reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I'm running out of time. You seem to be pro-vaccine but have started a group, Children's Health Defense, which sells baby clothing with anti-vaccine messages, like "unvaxxed, unafraid" for $26. Can you assure us that your organization will stop selling these products? I have no control over that organization; I resigned from the board. You founded it just a few months ago. Are you supportive of these onesies? I support vaccines and want good science. Will you tell your organization to stop selling those items?

We must address the challenge of anti-vaxxers by being more aggressive in promoting the effectiveness of vaccines. They are using COVID to spread misinformation and cause harm. It's time to push back with evidence and facts.

A meme showing the evolution of CNN headlines about the COVID vaccine went viral. The headlines started with positive statements about vaccine protection, but gradually changed to include recommendations for masks, additional doses, and doubts about effectiveness. The speaker questions the claim that the vaccine is effective and criticizes the idea that questioning or opposing it is anti-science. They mention a video where FDA experts admit they don't know if the vaccine is safe for children aged 5 to 11, yet it was still approved. The speaker concludes by suggesting that if this is science, then science is uncertain.

Please get vaccinated and encourage others to do the same. The unvaccinated are the only ones dying, and it's a shame that some people are spreading misinformation. Think about the unnecessary deaths caused by this. I can't understand how those who do this for a living can sleep at night.

All of this cannot be true. Are you lying to Congress about being pro-vaccine, or did you lie on those podcasts? We have it all on tape. Senator, that statement from the Lex Fridman podcast has been debunked. I was asked if there are safe and effective vaccines, and I said some live virus vaccines are. I also stated that no vaccine is universally safe and effective, as every medicine has individuals who may react negatively, including vaccines. I was interrupted before I could elaborate. I've clarified this multiple times, including on national TV, so bringing it up now is misleading.

Vaccines have a place, but the population has been scared into accepting them. It's frustrating that vaccines are being promoted as gene therapy to children who are not at risk. It's ethically questionable to recommend something dangerous to a certain group to protect the elderly. Personally, as a 70-year-old, I don't want young people getting vaccinated for my sake. If something happened to them, I would feel guilty.

If you argue against the vaccine or campaign against vaccination mandates, you are considered anti-vaxx. Your personal vaccination status doesn't matter. It's important to support teachers being vaccinated, especially in remote classrooms with unvaccinated kids. Those who oppose the mandate are also anti-vaxx. We need to ensure as many people as possible are vaccinated to protect against the virus. Recent data shows that vaccinating 80% of people aged 5 and above in remote communities is crucial. I will always support vaccines and anyone against the mandate is anti-vaxx.

We must push back against anti-vaxxers who pose a serious challenge. Vaccines work for adults, and we have evidence on our side. It's time to be more aggressive in countering their harmful actions, especially during the COVID pandemic.

I believe in safe vaccines, robust science, and independent regulators. The problem with vaccines is that they have become profitable, leading to an increase in the number of vaccines given to children. In 1986, a law was passed that protects vaccine companies from being sued, removing their incentive to make vaccines safer. The four companies that make all 72 mandated vaccines have a history of wrongdoing. There is a body of science that supports my position, but I won't go into it here. The few studies that exist are flawed and written by industry and the CDC. The Institute of Medicine has criticized the CDC for not properly studying the link between autism and vaccines. Big tech companies like Facebook are censoring vaccine information. I am not anti-vaccine, but I advocate for safe vaccines.

It's time to stop coddling those who won't get the vaccine. They're afraid, not hesitant or skeptical. No more sugarcoating. They're scared of the vaccine, being wrong, following rules, and needles. Except for those with medical issues, we must stop coddling these individuals and call them what they are: snowflakes, cowards, idiots, losers, and most importantly, afraid.

Vaccines have a place, but the population has been terrorized with propaganda. It's frustrating that vaccines are being promoted as gene therapy with unknown risks for children who are at low risk. It's not ethically or morally acceptable to recommend something dangerous to them to protect the elderly. As a 70-year-old, I don't want young people getting vaccinated for my sake, and I would feel guilty if something happened to them.

Our biggest enemy in America is our fellow Americans. We can't trust the unvaccinated. It's time to do what you're told, as this is not about freedom or personal choice. Walking around unvaccinated is psychotic, as it makes you an incubator for every variant. Our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost us all. The unvaccinated overcrowd our hospitals, leaving no room for those in need. This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.

I'm not against vaccination, but I choose not to get vaccinated. Some people label me as anti-vax, but I consider myself pro-vax and pro-freedom of choice.

Speaker 0 argues that invoking “the science says this because CDC says it, because my doctor says it, or because FDA says it” is a “logical fallacy” and an “appeals to authority.” “You cannot show me a study that shows that the flu vaccine actually efforts more problems than it causes.” He says he can show many studies, “It’s in the Dear Sanjay Gupta letter.” “Show me that study, then I will walk away from that issue.” Speaker 1 concedes the CDC isn’t perfect but notes, “There are hundreds of millions of people who have gotten these vaccine vaccines who are perfectly healthy. Perfectly healthy in part thanks to the vaccines.” “The vaccines are not all bad.” and adds, “Just because we have suspicions about some of them, and in particular, the COVID vaccine, it doesn't mean we can and because you started this, Bobby, by saying, I am not anti vaxx.” Speaker 0 asks for “a scientific study for each vaccine that shows that this vaccine is averting for harm and it's causing.” Speaker 1 says, “They say the studies show no linkage of harm.” The exchange ends: “Let's advance the discussion. Okay?”

There are concerns that discrediting public health officials could lead to a lack of trust in vaccines, similar to what is happening in Russia. Attacks on me are attacks on science, as everything I have said is based on scientific evidence. It is clear that science and the truth are under attack.

We must confront the challenge of anti-vaxxers by promoting the effectiveness of vaccines with evidence on our side. It's time to be more aggressive in countering their harmful impact, especially during the COVID pandemic.

My responsibility is to assess your trustworthiness in supporting public health. We share concerns about issues like ultra-processed food and obesity, and I understand parents want reassurance about vaccine safety and effectiveness. However, our approaches differ; I rely on the preponderance of evidence, while you seem to use selective evidence to create doubt. As a 71-year-old who has long criticized vaccines, can you change your stance now that you hold a key position in vaccine policy? Your declaration that vaccines are safe could significantly impact public trust. Politically, as a Republican from Louisiana, I want President Trump's policies to succeed. If someone remains unvaccinated due to your influence and dies from a vaccine-preventable disease, it would not only be a tragedy but also tarnish the President's legacy, which I hope to see shine.

I cannot understand how anyone can recommend the mRNA vaccination and sleep well at night. They seem afraid to admit they were wrong. I want to give you a chance to address your colleagues, fellow pathologists, and medical professionals. My advice is to always question what so-called experts say. You don't need top scientists, you need experienced doctors who think critically. In the past, people died from the flu without it being turned into a pandemic or locking people away.

The unvaccinated are the problem, period. It's time to blame the unvaccinated folks for prolonging this pandemic. Anyone who comes into contact with them will blame them, as will the rest of us who've done the right thing by getting vaccinated. We can't trust the unvaccinated. Our patience is wearing thin with those, including children and people acting like children, who refuse vaccination. It's not about freedom or personal choice when your freedom infringes on others' well-being. It's mandatory to get vaccinated. The anti-vaxxers are putting lives at risk, and we need to prioritize the greater good of society over their misinformation. They're being stupid and silly. The unvaccinated will pay the price, perhaps through taxes or healthcare costs. Remaining unvaccinated is like driving while intoxicated. The choice for ICU beds won't be tough: vaccinated people first. Every COVID death now is preventable, and those spreading misinformation should be ashamed.

The vaccine discussion is overly simplified. People distrust the government because they recommend a Hepatitis B vaccine for one-day-old infants, despite it being contracted through drug use and sexual transmission. I believe in vaccines, but not a one-size-fits-all approach. I delayed my children's Hepatitis B vaccine until they started school. On the COVID vaccine, there's a huge difference in risk between the elderly and children. The science doesn't support mandating it for healthy six-month-olds. For those over 65 or with risk factors, the vaccine was advisable. We should openly debate these issues. There isn't any clear scientific evidence about what causes autism, so shouldn't we keep an open mind about potential causes like vaccines? We need to follow the science without presuppositions.

I have over 30 years of experience in pharmaceuticals and biotech. Based on my expertise, I believe that vaccines were intentionally designed to harm, maim, kill, and reduce fertility. I advise against taking any injectables, including mRNA-based materials, as they are all dangerous.

The speaker is questioned about his stance on childhood vaccines, with many scientific and medical organizations disagreeing with him. The audience asks how they can help him align with science. The speaker clarifies that he is not anti-vaccine, but believes vaccines should undergo safety testing like other medicines. He criticizes the lack of prelicensing placebo-controlled trials for vaccines and cites examples of potential risks and lack of long-term studies. The other speaker argues that there is evidence of vaccines preventing diseases and highlights the importance of distinguishing between association and causation. The speaker emphasizes the need for good science and questions the trustworthiness of pharmaceutical companies. The conversation ends with a discussion about the speaker's family not supporting his views on vaccines.

As a left-leaning hippie Texan, I tend to be rebellious. I have to wonder, despite the criticism Robert Kennedy Jr. received for encouraging skepticism about the rushed COVID vaccines, what if he was right?

I'm skeptical about the COVID vaccine, especially the mRNA vaccines. I recently spoke with a top cancer expert in Britain who was very critical of the long-term effects of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. According to this expert, we may see a significant increase in cancer cases as a result of these vaccines. While I believe the vaccines saved lives, I question whether we had enough time to fully understand the potential long-term consequences.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.