reSee.it - Related Video Feed

During the Vietnam War, the Vietcong used guerrilla warfare tactics against American forces in the dense rainforest. To combat this, the US sprayed 19.5 million gallons of Agent Orange, an herbicide, which devastated the ecosystem. However, the long-term effects on the Vietnamese population were severe. Evidence showed that Dioxin, a contaminant in Agent Orange, caused birth defects. These defects have affected around 3 million Vietnamese, including 150,000 children, causing various health issues such as cancer and heart disease. The US provided $400 million in aid for cleanup and victim care, but only $125 million reached the victims, amounting to about $41 per person. The cleanup projects remain unfinished, and the US and its companies refused to take responsibility in court.

News Nation reports a secret test in St. Louis: 'the United States Army now admits that it sprayed a chemical that contained cadmium, a known carcinogen, on a neighborhood of 10,000 people.' The Army sprayed 'zinc cadmium sulfide' into the air in Pruitt Igo. Residents say, 'We were subjects' and 'They didn't ask for our permission.' The spray came from 'planes, rooftops, vehicles' to simulate how a biological attack might spread in more than 30 tests across the US and Canada. Saint Louis was chosen for its similarity to Moscow in population density and proximity to a river. The 33 high rise buildings housed 10,000 residents before demolition in 1976. NRC (1997) warned that 'repeated exposure to zinc cadmium sulfide can cause kidney or bone toxicity or lung cancer' and noted missing records and that an independent study wasn't feasible. Army says 'inhalation exposure would not pose a health risk.'

We used to have a sophisticated biological weapons program from World War 2 to the sixties, which ended in 1969. Many records of the program were destroyed, but some are resurfacing. Our offensive weapons program was massive and advanced, but not well-known by most people.

"The fog drifted through the streets like a ghost." "It wasn't the weather. It was an eerie smoke descending from rooftops, rolling from the backs of trucks." "In the nineteen fifties and sixties, in secret, the US army sprayed zinc cadmium sulfide into the air of a Saint Louis housing project, a largely black neighborhood called Pruittigo." "We were subjects." "More than 30 tests conducted across The US and Canada, spraying zinc cadmium sulfide from planes, rooftops, and vehicles to simulate how a biological attack might spread, all to prepare for potential warfare against the Soviets." "The government now admits to a secretive series of cold war tests, including one dubbed large area coverage." "This used to be filled with 33 high rise buildings. It was all demolished in 1976,"

In the 1950s and 1960s, the US Army conducted secret experiments involving the release of bacteria in public places across America, including New York City. These experiments were kept hidden from the public for many years. Some of the experiments had fatal consequences, with people developing infections and even dying. The government also covered up the deaths of individuals who were unknowingly tested with mind-altering drugs. It took decades for the truth to come out, and families had to fight in court for justice. The Army and Navy have a history of conducting secret risk assessments to test the vulnerability of American cities to biological attacks. These experiments need to be stopped, and there should be accountability for the harm caused.

The chemical in 72% of American water systems is hexafluorosilicic acid. It is not pharmaceutical grade and is not manufactured for water treatment; it is captured from the smokestacks of phosphate fertilizer plants by pollution scrubbers. Regulators would classify it as toxic if it escaped into the atmosphere, and it would trigger an environmental emergency if it leaked into a river. Instead, it is shipped by tanker trucks to local utilities, diluted, and added to drinking water and used for cooking and bathing. The story is traced to decisions made decades earlier rather than through public approval. No national referendum approved fluoridation, no consent forms were signed by parents or grandparents, and in most communities no public hearing occurred. The policy is described as originating about 80 years ago with officials whose financial interests aligned with moving the substance from factories into water systems. The transcript links fluoridation to fluoride waste from aluminum refining in the early 20th century. A 1933 toxicology report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture singled out the aluminum industry as the biggest fluoride polluter. Lawsuits and environmental harms near Elco smelters are cited, including dying livestock and scorched vegetation. The 1930 Belgian Meuse Valley disaster is cited as having killed 60 people and identifying airborne fluorides as the primary cause. Disposal of fluoride is described as expensive, with Alcoa having large amounts. Andrew Mellon, founder and controlling shareholder of Alcoa and U.S. Treasury Secretary (1921–1932), is presented as an influential figure because the Public Health Service operated under Treasury jurisdiction. In 1931, the PHS is said to have sent a dentist, H. Trendley Dean, to study areas with naturally occurring fluoride. Towns with higher natural fluoride were reported to have fewer cavities, though they also had mottled, stained teeth. In 1931, Alcoa’s chief chemist is said to have identified fluoride as the cause of brown staining in Bauxite, Arkansas, an Alcoa company town. The transcript states that in 1939, Gerald Cox at the Mellon Institute (Alcoa’s research lab) fluoridated lab rats and declared the case for fluoride proved, then made the first public proposal to add fluoride to drinking water. It adds that U.S. public health regulations in 1939 stated that any water supply containing fluoride above 1 part per million should be rejected. Six years later, the same government is described as deliberately adding fluoride at 1 part per million, the stated threshold for rejection. A quoted comment attributed to a 2000 EPA scientist is used to describe the logic: fluoride is treated as a pollutant if released into air or water bodies, but not treated as a pollutant when added to drinking-water systems. On January 25, 1945, engineers at the Monroe Avenue Water Filtration Plant in Grand Rapids, Michigan, began adding sodium fluoride. Grand Rapids is described as the first city to fluoridate its drinking water, with Muskegon, Michigan, as the control. The comparative study is described as never finishing. The PHS is said to have endorsed fluoridation nationally by 1950, after which Muskegon demanded fluoridation, destroying the control group. The transcript also credits Oscar Ewing for accelerating the national campaign: in 1944 he joined Alcoa as lead counsel with a stated salary, then in 1947 was appointed to head the Federal Security Agency overseeing the Public Health Service, and the campaign used Edward Bernays as a public relations strategist. The transcript asserts that by the 1950s, supporters were uncomfortable with the speed and begins citing congressional concern, later European comparisons, and changing scientific consensus. It claims that fluoride’s mechanism is mainly topical and post-eruptive, and references a 2011 European Commission review stating no advantage of water fluoridation compared with topical fluoride application. It lists multiple European countries that did not fluoridate or stopped, while tooth-decay rates are described as declining at similar rates to the United States. A turning point is described as a September 24, 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen. The case is described as reviewing the National Toxicology Program’s system and analyzing 72 epidemiological studies, concluding that fluoridation at 0.7 milligrams per liter poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children. The transcript says the EPA appealed on procedural grounds and did not contest that risk. It then states that after the ruling, Utah banned community water fluoridation (House Bill 81, signed March 27, 2025) and Florida followed, with more than 60 communities serving over nine million people ending, suspending, or preventing fluoridation. Examples include districts disconnecting fluoride equipment and reported costs for removal. The transcript argues that government action is now shifting to prevent similar challenges by proposing changes to the Toxic Substances Control Act, described as aiming to stop courts from doing what the case did. It concludes by reiterating that the policy continued for decades without public voting, presenting the chemical’s industrial origin and the alleged financial ties behind its promotion as central to the narrative.

President Richard Nixon announced in 1969 that the United States would renounce the use of deadly biological weapons, but few Americans knew that the country had been operating a secret bioweapons program for over 25 years. Born out of fear during World War II, the program conducted extensive research and experiments, even using human subjects. The British and Japanese also had their own bioweapons programs, with the Japanese conducting horrific experiments on thousands of people. The US program, fueled by the Cold War, conducted tests on American cities and human subjects, proving the feasibility of biological warfare. However, concerns over the uncontrollable nature of these weapons and the mounting political pressure led to the program's eventual end in 1969.

In secret during the 1950s–60s, the US sprayed zinc cadmium sulfide over Pruittigo, Saint Louis. The fog drifted through the streets like a ghost. They didn't ask for our permission. My government used me like I was a guinea pig. Saint Louis was chosen for spraying experiments because it had characteristics similar to Soviet targets. More than thirty tests across the US and Canada sprayed zinc cadmium sulfide from planes, rooftops, and vehicles to simulate a biological attack. A 1997 NRC review warned that repeated exposure can cause kidney or bone toxicity or lung cancer if levels are high enough, and noted that some army records remained classified. The army said none of the reports contained evidence of a radioactive component to the zinc cadmium sulfide dispersion tests. Erin Brockovich weighs in.

From 1946 to 1952, the US health emergency known as polio was addressed by promoting the use of DDT, a toxic substance, to control the disease. The American population was convinced that DDT was the solution to stop the spread of polio, even though its safety for humans was questioned. The decline in polio cases began before the introduction of the polio vaccine and was likely due to reduced DDT use. The Salk polio vaccine was later administered, but its side effects were downplayed. The government also changed the definition of polio, leading to an increase in similar diseases. The Rockefeller Group, which funded Nazi Eugenics, was involved in these events.

The military industrial complex often evokes images of soldiers in combat, but it encompasses much more. In light of recent global events, previously taboo topics, including government secrecy around bio labs, have gained attention. One notable example is Project 112, authorized in 1962 under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara. This project involved extensive testing of biological and chemical agents, including VX nerve gas, Sarin, and E. Coli, across various locations. The aim was to explore controlled temporary incapacitation as a military strategy. The government denied Project 112's existence until 2000, raising concerns about the safety of military personnel involved, many of whom were unaware of the risks. The project reflects a troubling reality where governments that condemn bioweapons may simultaneously engage in their development, leaving the public unaware of the potential dangers lurking in their midst.

During the Vietnam War, Operation Ranch Hand sprayed defoliants, including Agent Orange, over a large area of Vietnam. US officials claimed there were no lasting effects, but the Vietnamese government blamed Agent Orange for miscarriages, birth defects, and rare cancers. Today, hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese still suffer from these health issues. Meanwhile, Project Storm Fury aimed to reduce hurricane devastation by cloud seeding with silver iodide. This process would create a new outer eye wall in the hurricane. The US Army also experimented with cloud seeding in Vietnam, leading to allegations of causing heavy rain and death. Despite controversy, governments continue to explore weather modification for various purposes, including military applications and controlling the world.

Speaker 0 argues that parasites have become a problem because they have been weaponized. They reference a Nobel Prize-winning finding showing that a certain parasite could produce stomach cancer in rats, and that a different parasite produced this effect in Japan. They note these results only worked in animals that ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated, not in healthy animals. They then connect this to twentieth-century American policy: vaccination began with troops during World War I and continued in the military, then expanded to schoolchildren after World War II. The speaker predicts that vaccines at school would eventually affect broader segments of the population, not just children, and claims that vaccines have the effect of making people more susceptible to parasites, including those that cause cancer, not just toxoplasmosis. Regarding diet, the speaker mentions the food pyramid of the twentieth century, pointing out that the bottom consisted of carbohydrates, implying a link to susceptibility. The speaker then discusses bioweapons policy: in 1971, Nixon declared an end to the United States bioweapons offensive program and signed a treaty (they mention a 1978 figure, implying a multinational agreement). They claim that, despite this treaty, the Soviet Union and others violated it, and that perhaps everyone violated it. They assert that, at the same time the treaty was signed, Fort Detrick was converted from a bioweapons lab to be part of the National Cancer Institute. They compare this to Nazi Germany, stating that they hid bioweapons under cancer research, and claim that the United States did something similar. The transcription ends with emphatic agreement.

In the 60s and 70s, there was a problem with nuclear waste disposal. The French and English dumped their waste in the English Channel, thinking it would dilute and disappear. However, the waste corroded and spread, causing pollution. Chemical weapons also froze and remained in the water for years. This nuclear and chemical pollution is a huge problem that cannot be touched or moved. It poses a risk to seafood in Normandy and Brittany. Efforts to clean up the pollution have failed, and it remains a significant issue in the area.

The speaker discusses the issue of radioactive waste being found in the English Channel near the La Hague nuclear plant. They mention that the English islands of Origny, Jersey, and Guernsey have abnormally high rates of cancer, particularly brain cancer and respiratory diseases. Many families are leaving the area to escape this problem. The speaker also mentions the discovery of plutonium particles on the beaches, which is not naturally occurring and indicates reprocessing. They question how these dangerous nuclear waste materials end up in the sand. The speaker suggests that there has been a well-kept secret for years that is not favorable for both the English and French. It dates back to the end of World War II.

The video discusses the history of biological warfare, starting with the use of germ warfare in ancient times. It highlights the discovery of germs as the cause of disease and the subsequent use of biological weapons during World War I and World War II. The video also mentions the unethical experiments conducted by Unit 731 in Japan and the involvement of the United States in biological warfare research. It touches on the Gulf War and the toxic effects experienced by military personnel. The transcript concludes with the sale of BioPort Labs to Fauwod El Hibri and Admiral Crowell's involvement.

The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours. the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime. the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front.

From 1946 to 1952, the US health emergency known as polio was addressed by promoting the use of DDT, a toxic substance, to control the disease. The American population was convinced that DDT was the solution to stop the spread of polio, even though its safety for humans was questioned. The decline in polio cases began before the introduction of the polio vaccine and was likely influenced by reduced DDT use. The Salk vaccine was later credited for the decline, despite deaths and paralysis caused by it being downplayed. The government also changed the definition of polio, leading to an increase in similar diseases. The Rockefeller Group, known for funding Nazi Eugenics, was involved in these events.

From 1946 to 1952, the US health emergency known as polio was addressed by promoting the use of DDT, a toxic substance, to control the disease. The American population was convinced that DDT was the solution to stop the spread of polio, despite no evidence supporting this claim. However, public concern about DDT's safety, along with Senate hearings in 1951, led to a decline in its use. This decline coincided with a significant decrease in polio cases. The Salk polio vaccine was introduced in 1955, but its effectiveness was questioned, and cases of other polio-like diseases increased. The Rockefeller Group, known for funding Nazi Eugenics, played a role in these events.

Ancient cultures prayed for rain, while in the 20th century, countries seeded clouds with chemicals. The US military is allegedly conducting secretive weather control research, with the Air Force aiming to control weather by 2025. Weather modification includes artificially changing the atmosphere. Since 2000, the Department of Defense and Department of Energy have supposedly been spraying the US sky with toxic chemicals and biologic agents via chemtrails, unlike contrails which dissipate quickly. These chemtrails contain pathogenic molds, weaponized viruses, barium, and nanoaluminum particles, potentially causing harm to humans and wildlife. Barium can affect the heart and nervous system, while aluminum diminishes kidney and brain function. Nanoparticles can penetrate the skin and interfere with plant growth. Other documented chemicals include ammonia, cadmium, lead, and xylene, posing various health risks. Asthma rates may be linked to chemtrails. The true nature of aerosol operations is undisclosed. Past secret chemical exposure incidents in the US include cancer cell injections, mustard gas experiments, and dioxin exposure. The Department of Defense admitted to Desert Storm chemical exposure. A controversial weather modification bill was passed without public discussion or oversight. The Pentagon wants to resume open-air testing of biologic weapons, potentially using this technology without consent.

Dr. Michael Yadin, an ex-Pfizer executive, is described as saying there was no pandemic at all and that “the lie was maintained” to inject 5.5 billion people with an intentionally dangerous substance, with “17 million of whom have died so far.” Dennis Rancourt’s data is cited as showing that all-cause mortality data “did not increase at all in the run-up” to the WHO’s declaration of a pandemic. The transcript claims there was “no public health emergency except that created by our governments,” and that an “inappropriate, fraudulent PCR test” was used to give people the impression they had a particular disease when “they didn’t,” describing those as “normal diseases.” Three ways the transcript says people were treated badly are listed: changes to medical procedures imposed above the level of nation, “ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals” leading to deaths, and in care homes, people being given sedatives and respiratory depressants leading to deaths. The transcript also claims that in the community, people were denied life-saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia. The transcript further states that because there was no pandemic, there was no need for “an experimental or rushed medical interventions.” It also claims that, even if such interventions were needed, it is “absolutely impossible” to invent, test, clinically evaluate, manufacture, and launch on a global scale a complex biomedical product, describing it as “years” away rather than on the reported timeline. It cites the “fastest record price” as six years, and says that “methods development” for a reproducible manufacturing process “takes a number of years.” The overall conclusion presented is that advancements in materials that are “intentionally toxic” were “sketchily advanced” and “jammed into people’s arms,” often “coerced” and sometimes “mandated,” resulting in “millions of people” dying.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss Nazi chemical capabilities and the use of Zyklon B. Speaker 0 states that Nazis had developed sarin gas and tabun, "nasty deadly nerve gases," and argues that the idea they would actually use Zyklon B, which was essential for maintaining health in the camps, is ridiculous. Speaker 1 agrees, saying it seems ridiculous and that “the whole story” appears ridiculous once examined. Speaker 1 adds that years ago they investigated because it was illegal, noting changes over time, and that they felt compelled to keep quiet. Speaker 0 then shifts to logistics, noting that there are documents on trains that came in, the amounts of coke used in the crematoria, and that everything is well documented, including the number of people who actually made it to Auschwitz. He mentions Red Cross–related deaths as part of the documentation but the sentence trails off: “The deaths by the Red Cross I think were put.”

The speaker discusses a turning point in how the international community views morality in warfare. They describe this as a really important moment in history, highlighting that debates about what is permissible in war were taking place on a global scale. The narrative anchors this moment in the experiences of World War I, pointing to the horrors that occurred during that conflict as a catalyst for reflection on ethical boundaries in warfare. A central example used to illustrate the shift is the devastation caused by poisonous gas in World War I. The speaker emphasizes how the use of chemical agents revealed the severe human cost of such weapons and underscored the need to reexamine what should be allowed during armed conflict. This exposure to the brutal consequences of certain weapons helped drive an international rethinking of permissible conduct in war. As a concrete outcome of this rethinking, the Geneva Protocol is highlighted as a landmark agreement signed in 1925. The protocol prohibited chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons, marking a formal restriction on what could be employed in warfare. The speaker frames this as a key moment in history because it represented a collective commitment to limiting the means of war in order to protect human rights, even while hostilities were ongoing. The underlying message conveyed is that there are defined lines in war—certain weapons or methods that should not be crossed regardless of military objectives. The Geneva Protocol is presented as an institutional embodiment of that principle, signaling that even in the midst of conflict, there is recognition of fundamental human rights and a willingness to place restrictions on how warfare is conducted. In summary, the speaker highlights a historical arc from the wartime horrors of World War I to a postwar commitment to moral constraints in warfare. The devastating impact of chemical weapons prompted international action, culminating in the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which prohibited chemical and bacteriological weapons and asserted that human rights should be protected even during armed conflict. The emphasis remains on the idea that certain practices in war are unacceptable and that there are explicit lines that nations agree not to cross.

Hitler embargoed the use of poison gas, as evidenced by a document signed by him, references in the German high command vows, verbatim references by him, and shorthand records of meetings. If Churchill had used poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because they possessed nerve gases like sarin and tabun. In 1944, Germany had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of these nerve gases. Had Hitler used them in Normandy, it would have ended the Allied bridgehead because Allied gas masks were ineffective against German nerve gases. Hitler, despite being able to gain a strategic advantage by using nerve gas, did not because he signed the Geneva Gas Protocol, which forbade him from using gas first.

They present a history where science is cast as a weapon and subjects as expendable. In 1845 Alabama, J Marion Sims, called the father of gynecology, strapped down enslaved black women with no anesthesia or consent, performing 30 operations while his journals admit the practice. The US medical establishment funded his work and later enshrined him as a hero. In 1932 Tuskegee, the Public Health Service and the CDC lured 600 black men with free treatment; 400 already had syphilis. The cure penicillin was deliberately withheld; autopsies were mandatory, and broken families buried their fathers without knowing the government had murdered them for medical data. In the 1950s, Puerto Rico became a laboratory where poor, some illiterate, women were coerced into testing birth control pills by big pharma, suffering seizures and hemorrhages; some called it population control, the victims called it genocide. Decades later, those same players would push vaccines with catastrophic fertility side effects. History is a spiral. World War II ended, but the Pentagon began a war on its own soldiers. At Edgewood Arsenal, secret documents show over 60,000 troops exposed to sarin, VX, and LSD; a veteran wrote, they told us it was harmless. The truth was declassified after eighty percent of the victims were already dead. In September 1950, the US Navy operated aerosolized sprayers over San Francisco, releasing Ceratia marcescens bacteria into the fog, linked later to fatal pneumonia; a whistleblower’s report was buried until a 1976 Senate hearing forced admission. Operation Big Buzz 1955 released millions of weaponized mosquitoes in Florida, testing infection spread; internal memos bragged that subjects showed symptoms within seventy-two hours. No warning, no cure. The Pentagon also turned soldiers into lab rats. Operation White Coat infected thousands with biological agents; a veteran testified, they told us it was harmless. It was classified as national security with no compensation or justice. Even vaccines became weapons; millions of Americans were injected with s v forty, a monkey virus linked to cancer. The CDC buried the truth for forty years; how many died remains in redacted reports. In 1977, planes sprayed mock bioweapons on civilian cities from New York to Saint Louis to study how quickly a lethal pathogen could spread when aerosolized. The victims were unconsenting civilians. Before MK Ultra, Plum Island, there were the Tuskegee syphilis experiments and the deliberate infection of hundreds of black men, the lie of free treatment, withheld medicine while the CDC watched. Sea Spray 1950 tested turning an American city into a test lab; Vanderbilt pregnant women drank vitamin cocktails laced with radioactive iron, and their babies were stillborn or deformed; files sealed for fifty years. The Fernald School experiments fed orphans radioactive milk, smiles for cameras, later claimed there were no long-term consequences. MK Ultra involved LSD, electroshock at unsafe voltages, sensory deprivation, aiming at total mind fragmentation; data were laundered through Princeton and Harvard. Plum Island fueled Lyme’s mutations; Fort Detrick and the 1960s spirochete research connected to weaponized ticks; the Pentagon’s patents point to the truth. Victims of chronic Lyme are labeled hysterical. Gulf War syndrome and Morgellons follow the same playbook: silence the sick, discredit the dying, deny everything. Then vaccines—untested, unnecessary, unleashed with legal immunity, with VAERS rising and the CDC scrubbing data. Doctors who spoke out were suspended or erased. The narrative extends to digital IDs, CBDCs, depopulation, food shortages, and a spanning claim that agencies once poisoned cities and murdered victims now demand total compliance. The Wuhan lab leak theory is a distraction, the text asserts, because Fort Detrick and NIH funded decades of gain-of-function research; Fauci’s emails, EcoHealth Alliance grants, and the 2011 bat coronavirus patent are cited as evidence. Now the claim is an ongoing program of transmissible vaccines, self-replicating mRNA, and mosquito drones, branded as biodefense but described as an extermination agenda, with witnesses disappearing and no statute of limitations on crimes against humanity.

The speaker discusses Adolf Hitler and poison gases, noting that Hitler possessed two nerve gases, Tabun and Sarin, against which none of the Allies had any defense. Despite this, Hitler ordered that these poison gases not be used because Germany had signed the Geneva Convention. The speaker asserts there are contradictions here that historians should have investigated, claiming to have spent thirty years in archives and even offering rewards for any evidence, yet suggesting that if such evidence exists, others would have found it. The argument pivots to the expectation of traceable chain-of-command documentation. The speaker points out the many people involved in the process—from the individual writing the teletype message on one end to the recipient at the other end, with twenty copies at each end—and argues that even if official files were destroyed, someone would have written home or kept a diary. The speaker asserts that such evidence should be in the records because Hitler’s other crimes are documented in various forms. Specific documented crimes and orders attributed to Hitler are listed: - Euthanasia: an actual order with Hitler’s signature, issued sometime in 1940 but backdated to the first day of the war, with Hitler’s euthanasia order in the files with the Signicharlotter. - The order to kill the Russian commissars after the campaign in Russia began, with those commissars described as political officers attached to the Russian armed forces; the order is documented in the military files of the day. - The order to kill British commandos, noted as a particularly sore point for Canadians, with Hitler’s order from October 1942 in the files, described as a criminal order and adequately documented. - The order to kill the male population of Stalingrad after capturing the city, recorded in the private diary of General Helder (Haldbr). - The order to Linzalla Airmen in May 1944, also attributed to Hitler, and documented. The speaker then raises an interesting question about Hitler’s character: how could he unhesitatingly issue orders that are crimes under international law, such as the order to kill prisoners, while at the same time ordering that poison gas not be used to avoid violating the Geneva Convention? The speaker notes that poison gas could have potentially changed the course of the war—specifically, around the Normandy Beachhead in July 1944, when it was established and near breakout—arguing that use of nerve gases against which Allied troops had no gas masks could have wiped out the entire Normandy Beachhead. The speaker contends that Hitler could have won the war by pulling out the Panzer divisions and redeploying them to the Eastern Front, potentially mopping up the Eastern Front in two to three months, but He did not.