reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Here, I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. Here. I just heard them say the active shooter Here, I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. Here. I just heard them say the active shooter Here, I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. Here. I just heard them say the active shooter

Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk You have to leave. You need to leave. The curb.

Approximately 12:20 Mountain Standard Time, Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at the Utah Valley University and transported to Timpanogos Hospital, where he later passed. The Utah Department of Public Safety will be co-lead this criminal investigation with the FBI, working in unison with the county sheriff's office, local police, and the university police. Shortly after the shooting, a suspect, George Zinn, was in custody but released after failing to match the shooting suspect; he was booked into the county jail by UVU Police for obstruction of justice. We still have an active investigation for the person of interest. The incident occurred with a large crowd; there was one shot fired and one victim. While the suspect is at large, this is believed to be a targeted attack toward one individual. Call 988 for mental health support; FBI to discuss public tips. Thank you.

"And, we all lost, no matter what side of the political aisle you're on, we lost something important in America today. But, the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And I think over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more, and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today. Yeah. I am hearing that they do have a couple of people of interest. That's the latest I heard from law That's correct. Law enforcement. You're hearing the same thing."

Wanna bring in now, this is actually, let's start with this new statement from Utah Valley University. We had a speaker, Charlie Kirk, invited by a student group, Turning Point USA, speaking on campus today at noon at about 12:20. Shots were fired from a building about 200 yards from the speaker. According to the best of our knowledge, the individual was hit and was taken away immediately by his security personnel. That individual, of course, is Charlie Kirk. Campus is closed for the rest of the day, our campus police have a suspect in custody. So that is new information. 200 from a building, 200 yards from the shooter is the newest information from the university.

I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said.

Greg Schaefer, former FBI agent and CEO of Schaefer Security Group, said investigators are at the scene collecting evidence, including cell phones, videos and photographs from everyone present, and are scouring footage to identify a vehicle or the shooter as they left. He notes the weapon may have been left on the rooftop and that there may be DNA residue, fingerprints or shell casings, with a full court press by the FBI, Homeland Security, and local and state police to identify the shooter. John Anarelli says witnesses with video want to solve the case and that the FBI has a contact number to upload video; surveillance cameras and vehicles will be reviewed. The event drew about 3,000 people; Charlie Kirk had security, but security was not the same as protecting the site, and countersniper capabilities are extremely difficult. Charlie Kirk is a civilian; ballistic glass costs were discussed.

We are here live at Utah Valley State University. There's been a shooting at the Charlie Kirk event, the TP USA event. There has been a shooting. We heard shots we heard shots. Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck is what my kid is saying. This is unconfirmed. My son just said Charlie Kirk has been shot in the neck. Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. You need to leave. Yes, sir. Officer. Now quick. Get him out. We have multiple eyewitnesses saying that Charlie Kirk has been shot in the neck, that they saw blood spray. Sound like a sharpshooter? Dude. He just got shot. The evacuation is underway as safety personnel move people away.

Speaker 0 says 'The FBI continues to destroy its reputation as a trustworthy investigative agency' and questions Charlie Kirk's death: 'Was it a 30 odd six round that killed Charlie Kirk or a different kind of bullet? Was it a Mauser rifle that was used?' They ask why the Utah Valley campus crime scene is not secure and link it to the pattern after the Butler rally. Zeb Boykin, a former marine sniper, claims 'I do believe I know where the bullet ended up' after analyzing footage. He notes a ricochet off water bottles or a table, two frames showing 'the bullet on exit,' and that it 'would hit the building.' He cites rapid cleanup, 'a 20 foot ladder on the window,' window repairs, and a tampering video with a man in black directing people as attention shifts upward. ER nurses identify an exit wound; 'the ballistics don't lie.'

We are here live at Utah Valley University. There's been a shooting at the Charlie Kirk Turning Point USA event. Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck is what my kid is saying. I heard a shot... there was blood protruding from his neck or his head about six inches or more, literally gushing out. there was blood spray. The police said it could have come from up on the roof, but they arrested a guy up down right in front of Charlie. Active crime scene. Keep they're telling everybody to get out of here. There was blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over. There might be a guy on the roof. We also don't condone Hamas. We think that genocide's wrong on both sides. My sign says free Palestine, love one another. Free Palestine, there's a genocide.

Coverage of the Utah Valley University shooting shows footage of people running away in aftermath. The FBI director, Kash Patel, has weighed in on this. He just tweeted the following: 'We're closely monitoring reports of the tragic shooting involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Our thoughts are with Charlie, his loved ones, and everyone affected. Agents will be on the scene quickly, and the FBI stands in full support of the response and the investigation.' Charlie Kirk is a divisive figure, polarizing, lightning rod, whatever term you wanna use. Why? Speaker 1: 'Well, he's one of MAGA's most prominent voices online.' He hosts a near daily podcast and opines on almost everything. He's been closely aligned with the president since his initial run for office in 2015, 2016, and his ties to Trump really elevated his own brand. His group has brought in tons of tons of money.

Speaker 0 says it's definitely not fireworks and that this area should be cordoned off. The safety team is here. They just said the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk.

Colin of Project Constitution sits down with Tyler (the interviewer’s name in the transcript isn’t consistently labeled; the speaker identifying themselves as “Speaker 1”) to discuss an in-depth, ongoing investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination and related events. The conversation covers timeline疑s, weapon analysis, hospital logistics, key individuals (notably Erica Kirk, Tyler Boyer, Terrrell Farnsworth, Candace Owens), and alleged foreign and domestic entanglements, with a focus on unfiltered details the team has uncovered. Key points and claims from the discussion: - Initial reaction and approach to Charlie Kirk’s assassination - The team initially accepted the FBI’s narrative but began seeing inconsistencies as reports alternated about suspect custody. Within days after the shooting, the crime scene was reportedly destroyed and the grass replaced with pavers at the university where Kirk spoke. - Video analysis reportedly shows the ground position of the shooter that the FBI cropped out, leading to questions about whether the shooter’s location and the weapon’s origin were accurately represented. - Weapon and ballistics questions - The team raised red flags about the reported firearm: a 30-odd-six was described, but ballistic experts argued that such a round would likely have killed or severely injured the target differently, prompting the theory that the weapon claim did not match the injuries observed. - The investigative team posits the use of an explosion intended to mimic past assassination patterns (e.g., MLK-era examples) and argues the actual kill injuries do not align with a 30-odd-six. - The team’s conclusion, based on crime scene photos, argues the presence of black shards and shards consistent with a microphone (a Rode wireless mic) that shattered on impact; burn marks on Charlie Kirk, and similar black shard traces observed in Candace Owens’ released SUV photos are cited as corroborating evidence. - They propose that an explosion occurred in proximity to the event, with a separate high-powered rifle shot possibly emitted by a drone—suggesting a drone sniper may have fired, not a ground-based shooter, and that the supersonic crack and potential muzzle flash were not from a conventional rifle fire but from a bullet transitioning from supersonic to subsonic speeds, creating a pressure cone. - Hospital choice and post-event handling - Charlie was taken to Tipanogos Hospital rather than a closer facility. Officials reportedly claimed this was to access a higher-grade trauma center, but the timeline questions why the closer hospital wasn’t used and how the decision was made in real time. - A witness (a landscaper at Tipanogos) described the sequence of events: an SUV delivering Charlie Kirk to the hospital, then a second SUV with Mikey McCoy entering through a doctor entrance and leaving, raising questions about who was picked up and where those individuals went afterward. - The FBI reportedly confiscated hospital security camera footage, which the team views as suspicious in a non-crime-scene context. - Candace Owens’ show highlighted an allegation that a surgeon attempted to access the body before Erica Kirk could see it; the surgeon allegedly faced FBI resistance to re-enter the patient area. There is a contested claim about “Superman neck” and whether the surgeon ever stated such language. - Erica Kirk: background, ties, and credibility - Erica is described as potentially military-trained and highly prepared; the team explored her past, tying her to Liberty University’s Falkirk Center and alleged trafficking connections, and to Romanian networks. They assert a pattern of deception—multiple inconsistent stories about how Erica and Charlie met, and extensive past relationships with multiple former partners. - They accuse Erica of deleting past social media and press content, pressuring photographers, and hiding past associations. - The team claims Erica has ties to a broader “Mormon Mafia” network tied to Mitt Romney, with connections to Utah and Arizona. They assert ties to CIA and other security entities, and claim involvement in trafficking and political influence networks. - Tyler Boyer, Terrell Farnsworth, and family/political entanglements - Tyler Boyer is described as deeply connected to the “Mormon Mafia” and as someone who previously ran Turning Point, with shell companies enabling political and charitable activities. The interview alleges he conducted surveillance on Colin and has conflicts of interest in Charlie Kirk’s case. - Terrell Farnsworth and his family connections are described as deeply entrenched in the network; Farnsworth’s stepfather reportedly held a senior position at Duncan Aviation, connected to alleged assassination logistics; Michael Burke (Farnsworth cousin) is identified as a top prosecutor connected to Tyler Robertson’s defense. - The discussion highlights a potential conflict of interest: Farnsworth’s cousin is the defense attorney for Tyler Robertson, creating a potential conflict, given Farnsworth’s role in the case and as a witness who allegedly handled the crime scene (removing SD cards and contaminating evidence). - Investigative aims and future directions - The team seeks a complete timeline that identifies every participant’s role and actions, both to present to the public and to pursue potential legal recourse. - They propose a documentary or comprehensive public analysis to expose alleged lies and inconsistencies and to push for accountability, either through court proceedings or public discourse. - They anticipate possible outcomes for Tyler Robertson’s case (conviction via public opinion, or a plea deal) and suggest the possibility of deeper CIA involvement in the radicalization and online manipulation processes surrounding the case. - They emphasize the risk to investigators and supporters, including concerns about surveillance, shadow banning, and potential threats or actions against prominent figures involved in the investigation. - Closing sentiment - Colin reiterates the importance of citizen journalism and collaboration with Candace Owens, Sam Parker, Baron Coleman, and others in pursuing truth and accountability. The interview ends with a pledge to continue the investigation and to keep the public informed as new information emerges.

And, we all lost, no matter what side of the political aisle you're on, we lost something important in America today. But, the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And I think over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more, and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today. Yeah. I hope so. I am hearing that they do have a couple of people of interest. That's the latest I heard from law That's correct. Law enforcement. You're hearing the same thing.

At a Utah press conference, authorities announced the arrest of Tyler Robinson in the Charlie Kirk case. A family member relayed information on Sept. 11 that Robinson had confessed or implied involvement, shared with the Utah County Sheriff’s Office and the FBI. Surveillance showed Robinson arriving on UVU campus in a gray Dodge Challenger at about 08:29 AM on Sept. 10; he was encountered in clothing matching the images. Investigators recovered a Mauser model ninety eight thirty ot six caliber 30 ot six caliber bolt action rifle with a scope; inscriptions on casings included: "Notices, bulges, capital o w o, what's this question mark," "Hey Fascist!" and "if you read this, you are gay, LMAO." The gun was found; Robinson was taken into custody in Washington County after being turned in by family/friend. The FBI released photos, a $100,000 reward, and leads surpassed 11,000; charging documents will be filed in three days. Officials praised unity and public involvement; Charlie Kirk’s family thanked the public.

The governor said yesterday there was a written note before the assassination attempt, and what did it say? The spokesperson stated the note did exist and there is evidence of its contents: 'I, the suspect wrote a note saying, I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm gonna take it.' The note was written before the shooting and was located in the suspect and partner's home. But we have since learned that the note, even though it has been destroyed, we have found forensic evidence of the note, and we have confirmed what that note says because of our aggressive interview posture at the FBI.

At Utah Valley University, during a Turning Point USA event with Charlie Kirk, livestreamers described gear and interviewed people about politics and love. Signs read "free Palestine, love one another" and "Gay pride." Then: "There has been a shooting." Eyewitnesses reported "Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck" and described "blood protruding" as security yelled. "'Active crime scene' and 'They arrested a guy' were noted, with speculation of 'a guy on the roof.' Police evacuated the campus; witnesses recalled hearing a 'higher caliber' shot and a possible sniper. The area was cleared, and attendees were moved to safety as authorities investigated. Reporters captured reactions, prayers for Charlie, and confusion over security and organization as the event ended in tragedy."

they have a rifle, cartridges collected from the woods near the attack location, and footprints compared to the suspect’s shoes. the video was going to be the catalyst, and photographs or images from someone who knew him could reach out to law enforcement or, per the president, push him to turn himself in. multiple sources confirm a person of interest is in custody. a press conference has been slid back as authorities prepare to release information. the community has known that someone had viciously killed Charlie Kirk. police were confident there was no ongoing threat to the public, but there were many unknowns. they’re hopeful this will conclude the case; a name is confirmed by sources as the person in custody, but not released until officially. my sources are breathing a sigh of relief that this case has taken a dramatic turn for the better if this pans out.

"This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting." "It is a high powered bolt action rifle." "That rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled." "So the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon." "Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis." "Now, I understand there are a lot of questions about motive." "I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being fully investigated." "As of this morning, we have received more than a 130 We thank the community for that."

From the outset, one of the speakers says there was a sense that the official narrative about the day didn’t add up, expressing that many Americans feel they were being lied to. The major problem they identify with the assassination narrative includes inconsistencies and unanswered questions rather than acceptance of the official story. Speaker 1 recalls being told Charlie Kirk was shot and initially in critical condition, but notes that the video shows an exit wound and movement of Kirk’s shirt that suggests an impact nearby. With extensive experience around gunshot wounds, they say what they saw didn’t make sense. They reference the FBI’s announcement of a shooter and describe a separate incident involving a person on the roof who allegedly disassembled and reassembled a firearm, aligned a scope, fired a cold bore shot, moved to the roof, and then wrapped the rifle up. They mention texts from the shooter that didn’t sound like a typical 22-year-old and state that these observations raise questions. They say asking questions leads to being torn down or accused of holding conspiracy views, and they specify they aren’t claiming “Israel did it,” but insisting the questions about the event “don’t look good.” They raise specific questions: did the security team remove Charlie Kirk’s lapel mic after the incident and give it to someone else; what happened to the SIM card; did someone take the camera behind him; why was the crime scene contaminated and rebuilt. They admit they don’t know what is true but insist the questions deserve answers. They note that once they question, they’re labeled antisemitic, and they say they didn’t even bring up Israel. They emphasize the personal and national significance of the incident. Speaker 0 mentions a claim that Charlie Kirk was portrayed as Superman, with his body supposedly stopping the 30-odd-six bullet, and asks what would have happened if a 30-06 round hit him. Speaker 1 says it would likely blow his head off and leave remnants of the bullet, arguing that they don’t think such remnants have been found yet. They question why the chair and desk were moved and contend that a forensic expert could determine the shot’s origin, insisting they are simply asking questions. If those questions can be refuted, they would stop asking; but they claim they’re not getting any answers beyond “this is what happened” and being told to “shut up.” Speaker 0 adds that telling someone to be quiet amounts to labeling them antisemitic, and that when the trial comes, they will look like a fool. Speaker 1 says that’s a tactic of the left—when you call them out, they label you a name—and that the right is now doing the same to them.

The broadcast covers the Utah Valley University shooting, showing the aftermath as people run. The FBI director, Kash Patel, has weighed in on this. He just tweeted the following: "We're closely monitoring reports of the tragic shooting involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Our thoughts are with Charlie, his loved ones, and everyone affected. Agents will be on the scene quickly, and the FBI stands in full support of the ongoing response and the investigation." Charlie Kirk is a divisive figure, polarizing, lightning rod, whatever term you wanna use. Why? Speaker 1: Well, he's one of MAGA's most prominent voices online. He hosts a near daily podcast. He opines on almost everything. He's been very closely aligned with the president since his initial run for office in 2015, 2016, and his ties to Trump really elevated his own brand. He was really quite young as an activist when the president launched his initial campaign, and he has kind of ridden along with MAGA since 2016 and built up a massive massive brand of his own. His his group has brought in tons and tons of money.

Yeah. We're showing, by the way, our affiliate in Utah and the aftermath of the shooting. You could see people running away pretty quickly as as you would imagine they would do gunshots. The FBI director, Kash Patel, has weighed in on this. He just tweeted the following. "We're closely monitoring reports of the tragic shooting involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Our thoughts are with Charlie, his loved ones, and everyone affected. Agents will be on the scene quickly, and the FBI stands in full support of the ongoing response and the investigation. Charlie Kirk is a divisive figure, polarizing, lightning rod, whatever term you wanna use. Why?" Speaker 1: Well, he's one of MAGA's most prominent voices online. He hosts a near daily podcast. He opines on almost everything. He's been very closely aligned with the president since his initial run for office in 2015, 2016, and his ties to Trump really elevated his own brand. He was really quite young as an activist when the president launched his initial campaign, and he has kind of ridden along with MAGA since 2016 and built up a massive massive brand of his own. His his group has brought in tons and tons of money.