reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The chemical in 72% of American water systems is hexafluorosilicic acid. It is not pharmaceutical grade and is not manufactured for water treatment; it is captured from the smokestacks of phosphate fertilizer plants by pollution scrubbers. Regulators would classify it as toxic if it escaped into the atmosphere, and it would trigger an environmental emergency if it leaked into a river. Instead, it is shipped by tanker trucks to local utilities, diluted, and added to drinking water and used for cooking and bathing. The story is traced to decisions made decades earlier rather than through public approval. No national referendum approved fluoridation, no consent forms were signed by parents or grandparents, and in most communities no public hearing occurred. The policy is described as originating about 80 years ago with officials whose financial interests aligned with moving the substance from factories into water systems. The transcript links fluoridation to fluoride waste from aluminum refining in the early 20th century. A 1933 toxicology report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture singled out the aluminum industry as the biggest fluoride polluter. Lawsuits and environmental harms near Elco smelters are cited, including dying livestock and scorched vegetation. The 1930 Belgian Meuse Valley disaster is cited as having killed 60 people and identifying airborne fluorides as the primary cause. Disposal of fluoride is described as expensive, with Alcoa having large amounts. Andrew Mellon, founder and controlling shareholder of Alcoa and U.S. Treasury Secretary (1921–1932), is presented as an influential figure because the Public Health Service operated under Treasury jurisdiction. In 1931, the PHS is said to have sent a dentist, H. Trendley Dean, to study areas with naturally occurring fluoride. Towns with higher natural fluoride were reported to have fewer cavities, though they also had mottled, stained teeth. In 1931, Alcoa’s chief chemist is said to have identified fluoride as the cause of brown staining in Bauxite, Arkansas, an Alcoa company town. The transcript states that in 1939, Gerald Cox at the Mellon Institute (Alcoa’s research lab) fluoridated lab rats and declared the case for fluoride proved, then made the first public proposal to add fluoride to drinking water. It adds that U.S. public health regulations in 1939 stated that any water supply containing fluoride above 1 part per million should be rejected. Six years later, the same government is described as deliberately adding fluoride at 1 part per million, the stated threshold for rejection. A quoted comment attributed to a 2000 EPA scientist is used to describe the logic: fluoride is treated as a pollutant if released into air or water bodies, but not treated as a pollutant when added to drinking-water systems. On January 25, 1945, engineers at the Monroe Avenue Water Filtration Plant in Grand Rapids, Michigan, began adding sodium fluoride. Grand Rapids is described as the first city to fluoridate its drinking water, with Muskegon, Michigan, as the control. The comparative study is described as never finishing. The PHS is said to have endorsed fluoridation nationally by 1950, after which Muskegon demanded fluoridation, destroying the control group. The transcript also credits Oscar Ewing for accelerating the national campaign: in 1944 he joined Alcoa as lead counsel with a stated salary, then in 1947 was appointed to head the Federal Security Agency overseeing the Public Health Service, and the campaign used Edward Bernays as a public relations strategist. The transcript asserts that by the 1950s, supporters were uncomfortable with the speed and begins citing congressional concern, later European comparisons, and changing scientific consensus. It claims that fluoride’s mechanism is mainly topical and post-eruptive, and references a 2011 European Commission review stating no advantage of water fluoridation compared with topical fluoride application. It lists multiple European countries that did not fluoridate or stopped, while tooth-decay rates are described as declining at similar rates to the United States. A turning point is described as a September 24, 2024 ruling by U.S. District Judge Edward Chen. The case is described as reviewing the National Toxicology Program’s system and analyzing 72 epidemiological studies, concluding that fluoridation at 0.7 milligrams per liter poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children. The transcript says the EPA appealed on procedural grounds and did not contest that risk. It then states that after the ruling, Utah banned community water fluoridation (House Bill 81, signed March 27, 2025) and Florida followed, with more than 60 communities serving over nine million people ending, suspending, or preventing fluoridation. Examples include districts disconnecting fluoride equipment and reported costs for removal. The transcript argues that government action is now shifting to prevent similar challenges by proposing changes to the Toxic Substances Control Act, described as aiming to stop courts from doing what the case did. It concludes by reiterating that the policy continued for decades without public voting, presenting the chemical’s industrial origin and the alleged financial ties behind its promotion as central to the narrative.

Hillary Clinton's association with Lafarge, a cement corporation, is being questioned. She recently resigned from its board, along with two others. Lafarge has been accused of engaging in questionable practices. The company purchased a hazardous waste disposal company in 1986 and now burns hazardous waste in the same kilns used for cement production. While Lafarge claims this is a form of recycling, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources found emissions violations. Concerns about pollution and potential health risks have been raised by residents and officials. Clinton's involvement with Lafarge has become a campaign issue, particularly given her husband's environmental stance. Lafarge is also facing opposition in Texas, where they want to establish a similar facility. Local officials and residents are worried about potential pollution of the water supply.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world's largest private philanthropy, is facing criticism for its investments in companies that contribute to social and health problems. With investments in 69 of the worst polluting companies in the U.S. and Canada, the foundation is accused of causing harm while seeking to address these issues. Additionally, other companies in their portfolio have been accused of various transgressions, such as displacing people from their homes, supporting child labor, and neglecting patients in need of medical care.

The transcript traces a tapestry of questions around Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and the Clinton Foundation, emphasizing perceived links between philanthropic or diplomatic activity and private gain, while laying out specific Haiti and international case studies that critics say illustrate a pattern of influence peddling and blurred lines between public power and private wealth. Haiti after the 2010 earthquake: - After the January 12, 2010 earthquake, Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state, and Bill Clinton, as UN special envoy for Haiti, led relief and recovery efforts. The Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC) was created to coordinate relief and reconstruction, with Haitian Prime Minister John Max Bellarive and Bill Clinton named as co-chairs. - The IHRC aimed to go beyond relief to long-term improvement, but concerns emerged that decisions were being made by Clinton and Bellarive with insufficient Haitian input. Members of the IHRC later wrote a letter complaining they were not involved and that national priorities were being disregarded. - Projects associated with US funding and Clintons’ involvement included: the Haitian mobile money initiative; plans to exploit mineral wealth; two gold exploitation permits issued after a fifty-year gap; and the Karakol Industrial Park (Caracol) intended to create tens of thousands of jobs. - The Caracol opening drew high-profile attendance (Bill and Hillary Clinton, Donna Karan, Ben Stiller, Sean Penn). However, questions arose about value and transparency: only about 5,000 of the promised 65,000 jobs materialized; the area displaced farmers; local workers reported low wages (roughly 225 gourds/day, about $5 USD); and only a portion of promised infrastructure and housing funding was realized. - Digicel, run by Irish billionaire Dennis O’Brien, profited substantially in Haiti’s telecom sector, and later contributed to the Clinton Foundation; Digicel was a key beneficiary in mobile money initiatives tied to post-disaster relief. - Tony Rodham, Hillary Clinton’s brother, joined the board of VCS Mining, which received a gold exploitation permit in Haiti, prompting scrutiny about potential family influence in contracting decisions. - The strongest economic gains were tied to US-linked firms such as Gap, Target, and Walmart through Caracol’s textile emphasis, while other projects did not deliver promised outcomes. - After the campaign for president, Hillary Clinton announced she would quit the Clinton Foundation to devote herself to full-time candidacy, and the foundation adjusted donation policies to restrict foreign government contributions, though concerns persisted about ongoing influence and access resulting from prior relationships. Global money, influence, and the Clinton Foundation: - The Clinton Foundation, founded in 2001 (initially as the William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation), positioned itself as a hub at the nexus of global money, influence, and power, with a stated mission to tackle hunger, poverty, climate change, and disease by marshaling government and private resources. - The Foundation reportedly raised more than a billion dollars over the years, with substantial speaking fees and book deals contributing to the Clintons’ wealth, especially after Bill Clinton left the presidency. - Critics argue that large donors could gain access to or influence through the Clintons’ public roles, while supporters emphasize the Foundation’s global humanitarian work. A memorandum of understanding during the Obama transition sought accountability: disclosures of new contributions to the Foundation, prior approval for foreign government donations, and state department vetting of Bill Clinton’s speeches and consulting arrangements. Selected foreign cases cited by Peter Schweitzer in Clinton Cash: - United Arab Emirates (UAE): In 2011, while UAE officials pressed Hillary Clinton on Iran sanctions, Bill Clinton was paid half a million dollars for a speech in Abu Dhabi by the crown prince’s brother; UAE later provided donations to charitable groups associated with Clinton-linked initiatives. - Ericsson (Sweden): In 2009-2010, Ericsson paid Bill Clinton $750,000 for a speech amid ongoing Iran sanctions discussions, framed by the foundation’s influence and Clinton’s crowd-pulling. - Colombia: In 2010, Bill Clinton met with President Uribe and, contemporaneously, Hillary Clinton discussed free trade agreements with Uribe; Frank Giustra, a Clinton Foundation donor, accompanied Bill Clinton and later secured government concessions in Colombia for Giustra’s companies. - Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia: Sheikh Al Amoudi pledged $20 million to the Clinton Foundation; Ethiopian rights concerns were raised regarding the donor’s government ties, and Hillary Clinton granted a waiver allowing continued US assistance despite human rights concerns. - Kazakhstan and Uranium One: Bill Clinton hosted a meeting with Kazakh officials in which Giustra had significant mining interests; Uranium One eventually came under Russian ownership, controlled by Vladimir Putin, with the deal requiring federal approval from Hillary Clinton as secretary of state; Canadian investor Ian Telfer contributed to the Clinton Foundation but reportedly did not disclose some donations. The report concludes with ongoing debates about the Clinton “blur”—the intertwining of philanthropy, political power, and corporate influence—while noting that Hillary Clinton’s campaign faced persistent questions about trust and influence, including opposition to certain foreign deals and ongoing scrutiny of donations and relationships involving the Clinton Foundation and related business interests.

In 2008, a billion gallons of coal ash sludge spilled from a pond at the Kingston coal plant, covering 300 acres. Workers were sent to clean up what was then the worst environmental disaster. Many of these workers became sick, and some died, allegedly due to exposure during the cleanup. Workers described arriving for cleanup with breathing problems and bloodshot eyes. A lawsuit was filed, and the workers won. They claimed they were told the coal ash was harmless, even safe to eat. Despite their health issues, they were allegedly told there was no problem. The speaker emphasizes the importance of remembering this event and its implications for worker protections across industries. The workers felt lied to and taken advantage of, with deadly consequences for some.

Speaker 0: An early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton to her campaign manager, John Podesta, states that ISIL ISIS is funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This email is described as the most significant in the collection. Speaker 1: The discussion notes that Saudi and Qatari money is spread widely, including to many media institutions. While some analysts and even the US government have mentioned that some Saudi figures have supported or funded ISIS, the typical explanation has been that it’s rogue princes using oil money with the government disapproving. The email, however, asserts that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been funding ISIS. Speaker 1: It is claimed that Saudis, Qataris, Moroccans, Bahrainis—particularly the Saudis and the Qataris—are giving money to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton is secretary of state, and the State Department is approving massive arms sales to Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0: Hillary Clinton says, “I’m Hillary Clinton,” and emails reveal a significant discussion about it. The email asserts that the largest ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia, more than $80,000,000,000. It states that during her tenure as secretary of state, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value doubled. Speaker 1: The consequence noted is that the notorious terrorist jihadist group ISIL or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation. The implication highlighted is that this is extraordinary.

After a recent fiery derailment, a couple noticed dead fish in Leslie Run, causing them to be concerned about the safety of the area's water and groundwater. The EPA is now facing numerous concerns regarding the environmental impact. However, the EPA claims that the levels of contamination are not harmful to groundwater and that residential wells are protected. Environmental cleanup crews and booms have been deployed to prevent further contamination.

Hillary Clinton's resignation from the Lafarge board, where she served since 1990, comes amid scrutiny over the company's practices. Lafarge, a French-owned cement plant in Alpena, Michigan, has faced allegations of environmental violations, including burning hazardous waste in its kilns. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources cited Lafarge for exceeding legal emissions limits, which the company disputes. Clinton's board membership raised concerns due to her husband's environmental stance, especially as Lafarge seeks to build a similar facility in New Braunfels, Texas, facing strong local opposition. Residents worry about potential pollution affecting their water supply. Lafarge insists it will not proceed with the Texas project until safety is assured. Meanwhile, the Alpena community expresses anxiety about the plant's impact on their environment and future.

- Indianapolis residents organized to stop Google's proposed $1,000,000,000 AI data center on a 500-acre site, which reportedly would have used 1,000,000 gallons of water per day. Google withdrew its petition to build, preventing a city council vote. Community members described the victory as “we beat Google,” while warning the fight isn’t over and noting tactics used by a secretive tech company in Saint Charles, Missouri. Residents voiced fears about water supply, contamination, and rising electricity costs, with one farmer stressing the risk to livelihoods if water is unavailable. - The victory was celebrated as a win for community power, though participants cautioned that Google could reappear with a new plan in a few months. The broader context included concerns that big tech seeks data centers in communities, potentially impacting water and energy prices, and the possibility of revisiting projects once opposition fades. - An NPR overview on America’s AI industry highlighted concerns about data centers depleting local water supplies for cooling, driving up electricity bills, and worsening climate change if powered by fossil fuels. The IEA warns climate pollution from power plants serving data centers could more than double by 2035. In the Great Lakes region, water utilities, industry, and power plants draw from a shared resource; questions arise about how much more water the lakes can provide for data centers and associated power needs. - Examples cited include Georgia where residents reported drinking-water problems after a nearby data center was built; Arizona cities restricting water deliveries to high-demand facilities. The Data Center Coalition notes efforts to reduce water use through evaporative cooling versus closed-loop systems; a Google data center in Georgia reportedly uses treated wastewater for cooling and returns it to the Chattahoochee River. There is a push toward waterless cooling, with a balancing act described: more electricity to cool means less water, and vice versa. - Rising electricity bills are a major concern as data centers increase power demand. A UCS analysis found that in 2024, homes and businesses in several states faced $4.3 billion in additional costs from transmission projects needed to deliver power to data centers. The dialogue includes questioning why centers aren’t built along coastlines where desalination could be used at the companies’ own expense, arguing inland siting imposes greater resource strain on residents. - Financial concerns extend to tax incentives for data centers. GoodJobsFirst.org reports that at least 10 states lose more than $100,000,000 annually in tax revenue to data centers; Texas revised its cost projection for 2025 from $130,000,000 to $1,000,000,000 within 23 months. The group calls for canceling data center tax exemption programs, capping exemptions, pausing programs, and robust public disclosure. - The narrative concludes with a call to resist placing data centers in established communities, urging organized action and advocating for desalination and energy infrastructure funded by the data centers themselves. A personal anecdote about Rick Hill’s cancer recovery via Laotryl B17 and enzyme therapies is tied to a promotional plug: rncstore.com/pages/ricksbundle, discount code pulse for 10% off, promoting Laotryl B17 and related detox/purity kits.

During Hillary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State, she allegedly directed $3.1 billion to Haiti. Her brother, Tony Rodham, who sat on the board of a mining company, obtained one of only two gold exploitation permits issued by the government in over 50 years. The permit granted them a mining rate of 2.5%, which is half the standard rate, causing dissatisfaction among the Haitian Congress. For more details, please check the link provided in the comment section.

The Clinton Foundation received $26 million from a Swedish fundraising arm while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state and not blacklisting Swedish companies for breaking sanctions against Iran. This, along with other evidence, suggests a quid pro quo. Bill Clinton also received his largest speech payment of $750,000 from Ericsson, a Swedish company involved in the Iran debate. Shortly after, the State Department, led by Hillary Clinton, announced they would not impose sanctions on companies like Ericsson, allowing them to self-regulate. This pattern of behavior, where the Clintons receive financial benefits while making favorable decisions, is seen repeatedly. The public's concern about corruption and self-enrichment by politicians is reflected in Hillary's declining poll numbers.

Hillary Clinton's association with Lafarge, a corporation accused of unethical practices, is being questioned. Lafarge, a French-owned cement plant, has been accused of accepting hazardous waste and burning it alongside cement production. The company claims this is a form of recycling, but there have been emissions violations and concerns about pollution. Clinton, who was on Lafarge's board of directors since 1990, recently resigned due to her involvement in her husband's campaign. Lafarge's plans to build a similar facility in Texas have faced opposition from local residents and officials, who are worried about potential pollution. The cement plant in Alpena, Michigan, which has provided jobs for the town, may now contribute to residents leaving due to environmental concerns.

Voters in Green Charter Township, Michigan, voted out their entire town board due to the board's support for a controversial battery plant linked to the Chinese government. A locksmith changed the locks on the officials' former offices. According to a NewsNation correspondent, the ousted supervisor took his desk and other items, leaving the office empty. The clerk's office is also empty. The new board members plan to move in and prioritize stopping the battery plant project.

I'm bringing attention to potential corruption involving the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI). An amendment was proposed to prevent taxpayer funds from being used for State Department employees to attend CGI events due to concerns about corruption and influence peddling. In one instance, Hillary Clinton allegedly approached the Moroccan government about hosting a CGI conference in Morocco. The Moroccans funneled money through a state-owned enterprise extracting phosphates from a disputed territory, seemingly condoning Morocco's sovereignty over the land in exchange for cash as Clinton began her run for president. There were also undisclosed donations linked to the sale of US uranium production to a Russian agency. The CGI has now been resurrected, and it has since morphed into a factory of radical elitist woke schemes. This amendment aims to prevent the State Department from coordinating with the CGI, sending a message against corruption and foreign influence on US policy.

Hillary Clinton campaigns in Indiana, highlighting the story of Magnaquench, a company that moved from Indiana to China in 2003, resulting in job losses. However, she fails to mention that her husband, Bill Clinton, was president when the Chinese bought Magnaquench in 1995. Despite security concerns, his administration approved the deal. Clinton argues that the Chinese now have access to our secrets, but a former Magnaquench vice president states that the Chinese already had that knowledge by 2003. Clinton emphasizes the need to elect a president who will remember Magnaquench.

A wind turbine caught fire and collapsed due to lightning and wind damage. Despite the need for energy, none of the turbines in the wind farm were turning. The burning turbine was damaged by a tornado, with smoke containing chemicals and fiberglass. Old turbine blades were found dumped, questioning the true renewable nature of wind energy projects.

Haitian activists protested outside Hillary Clinton's Manhattan office, accusing the Haiti Reconstruction Commission, led by Bill Clinton, of stealing billions of dollars. They alleged that foreign governments used Haiti as a cover to funnel kickbacks, possibly totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, through the Clinton Foundation. The activists claimed that these actions were done in exchange for favors Hillary did as secretary of state. Their goal was to inform Americans about these crimes and discourage them from voting for Hillary if she runs for president. In January, they also rallied outside Bill Clinton's office in Harlem.

Bill Clinton's Wikipedia page has recently seen the removal of references to his connections with Jeffrey Epstein. Previously, Epstein was mentioned 47 times, detailing their extensive relationship. However, on July 22, all mentions were deleted, leaving only a footnote related to Jennifer Epstein. Despite numerous documented instances of Clinton's friendship with Epstein, including photographs and threats against news outlets discussing it, no edits have been made since the deletion. This raises questions about the timing and motivations behind the removal of these connections from Clinton's page.

In 2010, the Clinton Foundation received $1 billion for Haiti after the earthquake, but less than 2% actually reached Haiti. The Haitian community wants Trump to ask Hillary Clinton to reveal where the money went during the next debate.

Congressional investigators are being asked if Hillary Clinton gave 20% of the US uranium supply to Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. The question stems from the 2010 sale of Uranium One, a company controlling a fifth of US uranium, to Rosatom, a Russian firm. The US part of the deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, comprised of nine agencies, including the State Department, where Hillary Clinton was the boss at the time. The Hill newspaper reported that the FBI was investigating a Rosatom subsidiary for racketeering, money laundering, and bribes aimed at giving Russia more influence over the US nuclear industry while the deal was being approved. Some members of Congress want to know why they weren't told about this. The Hill also reports that the Russians were channeling millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation at the same time. Republicans are questioning if Hillary Clinton helped this deal along.

Hillary Clinton recently resigned from the board of Lafarge, a cement company under scrutiny for its hazardous waste practices. The Lafarge plant in Alpena, Michigan, has been a local economic staple but faces criticism for burning hazardous waste as fuel, which has led to emissions violations. Residents express concerns about pollution and health risks associated with dioxins. Clinton's board membership raised questions, especially given her husband's environmental stance. Lafarge is also facing opposition for a proposed facility in New Braunfels, Texas, where local officials worry about potential water contamination. Despite the company's claims of environmental responsibility, community members fear the impact on their health and environment.

A company backed by a billionaire hedge fund is attempting to drill 30 industrial wells into the Carrizo Wilcox Aquifer in rural East Texas, potentially extracting 15 billion gallons of water per year. This water would be piped out of the area and sold, while local communities that rely on the aquifer would face depleted water levels and dry wells. The well drilling company hired for the project is owned by Donald A. Foster, who until recently, served on the groundwater district board responsible for reviewing the permits. Public records allegedly do not show Foster recusing himself from discussions or votes regarding the project, except for one vote in April 2025. He was present during discussions of this project and even participated in closed sessions where this project was discussed. Foster resigned from the board the day before a public hearing on the issue.

Mining uses toxic chemicals and creates hazardous waste, yet is needed for green technologies. Demand for minerals is expected to increase 400-600%. Years ago, a proposal for Pebble Mine in Alaska was vetoed by the EPA due to environmental concerns, despite scientific studies. A Republican administration removed the EPA veto, but President Biden vetoed it again. Environmental groups and regulators have allegedly killed new mines in America, with permitting taking decades. The Biden administration dealt a blow to Twin Metals mine plans. Environmental groups oppose American mines, but clean energy needs minerals. Windmills, solar panels, and batteries require a massive increase in minerals. The NRDC didn't provide examples of mines they support. The Green Movement has been happy outsourcing mining to disadvantaged countries with child labor. America has child labor laws, safer equipment, and environmental rules. America once led in mineral production, but now depends on other countries. Society can't exist without mines.

Wildfires in Los Angeles have the potential to spread rapidly, threatening structures. Amidst this crisis, questions arise regarding the absence of Mayor Karen Bass. While the fires broke out, Mayor Bass was in Africa. Upon her return, she remained silent when reporters asked critical questions about her absence during the disaster. The decision to endorse Karen Bass was a mistake. Now, calls for her resignation are growing louder.

Hillary Clinton resigned from the board of Lafarge, a corporation accused of engaging in questionable practices. Lafarge, a French-owned cement plant, has been accepting hazardous waste and burning it in the same kilns used for cement production. The company claims this is a form of recycling. However, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources found emissions violations above legal limits. Concerns have been raised about the health effects of the emissions, including high cancer rates and birth defects. Clinton's presence on the board was seen as a potential campaign issue, given her husband's environmental stance. Lafarge is also facing opposition in Texas, where they want to build a similar facility. Local officials and residents are concerned about potential pollution of the water supply.