TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I was asked about the president's debate performance and his travel schedule. I didn't mention it initially, but I knew about it. The jet lag and foreign trip did play a part in his performance, along with a cold. I focused on the cold during my previous comments, but I acknowledge that his schedule was a factor as well.

Speaker 0 talks about their involvement in the civil rights movement, mentioning desegregating movie theaters, organizing voter registration drives, and sitting in black churches. They emphasize their deep involvement in the movement since they were 18 years old. Speaker 1, referencing the New York Times, accuses Biden of lying about marching in the civil rights movement. Despite being reminded that he hadn't actually marched, Biden continued to tell the story. Speaker 1 finds this behavior strange.

The speaker was asked if they misspoke about carrying weapons in war, despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years in uniform and their service in public education. They believe people know them and that their record speaks for itself. Regarding the alleged misstatement, the speaker said they were discussing carrying weapons of war after a school shooting. They acknowledged their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated that they will never demean another member's service.

I always made sure when I ran for congress to be truthful and back up my claims with evidence, especially regarding my background, because trust is essential for public office. I'm asking you directly about your claim of not speaking Chinese. I've seen videos of you speaking Mandarin during your congressional run. Why do you say you don't speak Chinese when you clearly do? I encourage people to watch the clip in question. I said thank you for inviting me in Chinese, but 99% was in English. My Chinese is at a rudimentary, kindergarten level. It's a family joke how bad my Chinese is. I understand my parents when they speak to me in Chinese, but I can't articulate myself well. I stand by my statement that I'm not able to have a fluent conversation.

I don't understand why the committee skipped over 30 years of my career and focused on a past incident from graduate school. We should be looking at the last three and a half years because people were killed in a terrorist act. The special agent found that I was involved and I apologize for lying to the committee. I was fired for it.

All of this cannot be true. Are you lying to Congress about being pro-vaccine, or did you lie on those podcasts? We have it all on tape. Senator, that statement from the Lex Fridman podcast has been debunked. I was asked if there are safe and effective vaccines, and I said some live virus vaccines are. I also stated that no vaccine is universally safe and effective, as every medicine has individuals who may react negatively, including vaccines. I was interrupted before I could elaborate. I've clarified this multiple times, including on national TV, so bringing it up now is misleading.

I spoke with the former president after the horrible events of last weekend. I expressed my concern and was glad to hear he was doing well. Regarding the language used in the campaign, I acknowledged that using the term "bullseye" was a mistake. My intention was to emphasize the need to focus on Trump's policies and record, not to incite violence. I am not the one trying to be a dictator. I don't know if the shooting will change the trajectory of the race. My primary concern is the former president's health and the tone of the coverage moving forward. I have seen signs with a lot of terrible things said about me and it's that kind of viciousness that needs to stop. 14 million people voted for me to be the nominee. I have seen parts of the debate, but not the whole thing. Trump will surround himself with people who agree with him.

The speaker is asked to explain a discrepancy between their claim of being in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests in the spring of 1989 and reports that they didn't travel to Asia until August of that year. The speaker says they grew up in rural Nebraska, joined the National Guard at 17, and used the GI Bill to become a teacher. In the summer of 1989, they traveled to China and started a program taking basketball teams, baseball teams, and dancers back and forth to China to learn. They say their community knows who they are and that they have poured their heart into the community, while acknowledging they are not perfect. They claim to have been a bipartisan member of Congress and were elected governor twice. They admit to sometimes getting caught up in rhetoric. They say the experience in China made a difference in their life and that Donald Trump should have come on one of those trips. When asked again about the discrepancy, the speaker says they misspoke and were in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protest.

Speaker 0 opens by saying he tries to be as transparent as possible and offers to share what the text in court filings was about. Speaker 1 asks to know, and Speaker 0 begins to explain. Speaker 0 reflects on his past views: he has no incentive to lie, he runs a business with his college roommate, and he supported the Iraq War vehemently, supported the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett (calling it a huge mistake and that it wasn’t what he thought), and he supports John Roberts. He says the list of “dumb things” he supported is long, and he has spent the last twenty-two years trying to atone for his support for the Iraq War. Speaker 1 acknowledges appreciation for that, and Speaker 0 continues. He says he isn’t seeking affirmation but explains the text in question concerns a discussion with a producer about election integrity. He describes a January post-election conversation with someone at the White House after Trump claimed the election was stolen. He says he was willing to believe allegations and asked for examples. The White House regional contact offered seven or eight dead people who voted, asserting they could be proven because death certificates and obituaries showed they voted and were on voter rolls. He states he did not claim “slam dunk” proof and insists he does not trust campaigns or campaign consultants, but he believed the claim was verifiable. Speaker 0 recounts going on air with the claim that “seven or ten dead people voted” and listing the names to show the evidence. He says, within about twenty-five minutes, some of the deceased people contacted CNN to say they were not dead, and CNN exposed that he had made a colossal error. He emphasizes that there is nothing he hates more than being wrong and humiliated, and that he should have checked whether someone had died; he acknowledges not checking carefully. Speaker 1 asks why he didn’t say these things on Fox News earlier. Speaker 0 says he did the next day. Speaker 1 contends he did not, and asks for the tape. Speaker 0 asserts he went on air the next day and admits he was completely wrong, blaming the Trump campaign for taking their word and also blaming the staffer who provided the information; he says he is still mad at that person. Speaker 1 challenges ownership of the situation and asks about the influence and the value of his career, implying he holds substantial influence with a top-rated show. They clash over sincerity and the magnitude of his earnings. Speaker 0 denies alignment with the accusation of insincerity, but Speaker 1 remains skeptical and asserts a belief that his sincerity is in question and that his views may be financially motivated. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 telling Speaker 1 to stop and declaring they’re done, as Speaker 1 pushes back about the immense wealth and status, prompting Speaker 0 to end the exchange abruptly.

Back in 2019, I was charged with war crimes and faced life in prison. While my family and teammates worked to expose the lies surrounding my case, Dan Crenshaw's name kept surfacing. Despite being a former SEAL, Crenshaw initially said he'd wait and see, then later claimed there wasn't enough information to help. While 50 congressmen signed a petition for my release, Crenshaw wrote his own petition to keep me imprisoned but allow me to see my lawyers. After I was found not guilty, I ran into Crenshaw at an event, but he ignored me. I later learned he actively worked against me, telling congressmen I was guilty and to butt out. Crenshaw's a liar, and I can prove it with emails and documents. This isn't about me; it's about the American people knowing who they're voting for. Just because someone is a SEAL or was wounded in combat doesn't automatically make them a good person.

Speaker 0 notes that Biden “may have more explaining to do.” Speaker 1 introduces the topic as arising from taped remarks of Biden during an April campaign appearance in New Hampshire. Speaker 2 recalls self-descriptions Biden offered: that he “went to law school on a full academic scholarship,” being “the only one in my class that have a full academic scholarship,” that he “went back to law school” and “ended up in the top half of my class,” that he “was the outstanding student in the political science department at the end of my year,” that he “graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and a 165 credits, only a 123 credits.” Speaker 1 states that Biden now concedes he did not graduate in the top half of his law school class, that he does not have three degrees from college, and that he was not named outstanding political science student in college. Speaker 0 reports Newsweek’s version: Biden “actually went to school on a half scholarship, ended up near the bottom of his class, and won only one degree, not three.” Speaker 3 adds: “Joe Biden ranked seventy sixth in the class of 85 at the University of Syracuse Law School. I mean, this guy comes off this whole thing as a flyweight.” Speaker 1 repeats that Biden says Newsweek is right and that his memory had failed him. Speaker 2 fires back: “And I’d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you’d like, Frank.” Speaker 1 repeats: “Joe Biden was victimized by the truth.” Speaker 2 concludes with “Bye bye Biden. He may not know it yet, but I think this is very diff going to be very difficult for him to recover it.” Speaker 0 asks: “Is Joe Biden dead meat? Yes or” Speaker 2 responds: “I think so. Bob? He’s” Speaker 3 interjects: “in terminal condition.” Speaker 0 asks for confirmation: “Terminal? Elinor?” Speaker 2 affirms: “Yes. Unless he comes in third in Iowa.” Speaker 0 labels: “Morton. Dying. I say dead.”

If I were to continue running and be officially nominated, what if I have another episode like we saw during the debate? What if I have another performance at that level? I don't plan on having another performance like that.

I received messages about Biden claiming no service members died under his administration. My husband died 7 months ago while deployed under Biden. I flew 12 hours with my 16-month-old to receive his remains at Dover AFB. Biden didn't show up. I'm not angry about his statement; I've been angry for a long time, knowing he doesn't care.

At age 59, I walked off the bus as a different man. Although I'm not proud of it, what I said was just locker room talk. Bill Clinton, on the other hand, has done far worse things to women. He has a history of abusive behavior towards women, and Hillary Clinton has attacked those same women. One of them, Kathy Shelton, was raped at 12 years old, and Hillary represented her rapist and laughed at her. Bill Clinton was impeached, lost his law license, and had to pay a fine to Paula Jones. So, when Hillary brings up my words from 11 years ago, it's disgraceful and she should be ashamed of herself.

As a US veteran, I felt betrayed by the way the US left Afghanistan after 20 years of sacrifice. Trump's criticism of Biden's handling of the situation resonated with me. The aftermath of our withdrawal allowed Iran to gain power and attack Israel. Many veterans share my feelings of anger towards Biden and support for Trump. It's clear why we feel this way if you pay attention.

"Of the war in Iraq was a big fat mistake. They lied. Okay. They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none, and they knew there were none." "Bush got us into this horrible war with lies by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true." "I lost a lot of friends that were killed in that building. The worst attack ever in this country, it was during his presidency." "We spent $2,000,000,000,000, thousands of lives, wounded warriors all over the place we're in."

The speaker was asked about a statement where they said they carried weapons in war despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years of service and their record speaks for itself. They speak candidly and passionately, especially about children being shot in schools. When asked if they misspoke about being in war, the speaker said the conversation was about carrying weapons of war after a school shooting, and their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated they will never demean another member's service.

Have you ever heard the president criticize white supremacists? I’ve repeatedly rejected David Duke and the KKK. The events in Charlottesville, where a young woman was killed resisting hate, prompted my return to this race. The president claimed there were "very fine people on both sides," ignoring the neo-Nazis and white nationalists. You wouldn’t even condemn David Duke. The party is struggling with figures like him joining. They don’t want to take responsibility for the hate associated with their party. I’ve disavowed these groups multiple times. When white supremacists say to vote for me, I don’t want their support, and I can’t control what they say. I don’t want their votes.

I have written extensively as a law professor and spent 4 years as a full professor at the University of Pennsylvania. I had the honor of meeting Nelson Mandela and even got arrested while trying to see him on Robins Island. I joked about it, but I come from a coal mining background in Scranton, Pennsylvania. I may have become president if I hadn't lied about having family in the coal mines. My dad was a salesperson, not a coal miner, but my great grandpa was. I used to drive a tractor trailer, so I know about driving big trucks. Corn Pop was a tough guy, and I stand by my word. There have been accusations of lying about marching in the civil rights movement, but I want to clarify that I attended Delaware State University and have connections to the Puerto Rican community. I have made mistakes in the past and will likely make more in the future.

A speaker addresses Tim Walz, claiming Walz said that troops in Afghanistan told him they were worried about their families' healthcare. The speaker asserts that in their four years of combat experience as a leader, no soldier ever expressed concern about their family's healthcare. The speaker accuses Walz of using combat experience he doesn't have to push a political agenda and lying to advance his career. The speaker hopes Walz faces stolen valor charges, alleging that these lies helped him and benefited him monetarily.

Biden is facing new questions about his past remarks. He claimed to have had a full academic scholarship, graduated in the top half of his law school class, and earned three degrees. However, it turns out he only had a half scholarship, ranked near the bottom of his class, and obtained one degree. Newsweek reported the truth, and Biden now admits his memory failed him. Critics see this as damaging to his credibility and believe it will be difficult for him to recover. Some even say he is "dead meat" politically.

I was involved in the civil rights movement as a teenager, but not as an activist. Joe Biden made hurtful comments about racial jungle and opposed bussing. I confronted him in debates, but now we seem friendly. Not everyone criticized him like I did.

I criticized Tim Walz for lying about his military service for political gain. We should focus on important issues like lowering inflation and securing the border. Kamala Harris changes her stance based on her audience, making her appear fake. I believe in debating and answering questions to make my case to the American people. Thank you for the interview.

I'm confirming that Tulsi Gabbard has appointed someone with a history of being untrustworthy, potentially aiding adversarial nations. In Connecticut, the leading Democratic candidate in a major US Senate race is facing scrutiny after being caught misrepresenting his military service. Richard Blumenthal, the state attorney general, previously stated he served in Vietnam, but reports indicate he received five wartime deferments and served stateside in the Marine Reserves. I misspoke, and I won't let a few misplaced words tarnish my record of service to our country. However, video evidence exists of Blumenthal claiming he was in Vietnam.

The Harris campaign clarified that Governor Tim Walz misspoke in a 2018 video where he mentioned handling assault weapons in war. They now state he was never in active war. This mistake may impact his image moving forward.