reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The Senate leaders are heading to Kyiv with $61 billion, possibly in cash, while our border is being invaded by 800,000 illegal immigrants in the last month. They had no time or money to address the border issue, but managed to prepare the money, load the planes, and get ready for their trip to Kyiv.

The speaker opposes sending defense articles and services from the US to Ukraine, arguing that they should be used to defend the US border instead. They claim that veterans in their district prefer fighting against Mexican cartels at the southern border rather than supporting Ukraine. They criticize the Secretary of State for prioritizing Ukraine and accuse the Biden administration of depleting US military readiness. The speaker also expresses concern about China's growing strength and accuses the government of lying about the need to support Ukraine to prevent China from invading Taiwan.

The speaker proposes an amendment to stop funding Ukraine, claiming that the US has taken over the country and is fighting a proxy war without public approval. They argue that the US is providing extensive financial assistance, military equipment, and weapons to Ukraine, totaling $113 billion in 2022 alone. The speaker criticizes the state and foreign operations bill for granting Ukraine a blank check, allowing the State Department to bypass oversight. They express concern that this funding will perpetuate endless war and bring the conflict to American soil. The speaker cites polling data showing that a majority of Americans oppose further funding for Ukraine and believe the US has already done enough. They argue that taxpayer dollars should be used to secure the US southern border and combat issues like human trafficking. The speaker urges the adoption of their amendment.

We fund one third of Ukraine's government, which includes salaries for teachers, janitors, and everyone else, not just the military. Meanwhile, people in our country are struggling to afford basic necessities like food and medicine. We need to focus on our own problems instead of paying for their government. Our priority should be to stop the killing and provide American leadership, rather than giving more money without any conditions.

The speaker questions why the government is sending funds to Ukraine instead of focusing on domestic issues. They criticize the president for not prioritizing their own territory and consider it a foolish decision. Biden is referred to as an idiot.

The speaker expresses concern about a potential government shutdown, emphasizing its negative impact on the country. They mention a previous shutdown caused by Republicans, which cost the economy billions of dollars. They question why the president would change his stance on reopening the government and speculate if he wants it to remain closed indefinitely. The speaker suggests that the president lacks belief in and understanding of the risks associated with shutting down the government.

The speaker expresses concern about Trump getting involved with Ukraine and providing more money. They believe that if Ukraine asks for more money from Trump, he will start looking into the details. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the IMF coming forward for both economic and physical security.

The speaker criticizes the conservative party for not supporting Ukraine in terms of military, financial, and humanitarian aid. They also mention that the party voted against the Canada Ukraine free trade agreement, blaming it on carbon pricing, which is irrelevant since Ukraine has had it since 2011. They ask the minister of international trade to explain the importance of the agreement. The speaker is interrupted and asked to focus on the government's business. The transcript ends with a mention of the next question from a member in South Coast, New York.

The speaker accuses the Congresswoman of voting to send arms and weapons to Ukraine, potentially starting a nuclear war. They criticize her for being an establishment figure and not standing up against the war. The speaker demands a simple yes or no answer on whether she will stop nuclear war. They claim that funding for the war continues and call her a liar. The speaker urges her to let her conscience guide her actions.

Speaker 0 expressed gratitude for the attendees and mentioned a meeting with President Zelensky, emphasizing support against Putin's invasion. They requested a clear strategy and detailed answers from the White House regarding Ukraine. Criticizing the Biden administration, they highlighted the need for oversight and a coherent plan before allocating additional funds. The speaker then shifted focus to national security, specifically the border crisis. They highlighted the high number of illegal crossings, the presence of terrorists, and the alarming amount of fentanyl entering the country. The speaker stressed the urgency of addressing these issues and reiterated the need for clarity and oversight in spending taxpayer dollars.

In 2017, the speaker pledged to fight alongside others and push the case against Russia in Washington, expressing confidence in their victory and promising to provide necessary support. Later, the speaker declared they would not vote for any aid until the U.S. border is secured and asylum/parole are reformed, claiming Democrats are unwilling to act while all Republicans are in favor. The speaker stated they will not help Ukraine until the U.S. helps itself.

The speaker criticizes the US government's funding of the proxy war in Ukraine, arguing that it prioritizes military aid over domestic infrastructure. They highlight the lack of transparency and accountability in the allocation of tax dollars, revealing questionable payments and arms deals. The speaker questions the wisdom of escalating the conflict with Russia, pointing out the potential for nuclear annihilation. They also criticize the erosion of democracy in Ukraine and the profit-seeking motives of individuals involved in the war. The speaker calls on the UN Security Council to enforce the UN Charter and monitor NATO's actions.

The American people should be proud of their support for Ukraine. We will continue supplying Ukraine with critical weapons and equipment, including $200 million that I just approved. However, without additional funding, our ability to help Ukraine respond to urgent demands is coming to an end. We need Ukraine to fix its broken immigration system, and Congress needs to do the same at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage to push a partisan agenda on the border is not the solution. We need real solutions.

We're spending $350 billion, and Europe gets their money back as a loan, while we're just giving it away. Why didn't Biden demand equalization? Zelensky, a dictator without elections, better move fast or he won't have a country left. If he asks Biden for money, Biden says yes. What about the foreign bank accounts and the woman the FBI didn't interview? What if we started opening those bank accounts? He's compromised. I'm not saying that's happening, but it could happen.

We have concerns about accountability and the objective in Ukraine. We want to know if America is having a proxy war with Putin and Russia. House Republicans, led by Mike Garcia and Dan Crenshaw, have presented 12 critical questions for the White House to answer before providing additional support. We delivered these questions to Jake Sullivan, the international security adviser. We need to know the plan, where the money will be spent, and have auditing for the dollars already sent. These are not tough questions. We want cooperation and transparency.

The speakers discuss the allocation of funds to Ukraine and the need for clarity on whether it is additional money or part of the existing budget. Speaker 2 strongly advises against a motion that suggests taking the funds from the existing budget. Speaker 3 discourages the motion as well, but Speaker 5 believes there is a chance it will pass. Speaker 2 emphasizes that if the motion is approved, they will not execute it. Speaker 4 suggests removing a certain part of the motion to ensure the funds for Ukraine remain secure.

The speakers discuss the allocation of funds to Ukraine and the need for clarity on whether it is additional money or part of the existing budget. Speaker 2 strongly advises against a motion that suggests taking the funds from the existing budget. Speaker 3 discourages the motion, but Speaker 5 believes there is a chance it will pass. Speaker 2 emphasizes that if the motion is approved, they will not execute it. Speaker 4 suggests removing a certain part of the motion to ensure the funds for Ukraine remain secure.

The speaker criticizes a bill that prioritizes Ukraine over America, arguing that it neglects pressing issues such as border security and rising costs for American families. They express frustration with the lack of debate and amendment opportunities in the Senate, emphasizing the need for individual members to have more influence. The speaker also highlights the Biden administration's actions that have contributed to the current border crisis, including reversing Trump-era policies and not enforcing immigration laws. They criticize the administration's energy policy and its impact on US relations with Russia. The speaker concludes by expressing concerns about the allocation of foreign aid and the neglect of American priorities.

Speaker 0 raises a question about accountability for Israel and mentions Jeffrey Epstein’s dealings with Mossad. Speaker 1 asks, without specifics, whether there are forces that tried to influence him to stop what he’s doing now. Speaker 0 responds that they wouldn’t vote for foreign aid and foreign war funding, and they were upset because he said no. He states: “I’m not voting to fund the Ukraine war ever,” and “Israel’s doing just fine. We don’t need to give them a penny, not a single penny, nor do we need to give it to any other country, but they get mad at me for that.”

The president's bill includes support for Israel, Ukraine, the southern border, and Taiwan. It seems like a favorable bill for both Republicans and Democrats. Regarding Ukraine, the question is whether the United States should fund it at the levels proposed by President Biden. However, it's worth noting that the money allocated for the border aims to process more illegal immigrants rather than address the root of the problem, potentially worsening the situation.

“Off the machinery that feeds money into Iran.” The speaker advocates stopping the flow of money to Iran. “We will no longer have a 100 hostages still in captivity, Israeli and American and otherwise, by Hamas and Iran's Hezbollah mercenary forces.” “We need America to wake up and prioritize Israel and bring home Israelis and make sure we stand by our number one ally in” The speaker urges the United States to prioritize Israel and secure the return of Israelis, reaffirming support for its top ally. The statements call for halting funding to Iran, freeing hostages, and ensuring unwavering US backing for Israel.

The speaker criticizes the act of withholding Ukraine funding to push a partisan agenda on the border, stating that it is not the right approach. They emphasize the need for genuine solutions.

The United States has been sending hundreds of billions of dollars to support Ukraine's defense, with no end in sight, and with no security. Do you want to keep this going for another five years? Two thousand people, or more, are being killed every single week.

The speaker questions why the United States is involved in Ukraine instead of focusing on issues like border control, migration, and national debt. They suggest negotiating with Russia and reaching an agreement, understanding that Russia will fight for its interests. The speaker believes it would be smarter to respect Russia's interests and seek solutions through common sense.

Earlier today, military officers were warned about the potential consequences of unresolved issues on Capitol Hill. It was emphasized that if Republicans in the Senate do not show seriousness in finalizing a national security agreement, Vladimir Putin could take advantage and advance through Ukraine and Europe. Both parties acknowledge the importance of aiding Ukraine and resisting Putin for national security. However, Republicans are holding up progress due to unrealistic demands on border security. Democrats are willing to find a compromise, but if Republicans continue to insist on Donald Trump's border policies, they will be responsible for the failure of agreements on aid to Ukraine, Israel, and humanitarian aid to Gaza. It is crucial for Republicans to show willingness to moderate and reach a reasonable bipartisan compromise.