reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that law c 69 guarantees there will not be a one-stop shop because it requires the Canadian government to duplicate regulations. They argue that there should be strong rules enforced once, rather than multiple levels of regulation. The speaker states that it currently takes seventeen years to get a major project approved in Canada. They assert that in the last ten years, Canada has had the worst economic growth and cannot afford a fourth Liberal term.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling them to stand up to the Americans from a position of strength. In response to criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting the questioner doesn't understand the tax code. The speaker also states that the biggest component of that was the cost of building.

Canada is facing economic challenges, with stagnant wages, soaring inflation, and high house prices. The Fraser Institute survey highlights 24 ways Canadians are struggling, including stagnant wages, with the average Canadian earning $18,000 less than an American. The OECD predicts Canada will be the worst performing advanced economy until 2060. Business investment has declined since Justin Trudeau came to power in 2014, while government spending and debt have doubled. Government workers are growing at a faster rate than the private sector, with Canadian taxpayers paying the salaries of 4.1 million government employees. Government-run healthcare has also collapsed, with long wait times for treatment. Canadians are increasingly dissatisfied with the size of government and high taxes, blaming Trudeau. There is hope for change in the upcoming federal election, but unions pose a challenge. Dark days are ahead for Canadians and potentially Americans as well.

Canada has opportunities in carbon capture, small modular reactors, and hydrogen, and could be a clean energy superpower. Mark Carney's ideas about energy omit the fact that Canada produces less than 1.5% of total global emissions. Even if Canada were wiped off the map, it wouldn't matter. Also, about 96% of all the machinery for climate change is made in China.

The United States has the largest reserves of oil and gas in the world, and we may soon see significant growth in our country. For years, we have remained the same size, but that could change. Our focus will be on increased drilling, which is expected to lower prices and boost the economy.

Speaker 0 asserts that Alberta is a wealth of natural resources, but they won't let them build a pipeline to the Pacific. They argues we should let them come down into the US, and that Alberta is a natural partner for the US. The Albertans are very independent people. There are rumors that they may have a referendum on whether they wanna stay in Canada or not. People are talking. People want sovereignty. They want what The US has got.

A year ago, it took an hour of work for a middle wage worker to get 5.5 gallons of gas, but now they can get 8 gallons. This is a 40% improvement. However, the current gas price is around $3.60 per gallon, compared to $2.39 when Biden took office. So, in less than 2 years, we are in a worse place. The speaker admits that things are worse than before, indicating a pretty bad situation.

Canadians are struggling with high gas prices and housing costs under Justin Trudeau's leadership. The speaker questions how people are surviving economically, mentioning the high cost of gas and housing. They express frustration with Trudeau's spending on foreign countries and propose that money should be invested in Canada instead. The speaker, fortunate due to their business success, considers leaving Canada if Trudeau is re-elected. They criticize Trudeau's plan to increase the carbon tax, referring to it as an "air tax." The speaker asks viewers to share how they are coping and what they desire in the next prime minister.

Speaker 0: He's one of the greatest I've ever seen. Speaker 1: Don't mess with Whitey, I'm crazy. Speaker 2: Trudeau announced a 3-year exemption on carbon tax reform. Speaker 3: Will there be penalties or jail for not paying carbon tax? The government expects everyone to work. Speaker 1: We need to find ways to extract and use oil and gas with minimal emissions and carbon capture. Speaker 2: I demand the same carbon tax exemption for Saskatchewan families as others. It's only fair. Hopefully, it will be provided.

Canada's population is 40 million, while Saudi Arabia's is 38 million. Saudi Arabia's main export is oil, with the second-largest reserves. Canada's main export is also oil, with the third-largest reserves, in addition to forestry, coal, hydroelectric, natural gas, fisheries, diamond, copper, nickel, iron ore, aluminum, and silver. Canada's national debt is $2.1 trillion, while Saudi Arabia's is $250 billion. The personal income tax percentage in Canada is 40% on average, and sales tax is 13% on average, while Saudi Arabia has zero personal income or sales tax. The speaker implies that Saudi Arabia, a rich country, does not tax its citizens, while Canada is "bleeding us dry." The speaker then makes a comment about the state of housing in Toronto.

I'm glad you're in Scottsdale instead of Toronto. Canadians are now poorer per capita in GDP than those in Mississippi. The richest province in Canada is less affluent than the poorest U.S. state. This decline has occurred since Trudeau took office. A decade ago, Canada was nearly on par with the U.S., but now Americans are about 40% ahead. Successful individuals often move to the U.S. because it's easier to thrive here without as much hassle.

Canada has opportunities in carbon capture, small modular reactors, and hydrogen, and could be a clean energy superpower. Mark Carney's ideas about energy omit the fact that Canada produces less than 1.5% of total global emissions. Even if Canada were wiped off the map, it wouldn't matter. Also, about 96% of all the machinery for climate change is made in China.

Climate change is a pressing issue with devastating consequences. Countries like China are capitalizing on renewable energy and electric vehicle technologies. Canada must acknowledge climate change, shape its economic strategy accordingly, and ensure competitiveness in a declining oil and gas market. Failure to do so threatens economic prosperity. The government of Canada is investing $300 million to support hydrogen operations.

Canada, with a population of 41 million, holds vast resources, including crucial energy and water. Recently, Canadians have expressed interest in the potential for an economic union with the U.S., which could enhance trade and security against external threats from countries like China and Russia. This union could involve a shared currency, unified tax systems, and streamlined travel, similar to the EU. However, many Canadians are hesitant about the current government, particularly Trudeau, leading negotiations for this deal. As a result, there's a desire for new leadership to initiate discussions on this promising opportunity.

We're the second-largest landmass globally, boasting 41 million people, vast natural resources including oil, natural gas, uranium, potash, freshwater, and farmland. We should be the wealthiest nation, but tariffs highlight our unmet potential. It's time for self-sufficiency. We need to build homes rapidly for our young people, foster entrepreneurial success, and ensure hard work yields rewards. We must harness our resources, secure our borders, and build a brighter future for our citizens.

The owner of the resource asserts their responsibility to manage emissions and rejects the idea that the federal government can do it better. When asked about public support for an emissions cap, the speaker questions the numbers and provides examples of emissions reduction in electricity and methane. They mention industry efforts to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 through technology rather than production cuts. The speaker argues against shutting down production, stating the negative consequences it would have on revenue and healthcare. They emphasize that Albertans and the federal government should not support such a production cut.

Mario and the Professor discuss the scale and spread of the current oil and energy shock and its broad economic and geopolitical ripple effects. - Severity and scope: The Professor calls the crisis “pretty catastrophic,” possibly the biggest oil crisis experienced, potentially surpassing the 1970s shocks. He notes a gap between Washington rhetoric and underlying economic reality and emphasizes the war’s effects beyond oil, including fertilizer and helium, all of which pass through the Strait of Hormuz or related chokepoints. - U.S. economic backdrop (before the war): The Professor provides a pre-war table: - U.S. GDP growth in 2024 was 2.3%, 2025 about the same after a dip in 2024 to 2.2%. - Jobs: 2024 added 2.2 million; 2025 added 185,000, with tariffs contributing to a manufacturing job loss of 108,000. - Productivity declined from 3% to 2.1% in 2025. - He argues the U.S. economy was already slowing and that the war exacerbates existing weaknesses rather than creating a boom. - Immediate physical and downstream effects: - The closure of the Strait of Hormuz affects more than oil: up to 20% of world oil, a third of fertilizer, and helium used in chip manufacturing (notably in Taiwan) pass through the strait. - The closure’s ripple effects include fertilizer shortages and higher prices (fertilizer up about 50%), and broader supply chain dislocations as related infrastructure and inventories (oil, fertilizers, helium) become depleted and must be rebuilt. - Relative impact by region: The U.S. is more insulated from physical shocks than many others, but financial markets (stocks and bonds) are hit, with higher interest rates and a rising 10- and 30-year bond yield. Europe and Asia face larger direct physical disruptions; India, Taiwan, and others bear notable hits due to fertilizer and helium supply constraints. - Global energy and political dynamics: - The U.S. remains a net importer of oil, though it is a net exporter of petroleum products; fertilizer reliance and pricing reflect broader global constraints. - The professor highlights the political costs: protectionism (tariffs), militarism (increased defense spending and involvement), and interventionism (policy actions). He notes polling is negative on these directions, suggesting policy headwinds for the administration. - The escalation and motivations for war: - A theory discussed is that the war was driven by a belief in decapitating Iran’s leadership to force regime change, a strategy the professor says many experts have warned against. He cites New York Times reporting that Mossad and Netanyahu supported decapitation, but that former Mossad leadership and U.S. intelligence warned it would not work; the escalation suggests a divergence between theory and outcome. - He acknowledges another view that controlling Hormuz could economically benefit the U.S., but ranks it as a lesser driver than regime-change objectives. - Possible outcomes and scenarios: - If the Houthis control the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and the Beber/Mendeb is blocked, the consequences would intensify; the professor describes a “freeway turned into a toll road” scenario in Hormuz and greater disruption in the Gulf, including potential attacks on desalination plants. - The economic signaling would likely worsen: downward revisions to growth, higher import prices, and increased financial market strain; a prolonged closure would intensify these effects. - The escalation ladder and endgame: - The professor warns that escalating with boots on the ground would favor Iran and could trigger widespread disruption of Gulf infrastructure, desalination, and regional stability. He suggests Russia would be a clear beneficiary in such a scenario. - He concludes with a stark warning: if Hormuz and the Beber/Mendeb remain closed, and desalination and critical infrastructure are attacked, the situation could resemble or exceed the scale of the 2008 financial crisis—“look like a birthday party” compared with what could unfold. - Overall takeaway: The crisis is multi-faceted, with immediate physical shortages (oil, fertilizer, helium) and cascading financial and political costs. The duration and depth depend on how long chokepoints stay closed and whether escalation occurs, with the potential for severe global economic and geopolitical consequences.

The speaker argues that oil is “unlimited,” stating that Middle Eastern people have messaged after the speaker posted a video claiming “everything’s unlimited.” They sent a video in Arabic in which a person explains that oil is unlimited because it has been sold for a long time and that all that is required is to drill to find oil. The speaker says oil producers “manipulate the price” and claim that “our pumps are running dry.” They add that oil-rig workers reportedly return to the same pump that was said to have run dry because they believe the narrative, and that a week later the rig is ready again, producing oil because “oil is the blood of the earth.”

The US is positioned for significant growth due to various factors, both fortunate and the result of hard work. Geographically, the US benefits from its own continent, providing physical security and abundant natural resources. There's a humorous notion that whenever the US seems to be running low on a rare earth material, a farmer in North Dakota discovers a massive deposit. The country has the potential for energy independence and can become a major net energy exporter. The previous administration chose to limit American energy production, but the current administration aims to revitalize it. Ultimately, the ability to be energy independent is a matter of choice.

Speaker: I have a message for the Canadian people. Don't vote for this guy. Real and Mark Carney is the most elite of elitists out there. This guy is not a man of the people at all. He's the ultimate elitist, and be careful because he put out a message, and he conflated, you know, hey, Trump is the biggest threat to we've had, you know, in his lifetime. Thinking about all the things that have threatened humankind in in his lifetime. So it's hyperbolic. But then he started bragging about the economy, you know, the liberal economy. I have all these charts. Mean, it's just and they're all heartbreaking if you're a Canadian. The standard of living has imploded. You look at the investments, right, or where the jobs are. Almost all of it, public sector, little private sector, and self employment, none. There's no real business opportunities there. OECD predicts the worst economies for 2020 to 2030 at the end of all 36 countries, Canada. I mean, careful. You're right. You've got to right. It's not bad. It's horrific. It's horrific. This country needs a reboot, right? Which means Canada's vulnerable. It's extraordinarily vulnerable. They're to a major power like America taking them on. Sure. They I mean and we're friends. Again, this is reciprocal. This is like, hey. Okay. You wanna protect your dairy farmers and they for whatever reason, they supersede everyone else? Negotiate with the Trump team. But this sort of saber rattling but I will say this. They do have a friend in the American media. And my emails this morning, get one from Fortune, and it says America's war in Canada. We didn't declare war. The article, you can't find that anywhere in the article, but that's where they headline it. Maybe it makes you open an email, but again, this is the kind of stuff that's happening out there. It's really it's really this is a heartfelt message to to Canada and and and people up there. It's time to turn your country around. I don't know. Time to make Canada great again.

Canada's standard of living is declining rapidly, with stagnant wages, rising inflation, and increasing bankruptcy filings. The country's economy is struggling, with high taxes and government dominance under Justin Trudeau. Many Canadians are considering moving abroad due to the worsening situation. Conservative Pierre Poliyev is leading in the polls, but government-funded media is working against him. The future looks bleak with more inflation, decline, and mass migration predicted.

The speaker claims to help the environment while creating jobs, enabling economic independence and strength against the Americans. Regarding criticisms about oil and gas subsidies and the industrial carbon tax, the speaker states that capital cost allowances are standard across corporate garments of industry. They claim to have answered this question previously, suggesting critics don't understand the tax code. The speaker also acknowledges that the biggest component of cost was building.

The speaker claims that law C-69 guarantees there will not be a one-stop shop because it requires the Canadian government to duplicate regulations. They argue that there should be strong rules enforced once, rather than multiple levels of regulation. The speaker states that it currently takes seventeen years to get a major project approved in Canada. They assert that in the last ten years, Canada has had the worst economic growth and cannot afford a fourth Liberal term.

Canadians are feeling the impacts of the climate emergency with wildfires and extreme weather. The government spent $34 billion on the Trans Mountain pipeline instead of investing in real climate solutions. Big oil CEOs profit while Canadians struggle. We need a windfall tax on oil and gas profits, regulations to cap emissions, and investments in clean jobs and climate resilience. The current government delays climate action, while conservatives deny the crisis. We need to end fossil fuel subsidies and prioritize real climate solutions.