reSee.it - Related Video Feed

An individual is being handcuffed and arrested. The speaker believes the arrestee will be prosecuted and likely had outstanding warrants. The individual is being taken away.

We're not doing anything to them. I'll explain everything. Do you have anything on you? Just the phone. How are your wrists? Okay. We'll go to the precinct. He didn't have anything. I'll bring this back to you.

An individual is being arrested for aggravated offenses. They are informed of their right to remain silent, and that anything they say can be used as evidence in court. The arresting officer asks if they understand. The individual is escorted to a van. Someone mentions social media posts and tells the person arresting them to get a "fucking real job."

Speaker 0 announces the time as 9:15 and mentions being arrested. They ask someone to double check something related to arrest in Germany. They then request the person to put something away.

Speaker 0 informs the individual they are being detained for violating conditions they did not break. The individual questions the reason for their detention. Speaker 0 asks if the individual understands the seriousness of the situation, to which they respond negatively. The individual requests identification from the officers, expressing confusion about where they are being taken. They question the officers' actions and ask for identification again. The individual seeks reassurance that they will not be harmed. The situation revolves around alleged violation of suspension conditions despite the individual's absence from social media platforms.

An individual is being arrested on a warrant for their arrest and for being in the country illegally. They are asked if they are taking any medication. The mission is described as arresting bad guys and ensuring the safety of the arresting officers.

An individual questions whether an action is due to a security concern or an intimidation tactic. The response indicates it is a security matter. Later, the individual asks why they are not being arrested and demands to see video footage. They express distress, stating "That is not okay." Another person urges calm. The individual mentions "FinCEO" and claims they will be arrested despite knowing nothing. They thank someone for their support and ask why another person isn't being arrested, claiming to have witnessed them slap someone. They deny anyone said "stab him." They state that even asking an impolite question could lead to arrest.

I'm being detained and can't return to my house. What am I being detained for? What are the specific reasons? Why am I here? You're going to put handcuffs on me? No, do not touch me. Don't touch me.

Speaker 1 recounts an incident where “eleven police officers” arrived at their house, which they describe as completely ridiculous. The speaker explains they had left the front door open and were waiting for their dad, actually being in the bath at the time the officers entered. They recall hearing their name called, noticing one female officer among the group of ten male officers. They initially thought the name might belong to their sister because they were upstairs in the bath. The officers then came up the stairs without giving them any privacy, and the speaker confirms they were naked. The speaker describes feeling disgusted and very upset, crying their eyes out. They asked that the female officer stay downstairs and that the male officers be the ones to handle the situation, expressing that they were upset about the lack of privacy and the presence of officers while exposed. Despite this, the males were sent downstairs, and the female officer sat with the speaker, who was crying and very distressed. When asked what the officers were there for, the speaker says they asked for clarification. The female officer explained that the police were there for “malicious communications. Hate crime and malicious communications.” The speaker pressed for more information about the reason behind the visit, and the officer indicated they would discuss the details “when we get to the police station” or “to the” authorities, but the exact phrasing in the transcript cuts off here.

Speaker 0 repeatedly tells Speaker 1 she is under arrest for assaulting a police officer. Speaker 1 denies the accusation, stating she did not touch the officer and was only going to touch the check. Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1 that she is resisting arrest and needs to stop. Speaker 1 asks why she is being arrested and accuses the officer of lying. Speaker 0 tells another officer to go with Shane and that he will meet them, after getting the woman's information.

I'm arresting you for offensive comments on Facebook. You'll be taken to the police station, where we'll interview you. Bring your medications. A nurse will assess them later. We'll search you before leaving. Do you want to bring your glasses?

Speaker 1 informs the person that they are being placed under arrest with a warrant, and will be taken to jail. The mom has been told she can contact a bondsman, and although the process for paperwork will take some time, the subject must come with them and be cuffed. The subject is instructed to turn around, stay silent, and that Rick knows about this, Candy is involved, and the dad is on the way to help. Speaker 1 explains the subject will go straight to the city Stillwater Jail, and that the mom should contact a person who does this regularly and knows what to do. The subject is advised to tell the person they contact that they are dealing with Stillwater Police Department, not the county, and to specify that Stillwater PD picked him up, not the county, to avoid confusion about the location or agency. The location is clarified as Stillwater PD on Lewis. Speaker 0 asks for the person to spread their feet, and mentions there is nothing on the subject’s side, with an additional note about cleaning, indicating a brief frisk or search.

I need to interview you about an allegation regarding an incident on Facebook. I'm asking you to come to the station voluntarily for a PACE-compliant interview, and you're free to seek legal advice. How about Sunday at noon? Can't you tell me the details now? Why do I need to come there? I need to do it by way of a formal interview. Do I have to come? What could I be charged with? What's the alleged crime? It's a racial matter, malicious communications. What's malicious about it? Malicious means intent to harm, right? That's what we'll discuss. Can you define "malicious"? It's making offensive comments on social media. Offensive? Who cares what's offensive? We can discuss it in more detail during the interview. I've got no hate in my heart, only for those who lie. I'll gladly discuss it. You've got to understand where I'm coming from.

If you prefer not to answer questions, you can say so. You’re not willing to sign anything or talk without a lawyer, but you’ll remain cordial. Since we lack a proper facility, we’ll explain your situation privately. We have a search warrant for your residence and are sending people there now. Is someone home? You can call them. This is a federal arrest warrant against you for civil disorder and entering a restricted area. You can review the warrant, which is from DC. You’ll be detained for a few hours today, and there will be a search of your house. I’ll explain the process to help ease your stress. We’re concluding our conversation now.

You are being arrested for improper use of an electronic communications network under the Communications Act. Your comments on Facebook were offensive and obscene, leading to complaints. You will be questioned at the police station. Personal items will be searched for safety. You may not be locked up for the night, hopefully.

The video shows a confrontation where someone is being arrested. The person being arrested asks why they are being arrested, but the police officers do not provide a clear answer. The person also asks for their phone and microphone, but it is unclear if they receive them.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 what the items are for, and Speaker 1 replies, "For the fence." Speaker 0 asks if there is anything illegal inside the vehicle, and Speaker 1 says, "Oh, no. No." Speaker 0 repeats the question, then tells Speaker 1 to turn around and put their hands behind their back, stating they are under arrest for human smoking.

An individual is being arrested, and officers are attempting to get him to cooperate. The individual refuses to provide his ID, driver's license, or proof of insurance, but an officer writes down the number as he holds it up. The individual does not consent to searches or seizures on his property. He asks what he is being arrested for and an officer replies that it is for a warrant. The individual demands to know what the warrant is for and accuses the officers of being crooked. He continues to resist and curse at the officers. An officer asks another if they have the individual's belongings. The individual asks an officer if he was following him.

An officer asks Autumn to step out of her car and turn around to put her hands on her back. Autumn asks what is going on and if she is under arrest, to which the officer replies that she is. Autumn asks if she can ask questions and make a phone call, and the officer says she can. Autumn asks if she can go to her house or the store. The officer asks if she has any other weapons. Autumn replies, "Thirty four o'clock," and the officer says, "That's only at thirty four o'clock. There's one thing else to go."

Why arrest her? You didn't say why she's arrested. Trespassing? We're within our rights. Why arrest her? I've told you twice. It's not trespassing. We're within our rights. You've been asked, but I have to. A mandate is not a requirement. Translation: Why are you arresting her? You didn't say why she's under arrest. Trespassing? We are within our rights. Why arrest her? I've already told you twice. It's not trespassing. We are within our rights. You've been asked, but I have to. A mandate is not a requirement.

Open the south, comply with the officer's orders or face arrest. Interfering with an arrest will also lead to arrest. Please move back and continue to do so. Thank you for your cooperation.

"you're under arrest currently, right, on suspicion of harassment." "the grounds of the arrest are that from the March 10, you've made apparently a number of posts online and on social media harassing an individual who came making serious allegations." "Someone from the church." "We've got serious safeguarding concerns." "But we need to interview you in relation to that investigation have been made." "My children are 12, 13, and eight." "First of all, there's three things that we need to do." "I've got three young children here on the property." "They don't I don't know where they are."

An individual is being handcuffed and arrested. The speaker believes the arrestee will be prosecuted and likely had outstanding warrants. The individual is being taken away.

An individual questions whether an action is due to security concerns or intimidation. The response indicates it is a security matter. Another person is told to stay away from someone. An individual asks why they aren't being arrested and demands to see video footage. Someone is told to calm down. An individual states "They will arrest me. I know nothing." Another person is asked if they would arrest someone else, claiming to have seen that person slap someone. It is asserted that no one said "stab him." Someone states they are on the side of another person.

Speaker 0 states: "You're under arrest for your breach of CSO. Can you come inside with us, please? We can do it right here." They ask, "Do you drop it? Sounds good." The conversation then shifts to the reason for the arrest: "Are you aware of that? I am not aware of that." The arrestee or another speaker questions the justification, asking, "You know why you're arresting this man for? He refused to apologize for his religious beliefs." A subsequent accusation is made: "So you have become a modern day Nazis right now doing the beatings." The location and context are referenced: "This is Calgary, Alberta, Canada, twenty first century right now."