reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We support Trump because he stands for America, God, and minorities. If you vote left, you'll have nothing left. If you like high gas prices, killing babies, confusion about gender, and giving money to other countries, the Democratic party isn't for you. Join us on the right side.

Speaker 1 argues that many people hate leftists, and when asked bluntly why, states that leftists are psychopaths who will destroy everything he cares about through suicidal empathy. Speaker 0 asks whether he means progressives or the entire left, and Speaker 1 says the delineation is threshold minute; when examining granularity, it all comes down to ethics, and leftists don’t have ethics, so it’s about degrees of psychopathy. Speaker 0 asks about people who want a little more wealth redistribution but generally love America, noting they exist on the left. Speaker 1 questions why they want these changes. Speaker 0 explains that they think the left has a different view of human nature and that luck and structures matter, contrasting with the right’s caricature of merit and hard work. The sensible left would acknowledge that luck can affect outcomes and that some people face sickness or accidents, so society should help those who are struggling, supporting social safety nets to a greater extent than those who want the lowest taxes. This is presented as the steelman argument. Speaker 1 says that makes sense and identifies the core idea as social safety nets. Speaker 0 asks why such safety nets aren’t voluntary. Speaker 1 responds that achieving the level of redistribution desired requires some degree of force. He notes that the entire idea of progressive liberalism is supposed to be volunteerism, with left-wing government not forcing people to do anything. Speaker 0 calls that a contradiction, and Speaker 1 counters that the left’s promise is that secular government will be fair and allow personal freedom as long as one does not hurt others, whereas Christian nationalists would compel certain actions. The conversation then shifts to the claim that the left’s promise of secular governance leads to compelling people to do things against their will, contradicting the previous ideal of voluntaryism. Overall, the dialogue centers on: a critique of leftists as lacking ethics and exhibiting psychopathic tendencies; a defense of a more nuanced left view that accounts for luck and structural factors; the tension between voluntary redistribution and the necessity of force to achieve redistribution; and the contrast between secular fairness and religiously motivated coercion. The speakers dispute whether progressive liberalism can be both voluntary and sufficiently redistributive, and they contrast secular promises with perceived implications for personal autonomy.

I don't understand why left-leaning media, which some say is predominantly Jewish, labels people as white supremacists. According to my Jewish friends, this perspective exists. But why is there a perceived animosity towards white individuals? It seems to stem from what some call "woke" culture and virtue signaling.

I'm not voting for Joe Biden because I believe he is a racist who funded a genocide. He shows no regard for human life, especially towards Arabs. It's disheartening that our government prioritizes overseas interests over its own constituents. Joe Biden, or Sleepy Joe as I call him, doesn't listen to us. I can't think of a single good thing he has done. While he's focused on issues like border walls and keeping kids in cages, he's also neglecting the needs of homeless people in DC. The United States people are realizing that we are constantly forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.

If you're voting for the left, you can express that with bumper stickers on your car. It seems like there's a divide, and I might not have many liberal fans.

I don't want anyone telling me what to do in my personal life or restricting voting rights. I fear that if we support Donald Trump, he will become a dictator like Kim Jong Un, Vladimir Putin, or Mohammed bin Salman. Trump wants to scare everyone and control America like these leaders control their countries. Voting for him means the end of democracy and the destruction of our great experiment. It's hard to understand why anyone would support someone who wants to destroy our democracy.

The only thing that matters in this election is keeping Donald Trump and Project 2025 out of power. I genuinely don't care who the Democratic nominee is, be it Biden or Kamala Harris, or someone else entirely. What's crucial is to vote against the party that has embraced white Christian nationalism. The Republican party is gone, replaced by Project 2025 and MAGA. Voting against the "R" is essential at every level of government to prevent them from taking away birth control, education, and historical knowledge, and implementing their white Christian nationalist agenda. Nothing else matters but stopping Trump, the Republican Party, and Project 2025 in November. The only way to stop them is with our votes.

I used to be a blind Democrat, following my girlfriend's views. I switched to supporting Trump during the pandemic. I believe Trump has provided opportunities and wealth for black people. I think Biden was blindly voted in based on emotions. Biden's comment about black voters was offensive, and I believe he is unfit to lead.

I don't want anyone telling me what to do in my own bedroom or deciding who can vote. I fear that if Trump is in power, he will turn the US into a dictatorship like North Korea, Russia, or Saudi Arabia. He wants to scare everyone into submission and control the country. Voting for him means the end of democracy, and I can't understand why anyone would support someone who wants to destroy the greatest experiment on Earth.

24% of people who identify as very liberal think that political violence is acceptable. That number is only 3% for conservatives. That's not an American problem. That's a left wing problem. Yes, everybody should be able to condemn political violence. On the left and the right, I certainly do. But this is a problem that we're seeing predominantly from the left.

In 2008 and 2012, I voted for Barack Obama, in 2016 for Donald Trump, and in 2020 for Biden. I plan to vote for Trump in 2024. My views changed as I grew up and focused on policies and taxes. Men realize the flaws in Democrat ideas sooner than women, who are more emotional. Democrats target women with issues like pro-choice and LGBTQ rights. Women are more accepting of gay men, while men find it uncomfortable.

I will vote for anyone to keep Hitler out of the White House, even if it's Biden in a coma. I don't really like Biden, but I don't want Trump in power. I care about keeping project 2025 out, so I will vote up and down the ballot to make sure that happens.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss why Speaker 1 dislikes leftists and progressives. Speaker 1 bluntly says they are psychopaths who are going to destroy everything he cares about through suicidal empathy. When pressed to distinguish leftists from progressives, Speaker 1 says the delineation is threshold minute, and that, at a granular level, it all comes down to ethics, which he believes they lack, equating it with degrees of psychopathy. They touch on people who favor a bit more wealth redistribution but love America. Speaker 0 notes these people exist on the left, though they are a smaller share. Speaker 1 probes why such people want redistribution, and Speaker 0 explains they see human nature differently from the right, arguing luck and structural factors influence outcomes. The right allegedly overestimates agency, with a caricature that people get what they deserve through hard work and merit. The sensible left, according to Speaker 0, acknowledges luck and misfortune, suggesting that not everyone’s struggles stem from personal failures, and therefore society should support those in need more than those who want the lowest taxes. This is presented as the steelman argument for more robust social safety nets. They move to why such redistribution isn’t voluntary. Speaker 0 asserts that achieving the desired level of redistribution requires some level of force. Speaker 1 notes that progressive liberalism is supposed to be about volunteerism, with a left-wing government not compelling individuals to do anything. Speaker 0 dismisses this as bullshit, while claiming the promise is that secular government will act fairly and not impose coercion, allowing people to do as they please as long as they do not hurt others. The contrast is drawn with Christian nationalism, which is framed as promoting forcing people to act in certain ways. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 suggesting that the left’s promise of secular government leads to compelling people to do various things against their will, illustrating a tension between voluntary principles and government coercion.

I'm critical of the Democratic party because I recently left it, like many others. I used to be a staunch liberal, but my perspective shifted when the left began pushing extreme narratives, leading me to research Trump more thoroughly. I realized much of what I'd been shown about him was taken out of context. The turning point was when I was told it was better to spend the holidays alone than with family who voted for Trump. I was also depressed as a liberal; liberalism made me hate everything. While empathy is good, lacking discernment is detrimental. The Democratic party now advocates for things I once opposed, like war, and they attack individual thought. It's why people are leaving, and Trump's increased support across demographics proves it. We're the "new right"—not Republicans, but a diverse group seeking positive change without the misery.

Every ism, except Nazism, was founded and/or led disproportionately by Jews. Marxism, humanism, socialism, environmentalism, and feminism were all founded or led by Jews. It's the Jews.

I used to be liberal but now I'm not, for political and personal reasons. Attended George Floyd protest, got tear gassed. Liberals were never happy, bad for mental health. Insulting and condescending. Turned off by condescension and insults when someone disagrees. Gay pride parades with nudity in front of kids was a turning point for me. Being gay is fine, but not in front of kids.

I left the Democratic Party because it is controlled by an elitist group of warmongers who prioritize woke culture over important issues. The party I joined years ago, which fought for free speech, working people, and civil liberties, no longer exists. It is clear that a political party that undermines our constitutional freedoms cannot be trusted, and we, the people, must not let them stay in power.

When I was an Islamist extremist, I only voted left because I viewed conservatives as principled and harder to manipulate. Islamic extremists typically do not support Donald Trump; they align with the left, despite opposing their views on LGBTQ+ rights. The left's focus on issues like abortion doesn't resonate with fundamentalists, who would never consider terminating a pregnancy. The underlying agenda from extremists is a vision for America that centers on Islamic values.

Because these big moneyed Middle Easterners know they can't sell Americans on the idea of marrying off their daughters at age nine or wearing burqas at the beach, instead, their new strategy is this. Not to sell us on their ideology, that won't work, but to get us on their side by seeing the same enemy, Israel. In doing that, they're succeeding because all these right wing influencers are not focusing on the real and ugly truth about Islam.

I used to be liberal but now conservative. Liberals are loving until you disagree, then it's cult-like. Conservatives talk to those they disagree with. Liberals focus on personal problems, while conservatives distrust the government. Liberals want diversity but focus on specific minorities. Conservatives debate pro-life issues but should prioritize caring for foster children. Liberals are creative, conservatives analytical. Gen Z is more drawn to aesthetics.

As a former Islamic extremist, I only voted left because I saw them as easily influenced. Extremists wouldn't vote for Trump, they prefer the left to focus on issues like pride parades and abortion, even though they disagree with them. The speaker criticizes a woman fighting for abortion rights, questioning if she would ever have one or harm a Muslim. The goal of Islamic extremists is for America to become Muslim-dominated. Translation: The speaker, a former Islamic extremist, explains why extremists prefer left-leaning politicians and criticize their focus on issues like pride parades and abortion. They question the sincerity of a woman advocating for abortion rights and discuss the goal of Islamic extremists for America.

I don't want anyone telling me what to do in my personal life or restricting my voting rights. I fear that if we support Donald Trump, he will turn America into a dictatorship like North Korea, Russia, or Saudi Arabia. He wants to scare everyone into submission and control the country. Voting for him means the end of democracy, and I can't understand why anyone would support someone who wants to destroy the greatest experiment on Earth.

I believe in the theory that we are saving the world from a satanic cult. If I can help save the world, I'm willing to do it. We are fighting against a radical left philosophy that will destroy our country and then the rest of the world.

I talk to black folk all the time as somebody that's a child of a preacher. Listen. Most black people are not republicans simply because we just as like y'all racist. I can't hang out with the KKK in them. That's really what it is. But when we think about who we are as black people and we think about where we come from, most black people have very conservative values. That's right. Right? But the reality is that, like, we just can't side with, like, the neo Nazis in them. We, like, we not we not dealing with y'all like that.

The speaker discusses the paradox of the political left in America being allied with radical Islam. They explain that as a former Islamic extremist, they would only vote for the left because they saw them as easily manipulated. They point out that Islamic extremists are against homosexuality and transgender rights, yet they support the left's agenda on these issues. The speaker also mentions Omar's support for abortion rights but questions if she would personally have an abortion or harm a Muslim. The fundamentalist and jihadi agenda for America is stated as the future of America being Muslim and Islam entering every home.