TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

On September 30th, the speaker and their group went to the FBI to report the state's elected attorney general for a crime. However, they admitted that they did not have any evidence to support their claim.

In Texas, there is breaking news about the removal of Ken Paxton, the attorney general who was fighting against election fraud. Republicans, known as "rhinos," are working with Democrats to expel him. This is part of a larger battle between the people and the establishment, not just Republicans versus Democrats. The establishment is trying to silence those who expose election fraud, like Liz Harris in Arizona. They are also targeting Donald Trump because they fear he will run and win in 2024. It is important to recognize that many Republicans are not acting in good faith and are supporting the continuation of election fraud. We need to remove these dishonest individuals and be aware that our elections are being stolen.

The speaker admits to reporting the attorney general to the FBI without evidence of any criminal activity. When questioned about this, the speaker avoids directly answering and instead emphasizes their "good faith belief" that a crime had occurred. They also claim to have not collected any evidence after making the complaint. The questioning becomes tense as the speaker is repeatedly asked if they had any evidence to support their claims, but they continue to evade a direct answer.

In this video, Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about their testimony in court regarding a memo outlining potential investigations. Speaker 0 argues that it was misleading and wrong to testify about possibilities and maybes. Speaker 1 defends their answers, stating that they were discussing the memo and its purpose. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's claims, suggesting that the Democrat district attorney was excited about pursuing investigations against Ken Paxton. Speaker 1 disagrees with the characterization and explains that the feds waved them off. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1's credibility and suggests they would never engage in criminal activity. Speaker 1 denies this and clarifies their stance. The video ends with Speaker 0 highlighting that Speaker 1 applied for a job at the AG's office after writing the memo, with a letter of recommendation from Margaret Moore.

The speaker asserts that Texas lied to prosecute the T-Mobile whistleblower and that the case exposes information Americans aren’t supposed to know. A key claim is that a conservative constitutional judge from Collin County was replaced days before the trial with a retired liberal judge from Dallas, which the speaker suspects allowed a juror to be planted in the jury. During jury selection, defense and state weeded 50 people down to eight, but the judge ultimately selects the jurors. The state prosecution allegedly lied about the gated community entry, claiming a security guard was present and that the speaker snuck in, a claim the speaker says is false and used to portray him as a dangerous stalker. The T-Mobile executive allegedly stated he feared for his life and his family’s safety, yet the speaker notes the executive flew to Bellevue, Washington, to T-Mobile’s headquarters the next day, arguing it contradicted the notion of a genuine threat from the speaker. The state prosecuted by obtaining all of the speaker’s social media from Ex Twitter, Instagram, Substack, and the speaker learned of this only when Instagram notified him. The state and T-Mobile labeled the speaker a violent threat for discussing his guns in self-defense, with a cited tweet and related materials used in the case. The speaker claims that his communications—tweets, videos, a long-form website—were censored, and that he then went guerrilla with flyers and a self-defense stance described as “staccato for self defense.” During sentencing, the state subpoenaed a police officer who arrested the speaker sixteen years earlier for a felony marijuana charge, with deferred adjudication and probation completed in 2008, to portray the speaker as a still-active drug dealer. The state reportedly shared some of the whistleblower story but downplayed that T-Mobile violated Texas Health and Safety Code chapter 81 d by discriminating against the speaker for being unvaccinated. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to share the story, claiming it exposes corruption among elected officials and corporations.

On September 30th, the speaker and their group went to the FBI to report the state's elected attorney general for a crime. However, they admitted that they did not have any evidence to support their claim.

Speaker 0 asks if Democrats risk playing into the president's hands by focusing on the Kilmaro Burgo Garcia case. Speaker 1 responds that they don't know of any Democrat who defended Garcia. They claim Garcia was falsely arrested and removed from the country. They allege "they" are making up things about Garcia, such as associating him with MS 13 or claiming he coordinated the January 6 attack, even though he has never been prosecuted or convicted of any crime.

The speaker urges the chairman to move forward with impeachment, questioning the delay and cost to taxpayers. The other speaker defends the process, stating they are following facts and oversight. The first speaker challenges them to call for impeachment if they truly believe in the evidence. Ultimately, the first speaker believes the impeachment efforts are a show without substance, claiming it will never happen due to lack of evidence and support.

The speaker accuses the attorney general of committing fraud and calls the entire case a fraud. They believe it is election interference and is preventing them from being in Iowa and New Hampshire. The speaker strongly asserts that the attorney general is a fraud who has committed fraud.

The Texas House impeachment managers released documents online that included Ken Paxton's personal address and GPS coordinates, despite the trial being over. The managers claim they didn't use the documents due to time limits, issues with responses, and witnesses pleading the 5th Amendment. In Texas, it's a misdemeanor to maliciously post someone's address or phone number online. The Republican Party of Texas chairman believes the managers should be charged. One of Paxton's attorneys stated that the managers are determined to harm Paxton and will do whatever it takes to disrupt their lives. The speaker concludes by telling them to stop because the trial is over.

An accounting expert testified that there was no fraud in President Trump's financial statements. He stated that the statements were undervalued and that Trump had nothing to hide. The expert criticized the attorney general for investigating a private company and violating constitutional rights. Despite a gag order, the expert plans to testify on Monday. The speaker expressed frustration with the trial, calling it election interference and garbage claims. They believe the outcome was predetermined and that there is no case. The speaker hopes this serves as a lesson to other attorneys general and district attorneys trying to make a name for themselves.

The attorney general, Dana Nessel, claims that none of the 16 people who signed the document as Michigan electors for the 2020 presidential election were legally elected or qualified. The speaker denies this, stating that they were duly elected Trump 2020 electors and followed instructions to submit documentation. They believe Nessel is working with Jack Smith to dismantle Trump's campaign and that this is a personal attack. The speaker suggests that the Democrats are using lawfare to target Trump and his supporters. They question whether Nessel will imprison elderly Republicans involved in this. Overall, the speaker sees this as a show and a performance to go after Trump and his supporters.

The speaker discusses the selective evidence and rigged cases surrounding the January 6th incident at the Capitol. They argue that the prosecutors, DOJ, and FBI have created a two-tier system of justice by hiding certain evidence and distributing others to maintain a false narrative of an insurrection. They also mention the attempt to remove Donald Trump from the ballot and highlight the connections between the law firm representing the group pushing for his removal and individuals like Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, and Gina Haspel. The speaker questions the logic behind accusing Trump of insurrection when he did not order the deployment of the National Guard.

We've faced years of politically motivated attacks from the New York Attorney General, who campaigned on targeting me. Despite millions of pages of documents and extensive litigation, they lack evidence against us. The only witness they have is a convicted felon who has recanted his statements. We've already won in the Court of Appeals, but the judge has been slow to acknowledge that. This case is unprecedented, using a consumer fraud statute inappropriately, and feels like a witch hunt and election interference. Despite these challenges, our poll numbers are strong, and the American people understand the situation. Thank you for your support.

I'm here instead of campaigning due to a court case. The prosecution has no evidence of a crime, and experts believe the case should be dismissed. The trial is seen as an attack on Biden and a political move. The justice system is being questioned, and the judge is criticized for bias. Many feel it's a miscarriage of justice and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is viewed as corrupt and unfair. Thank you. Translation: The speaker is not campaigning due to a court case where the prosecution lacks evidence of a crime. Experts suggest dismissing the case. The trial is seen as a political attack on Biden, questioning the justice system and criticizing the biased judge. Many view it as unjust and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is perceived as corrupt and unfair. Thank you.

The attorney general found no fraud or accounting fraud in this case. The speaker believes this is a political witch hunt orchestrated by the White House to influence the election. They claim that the judge and attorney general manipulated the values of properties like Mar-a-Lago and Doral to deceive the court. The speaker argues that the case should be ended and criticizes the judge for not acknowledging a higher court's rebuke. They believe this is a weaponization of justice and election interference. The speaker expresses frustration at being in court instead of campaigning in Iowa, despite leading by a large margin.

The speaker claims that someone received 14,000,000 votes but was thrown out of office. The speaker states this action is a threat to democracy. The speaker also claims that this person hates the woman who ran instead of him and cannot stand her.

The Attorney General briefed Speaker 0 on the DOJ and FBI review of the Epstein files. Speaker 0 stated the briefing was very quick and focused on the credibility of the information. Speaker 0 claimed the files were fabricated by Comey, Obama, and the Biden administration, similar to the "Russia, Russia, Russia hoax." Speaker 0 stated the Attorney General has handled the situation well and should release whatever she deems credible. Speaker 1 then asked about Texas and how many more seats Speaker 0 wants Republicans to have.

Texas Democrats have turned against the state, using rhino Republicans to run a fake impeachment trial against Attorney General Ken Paxton. The trial lacks fairness, as members of the House cannot question witnesses or access firsthand evidence. This goes against the principles of due process that America was built on. Democrats, along with Republicans in Texas, are trying to stop conservatives in their tracks, which is sickening.

The first time I ran, I told the people of Mississippi I was going to be a watchdog for the taxpayers. The days of Mississippi running its government with and for handouts and giveaways is over. But here's what happened. At least $77,000,000 meant for needy families instead funneled to pet projects of the politically connected and celebrities. Tate Reeves promised to protect your tax dollars. Instead, under his watch, your money was funneled to his wealthy and well connected friends. And then he blocked the investigation by firing the independent prosecutor. Special interest have been begging the system to get more of your taxpayer money in their pockets. I'm not their guy. Actually, he is. Bombshell reporting examines governor Tate Reeves and his links to the largest welfare scandal in state history. Watchdog? Really?

The speaker discusses the issue of voter fraud in Texas and how it cannot be prosecuted due to a court ruling. They explain that local district attorneys are not prosecuting voter fraud cases, so the attorney general took on the responsibility. However, the Court of Criminal Appeals deemed it unconstitutional for the attorney general to be involved in court cases. This means that voter fraud is no longer being prosecuted. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of defense against voter fraud and mentions attempts to pass a law to reauthorize prosecution, but it was not prioritized by the Texas House. They emphasize the importance of addressing voter fraud as it impacts the election of the right people.

The former president is being accused of converting a misdemeanor into a felony by the borough district attorney. However, two previous prosecutorial agencies have already examined the case and found nothing. This attack on the former president seems baseless and exaggerated, especially considering my experience as a prosecutor and defense attorney. It appears to be an over-the-top move.

Speaker 0 presents evidence (AG 50) to the attorney general, who confirms signing it. The evidence suggests a belief that the attorney general violated federal and/or state law. However, no documentary or physical evidence was provided to the FBI. The attorney general questions the credibility of Nate Paul, as he failed to provide any documentary evidence to support his theory. The attorney general disagrees that they would have brought documentary evidence of a crime by Ken Paxton to the FBI. The initial report was made in a hurry, but the urgency is not specified.

We were federal prosecutors on the Justice Department's Capitol attack investigation until the Trump administration fired us on January 31st. Why were we fired? Because we did our job. We followed the facts and the law. What we did was justice for 140 police officers wounded on January 6th, 2021. We were hired to prosecute cases from the riot, and none of our defendants were acquitted, which shows the evidence was overwhelming. But last month, the president pardoned even the most violent convicts, calling them "hostages." Letters of termination hit the Justice Department, calling the prosecution itself a grave national injustice. Anyone who has watched videos of January 6th knows that prosecuting the rioters was not the injustice. The injustice has been the Department of Justice turning its back on law enforcement officers, members of Congress, and all the victims affected.

The speaker expresses concern that Paxton running to the right in the primary could negatively impact President Trump's agenda. The speaker claims that the race in Texas could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, diverting funds from key states like Michigan, New Hampshire, and Georgia in the midterm elections. The speaker accuses Paxton of being a "con man and a fraud" and states that this will be a key issue in the campaign. The speaker emphasizes their own record of effectiveness and support for President Trump's agenda, citing a 92% voting record. The speaker questions Paxton's motivations, suggesting they are driven by "vanity and personal ambition."