reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the tactics used by industries to spread disinformation when scientific findings go against their interests. They mention examples from various industries, such as coal, gas, energy, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals. The speaker believes that the pharmaceutical industry is the most skilled and devastating practitioner of these tactics. They describe tactics like "the blitz," where doctors and scientists who support inconvenient science are harassed. The speaker shares their personal experience of being targeted by the pharmaceutical industry and the censorship they faced on platforms like YouTube. They express their commitment to documenting and exposing these tactics in a book.

In this video, the speakers cover a wide range of topics including their experiences with the COVID-19 vaccine, the role of big pharma and government in controlling narratives, erosion of civil liberties, and the importance of free speech. They discuss conspiracy theories, government corruption, and the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The speakers emphasize the need for transparency in vaccine trials and the importance of plant-based medicine. They express admiration for individuals who have questioned authority and exposed corruption. The conversation also touches on the benefits of fasting, the addictive nature of sugar, and the importance of taking care of one's health. They discuss financial issues, government transparency, and the potential for societal change. The speakers express hope for a future where people are more united, civil liberties are protected, and individuals are empowered to make a difference.

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed inconsistencies in statements made by colleagues and realized something was amiss. The simultaneous lockdowns across multiple countries convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses those in power of lying and implementing ineffective measures. He believes that the vaccines being administered are intentionally harmful, based on his extensive experience in drug design. He is unafraid of legal action and challenges them to sue him, confident that he would win.

The speaker has 32 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, with senior positions at Pfizer, including vice president and worldwide head of research in allergic and respiratory diseases. Since 2020, the speaker claims to have been speaking out against the fraudulent pandemic and the intentionally dangerous injections. The speaker states that they have been censored and smeared as a result. The speaker suggests that censorship and smearing is the experience of people who try to convey truths that authorities want suppressed.

I have a gag order from my former healthcare employer, but I want to share my experiences. The corruption and greed I witnessed were appalling. Patients were coerced into taking medications they didn’t want, often for profit. I reported serious issues, including a near-fatal medication error, but was told to keep quiet. I eventually took legal action, and the company settled, knowing I was right, but imposed a gag order to silence me. They prioritize money over patient care, using threats to manipulate vulnerable individuals. I urge everyone to share their healthcare stories. This is just the beginning; we need to expose these injustices and not let them win.

It is nearly impossible to publish data that goes against the national public health narrative, preventing doctors from finding solutions. The speaker has conducted clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, including vaccine studies, and has brought vaccines and other drugs to market. Some drugs never made it to market because they killed people. Clinical trial guidelines ensure safe drugs, but these guidelines were not followed during the pandemic, affecting everyone. COVID should have been a time for doctors to unite, but interference with research occurred. Science evolves through experiments, skepticism, and an open mind. Challenging current knowledge must be allowed to move science forward, but what the speaker witnessed during the pandemic was not science.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department against me and my family for whistleblowing about gender-affirming care at Texas Children's Hospital. A Health and Human Services memo signaled that anyone interfering with such care would be targeted. I was indicted on patient privacy violations, but the DOJ was the one releasing patient initials. Facing years in prison and financial ruin, my family spent almost $2,000,000 defending me. The prosecutor even threatened my wife, who was onboarding as a federal prosecutor. I was willing to go to jail to expose the injustice. X was a lifeline, enabling me to share my story. The case was dismissed with prejudice, a victory after immense pain. Now, I seek accountability for those who abused their authority, hoping this never happens to anyone again.

Companies worldwide are allegedly conspiring and lying to inject unknown materials into the global population. The speaker believes this, claiming they could testify in court. They express concern that institutions meant to protect the public have been compromised. Another speaker recalls meeting Reiner and Mike two years ago, discussing nanotechnology in what they now refer to as "injectables." They struggled to convince others at the time. Fast forward to the present, and they have not witnessed any evidence of spike proteins being extracted from anyone's blood.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department against me and my family, targeting me for blowing the whistle on gender affirming care for minors at Texas Children's Hospital. A Health and Human Services memo signaled that anyone interfering with this care would be targeted. They tried to manufacture an indictment, violating my patient privacy while accusing me of the same. Without X, the truth wouldn't have been heard. The charges were eventually dropped, a moment of indescribable relief after immense pain. This dismissal, with prejudice, means the case can never be brought again. Accountability is crucial: those responsible should be held accountable. The emotional and financial toll was huge, costing us almost $2,000,000. This case highlights how the government can exploit its resources to crush dissent. This isn't the America I grew up in.

Odessa Orlewitz hosts Liberty Talk Canada and introduces Doctor Dimitri, a senior data scientist with the Government of Canada (employee of CBSA). Dimitri says he is coming forward publicly with his full story as his case becomes public in two weeks. He states he did not disclose his medical status or discuss private correspondences, but he began sharing data-driven insights from within the system, building a portfolio of resources over the last five years. He says he has included his discipline letter and investigation report, which detail violations and allegations he defended against for talking about data he analyzed. Dimitri describes a key, simple piece of evidence: deaths following COVID by vaccination status, published by the Public Health Agency of Canada. He argues that vaccine efficacy appears not to show significant improvement and that a technique he calls “algorithmic bias” or data skewing is used to hide the inconvenient truth. He says the data show that what researchers want to know—deaths among unvaccinated versus vaccinated—cannot be accurately inferred when data before vaccination campaigns are counted in, thus diluting comparisons. He frames this as a political interference issue, not a new phenomenon, comparing it to past concerns raised by Shiv Chopra and continuing into 2021. Dimitri emphasizes fear of reprisal in the public service. He notes that, in public-service surveys, fear of reprisal is highest in the Health Products regulation unit, which he says he uncovered, and claims colleagues would testify but fear losing their jobs. He explains that his own union activities and leadership seminars since 2019 involved teaching data visualization tools (including PSESS) to observe datasets and detect issues. He recounts that after pushing data on vaccination and COVID, he faced multiple disciplinary actions: five days of suspension without pay for discussing information conflicting with government messaging; an eight-day suspension; and a ten-day suspension, all connected to the hearing and his broader aim of alerting on red flags. Dimitri states that the hearing concerns limits to the duty of loyalty and insubordination in a democratic country like Canada. He argues that data people should be allowed to publish information that could challenge official messaging. He also notes that, outside Canada, Alberta passed a Regulated Professions Act and a Neutrality Act to protect free speech across regulated professions, suggesting a national parallel is needed for public servants. He says he will post updates in a newsletter and provide links to evidence and to testimonials from colleagues, professors from Ottawa U, and other data scientists who assisted with analyses, including Pfizer papers. Dimitri recounts personal context: he took his own vaccine dose and has presented his case publicly, including short videos from a journalist documentary and his Freedom Convoy presentation. He asserts that mainstream media, such as CBC, did not interview him during the convoy era, implying a cover-up by mainstream outlets. Odessa urges viewers to attend Dimitri’s hearing, visit his website, and share the information widely. She closes with promotional plugs and advises the audience to follow the case through ivim.ca and related links. Throughout, Dimitri stresses the overarching themes of political interference in data, fear of reprisal within the public service, and the need for transparency and accountability in health data and governance. He frames the hearing as a pivotal moment for trust in Canadian public institutions and urges support for whistleblowers like himself.

Today in The Netherlands, outside the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, a landmark case brings senior government officials, major media figures, pharmaceutical leadership, and global policy actors together as defendants in a single COVID response case. Among those ordered to appear are Albert Baller, the CEO of Pfizer, the former Dutch prime minister, senior Dutch health ministers, leading figures from the Dutch media, and Bill Gates. This makes the case extraordinary. On March 9, an important step is happening at the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. This hearing is not the main trial. The main trial is proceeding, and Bill Gates, if not appearing in person, must have representation and offer a defense. Today’s hearing concerns a procedural question: should the court allow an appeal against an earlier decision that blocked a request for preliminary evidence? In simple terms, the claimants ask the court for permission to present and examine expert evidence early before the trial, to have experts testify, documents examined, and key scientific and legal claims tested through cross examination. The lower court refused that request. The Amsterdam Court Of Appeal is being asked to decide whether that refusal should itself be reviewed. This hinges on the right to have evidence examined in public. If the appeal is allowed, expert testimony and scrutiny of the evidence could proceed; if refused, the claimants must continue without that preliminary examination. The reason for this hearing traces to the main lawsuit, begun in July 2023. Seven Dutch citizens filed a civil case in a district court, claiming they were misled about the nature of the COVID threat and about the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines. They argue that government officials, public health authorities, pharmaceutical executives, and major media figures promoted a narrative that induced fear and compliance based on unscientific claims of a novel pathogen called COVID nineteen. They claim these representations caused them to take vaccines and to suffer psychological and physical harm. The claimants describe a tort claim: the defendants breached a duty of care owed to the public by providing false or misleading information that resulted in damage. They seek two things: a declaration that the defendants acted unlawfully and compensation for the harm. Before the trial proceeds, the claimants asked for the evidence behind those claims to be examined in court, hence the provisional evidence request and today’s appeal. Central to the request are expert witnesses from multiple disciplines addressing scientific, legal, psychological, and institutional dimensions. The experts include Catherine Watt (legal researcher in public health law), Sasha Latipova (pharmaceutical regulatory processes), Doctor Joseph Sansone (psychologist studying crisis messaging and behavioral compliance), Catherine Austin Fitz (financial analyst on institutional power structures and global policy networks), and Doctor Mike Yeadon (English pharmacologist, former Pfizer VP). Yeadon has argued that the safety narrative surrounding the vaccines is challenged, claiming inadequate testing and concerns about toxicity. The point of a court is that such claims should be tested under cross examination, not dismissed without scrutiny. Allowing this appeal would enable the evidence to be heard and tested in public, with broader implications beyond the Netherlands, potentially influencing accountability, transparency, and public trust in other jurisdictions. What happens here may influence debates about open scrutiny of evidence in courts elsewhere. The speaker closes with a personal note, recalling six years spent fighting misinformation and supporting the truth be told campaign for COVID jabbed, injured, and bereaved, and underscoring that this case concerns justice in action, public scrutiny, and accountability for powerful institutions.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department and Health and Human Services against my family after I blew the whistle on gender affirming care for minors at Texas Children's Hospital. They targeted me after a memo was sent out that said anyone who interferes with gender affirming care will be targeted by the federal government. I was indicted, accused of violating patient privacy laws by releasing patient names. I redacted the patient names and protected their identities. I was facing ten years in prison. The Justice Department was trying to crush us, but we didn't let them. The case was dismissed with prejudice. It was an indescribable relief. Accountability looks like the people responsible being held to account. The emotional toll, the fear, and the legal defense cost us almost $2,000,000.

I was jailed for speaking out, do you agree? I don't want another lockdown. The speaker presents a book exposing research fraud behind vaccine mandates to a senator.

"Your government doesn't censor those people as a way to do the best that it can." The speaker recalls being interviewed by a major newspaper and "I bring up doctor Peter McCullough every time" when asked "what evidence? What proof?" They argue that "the world's leading heart doctor" and "the most published heart doctor in the world was censored during COVID." They question whether "the government was just doing the best that it could under the circumstances," answering "Like, no." The speaker asserts that "The best a government that considers itself to be in a free nation does not go out of its way to censor world renowned scientists, doctors, the number one heart doctor in the world in doctor Peter McCullough, the most published ICU doctor the world in doctor Paul Merrick, the inventor of the technology itself, doctor Robert Malone." "Your government doesn't censor those people as a way to do the best that it can."

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and criticism. In another segment, an IT worker is accused of spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths. The worker appeared in court, and the health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The worker allegedly shared cases of individuals who died after receiving the vaccine, citing cardiac arrest, brain bleeds, blood clots, and aneurysms as causes of death. The speaker emphasizes that they are not an expert but are willing to face criticism if it helps stop the misinformation.

Good morning, everyone. I'm on my way to the Commonwealth Court in Harrisburg for a hearing at 9:30 AM regarding our whistleblower case against Kathy Bookbar. This appeal, which we've awaited for three years, involves evidence from a sting operation during the 2020 election that exposed public officials committing felonies. We fought for oral arguments, which we won, and the hearing will be live-streamed. Thank you to everyone for your support; we ask for your prayers today. We will discuss obstruction of justice and the lack of forensic analysis on our evidence, despite the closure of criminal investigations. We believe there was election fraud in 2020, and we will continue to fight for the truth. Please share this video and tune in to the live hearing. God bless.

The speaker states they were relaxed in court due to greater worries about the WHO and gene-transforming vaccinations, making their personal situation trivial. The case against them was based on three minutes taken out of a 90-minute period, which, when viewed in full, showed the charges were out of context. The speaker read a letter from Holocaust survivors comparing vaccinations to a second Holocaust, which was used against them, accusing them of trivializing the Holocaust. The judge acquitted them after a nine-hour meeting. The speaker felt gratitude towards the judge for upholding the honor of German jurisdiction by going against the mainstream. The speaker believes the acquittal was a good day for the world and hopes it sets an example.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department against me and my family. A Health and Human Services memo signaled that anyone interfering with gender-affirming care would be targeted. I blew the whistle on Texas Children's Hospital providing these treatments to minors. The DOJ indicted me, alleging I violated patient privacy, even citing a law that doesn't exist. X was essential for getting my story heard, the government tried to crush us but we didn't let them. The case was dismissed with prejudice, a huge relief after a two-year nightmare. Accountability is needed for the agents and prosecutors involved, especially after the emotional and financial toll this took on my family, costing nearly $2,000,000. I was even threatened with jail for simply posting public motions. The America I grew up in is unrecognizable.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and are confident that the world will support them. The IT worker accused of accessing sensitive health data and spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths appears in court. The health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The speaker lists several cases of individuals who allegedly died after receiving the vaccine. They express their willingness to be targeted and emphasize that their goal is to stop the situation.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department against me and my family for whistleblowing about gender affirming care at Texas Children's Hospital. A HHS memo signaled that anyone interfering with gender affirming care would be targeted. I faced multiple indictments, based on a nonexistent law, for allegedly violating patient privacy, even though I protected patient identities while the DOJ did not. The prosecution was relentless, even threatening my wife. Facing financial ruin and the possibility of imprisonment, I used X to share my story and expose the injustice. The charges were eventually dropped, a moment of indescribable relief. Accountability is needed to prevent this from happening to others.

I'm in Helsinki to give a witness statement in a case against the Finnish government and a catering company for human rights violations related to the COVID pass. We aim to fight for freedom against medical tyranny. This is a unique case globally where the government is being sued. We are determined to expose corporate crimes and mistakes in history. Though we can't film the court, the transcript will be available. Let's stand up for freedom and justice.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department and Health and Human Services against me and my family after I blew the whistle on gender affirming care for minors at Texas Children's Hospital. A memo was sent out saying that anyone who interferes with gender affirming care would become a target of the federal government. They tried to manufacture an indictment out of nonexistent law, accusing me of violating patient privacy, even though I protected patient identities while the DOJ released patient initials. They aimed to make me pay for doing the right thing. I was willing to go to jail so the world could see what they were doing. With the help of X, we exposed the injustice and ultimately won, achieving the greatest victory of my life. We seek accountability for those who abused their power.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department against my family and me after I blew the whistle on gender affirming care for minors at Texas Children's Hospital. A Health and Human Services memo green-lit prosecutors to target anyone interfering with this care. The DOJ indicted me multiple times, even citing a non-existent law, for allegedly violating patient privacy, which I never did. They even threatened my wife. This ordeal cost us nearly $2 million. The charges were eventually dropped with prejudice, a huge relief, especially for our daughter. We're calling for accountability for those responsible for this abuse of power, hoping to prevent similar injustices. Without X, I never would have been able to blow the whistle. This isn't the America I recognize anymore.

Speaker describes ongoing experiences challenging corona mandates in Switzerland: leading court proceedings as a Swiss lawyer against unconstitutional mandates, representing individuals seeking compensation for injuries from mRNA injections, and initiating a major criminal court proceeding against Swissmedic, the Swiss medical safety agency. Despite over three years of hard work, results regarding justice remain unseen. From these efforts, the speaker identifies a lesson: in Europe, in all involved courts and health authorities, they protect their governments with deceptive information policies, wrong decision making, and, most of all, with totally illegal authorizations of mRNA products granted in Switzerland by safety agencies. The speaker notes that no justice has been done and no lesson learned in the official European world. The speaker then asks what can be done about this and first seeks input from the MAHA team and Doctor Robert Malone about any hope from the United States, where positive signals have emerged, notably on January 20 with the present president Trump’s declaration to exit the WHO and other steps. From today’s event, the speaker derives hope, but contends that the hope must come from Europe. A plan is articulated: Europe will take its destiny into its own hands. The speaker intends to ensure that people can see the true effects of the WHO and the true effects of the industry after many proceedings have resulted in authorities claiming that the WHO was setting Gold standards. The speaker aims to contribute, together with the MEHA movement, all of their experience and investigations conducted against the WHO, and to work together to make Europe healthy again. The commitment is clear: they will never give up.