reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asks if it lives in the jungle. Speaker 1 says no. Speaker 2 asks if it is eaten on Sundays. Speaker 1 says no. Speaker 2 asks if it lives on the great plains of Africa. Speaker 1 hesitates but eventually says yes. Speaker 2 asks if people keep it in pens and harvest it for meat. Speaker 0 interrupts and asks if it is an animal with fur. Speaker 1 confirms it is a pet. Speaker 2 guesses if it is a cat, and Speaker 1 confirms. Speaker 1 mentions there is another one.

An extreme, hostile exchange unfolds, filled with insults and explicit sexual references. The participants trade provocations while questioning each other's behavior. "You do. Not gonna happen, dude. Another pussy." "You don't think anal sex is good, do you?" "No. It's not the it's not the purpose." "Have you ever fucked your old lady in the ass? Who would do that? I fucked your old lady That's why you're here with me." "Watch your language." "Hey. Shut your ass." "Shut your ass, you little piece of shit." "Where are you from? These people are out here having a good fucking time, and you're being sick."

Someone was upset and stated, "They're fighting. They're really trying to hurt me." They then exclaimed, "Run. Damn. Run."

Speaker 0: No. No. Shame. Shame. Oh my fucking god. What the fuck? What the fuck? You just fucking what the fuck did you do? You are fucking criminals. You're fucking criminals. What the fuck? What the fuck are you guys doing? What the What the actual fuck? What are you doing? You are fucking insane. What did you do? What did you do? Speaker 1: You. Shame. Shame. Speaker 0: Shame. Shame. Shame. Shame. Shame. Did that Shame. Shame. Speaker 1: Dude, you shot her. I'm trying to help. No. No. You fucking shot someone in the Speaker 0: fucking face. You fucking someone in the fucking face. Do Speaker 1: you have a conscience? Speaker 0: Do you have a conscience? Don't let the murderer leave. Don't let the murderer leave. You Speaker 1: guys are the fucking criminals. You don't get to tell us what to do. Fucking criminals. Don't let him leave. Speaker 0: Don't let him leave. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a fucking crime. Speaker 0: We fucking knew it. We're here. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like, what the absolute fuck, man? What the absolute fuck? Do you have Speaker 0: a Speaker 1: conscience? Do you have a conscience? Do you have a conscience? This is the time, man. This is the time to have a conscience. This is not okay. This is not okay. Speaker 0: Get Speaker 1: a fucking conscience. You okay, mommy?

A person is being followed and questioned about throwing food at a white woman. The person being followed stated, "White people inferior" as the reason for their actions, apparently to provoke a police response. The person following threatens to find out where the other person works.

The speakers express shock and concern as they witness a violent incident. They repeatedly mention that someone is dead and express disbelief. They mention getting "cow po" and "cow poleys" to help the injured person. The conversation ends abruptly.

Someone confronts another person about putting stickers on their car, including stickers with curse words, and claims to have video evidence of them doing it twice. The person denies knowing anything about it and says they have no comment. The speaker expresses frustration that the person won't defend their actions or discuss the situation, despite initiating it by putting something on the car.

Brian is repeatedly questioned about killing someone and asked why he did it. The person speaking also asks what the victim did to Brian and if Brian wants to apologize.

A person is recording what appears to be a dog being barbecued over an open fire in a neighbor's backyard. The recorder zooms in on the animal's tail. A child is present and repeatedly identifies the animal as a dog. The recorder states their cat is missing.

The speaker expresses shock and disbelief at seeing what appears to be cats being grilled. The speaker points out a live cat nearby and suggests it should leave for its own safety, implying the grilled meat might be its companions. The speaker uses strong language to convey their disgust and disbelief at the scene.

The speaker expresses shock and disbelief at seeing what appears to be cats being grilled. The speaker points out a cat nearby and suggests it should leave immediately, implying that the grilled meat might be its companions. The speaker uses strong language to convey their disgust and horror at the scene.

The speaker sees something on a grill and asks if it's a cat. The speaker then sees a cat and warns it to disappear, suggesting its "homies" are on the grill.

Someone wants to hold a bunny, but another person is worried they will hurt it. Despite assurances to the contrary, the second person remains concerned that the first person will kill or launch the bunny. The first person denies these intentions. The situation escalates with expletives and culminates in the bunny being released.

Speaker 0: God loves you. Speaker 1: I'm angry. Speaker 2: I had an abortion and I'm happy. Speaker 1: What's your name? Speaker 2: None of your business. Speaker 1: Nice to meet you. Speaker 2: You ruined everyone's lunch. Speaker 1: Can I have my mic back? Speaker 2: No. Speaker 1: God bless you. Officer, she assaulted me. Speaker 2: I did. Speaker 1: Can I get my stuff? Officer: No, you're under arrest. Speaker 1: Let go. Officer: No. We pray for you.

Speaker 0 is questioning why someone is removing kidnapped people and asks them to call the police. They mention that there are missing dogs as well. Speaker 0 accuses the other person of being antisemitic and threatens to call the police again. They ask for an explanation as to why the removal is happening, particularly because there are babies and kids who have been kidnapped. The other person refuses to engage in conversation. The transcript ends abruptly without further information.

Two individuals clash over dog adoption and personal conduct. 'You bought those dogs, didn't you? No. You didn't adopt them. You didn't save their lives. You don't care about them.' The exchange escalates as Speaker 0 pleads, 'Help me. Help me.' while Speaker 1 repeats, 'Go away from me.' and warns, 'You'll kill him.' The quarrel includes claims of video evidence: 'I have all on video, lady' and 'Names? I have it all on video, lady.' Insults fly: 'Look at this guy. Look at his bread dogs. Look at what an unethical piece of shit is done.' Accusations of racism and mental illness surface: 'I did not say anything racist at all.' 'You are mentally ill.' They threaten contacting ICE: 'Where's ICE? ... Let me call ice.' The dialog ends with an unfinished 'Adopt a'.

Immigrants are allegedly behaving according to their customs, such as killing ducks in the park for food. A van was reportedly pulled over containing over 100 cats with Haitians who admitted to eating them. The speaker claims to have witnessed this incident, with the people in the van admitting to the police that they were eating the cats.

An individual identifying as a cat is pulled over while driving. The officer notes the driver only has a cat collar as identification and assumes the driver and passenger are in a homosexual relationship, which the passenger corrects, stating he is the driver's owner. The officer states that he can have the car towed, animal control take the driver to a shelter with a $70 retrieval fee, including vaccinations and spaying/neutering, or request a mental health evaluation. The officer suggests these actions because the passenger is willing to let the driver receive a rabies shot rather than provide standard identification.

The speaker expresses shock and disbelief at seeing what appears to be cats being grilled. The speaker points out a live cat nearby and suggests it should leave to avoid the same fate as its "homies" on the grill. The speaker uses strong language to convey their disgust and disbelief at the scene.

Moreno está pelando un perro Chihuahua que está asando en el fogón. Él dice que sabe a chivo. Le preguntan si se come los perritos. Explica que lo ponen a secar. Otros dicen que dominicanos se comen esa carne y que es buena. Le preguntan si se lo va a comer ahora o después de secarlo. Luego dicen que parece un gato, y Moreno confirma que es un gato que atropellaron con un carro. Afirman que muchos dominicanos se comen los gatos bien preparados. Otro dice que es un "can". **Translation:** Moreno is skinning a Chihuahua dog that he is roasting on the stove. He says it tastes like goat. They ask him if he eats the dogs. He explains that he puts it to dry. Others say that Dominicans eat that meat and that it is good. They ask him if he is going to eat it now or after drying it. Then they say it looks like a cat, and Moreno confirms that it is a cat that was hit by a car. They claim that many Dominicans eat well-prepared cats. Another says it is a "can."

They're eating the dogs. They're eating the cats. Eat the cat. Eat eat the cat.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they have thought about killing themselves. Speaker 1 says it would be better without Speaker 0 and that Speaker 0 would be more useful decomposing in the earth. Speaker 1 tells Speaker 0 to kill themself and imagines their body hanging from trees. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 will drop dead for them and imagines Speaker 0 shot in the head. Speaker 1 says Speaker 0's blood would be beautiful on the country. Speaker 0 says they are waiting for the cops to do something, and that the police can't remember where their cars are because they have no VIN. Speaker 0 states that two people should not be driving because they are drunk.

A person is questioned about a dead cat. The person is asked why they killed the cat and if they ate it. Another person states they saw the first person with the cat, saying "she was just laying there with it" and "she was eating it." Someone suggests calling the humane society to pick up the deceased cat.

The individual accuses the speaker of pointing a gun at them while they were on a vehicle. The speaker sarcastically admits to it to avoid confrontation, but clarifies it was not true. The conversation turns into a debate over sarcasm in a murder trial.

The speaker initially denies sending a strange message but later realizes that someone may have used their username to mess with them. They discuss involving the police and admitting their mistake. The speaker explains that they received information from others and didn't do proper research, leading to a serious incident involving the police and a dog. They apologize for their actions and express regret. The speaker then criticizes a plan suggested by the other person, emphasizing that it was wrong and messed up. They apologize again for their mistake and express sympathy for the dog. The conversation ends with the speaker expressing their seriousness and disapproval.