reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Air marshals are currently not conducting regular missions to find criminals. Instead, they are focused on Quiet Skies missions, which involve following individuals who flew into the National Capital Region in January 2021. These people are not necessarily connected to the Capitol incident but have been placed on a list for air marshals to monitor. Even individuals who were in the region for reasons like job interviews or funerals have been included. Some of these individuals are aware of being followed due to enhanced security measures at airports. However, they have not been investigated or committed any crimes. This monitoring has been ongoing for three years, despite these individuals posing no threat to the country.

I feel a deep sense of betrayal upon learning that I am on the "quiet skies" list, labeled as a potential domestic terrorist by my own government. After serving in the military for over 21 years to combat Islamist terrorism, it is shocking to be targeted in this way. The Biden Harris administration's focus on domestic terrorism has led to the weaponization of institutions against Americans. The lack of transparency and accountability in these secret lists is concerning, with no explanation given for being labeled a threat. Legal action is being taken to address this unjust targeting of political opponents.

Learning about being added to the terror watch list confirmed my suspicions about political retaliation, especially after my appearance on Fox News discussing Kamala Harris. The real stress comes from wondering how the government is surveilling me and what other lists I might be on. TSA's focus seems to be on covering their tracks rather than addressing the abuse of power. This situation aims to create a chilling effect on free speech, discouraging people from expressing their views. I'm pursuing legal action to uncover the truth about these secretive watch lists and ensure accountability. We must recognize the implications of this surveillance state and take action in the upcoming elections to protect our constitutional rights.

I have been accused, and it's been a paid campaign, of being a federal agent because I was at January 6 and did not get charged. However, despite being at January 6 and not trespassing, which is the crime that everybody was charged with, despite not being charged, not having committed a crime, I only had my bank account frozen for six months, I only was placed on the federal no fly list for a year, and I was only subpoenaed by Congress. I testified under oath when I was deposed as part of the subpoena last year, or I think that was rather in 2022, that I did not ever have contact with federal law enforcement at any time during or after any of the election riots or protests. This was a narrative that was cooked up. Nobody was saying this in 2021 or 2022 because all of my legal problems were publicized. I was on the no fly list, I had my money taken, I was banned from everything. It was only after Joe Kent was defeated in 2022 in the midterms that Max Blumenthal, Joe Kent's best friend, wrote a three part hit piece about me with his wife, Anya Parampol, accusing me of being a fed. They paid people, someone paid people, on Influencible to spread this article and the narrative that I'm a Fed. The claim grew that I gave a speech outside the Capitol and I said, we're taking the Capitol back, keep moving. They say I incited people to go in the building. The report says that none of their confidential sources on the ground were encouraging people to go in the building. There were undercover operatives or informants tasked to do that, but there were no undercover agents and out of 26 informants none of them were doing that. If the claim was I was entrapping people, that wasn't happening. The report also says that all the confidential sources were known to law enforcement before and were interviewed afterward. If I were one of the confidential sources, why would they make the mistake of freezing my money and putting me on the no fly list? The New York Times said they did charge me. I testified under oath that I never talked to law enforcement under penalty of perjury. So if anything, they’ve been saying Trump is gonna get in and blow the whistle. I wish he would on January 6 because if anything comes out, they could arrest me for perjury. I spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending myself from the feds; lawyers aren’t cheap. My lawyers, not cheap. I probably spent over 200,000, close to 250,000 in legal fees. All the money that I was given by the mysterious French donor, nearly all of it after it was unfrozen, I wound up spending on legal fees. I had to borrow money from people because my bank account was frozen for six months. I missed weddings of my best friends, funerals of my best friends because I was on the federal no fly list. I haven’t had banking services for four years. I haven’t been able to process a credit card for my business. I’ve been banned from everything—Facebook, Instagram; Twitter until May, not even a year ago. For years I spent defending myself from attacks as a racist and a Nazi and a Holocaust denier, then the tactic switched to accusing me of law enforcement, then gay, pedophile, the usual. The grand irony is that Tucker Carlson, a close friend of Max Blumenthal, collaborated on the piece; Tucker Carlson’s father is a federal agent, and during January 6 Tucker Carlson was not talking about election fraud and said he hated Trump. I’m pulling the veil back a little bit, because this is politics. The election was stolen, and there are these dynamics with Blumenthal, Kent, Tucker, and Max Blumenthal’s wife’s article in The Grey Zone.

Air marshals are currently not on regular missions but are instead following individuals who flew into the National Capital Region in January 2021. These people have been put on a list by the TSA, even if they did not commit a crime or attend the Capitol rally. Passengers on flights may have air marshals following them if they have the "quad assist" on their boarding pass. Despite not being a threat, these individuals have been followed for three years. Average passengers should be concerned and should look for potential help from other passengers in case of an emergency, as there will be no law enforcement assistance.

The discussion centers on a rapid escalation of online activity described as military bot operations, which the speakers associate with attempts to cancel Candace Owens from Australia after October 7. They note a pattern in which bot activity appears when certain topics are discussed, including Fort Huachuca, the Obas Gai, and Cairo/African plains references, tying these to an eyewitness who insists he saw Brian Harpole and believed there was an all-hands-on-deck meeting the day before. The speakers stress a broader pattern of activity on the same day and say they verified the eyewitness’s account with people stationed at the base. A longer clip from Baron Coleman is introduced, focusing on what it means to see a SAM call sign on a plane, especially those flying from Andrews outside Washington, D.C. Coleman argues that a key piece of evidence in Candace Owens’ story is a jet used exclusively by few people—presidential family members, cabinet officials, and military generals at the Pentagon—present at the location of a high-level meeting the morning of September 9, the day before Charlie Kirk’s alleged neutralization. The jet is described as a Special Air Mission (SAM) jet; the conversation explains that SAM call signs designate flights carrying high-ranking officials, with Air Force One and Air Force Two as the corresponding designated callsigns when the president or vice president is aboard. The flight logs show a jet with the rarely used SAM000 call sign, which indicates a highly sensitive passenger manifest, traveling on August 25 from Joint Base Andrews to Colorado Springs (home of the 10th Special Forces Group), then to Las Vegas, and later a return leg to Joint Base Andrews as SAM658. Speaker 0 questions whether this pattern means a very important person traveled on the flight, noting the call sign changes from a high-priority SAM to an RCH (a less VIP designation) and later to SAM as the VIP reappears. They discuss the possibility that someone significant either boarded or disembarked in Las Vegas, with Venus noted as an empty-flight designation when only the pilots are aboard. The timeline is tied to Brian Harpole’s statements about UVU event preparations, with the August 24 date identified as when intel gathering and hard conversations began, described by Harpole as starting two weeks prior and documented in a decentralized command app. The speakers compare this to “Operation Valhalla,” which they say began on August 24 and ended on August 27. They observe that on August 25, a VIP flight to Colorado Springs occurred, the same day the aircraft flew to Las Vegas, after which the log shows an RCH designation on a subsequent leg, suggesting a less-than-top-tier passenger on that leg. The speaker notes they have multiple emails confirming Fort Huachuca as an intelligence base, reinforcing the claim that the base is linked to covert missions rather than routine operations. They express a belief in the credibility of the eyewitness account about Harpole and say they plan to feature the testimony and related details, including additional flight logs (referred to as the finishing touch on SUBTV) and visuals from a car investigation, on kennethowens.com or similar platforms. The overarching aim is to explore whether Egyptian planes are connected to Israel, which they say would explain a mass panic. They emphasize continuing to pursue these narratives while minimizing distractions from “timelines and delivering this information.”

Migrants were flown on a Delta Airlines flight to New York City, funded by taxpayers. The speaker documented the lack of proper screenings and identification for these individuals. Pilots have reported a significant increase in transporting migrants, with little information provided to them. Delta representatives followed the speaker after the incident. The speaker plans to continue investigating and urges others with information to come forward. The government's influence on airlines and funding sources for these operations are questioned. No official response from Delta has been received. The speaker will continue to monitor and update on the situation.

Migrants were seen boarding a Delta Airlines flight from Phoenix to New York City, with the cost being covered by American taxpayers. The Delta representative's response to concerns about proper screening was dismissive, stating that the migrants are humans too. The video footage captured by Ashley St. Clair, a Babylon Bee contributor, revealed that these individuals lacked proper identification and were even using arrest warrants as identification. The migrants are being transported to various destinations across the country, including sanctuary cities. Pilots have reported that approximately 10 to 20% of flights now consist of these migrants, and they are left uninformed about who is boarding their planes. Delta has not yet provided an official response to these concerns.

Prosecutions have primarily targeted individuals who entered the building or engaged in violent conduct on Capitol grounds. However, anyone who knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization committed a federal crime. It’s clear that thousands occupied an area where they were not authorized to be.

At the Tucson airport, a sign indicates that non-US citizens without passports should enter a specific line. Surprisingly, TSA allows an arrest warrant as a valid form of ID for illegal aliens. If an arrest warrant can secure a domestic flight for them, it raises the question of why it can't lead to their arrest. As a member of Congress with TSA pre-check, I must verify my identity. If my airline ticket lists my name as Wesley J Hunt, I cannot board the plane, highlighting the inconsistency in the system.

There has been a debate about the presence of federal agents at the January 6 event. Initially, it was denied, but now it is confirmed that there were indeed federal agents in the crowd. It is not uncommon for federal agencies to have people in plain clothes for situational awareness at large events like demonstrations and inaugurations. The FBI took overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6 event. A GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 18 or 19 domestic terrorists planning to attend the event. It is concerning that this information was not shared with intelligence. It is important to deconflict and communicate with the Chief of Capitol Police to avoid any confusion or conflicts.

I received a call from someone in Great Britain asking about federal agents in the crowd. I denied their presence, assuming I would have been informed. However, later I learned that there were indeed federal agents present. This was confirmed by Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021, where she mentioned the FBI taking overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6th event in DC. In February 2023, a GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists on January 3rd, which increased to 18 or 19 by January 6th. It's reasonable to have resources and multiple agents for such a situation, but it's concerning that this information wasn't shared in intelligence.

Tulsi Gabbard was placed on a domestic terror watch list after criticizing the Biden administration. She views it as political retaliation and a violation of her rights. Surveillance includes explosive detection teams and air marshals on her flights. Gabbard questions what other government agencies may be monitoring her. She believes this is an attempt to silence critics and calls for those responsible to be held accountable. She stresses the importance of freedom and privacy in the United States.

We are committed to ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in elections, and so far, there is no evidence of noncitizen voting. However, there have been instances where noncitizens voted; this year, 135 were identified as having voted, with another 400 registered but not yet voting. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean we shouldn't have measures in place to prevent it, similar to how we maintain TSA for air travel security.

Last week, there were reports of TSA air marshals following people who were in DC during the January 6th incident, even though they were not involved. This raised concerns about the government's intrusive surveillance. The pressure to prevent future incidents like this seems to be leading to unjust arrests. Even if people were let into the Capitol by the police and encouraged by federal agents, the authorities deny any involvement. The situation is ethically inappropriate and would have caused outrage if it had been done by the right.

Illegals at the Miami airport can use the CBP one app as a valid ID to board planes in the US. The app allows migrants to claim asylum and enter the country, even if they have committed crimes. The app does not require photos and does not store biographical information. This raises concerns as illegal immigrants from countries on terror watch lists can use this process, while American citizens are required to have a real ID by 2025 to board flights. This discrepancy is difficult to justify.

The Biden administration is allowing migrants to bypass ID checks at airports, raising security concerns. A recent DHS report reveals that illegal migrants can use the CBP One app instead of traditional identification, even choosing whether to allow officers to take their photo. This practice may inadvertently increase national security risks, according to the inspector general. A DHS spokesperson disputed the report, claiming it lacks context. However, the national security director for air marshals emphasized that unvetted individuals on flights pose a threat, as they can repeatedly fly without proper identification, often on taxpayer-funded flights.

Many people entered the Capitol building without permission, which is a federal crime. Our focus is on prosecuting those who entered the building or engaged in violent or corrupt behavior on Capitol grounds. However, it's important to note that even those who entered the restricted area without authorization committed a federal crime. Thousands of people occupied an area where they were not allowed to be in the first place.

Speaker A: We're on the list because we were at a party or a wedding or something that somebody might have been. That's what I found out anyway. The guy was at Trump's wedding to Marla. Right. Maybe Epstein was there too. Who knows? I don't know. So that means that I'm not guilty, obviously. But these other ones, how are you going to decide who's really guilty and who's not? Speaker B: It's very tricky. I think it no. I think it's it's very I think it's very clear because when you when if you look, you know why my name is there. Because someone was looking for a plane, and that's what people do. They go to all the people who have private planes and say, do you have one? I didn't get on the plane? I didn't know they were looking for a plane. Yeah. I had no idea that the plane that I was supposed to be on was no longer available. So so I'm named in there like Whoopi Goldberg is needs a plane. There are a lot of people—Speaker A: that are named Marilyn Monroe was on the list. Yes. There were plenty of people that were were plenty of people named in in the list that that may have not done anything wrong. Yeah. But I think that there are a lot of people that are on their list that are guilty of wrongdoing. Speaker A: And I have no confidence, unfortunately. It gives me no pleasure to say I— Speaker B: I think they are going to hold on, Joy. I think they are going to they're going to do it like, you know, how you eat around an apple till you get to the core? Yes. I think that's how they're gonna do it. They're gonna eat all this stuff all around here. I need a of gonna get, hopefully, then they'll get to the court.

The chairman of the January 6th select committee, Benny Thompson, sent a letter to the TSA requesting a briefing on efforts to address the travel of white supremacists and domestic terrorist groups. They also wanted information on denying air carriers service to potential threats and the status of evidence to identify such individuals. The TSA then instructed air marshals to track Trump supporters who had arrived in DC on January 4th, 5th, or 6th, even if they hadn't been charged with a crime. This tracking is still ongoing. The letter was signed by Bennie Thompson and John Katko, advising the TSA to use their authority to track these individuals.

Air marshals are currently not on most flights, as they are primarily focused on following individuals who flew into the National Capital Region in January 2021. These people are not necessarily connected to the Capitol incident but have been placed on a domestic terrorist list based on their geographic location. Although they have not committed any crimes, they are being monitored by air marshals during their travels. Passengers should be concerned and take precautions, such as identifying potential helpers and being aware of exit doors and flight attendants. It is suggested to look for individuals who can provide assistance if needed.

Air marshals are currently not on regular missions due to the Quiet Skies program, which focuses on individuals who flew into the National Capital Region in January 2021. These people are being followed by air marshals despite not having committed any crimes. Even those who were not present at the Capitol on January 6th are being tracked if they flew into the area. Passengers should be concerned for their safety and consider identifying potential allies on the plane in case of an emergency. The Department of Justice's focus on monitoring these individuals instead of targeting terrorists or criminals is alarming. This information needs to be shared widely to address the issue.

I flew into Tucson and realized it was packed, so I don't recommend flying out of there. Despite being a loyal American Airlines customer, I advise against flying with them right now. On my flight, there were many individuals with paper IDs who were likely not attending the Trump rally. It's frustrating to pay full price while they use our tax dollars to enter the country. The security line for these individuals is longer, and the smell is unpleasant. If you voted for Biden, you're responsible for this situation. Some of them even complained about the TSA taking too long. Boarding for flight 2926 to Dallas is about to begin. If you still support Democrats in Tucson, you're foolish.

I want to emphasize that the recent aviation incidents will likely raise concerns about FAA and air traffic control staffing. Even though a recent incident occurred in a Canadian air traffic control tower, the discussion about potential staff cuts at the FAA, under the previous administration, is relevant. The FAA has been expressing concerns about being understaffed in critical positions, particularly air traffic control, for years. While air traffic control may not be affected by staff cuts so far, other positions related to maintaining critical equipment may have been cut. All of these recent incidents will feed into concerns about the safety of the air traffic system going forward, at least on this side of the border.

The National Guard and Marines are being stationed at federal buildings across the country where riots are taking place, not deployed against US citizens. They remain on federal property to provide security for those buildings. If people do not storm the federal building or attack the National Guard, they will not be attacked. As an investigative journalist who covers protests, the speaker says they stood two inches from the National Guard, who did nothing. The National Guard is not allowed to operate in a law enforcement capacity because the cities will not allow it.