the Federal Reserve and the IRS were created, leading to the introduction of taxes. The speaker believes that those who work harder and earn more money end up paying higher taxes, which they equate to communism. They assert that it is an American duty to refuse to pay taxes, referencing the Communist Manifesto as support for their stance.

One speaker believes cutting corporate taxes overwhelmingly benefits the wealthy because capital income represents a huge amount of their income. Another speaker argues corporations provide jobs and pay taxes that fund government jobs. The first speaker asks where the government gets the money to pay its employees, and the second speaker answers, "Revenue from both households and corporations," further stating that trickle-down economics has not worked for the past 50 years. Michael Faulkinder believes tariffs are an important tool to address practices like currency manipulation and intellectual property theft, particularly by China, and to bring them to the table to negotiate trade inequities. He anticipates tariffs would incentivize moving supply chains to more resilient locations.

Today, nearly half of every dollar earned in the U.S. goes to taxes, often unnoticed because they are embedded in business costs. Politicians advocate for taxing businesses to help the average person, but these taxes ultimately increase product prices, acting as a hidden sales tax. There are numerous such taxes affecting consumers. Additionally, there is a call to raise corporate taxes to ensure that large corporations and billionaires contribute their fair share. While success is not criticized, the emphasis is on the importance of equitable tax contributions from those who can afford it.

We started with a small tax revolt, but now we're taxed on everything - earning, spending, saving, investing, and even dying. We pay taxes on our commute, work, and home, which we already bought with taxed money. The more we earn, the more the government takes. Taxes are everywhere, from our morning coffee to our paycheck.

Many of you benefited from the $1.9 trillion tax cut, which is great to hear. However, if you're like me, your taxes will actually increase, not decrease.

Someone questions why money is taxed multiple times. They describe a scenario where someone gives them $500 that has already been taxed. They then have to pay taxes on that $500. When they spend any of that money, they pay taxes on the item they purchase. The person they bought the item from also has to pay taxes on the money received. They suggest that every dollar is taxed repeatedly.

The Laffer Curve shows the relationship between tax rates and tax revenues. At 0% tax rates, there are no revenues. At 100%, no one works, also resulting in 0 revenues. There is an optimal tax rate where revenues are maximized. The curve illustrates the balance between raising tax rates for more revenue (arithmetic effect) and lowering tax rates to stimulate economic activity (economic effect). Politicians should aim for the point where tax rates are not too high to discourage work but not too low to reduce revenue. The Laffer Curve is a tool to understand the impact of tax policy on government revenue.

Joe Biden and another speaker plan to get rid of a tax bill/cut. Proposals include raising the corporate tax rate, increasing estate taxes, and taxing capital gains. One speaker believes unrealized gains should be taxed, while another finds taxing what you don't have unfair. It is argued that property tax is already a tax on unrealized gains, as homeowners pay higher taxes when their home value increases, even without selling. A carbon fee is also proposed, with the caveat that there should be a connection between the fee and bad behaviors. It must be monitored whether the fee will be passed on to consumers, but this should not be a reason to avoid implementing a carbon fee.

Today, nearly half of every dollar earned in the U.S. goes to taxes, often unnoticed because they are embedded in business costs. Politicians advocate for taxing businesses to help the average person, but these taxes ultimately increase product prices, acting as a hidden sales tax. There are numerous such taxes affecting consumers. Additionally, there is a call to raise corporate taxes to ensure that large corporations and billionaires contribute their fair share. While success is commendable, it is crucial that everyone pays their fair share of taxes.

High-income individuals avoid high taxes by sending money overseas, impacting job creation and small businesses. Increasing taxes will drive more businesses overseas, leading to job loss and economic challenges for those unable to relocate.

The speaker claims that high taxes are not the core financial problem in the United States. They argue that taxes don't truly fund the government, which is instead financed by treasury bonds purchased by the Federal Reserve. The Fed buys these bonds by printing money, which is backed by the bonds themselves. Taxes exist, according to the speaker, to maintain the illusion of government funding. The speaker contends that the government is funded by printing money backed by paper, creating a bubble. If the public were to realize this, confidence in the dollar would collapse, potentially leading to the fall of Western civilization. The speaker urges the next president to implement necessary policy and structural changes to avoid this outcome.

Inflation is high, leading to possible rate hikes instead of cuts. Biden plans to tax unrealized gains, causing concern. The country is in significant debt, yet the focus is on raising taxes. Economist Steve Moore criticizes the plan, warning of its negative impact on individuals, including potentially forcing them to sell assets to pay taxes.