reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker points out that the prosecutor in the case has intertwined her political interests with the case, which could backfire. The prosecutor has been removed from part of the case due to a conflict of interest and has made inappropriate public statements. The speaker believes this is bad form for a prosecutor and could be a problem when the case goes to court. They predict that Donald Trump will argue that the prosecutor has improperly mixed politics with the case and should be removed. The speaker acknowledges that these arguments may not succeed, but the prosecutor has created problems for herself.

What has happened to Tina Peters in Colorado is outrageous, and a criminal violation of our civil rights laws. As Mesa County Clerk, Tina Peters tried to look at election irregularities in Colorado, which is her job under Colorado statute, and accessed tabulation codes in the voting machines. Instead of a warning, the Colorado Secretary of State went to the Mesa County Prosecutor, and put Tina Peters in prison for nine years with the help of a partisan hack judge. The judge admitted he imposed the severe penalty because she advanced false claims about Trump's defeat and became a celebrity among those who denied he lost the race. The acting US attorney in Colorado just filed a statement of interest in Tina Peters' habeas petition, pointing out that this is a 69 year old woman whose health is failing in state prison, and she's being punished for protected First Amendment thoughts.

The January 6th incident was not a Trump-led insurrection, as he was at the White House calling for calm. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Trump an insurrectionist, barring him from the state's ballot. Critics celebrated this decision, claiming it was a victory against voters' desires. Colorado Secretary of State Griswold stated that accusations on TV are enough to disqualify a candidate, bypassing legal processes. This undemocratic behavior signals a troubling trend.

Coy Griffin, founder of Cowboys for Trump and an elected county commissioner, was charged with misdemeanors for being at the Capitol on January 6th. Although acquitted of disorderly conduct, he was convicted of trespassing. A nonpartisan watchdog group called CREW sued to remove Griffin from office, claiming he violated the 14th amendment. Despite being acquitted of any participation in the riot, a New Mexico judge ordered Griffin's removal, stating the Capitol attack was an insurrection. This marked the first court disqualification of a public official for this reason since 1869. The goal was to establish precedent to target Donald Trump. Trump claims to be a target of the January 6th grand jury investigation, fearing multiple indictments and the use of the 14th amendment to prevent him from running for office. Conservative media has largely avoided covering January 6th. The story of Coy Griffin highlights the danger of left-wing ideological zealots weaponizing courts to control election outcomes. The American people must wake up to the left's efforts to destroy institutions and prevent Trump's election. (150 words)

The speaker asserts that Texas lied to prosecute the T-Mobile whistleblower and that the case exposes information Americans aren’t supposed to know. A key claim is that a conservative constitutional judge from Collin County was replaced days before the trial with a retired liberal judge from Dallas, which the speaker suspects allowed a juror to be planted in the jury. During jury selection, defense and state weeded 50 people down to eight, but the judge ultimately selects the jurors. The state prosecution allegedly lied about the gated community entry, claiming a security guard was present and that the speaker snuck in, a claim the speaker says is false and used to portray him as a dangerous stalker. The T-Mobile executive allegedly stated he feared for his life and his family’s safety, yet the speaker notes the executive flew to Bellevue, Washington, to T-Mobile’s headquarters the next day, arguing it contradicted the notion of a genuine threat from the speaker. The state prosecuted by obtaining all of the speaker’s social media from Ex Twitter, Instagram, Substack, and the speaker learned of this only when Instagram notified him. The state and T-Mobile labeled the speaker a violent threat for discussing his guns in self-defense, with a cited tweet and related materials used in the case. The speaker claims that his communications—tweets, videos, a long-form website—were censored, and that he then went guerrilla with flyers and a self-defense stance described as “staccato for self defense.” During sentencing, the state subpoenaed a police officer who arrested the speaker sixteen years earlier for a felony marijuana charge, with deferred adjudication and probation completed in 2008, to portray the speaker as a still-active drug dealer. The state reportedly shared some of the whistleblower story but downplayed that T-Mobile violated Texas Health and Safety Code chapter 81 d by discriminating against the speaker for being unvaccinated. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to share the story, claiming it exposes corruption among elected officials and corporations.

Speaker 0: Listen to this clip, Hannah, of what I said that was so dangerous and controversial. K. Keen Jeffries, a progressive congressman, literally tweeted, while the trial was going on, lock up Kyle Rittenhouse and throw away the key. And he's the same guy that rails against mass incarceration, and I agree with him on some of it. But now, before the trial's even over, they're calling for this guy to be locked up and throw away the key. Like, they've already reached their conclusion. Speaker 1: No. Didn't give him a fair shake. Speaker 0: It's a very ... And they lied about it being a white supremacy thing when it's a white dude that shot three other white people. It's the entire thing is bizarre and it's Out of self defense. Speaker 1: Right. Yes. Speaker 0: In my opinion. Speaker 1: That's most important. Speaker 0: The truth is he defended himself; he wasn't some mass shooter white supremacist, and he should be acquitted. Do you feel bullied? Speaker 1: I I don't. And honestly, I think that was the most milquetoast explanation of everything that went down.

Marxists, Islamists, and the administration have convinced a Washington DC jury to convict 5 pro-life activists who now face up to 11 years in prison for protesting. Meanwhile, individuals with different political beliefs are being sentenced to 10, 15, and even 20 years in prison. Antifa and other groups have caused chaos in cities like Portland, Minneapolis, and Seattle, engaging in violence, looting, and even taking over parts of the city. This political repression is immoral, un-American, and dangerous. If elected, the speaker promises to appoint a special task force to review the cases of unjustly persecuted political prisoners and sign their pardons or commutations on day 1.

Tina Peters, a gold star Navy Seal mom and former Mesa County, Colorado recorder, is imprisoned with a nine-and-a-half-year sentence after a conviction. She became suspicious of election systems after unusual April 2021 county elections. When Dominion was sent to work on her county's machines, Peters preserved records, leading to the Mesa County number three report. The DOJ filed a statement of interest regarding her case, citing concerns about the lengthy sentence, First Amendment implications, and denial of bail. The DOJ is reviewing cases nationwide for abuse of the criminal justice process, including whether Peters' prosecution was politically motivated rather than pursuing justice. The speaker claims Peters had a duty to preserve the records, and her actions revealed significant fraud. The speaker alleges the judge ran a kangaroo court, preventing the admission of evidence of fraud uncovered by Peters' actions. A key witness allegedly lied on the stand, with the judge and prosecutor reinforcing the false testimony. The speaker urges financial support for Peters through TinaPeters.US and vouches for the integrity of the Lindell Offense Fund, stating that no money was taken for personal use.

A poll worker states that while observing the duplication of a spoiled ballot, she read a Trump Republican ballot to her partner, but the system defaulted to a Biden Democratic ballot when entered. She and others reported witnessing the same manipulation to supervisors. The witness says she was scolded for suggesting the machines were not working correctly and was told not to discuss what was happening. She also claims many people were threatened with removal from the room or job if they spoke out. She believes it is her duty to speak the truth.

Two years ago today on 10/17/2023, I was sentenced to sixty days in prison for trespassing outside the capital on J sixth. The judge during my sentencing said that I misused my platform as a candidate for elected office. If you don't know, my name is Ryan Kelly. I was the leading gubernatorial candidate in the state of Michigan in 2022 when the FBI raided my house on 06/09/2022, and they arrested me on misdemeanor charges, nonviolent, never even went inside the Capitol Building, was the leading gubernatorial candidate, election interference. I was the best poised to beat Whitmer. But, anyway, that's the point of all of this right now. The judge said that I had a lot of folks that followed me. I had a lot of folks that supported me. And with that comes the responsibility of not peddling lies and falsehoods. And he was talking about the twenty twenty election because I said it was a fraudulent stolen election. He was talking about January 6 because I said that the January 6 that there was FBI agents there that were setting the whole thing up and involved in the crowd. And what did we find out here recently? Oh, I was right, but I was sentenced to sixty days in prison for that. One of the biggest things the judge brought up that he had a huge problem with the Facebook posts that I had. Right? Freedom of speech. Poof. Gone. Kings do that kind of stuff. They don't let their people talk freely. Is that right? And then on top of that, you know, lying and misleading all of my supporters when we come to now find out there was 274 agents that were in the crowd that day on January 6. You know, it's obvious that the Democrats are the tyrants, the kings, if you will. Right? I mean, look at what they did with Kamala in the primary. Right? I don't need to explain it to y'all. But, you know, here we are. The Trump administration is removing illegal immigrants from our country and doing good things for America. It was the Biden administration, the Democrats that targeted American citizens. Red, white, and blue. Let's go USA.

In Denver, Colorado, a trial begins to determine if President Trump can be banned from the upcoming presidential election ballot. The trial is based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which states that individuals engaged in insurrection or rebellion can be barred. However, there is no legal basis for this case, and both sides acknowledge that. The trial is seen as a way to interfere with the election and is criticized as a frivolous lawsuit. It is argued that instead of pursuing these lawsuits, the focus should be on winning over the people to beat Trump. The claim is made that the establishment is unfairly going after Trump.

Tim Hazelow, a Republican ballot observer and Trump supporter in Island County, Washington, was convicted on trespassing and unlawful entry of an election center, a felony. The charges stem from Hazelow's refusal to wear a COVID mask while observing ballot counting in 2024, after which he was escorted out by law enforcement. The elected prosecutor, Greg Banks, known for his anti-Trump sentiments and wishing death on those not wearing masks, personally prosecuted the case after Hazelow refused to plead guilty to a misdemeanor. The speaker argues this is a political prosecution, highlighting that Banks compared Trump supporters to Nazis and wished death on people who don't wear masks. The defense was limited, as the judge deemed the prosecutor's bias and evidence of others not wearing masks irrelevant. Another Republican ballot observer, Tracy Abdul, faces similar felony charges. The speaker calls for a better defense team for Hazelow's appeal, as a felony conviction could impact his security clearance and lead to jail time.

A security guard, who was protecting a doctor, is facing sentencing for his actions during the January 6th incident. Marjorie Taylor Greene wants the U.S. Attorney prosecuting the case impeached. The guard claims that he has not engaged in any violence or destruction. He finds it ironic that the government is withholding 45,000 hours of video footage, which he believes would exonerate him. Despite his requests, the footage has not been released. He questions who the real criminal is when the alleged criminal is asking for evidence to be revealed, but the government is hiding it.

The speakers discuss the case of the shaman involved in the January 6th incident. They mention that he received a 31-month prison sentence, while Nancy Pelosi's daughter questions what he actually did. They suggest that the incident was a setup by the establishment to make a political movement illegal. They also mention the possibility of rigging the jury system for political purposes. Overall, they criticize the overprosecution of the protesters and highlight the hypocrisy of accusing Trump of the same actions.

There is a trial to remove my name from the ballot. I believe the 2024 election is crucial because our country is being destroyed by people who may hate it. If they succeed in removing my name, there will never be a free election in America again. We are at risk of becoming a dictatorship. The 2024 election is our last chance to save America. We must win to make America greater than ever before.

The speaker discusses the selective evidence and rigged cases surrounding the January 6th incident at the Capitol. They argue that the prosecutors, DOJ, and FBI have created a two-tier system of justice by hiding certain evidence and distributing others to maintain a false narrative of an insurrection. They also mention the attempt to remove Donald Trump from the ballot and highlight the connections between the law firm representing the group pushing for his removal and individuals like Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, and Gina Haspel. The speaker questions the logic behind accusing Trump of insurrection when he did not order the deployment of the National Guard.

I'm here instead of campaigning due to a court case. The prosecution has no evidence of a crime, and experts believe the case should be dismissed. The trial is seen as an attack on Biden and a political move. The justice system is being questioned, and the judge is criticized for bias. Many feel it's a miscarriage of justice and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is viewed as corrupt and unfair. Thank you. Translation: The speaker is not campaigning due to a court case where the prosecution lacks evidence of a crime. Experts suggest dismissing the case. The trial is seen as a political attack on Biden, questioning the justice system and criticizing the biased judge. Many view it as unjust and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is perceived as corrupt and unfair. Thank you.

The speaker claims they were barred in a separate proceeding by a political operative unconnected to the trial. They allege the judge refused to consider evidence, including 12 hours of tape from Atlanta purportedly showing thousands of stolen votes. The speaker asserts that 3 hours were missing from the tapes provided to them, and the tapes were reengineered to appear continuous. They claim the altered hours contained evidence of misconduct, including multiple counting of ballots, people being removed from observation, and an improbable vote count favoring Biden. The speaker alleges that 375,000 absentee ballot envelopes are missing, approximating their estimate of fraudulent ballots. The speaker states that the bar association hasn't found any lawyer involved in a case with them who alleges unethical behavior. They claim allegations originate from outside Democratic advocates, some paid large sums. The speaker calls a $145,000,000 judgment ridiculous and says the plaintiffs are represented by Hunter Biden's classmate. They say the judge in that case, Beryl Howell, was hand-picked and is the most bloodthirsty in D.C. The speaker claims they made no admissions and couldn't provide discovery because the FBI seized their material, which the judge wouldn't excuse. They argue the case should have been in Georgia, not Washington.

The speaker expresses concern over the exclusion of a person from the ballot without any criminal conviction, viewing it as a form of extreme election interference. They criticize the misuse of the justice system for political purposes, highlighting the involvement of weaponized prosecutors and Democrat-appointed justices in Colorado. The speaker emphasizes that this issue affects all Americans, regardless of their political affiliation, as it undermines the right to vote and manipulates the courts. They believe that the current situation, including the persecution of President Trump, represents the greatest constitutional crisis in American history since the civil war.

My son graduated from high school, but the judge won't let me attend. The trial is a scam and a political witch hunt. The judge won't allow me to go to the United States Supreme Court either. I can't campaign like I should be, which benefits the radical left Democrats. It's a sad situation with a conflicted judge and unnecessary trial. Thank you for your support.

The speaker claims that a video shows a van dropping off boxes of ballots at the TCF center. They put the video on their website and tweeted about it, resulting in the suspension of their Twitter account. The video shows a lead car and an escort car arriving, with people inside adding something each time. The van enters twice. However, a local reporter who was present all night denies any fraud or wrongdoing.

The speaker criticizes the political lawfare in the Alvin Bragg trial, accusing it of being a sham to target Trump. They highlight the lack of prosecution by various agencies and question the motives behind the case. The speaker also questions the jury selection process, alleging bias against Trump supporters. They argue that this lawfare is aimed at interfering in elections and boosting Biden's campaign, vowing that Trump will win in 2024 to stop this misuse of the justice system.

I was scheduled to speak at a permitted event on Capitol grounds on January 6th. As I arrived, I learned that people were entering the Capitol. There were no police officers on the east side, and I walked through open barricades into a crowd. This led to my first felony charge for being on restricted grounds. After filming a video outside, the FBI raided my home, and I faced multiple felony charges. The government is overcharging individuals, forcing them into a difficult position of either going to trial or accepting a plea deal that they dictate. This has been a targeted effort against Trump supporters. I'm also part of the Walk Away Campaign, a movement of former Democrats encouraging people to think independently and move away from identity politics. For more information, visit walkawaycampaign.com.

A Wisconsin government employee was fired for allegedly rigging the 2020 election by printing 64,000 extra ballots in City Hall. She had ballots filled out by city employees, kicked out observers, and brought in more ballots in the middle of the night. An email from a coworker confirmed the suspicious activity. The speaker believes this fraud led to Biden winning the election unfairly. The woman's actions were deemed illegal and unconstitutional, and the speaker calls for prosecution. They express anger and frustration over the situation, calling Biden a fake president.

Speaker 0 presents what he calls an explosive piece of tape: a man buys a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter, pocketing $200 and expecting to collect the ballot when the voter receives it. Speaker 1 reacts, noting the illegality of the act and questioning why it isn’t illegal to do certain things, followed by a line that “We don’t get illegal” and a claim about lions, then attributes responsibility to someone who “came up with all this.” Speaker 0 continues, stating that she started the whole “pay to vote” scheme. He alleges that “the people that work for Ilhan” are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. Speaker 1 adds that they “become a manager in the prison too,” claiming that those people “walk with you to the booth, and then they vote, oh, vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote even if you speak English.” Speaker 0 introduces James O’Keefe, identifying himself as a truth exposer who holds the corrupt elite accountable, and pivots to messaging about protecting readers’ freedom and finances. The segment shifts to a financial pitch. O’Keefe warns of one of the biggest financial shifts of their lifetime, describing de-dollarization with nations like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia moving away from US dollars. He claims this threatens savings and retirement security and cites Ray Dalio’s warning about skyrocketing debt, relentless money printing, and a weakening dollar as part of a dangerous cycle that could impact Americans. He asserts that more Americans are turning to real assets like physical gold and silver, noting that gold “surged past $3,700 per ounce,” and that momentum is building. He says he has partnered with veteran-owned American Independence Gold to help viewers take action, offering to open a qualifying account with up to $10,000 in bonus gold and a free gold protection guide. He adds that a portion of every sale supports Tunnel to Towers and wounded warriors, and closes with the line, “Freedom isn’t given, it’s secured,” followed by the disclaimer, “This is James O’Keefe. As always, this is not financial advice. Always check with your licensed financial advisor before you invest.”