reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Somebody has to stand up to the bullshit going on in this country and in this city.

On 03/26/2026, the Pentagon's Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) quietly announced BIOW, basic information awareness operations, a cognitive warfare program that changes the rules of the battlefield through belief rather than bullets or bombs. The SCO sits inside the Office of the Secretary of Defense, with a mandate to deliver breakthrough capabilities to war fighters typically within three to five years. Sam Gray, SCO's chief technology officer and lead for autonomy and artificial intelligence, leads BIOW. Speaking at the National Defense Industrial Association's Pacific Operational Science and Technology Conference in Honolulu, Gray stated: the goal of cognitive warfare is to disrupt the cognition and the thinking ability of an adversary or person and influence how they perceive, sense make, and act. This is not propaganda in the old sense. This is something fundamentally different. For most of military history, influence operations required a physical observable. In World War Two, the Allies inflated fake tanks to fool German reconnaissance. You needed something the enemy could see. Gray said that era is over. Quote, I don't actually need the physical observable because I can generate both the physical observable and the associated narrative that comes along with it, and I can promulgate it across the digital environment that allows it to go everywhere. BIOW. BIOW is built on three technological pillars. Pillar one, detection: systems designed to identify adversary generated materials to see what the enemy is pushing into the information space before it takes hold. Pillar two, multimodal effects: AI models capable of generating text, video, and audio, synthetic content designed to shape how target populations perceive events in real time. Pillar three, population modeling: a large scale simulation environment that can model entire populations and produce quantitative metrics. Answering the question Sam Gray himself asked, how good am I doing with this narrative? Did it resonate like we thought it was going to? The technology architecture Gray described is deliberately lean and distributed. Quote, give me 100 Mac minis with 100 different agents on them that are out running and operating, that are lightweight, small, do not require gigawatts of power. This is not a massive fragile supercomputer. This is a swarm. But there's a problem Gray openly acknowledged: the off the shelf AI systems we all use, ChatGPT, Gemini, do not think like Russia. They do not think like China. They were trained on American data shaped by American assumptions. Gray said directly, we have to get to a point where we can understand what it is that they think about and what we can create from a model perspective to emulate and behave like our adversary does. BIOW's goal is to build bespoke AI models specifically tuned to adversary cognitive frameworks. Why is this urgent? Gray pointed to two ongoing adversary campaigns as evidence: The United States is already behind. First, Iran's information operations during Operation Epic Fury. Second, China's large scale efforts to, in Gray's words, change the way that certain populations are thinking. And then Gray stated plainly, The United States is not currently positioned to counter these operations at machine speed. Quote, we need to start to get into that space. Congress didn't wait. The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act directed the Secretary of Defense to formally define cognitive warfare for the department, assign organizational responsibility, and assess the value of narrative intelligence with a deadline of 03/31/2026. BIOW does not operate in isolation. In 2025, the US Army created Detachment 201, the Executive Innovation Corps, commissioning four Senior Silicon Valley technology executives directly into the Army Reserve at the rank of Lieutenant Colonel: Andrew Bosworth, Kevin Weil, Shyam Sankar, and Bob McGrew. They wear the uniform and serve within the chain of command. Together, BIOW's technology stack and Detachment 201's Silicon Valley expertise represent a deliberate convergence of artificial intelligence, influence operations, and military command structure. NATO's chief scientist framed the stakes: cognitive warfare targets trust networks, identity narratives, and institutional legitimacy. The battle space is continuous, operates below the threshold of armed conflict, and the measure of success is not a message received, but a durable change in how a population thinks, decides, and acts. The human mind is now a contested domain. As of April 2026, BIOW is active: performers are being on-ramped, models are being built, simulations are running. And Gray made one thing clear about the vendors chosen to build this system: those who don't keep up will be cut. Quote, I will offramp you. The battle for cognition has begun. Whether you believe this program is an essential shield against adversary manipulation or a capability that raises profound questions about who defines the adversary and where those tools can be aimed, one fact is not in dispute. This is real. It is funded. It is operational. And you are now aware.

I might go to jail for this, but tomorrow we need to peacefully go into the capital.

"Girl, come on. Leave the shape of the world to the men? I don't think so." "We ain't getting no You got into Harvard long? What? Like it's hard?" "Sir, what is your name as a group? The click. Click or click? Click. Let's do it."

Now is the time for teachers to get in the streets. Opportunities to do so are coming up on April 5 and May 1. Building power requires teachers, particularly white teachers with privilege, to get into the streets in ways they haven't before. This will show a willingness to do more to stop what is going on. Because this situation is unprecedented, bigger steps are needed. More teachers need to be out in the streets to slow this monster down.

To effectively create change in the world we desire. And side prop will argue that at times there's simply nothing else that can be required other than violent retaliation. And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with. This view the view that some institutions are too broken, too regressive, too oppressive to be reformed like cancers of our society. They must and they should be taken down by any means necessary.

The conversation opens with Speaker 0 expressing irritation about smoking, saying, “Smoking induce shit to me. I go to the casino twice a week. Fuck your smoke.” The exchange quickly shifts to a request for clarification or communication: Speaker 1 asks, “It like, from the local or I will send you a message?” and Speaker 2 repeats the detail, noting “The casino twice a week, bitch.” A brief interjection acknowledges a small moment of support or appreciation, as Speaker 0 mentions Alaska Post with an Amazon Prime sub and adds, “Thank you. It’s a dumb by the way, the Amazon Prime sub.” The tone then pivots to a discussion about screens and expectations for the group’s audience or participants. Speaker 2 criticizes having “too many screens,” while Speaker 1 asserts a standards-based stance: “we are very selective, and we we're not here for people who just say too many screens. Either you fucking marinate and you figure it out or you don't. Just fine if you don't.” This reveals a commitment to a certain level of engagement or preparation from participants. The dialogue returns to a chaotic incident as Speaker 2 asks about a situation, “Hold on. Jerry, I see Jerry. Did they just chase Jerry out? I don't know.” Speaker 1 responds, “Sure. Sure. You didn't do nothing wrong, man.” But Speaker 2 pushes back, insisting someone did something: “I didn't nothing. Yes. You did, bro. You fucking knocked the old man out of his chair. People.” The narration then pivots to a description of an event in progress: “So it's in slow. He was driving down the street. I got you. I got it. I got it.” The speakers explain that they had told someone to stay home, repeatedly: “We told him to stay home, bro. Fuck. We told him to stay home, dude. We told him to fucking stay home, dude. We told him to stay home.” The commenters attribute the action to “Spider Mike,” who allegedly knocked the old man down, and they acknowledge gratitude: “Thank you. Thank you. Send it to him, please.” A subsequent query asks whether anyone witnessed the incident or has video evidence: “Anybody witness this or have any video of this? Not for you.” The exchange repeats the sentiment of a witness or footage request: “Not for you.” The conversation concludes with a sense of closure or reflection as Speaker 2 notes, “It’s beautiful. And I I just stood there, and then he just went back.” Throughout, the participants reference a chaotic scene surrounding a dispute or altercation near the casino, involving force against an older person, the instruction to stay home, and a call for witnesses or video documentation, all framed within a broader discussion about engagement standards and personal conduct.

I'm a journalist, you're not. The goal is to get rid of America and the West. Decolonization, land back in our communities, away from central capitals.

We need to go into the capital tomorrow. It's crucial. No violence, just a peaceful approach. I hesitate to mention it because of potential consequences. But we have to make our presence known. Shut up, older generation. We didn't actually go into the capital; that was unexpected.

To effectively create change in the world we desire. And side prop will argue that at times there's simply nothing else that can be required other than violent retaliation. And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with. This view the view that some institutions are too broken, too regressive, too oppressive to be reformed like cancers of our society. They must and they should be taken down by any means necessary.

Silence won't save us; solidarity will. We are not afraid of America facing challenges; this is our moment to ignite change. We aim to unite everyone dissatisfied with Wall Street and establish a new communist party as a tool for the working class to challenge monopoly capitalism. Join our marches and stand with us. We refuse to remain passive and hope for better times in the next four years. Instead, we will confront every challenge and strive to make the U.S. ungovernable.

We must kill the white man, as Fanon suggested, because he brought us here.

"In the moment that you grab the gun, like Fanon says, you're no longer oppressed. You're now free." "We actually need to crash The US settler state, which has incredible reverberations and literally strangles the tentacles, that are reaching into the Israeli state." "putting our bodies on the line sometimes to protect those who are more vulnerable, right, to eat tear gas when we should be doing that and not students." "we have to struggle to crash things here. And my students were very, very clear about this. We have to struggle for indigenous sovereignty right here on Turtle Island." "You know, I'm sure that you've been snitched on to the administration about the content in your courses." "I'm trying to really ride the wheels off of these institutional resources and go for broke."

Sometimes you have to confront the presidential nominee of your party and speak your mind directly to them.

I realize it's in my self-interest to plant seeds for change. I won't engage in political talk or join panels. Now is the time to tap into white guilt money and invest it in my community to empower my people. Let's move from the hills of West Virginia to Wall Street. Forget about white women, they follow what white men say.

I don't think we should leave shaping the world to just men. Absolutely not. And, "You got into Harvard?" Like it's hard or something? We're called The Click. Let's do this.

Speaker 0: Audience, someone from the left comes up to the mic, let's treat them with respect. Let's not interrupt or scowl or boo them. Show the left the respect that we don't get on these college campuses. With that, let's do some

We will stage a sit-in and occupy the streets to cause a major disruption. We cannot allow life to continue as usual.

We are here to overthrow democracy and replace it with this. Amen.

- Grabbing a gun equates to freedom, and violence is sometimes a revolutionary essential. - The U.S. settler state must be crashed to impact the Israeli state. - Armed resistance will defeat Zionism on an open battlefield, so weapons flow to Zionists must be stopped. - October 7 was a profound moment to dig in and go harder. - Putting bodies on the line to protect the vulnerable is essential. - Struggle for indigenous sovereignty on Turtle Island. - Being a "Gorilla Scholar" means being prepared to be fired for your beliefs. - Some have been snitched on to the administration for course content. - Groups like Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolution have been misrepresented due to imperialist ideology. - Challenge the settler state, like the University of Virginia, and exploit institutional resources. - Al Aqsa Flood on October 7 was a decisive strike against imperialism. - Faculty should teach Palestinian liberation and resistance struggles. - The armed resistance movement rejects dependence on oppressors. - Subjugated people must overthrow the broader imperialist world system.

We must unite against the federal government and bullies. The current administration is criticized for being too male, too pale, and too stale. We refuse to remain silent and will not tolerate this oppression.

Start a revolution. You have nothing to lose.

I'm a journalist, not you. Let's talk about getting rid of America and the West. We need decolonization, land back in our communities, away from capital cities.

We need to go to the Capitol. It’s where our problems are. Let’s spread the word. Are we going to get arrested when we go in? We need to be cautious; we don’t want to get shot. If it comes to it, arrest us all.