TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker addresses disturbing letters received from mainstream media outlets, accusing them of attacking and undermining the news. The speaker denies serious criminal allegations made against them, stating that their past relationships were always consensual. They question if there is another agenda at play, citing previous coordinated media attacks on individuals like Joe Rogan. The speaker believes there is an agenda to control voices like theirs and urges viewers to stay awake and free. They mention witnesses who contradict the narratives being constructed by the media outlets. The speaker promises to investigate the matter further.

In this video, the speaker highlights various instances where they believe the media has lied to the public. They mention the portrayal of the 2020 Wendy's protests as mostly peaceful, the effectiveness of masks, the safety of vaccines, and the claim that Russia blew up its own pipeline. The speaker then mentions their intention to visit Julian Assange but abruptly switches to talking about boycotting Bud Light. The video abruptly ends with the speaker expressing gratitude for a job well done.

Both speakers admit they don't know what QAnon was. They recall material that would switch from useful information to 'the whole, and here's Trump and his generals are gonna save the world.' Friend spent year looking into QAnon; 'What'd he get? I don't fully understand it, but here's what I understand is that, you know, some of the predictions of QAnon came true.' They say it's 'a sophisticated thing. It's not just Oh, I think it's a bunch of ex spooks.' It's not 'a bunch of college kids on No. 4chan or whatever they claim it was.' They note 'these are guys who are probably pissed that the system went bad.' Behind it is unclear; 'What is obvious to me is that it was it's a control mechanism. Trying to siphon off some of that energy and move it in a' 'Siphoning off the energy.' That's Exactly. Less dangerous direction.

Alex Jones claims he had the founder of QAnon at his house two years ago and should have hired him. He believes QAnon was started by people inside US intelligence. Jones says he spoke to one of these individuals who admitted their early involvement but claimed they haven't been in control for months. Jones suggests Trump's lack of denial implies knowledge or involvement with QAnon. He refused to address QAnon on a previous show because he didn't want to insult those already "brainwashed" by it. Jones states that QAnon is attacking him and gives them until next Tuesday to reveal everything, or he will expose it next Wednesday. He asserts he is risking his life and that this is not a game.

The transcript presents a detailed exploration of the relationship between former President Donald Trump and the QAnon conspiracy movement, tracing alleged endorsements, interactions, and “proofs” claimed by adherents. It weaves together interviews, clips, and a litany of “queue proofs” that supporters say demonstrate a hidden alliance between Trump and QAnon. - Trump and QAnon alignment signals: - An illustrated meme and QAnon slogans reshared by Trump on his social platform are described as one of his brazen endorsements of the conspiracy theory. Followers interpret Trump’s post as a sign he is with them and with QAnon, with quotes like “at this point, anyone denying that queue was a legit operation affiliated with the Trump administration is in major denial” and references to “real donald trump has over 4,000,000 followers, yet he seeks out q people to retreat.” - In several episodes during 2020, Trump is shown as engaging with questions about QAnon, sometimes dodging the topic, sometimes declining to distance himself, and sometimes acknowledging that the movement “likes me very much” and that its followers “love our country” and want problems in cities like Portland, Chicago, and New York to go away. - Sanctions and other policy items: - A separate strand notes Trump’s announcement of reimposed sanctions on Iran with a Game of Thrones-inspired poster, and HBO’s trademark joke. This is presented as contemporaneous political news but not tied causally to QAnon in the transcript’s framing. - Early QAnon questions and responses: - The transcript recounts early Q movement questions to Trump about Q, and Trump’s responses (or lack thereof) on August 15, 2020, and August 20, 2020. It quotes Trump saying he doesn’t know much about the movement beyond hearing that it is gaining in popularity and that supporters are upset with certain urban crime conditions, with statements about potentially sending federal troops or law enforcement to reform cities. - QAnon core theory and Trump’s stated stance: - The core QAnon theory is summarized as belief that Democrats are a satanic pedophile ring and that Trump is a savior, with questions about whether Trump is behind or involved in the movement. Trump’s replies are framed as either disclaimers or as partial acknowledgments, including expressions of willingness to “help save the world from problems” and to counter “a radical left philosophy” that could destroy the country. - Q’s evidentiary framework and “proofs”: - The documentary surveys “50 proofs” that supporters say demonstrate Q is a real military intelligence operation tied to Trump. Examples include: - Proof that Trump lurked on 4chan before Q postings, with a Trump tweet referencing “Colorado was amazing” followed by a Q-related post; the number 17 is emphasized as a recurring cue (Q is the 17th letter). - The “consecutive cues” and timing of Trump’s tweets about JFK conspiracies on the same day Q posted, suggesting synchronization. - The Saudi Arabia faction: Trump’s Saudi visit, a gold necklace gift, a traditional sword dance, and subsequent Saudi purges and financial seizures are linked to Q’s posts about the House of Saud, and to a broader argument about a global power triangle involving Saudi Arabia, the Rothschilds, and George Soros, with mentions of “plus plus plus” as code for Saudi Arabia and the idea of a global power realignment. - The Las Vegas Mandalay Bay shooting (October 1, 2017): The narrative presents the shooting as a staged or attempted assassination meant to serve a larger strategic purpose, including links to MBS (Mohammed bin Salman) and a claim that Trump warned MBS, with the “sword dance” seen as symbolic. - The Hillary Clinton-Alice and Wonderland code: Hillary Clinton is equated with Alice, Saudi Arabia with Wonderland, and the “trafficking lanes” and child rescue narratives tied to Saudi actions are presented as corroborative “Alice in Wonderland” symbolism in Q drops. - The “Alice” code, Hillary’s email timeline, and Hillary Clinton’s alleged insider status tied to alleged transfers involving Saudi interests and Clinton Foundation donations. - The “Alice in Wonderland” thread extends to Hillary, Hillary’s emails, and Hillary/Saudi Arabia as a recurring motif. - The “proofs” also connect to the 2017-2018 period’s geopolitical shifts and to the appearance of various slogans and signifiers in Trump’s public rhetoric and in Q postings (e.g., “the best is yet to come,” “where we go one, we go all,” and “this is not a game” type lines). - Notable Q proofs and their examples: - “Tip top” and the state of the union references; “space force” and the U.S. Space Force; Washington crossing the Delaware; “good win” vs. “when” typographical plays; the Pope’s changing Lord’s Prayer; “Magapill” via Trump retweets; “VIP Anon” back-stage access to Trump rallies; “Honk for Q” stunts at Trump events; “scot free” and references to the human-interest angle around a dramatized “Where we go one, we go all” refrain. - The chain of command, the military’s tacit support for QAnon, and the idea of a national-level security benchmark seeded in Q posts; the DoD’s National Geographic tie-in; the “best is yet to come” catchphrase as a refrain in Trump speeches. - The Flynn connection: Michael Flynn’s oath video and Flynn’s public slogans; Flynn’s book-signing and Q’s linking of Flynn with the “where we go one, we go all” slogan. - The documentary’s synthesis and conclusion: - The concluding argument frames Q as a military intelligence operation at the heart of the Trump administration, a war for credibility against a “criminal surveillance state” and a “mafia media.” It posits a global awakening and a countercoup against entrenched power structures, asserting that Q’s drops have prepared the public to accept a coming public disclosure of the operation and a reestablishment of a “full original republic.” - It emphasizes the Socratic method used by Q to guide Anons to conclusions without overtly revealing sensitive information, presenting Q as a boot camp for critical thinking and a driver of citizen journalism in an information war against mainstream media. - Final framing and call to action: - The film closes with a broad, conspiratorial meditation on “the end game” of QAnon, the impending public recognition of the operation, and a global reaffirmation of “one movement, one people, one family, and one glorious nation under God,” with the closing credits urging viewers to subscribe for more content.

QAnon is discussed in this video, with some speakers expressing skepticism and frustration towards the movement. Speaker 0 questions who Q is, suggesting that their identity will never be known. Speaker 1 claims to have no knowledge of Q, while Speaker 2 dismisses it as nonsense but acknowledges its existence. Speaker 1 mentions that President Trump has validated Q in some ways, but Speaker 2 criticizes those who believe in it, calling them gullible. The conversation also touches on other topics such as the state of Christianity in America and the current political climate. Overall, there is a sense of weariness and irritation towards QAnon among the speakers.

The speaker discusses the importance of getting information directly from reliable sources rather than listening to uninformed people or the news. They mention QAnon and express their frustration with individuals who claim to be part of it but lack knowledge about it. The speaker asserts that Q refers to six military intelligence agencies led by the President and Vice President of the United States. They also mention a helicopter ride with Donald Trump Jr. and a photo taken on Mount Rushmore. The speaker expresses their difficulty in setting specific dates for events and their desire for immunity to take action against Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden.

Weird events on the White House lawn aside, attempts to silence this show have been relentless, from censorship to deplatforming. Now that we've succeeded and exposed entities like the Global Disinformation Index, critics are resorting to personal attacks. A journalist from the Daily Mail plans to write a lengthy article discrediting me based on my clothing choices. I find it amusing that they can't challenge our credibility anymore, so they focus on my wardrobe instead. While they cover my fashion for the next four years, I'll be in the White House press briefing room cohosting a significant podcast. It's disappointing but revealing that, lacking substantial arguments, they choose to critique my appearance rather than our work.

The speaker discusses plans to ruin someone's reputation through news articles and videos. They mention a major Wall Street insider trading case and a rare look inside the secret world of the KKK. The speaker admits to creating doctored videos and leaking secret corporate information. They express a lack of boundaries with fake news and mention making shorter versions of the videos for commercials. The speaker reveals concerns about being tracked and creating a fake YouTube account with a fake IP address. They mention paying for fake views and believing they could say anything without consequences. The speaker also talks about appearing on a show in the Bahamas and hiding their identity while making these videos. They mention Nygard's belief that Jesus was popular due to a good PR team.

In this video, the speaker discusses the rise of the QAnon movement and the global protests that have taken place as a result. They claim that the mainstream media has tried to discredit the movement, but the people are waking up to the truth. The speaker also suggests that Q is a group of people, including Donald Trump and army generals, who are working to expose corruption and create a better world. They mention various clues and predictions made by Q, including connections to sex trafficking and child sacrifice. The speaker concludes by stating that arrests and mass revelations are imminent, which will shock the world.

Asmyn Gold watched it, and it got millions of views. Then The Daily Show talked about it, and it was all over the internet. Engage with the media in an adversarial role because they are an adversary. Allow them to freak out; don't be afraid of their freak out because the freak out is your free press. You can take your budget, stick it in your pocket, and watch them freak out, and then you win. Pierre won yesterday and today. He got handed an empty net with ten seconds left.

The video discusses the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, which claims that high-profile individuals are involved in a pedophilia ring. The speaker argues that the mainstream media has tried to discredit Pizzagate, but the use of code words in leaked emails suggests otherwise. The speaker also mentions other cases, such as the Nexium cult and Jeffrey Epstein, to support the existence of elite pedophile rings. They suggest that these rings are protected by powerful individuals and that the media is complicit in covering up the truth. The speaker emphasizes the need for critical thinking and investigation into these allegations.

The video presents a sweeping conspiratorial narrative about a globalist plot to destabilize the United States, centered on Jewish-Israeli influence. The speaker apologizes to newcomers for exposing uncomfortable truth and promises to reveal a step-by-step playbook used to undermine America without bullets, culminating in the claim that Charlie Kirk had to be killed. Key claims and themes include: - A 1990 Netanyahu quote is presented as evidence that America is destined to be destabilized and exploited as a “golden calf,” transformed into a large welfare state under control of others. The speaker asserts this explains why “they” destabilize the U.S. and destroy nations slowly. - JFK is portrayed as the first prominent opponent of Israel, with claims that he hated Jews and opposed Israel, while simultaneously being briefed on Israeli actions. The video argues JFK’s assassination was tied to preventing subversion of the U.S. education system, referencing the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act that allegedly allowed Israel to infiltrate U.S. education. - Charlie Kirk is depicted as someone who “poisoned the minds of the youth” and posed a threat to the supposed Jewish-dominated destabilization plan. A segment suggests Kirk’s influence on Christian conversions among Jews upset “the Rabbis” who control Mossad and political circles. - A rabbi’s comments are quoted to claim that Christians are more dangerous than other societal groups because they threaten the Jewish order, framing Christianity as idol worship that endangers Jews. - A KGB/Marxist playbook is invoked (via a named agent, Jory Bensmanov) to outline the four-phase destabilization model: demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization, followed by a new foreign-backed authority and the dismantling of constitutional norms. The eight-front war concept is presented, with disinformation as a critical modern battleground. - The video cites a Cuban/foreign intelligence asset describing five warfare principles: changing minds of the young is easier than changing old minds; create instability by division; normalize the abnormal; and portray law and order as fascism to topple democracy. These ideas are linked to contemporary U.S. debates on DEI, CRT, open borders, and perceived Jewish influence in policy and media. - DEI, CRT, LGBTQ agendas, and open borders are framed as tools to divide Americans and destabilize society, with ongoing insinuations about “God’s chosen people” manipulating policy and education to advance their aims. - The closing segments claim America cannot be saved unless people wake up, call out accountability and transparency, and reject a political system controlled by these forces. The speaker ends with a hostile, anti-Jewish sentiment, alleging that the political and social upheaval serves a Jewish-driven agenda. Throughout, the speaker ties Charlie Kirk’s activism and public influence to a broader alleged plan by Israelis and Jews to depose American institutions, collapse the constitutional order, and install new authorities. The overall message asserts that the destabilization of the United States is deliberate, orchestrated by Jewish-Israeli interests, and that traditional social changes (education infiltration, DEI/CRT, open borders) are instrumental steps in that plan.

The transcript assembles a dense, interconnected narrative alleging extensive ties between NXIVM, the Clintons, Epstein’s network, and other elites, interwoven with QAnon theory and culture-war rhetoric. - NXIVM and Clinton connections - NXIVM attended a Hillary Clinton fundraiser, reserving three VIP tables at the front. Kirsten Gillibrand sat at one table; Nancy Salzman (NXIVM co-founder) sat at the table and was later arrested on racketeering charges along with her daughter Laura Salzman. Victims described Nancy Salzman as Ranieri’s “fiercely loyal enabler and enforcer,” who turned a blind eye to his atrocities and parroted his theories, including claims about children and adults and women’s “freedom during rape.” - Clare Bronfman illegally funneled thousands into Hillary Clinton’s campaign to buy influence. Bronfman, daughter of Edgar Bronfman (president of the World Jewish Congress), came from immense wealth and leadership in NXIVM, and was later imprisoned for her role in the organization. - The program notes that at least three NXIVM top members were Clinton Global Initiative members, including Nancy Salzman and the Bronfman sisters. NXIVM donors contributed about $29,900 to Clinton’s presidential campaign, with several first-time donors giving the maximum $2,300. The Bronfmans also tried to influence political events beyond NXIVM, including Libyan matters. - NXIVM leadership, structure, and practices - Keith Ranieri, who called himself Vanguard, cultivated a largely international circle; half of his close associates were Mexican, including Emiliano Salinas (son of former Mexican president Carlos Salinas) and Rosa Larayonco (connected to a major Mexican newspaper group). - Ranieri elevated Clare Bronfman’s former ally Mac (Allison Mack’s ally) to leadership of Jeunesse, then to DOS (Dominus Obsequious Sororium), a women’s group where branding, blackmail material, and control mechanisms were used to keep women from leaving. DOS led to a hierarchy culminating in Ranieri’s harem, with some women identified as slaves under Mac’s leadership. - Mack recruited celebrities; tweets show Mack attempting to recruit more celebrity involvement. DOS used branding of women and arranged coercive dynamics, including starvation for those who refused. - Key individuals and affiliated networks - Alison Mack emerged as a high-profile NXIVM member who admitted to involvement and expressed remorse in public statements, though some victims dispute her remorse. - The organization’s inner circle connected to notable figures and families, including ties to the Bronfman sisters, the running of Rainbow Cultural Garden centers, and connections to other elites. The Rainbow Cultural Garden centers reportedly conducted multi-language child care that drew scrutiny for potential exploitation, tying back to NXIVM leadership and to Mack. - The transcript alleges connections to powerful figures such as Richard Branson (Virgin), with Branson reportedly hosting a NXIVM event on Necker Island and being linked to Epstein’s orbit; it mentions Branson’s family ties to other elites and a broader network around Spirit Cooking, Marina Abramović, and related controversies. - Broader NXIVM-related scandals - DOS is described as a training ground for women who could be recruited into Ranieri’s harem, enabling branding, control, and coercive recruitment. - The Rainbow Cultural Garden is described as under NXIVM influence, with allegations of human experimentation on children in Albany and connections to Halliburton-like leadership and Hillary donor links. - The transcript cites Pizzagate-era claims and suggests a broader conspiracy linking NXIVM, Epstein, and other high-profile figures to trafficking, blackmail, and occult symbolism. - Epstein, trafficking, and associated figures - The transcript highlights Epstein’s network, including flight logs with Bill Clinton and Rachel Chandler, described as a child handler linked to trafficking. It asserts Chandler’s modeling agency Midland Agency (co-founded with Walter Pierce) as a front to attract minors into trafficking networks, with connections to MC Squared and Epstein’s circle. - MC Squared is presented as Epstein’s underage-model procurement agency, run by Jean-Luc Brunel, who allegedly supplied underage girls to Epstein and others; Brunel is reported dead in a Paris prison cell, with officials treating his death as suicide. - Ghislaine Maxwell is described as having been convicted and sentenced to twenty years for trafficking, with the transcript presenting victim perspectives on accountability and justice. - The document links Chandler to Marina Abramović’s spirit cooking and to public figures associated with Epstein’s island, including a claimed temple beneath the temple on Little St. James. - QAnon and public discourse - The speakers reference QAnon posts, claiming that Q dropped evidence about Epstein, Maxwell, Chandler, and other elites, including assertions that “the big arrests” are coming and that information is stored on servers (including in China). They discuss fingerprints of Q posts about “class one to 99” trafficking and suggest that information is being revealed in stages, with references to the Clinton Foundation, Mueller, and the broader “deep state.” - They present a narrative of hidden surveillance, blackmail, and “puppet masters” behind global elites, arguing that revelations are imminent and that media coverage has downplayed these issues. - Closing tone - The closing segments urge sharing the video and frame the revelations as part of a larger, ongoing exposure of “the deep state cabal” and “pedos” within politics, entertainment, and media. A concluding sequence features a dramatic, cautionary outro and a call to stay vigilant. Note: The summary preserves the transcript’s explicit assertions and naming, without evaluating their veracity or providing independent commentary.

This video discusses various conspiracy theories and controversial topics, such as forest fires, chemtrails, organ donation, the Vatican, 9/11, abortion, the migrant caravan, Monsanto, the Federal Reserve, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, George Soros, pedophilia in Hollywood, and Pizzagate. The speaker suggests that there is a hidden agenda by powerful elites to control the world and that the mainstream media is complicit in covering up these issues. The video also mentions QAnon and their belief in a global battle between good and evil. The speaker concludes by questioning the motives and connections of political leaders like Donald Trump, the Clintons, and Justin Trudeau. (150 words)

Asmyn Gold's video got millions of views, leading to coverage on The Daily Show. Engaging with the media in an adversarial role is beneficial; their "freak out" is free press. You can use a minimal budget and let the media "freak out," which leads to victory. Pierre won, not because of CBC, but because he was handed an opportunity. Blanche had to play them.

In this video, the speakers discuss various controversial topics such as Pizzagate, Bill Cosby, and Jeffrey Epstein. They mention their disbelief in conspiracy theories involving pedophilia and question the credibility of these claims. They emphasize the difficulty for people to accept the existence of an elite pedophile ring due to the psychological barriers it presents. The video concludes with a demand for the names of those involved in these scandals.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the political and legal dynamics surrounding potential investigations and trials, focusing on timing, venue, and public interest. - They agree that if Democrats lose the House and the committee is eliminated, public interest may wane. The first trials, if they occur, are expected to attract a lot of attention, similar to anniversaries, but interest could fade once Democrats are out of power and especially if Biden is removed from office. - The idea of dragging proceedings out is considered, with caution that delaying too long could reduce attention. They suggest not initiating a first trial in Washington, DC, because DC has many government workers and may be sympathetic to the defense; this relates to concerns about the potential jury pool. - There is a debate about whether the trial should be moved out of DC. Speaker 1 believes it would be difficult to move the trial and that those in DC would resist removal, arguing that hearings would be seen as fair and the jury would be impartial if held there, contrasting with Speaker 0’s concern about DC’s jury demographics. - They discuss the likelihood of successfully moving the trial, with Speaker 1 asserting that it would not be successfully moved and that the defense or supporters would resist. - The conversation touches on a hypothetical interaction with an individual who might have been involved in insurrection plans. Speaker 0 asks about what the plan would be if such an individual were in line and marching, in a military context, suggesting a scenario where operations would be outlined: “you’re gonna go here,” “you’re gonna go in by this side,” “at this time, we’re gonna take over this.” They describe the insurrection as lacking guns and involving a man “smoking pot,” noting it as the most pitiable insurrection of the 21st century. - They shift to an observation about the Proud Boys, mentioning Gavin McGinnis. Speaker 0 describes knowing Gavin from road trips to parties and finding the term “Proud Wizards” humorous when they first heard it in Brooklyn years ago. Speaker 0 characterizes McGinnis as a provocateur who says shocking things to be funny, and expresses amusement at his elevation to a prominent figure. - Speaker 0 clarifies that they have a personal history with these people and emphasizes that McGinnis says outrageous things, which they view in a historical and somewhat humorous light, contrasting with the contemporary prominence of the group. - The exchange ends with Speaker 0 explaining their familiarity with the individuals and reiterating that the portrayal of these figures is part of their broader historical context.

The transcript details former President Trump's connections to the QAnon conspiracy theory, including reshared memes with QAnon slogans and Trump's responses to media questions about the movement. Trump acknowledged QAnon followers like him and share his views on cities like Portland and Chicago. He avoided directly denouncing QAnon, stating he didn't know much about it, while also claiming they are against pedophilia. The transcript presents "proofs" of Q's legitimacy, citing coincidences between Trump's actions and Q's posts. These include Trump retweeting a Pepe account, emphasis on the number 17, consecutive "Q"s in tweets, Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia, references to Alice in Wonderland, and Trump's use of QAnon phrases. Other "proofs" include Trump's announcement of Space Force, a photo of George Washington crossing the Delaware, and various instances where Trump seemingly confirmed Q's messages through tweets, rallies, and gestures. The speaker claims Q is a military intelligence operation and that the world is fighting back against a globalist system of totalitarian rule.

This is a video where the speaker expresses their strong opinions and accuses John Podesta and George Soros of being involved in some kind of negative activity. The speaker is determined to win and challenges them to reveal what they are hiding.

The video transcript explores the QAnon conspiracy theory, originating in 2017 with an anonymous poster, Q, claiming to have classified information about a "deep state" plot against Trump. QAnon followers believe Trump is battling a cabal of Satan-worshipping, child-trafficking elites. The movement gained traction on 4chan, where users deciphered Q's cryptic posts. Pepe the Frog became a symbol, linked to the ancient Egyptian frog god Kek, and associated with Trump's 2016 election. 4chan users trolled Shia LaBeouf's "He Will Not Divide Us" project and reportedly helped locate a rebel base in Syria for a Russian airstrike. The transcript also references the Seth Rich murder, suggesting a connection to WikiLeaks, and General Flynn's acknowledgment of "digital soldiers." The video posits that Q is a white hat military intelligence operation using online forums to bypass mainstream media and combat the deep state.

The speaker discusses their plan to ruin someone's reputation by creating fake videos and spreading them through news articles and online publications. They mention being involved in a major Wall Street insider trading case and reveal a rare look inside the secret world of the KKK. The speaker admits to creating doctored videos and leaking secret corporate information. They express their lack of boundaries with fake news and their involvement in spreading it years ago. The speaker talks about making shorter versions of the videos for commercials and using a fake YouTube account with a fake IP address to upload them. They mention paying for fake views and believing they could say anything without consequences. The speaker also mentions appearing on a show in the Bahamas to present one of the anti-Bacon videos. Throughout, they emphasize the use of fake accounts and hiding their identity. The speaker concludes by mentioning Nygard's belief that Jesus was popular due to having a good PR team.

Speaker 0 argues that conspiracy theories have been made to look like lunacy, noting that the Kennedy assassination popularized the term “conspiracy theorist.” He says it wasn’t widely used before Kennedy, but afterward it became a label for “kooks,” and he’s repeatedly been called that. Speaker 1 acknowledges this dynamic. He and Speaker 0 discuss what a conspiracy is—“more people working together to do something nefarious?”—and Speaker 0 asserts that conspiracies have always happened. He disputes the view that most conspiracies are due to ineptitude, insisting that when there is profit, power, control, and resources involved, most conspiracies, in fact, turn out to be true. He adds that the deeper you dig, the more you realize there’s a concerted effort to make conspiracies seem ridiculous so people won’t be seen as fools. Speaker 1 remarks on the ridicule as well, and Speaker 0 reiterates his own self-description: “I am a conspiracy theorist,” a “foolish person,” and “a professional clown.” He mocks the idea that being labeled foolish is a barrier, and reflects on how others perceive him. Speaker 0 then provides specific, provocative examples of conspiracies he believes are real: Gulf of Tonkin was faked to justify U.S. entry into Vietnam; production of heroin ramped up to 94% of the world’s supply once the U.S. occupied Afghanistan; and the CIA, in the United States, allegedly sold heroin or cocaine in Los Angeles ghettos to fund the Contras versus the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. He states clearly that these claims are real and asserts that there are conspiracy theorists who are “fucking real.” Speaker 1 pushes back on reputation and judgment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms his self-identification as a conspiracy theorist who faces mockery. Speaker 1 suggests that this stance might give him a “superpower.”

The speaker says the reason for the checks is to get attention. When they do these things, the legacy media loses their minds and runs it on every news channel. The speaker says they couldn't pay for that kind of coverage, that it would cost 10 times more to get it.