TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In 2022, as Director of Information Security at The Intercept, the speaker wrote articles critical of Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter, including his purging of leftist accounts and reinstatement of neo-Nazis and anti-vaxxers. Subsequently, Musk permanently suspended the speaker's account, then reinstated it after a poll, but demanded deletion of a tweet. Instead, the speaker quit Twitter for a year. The speaker now works with a collective that makes open-source security and privacy software, including Syd.social, an app to delete data from X and migrate tweets to Blue Sky. The speaker is also involved in Tesla Takedown, a nonviolent movement aiming to devalue Tesla stock and force Musk to sell shares to cover his Twitter debt. The goal is to trigger a Tesla stock "death spiral."

The speaker announces plans to start a GoFundMe on November 2 to raise money for severance pay that they declined, acknowledging that nobody owes them anything for their actions but asserting that many people are tired of tyranny and censorship from corporate America. They express a belief that supporters will back them in showing corporate America that this fatigue exists. The speaker claims that in December 2021, T-Mobile censored text messages by blocking customers from sharing links related to vaccine efficacy from the gateway pundit. They state that T-Mobile blamed the action on a content filter, but they view that explanation as a convenient cover-up, especially given that Twitter and Facebook were censoring the same information at the same time. The speaker notes that nearly every statement they have made about T-Mobile in this video and on their X account would likely put them in breach of contract. They anticipate potential backlash for initiating a GoFundMe but emphasize that they are fully transparent and believe being upfront about their actions is important. The speaker frames the move as part of a broader stance against what they see as censorship by large corporations and signals a desire to mobilize supporters to challenge such practices. They acknowledge the potential criticism they may receive for the fundraising effort while reiterating their commitment to openness regarding their decisions and actions. The underlying message highlights a personal choice to publicize grievances against corporate censorship and to seek financial backing to address consequences they perceive from severance-related actions. The overall narrative combines a claim about past censorship by a major telecom, a call for collective action against perceived corporate tyranny, and a transparent, upfront approach to pursuing support through a GoFundMe. The speaker emphasizes transparency about their motives and actions and anticipates scrutiny from others while presenting the fundraising as a response to censorship and a broader fight against corporate control of information.

It's frustrating dealing with content takedowns, especially for the community. I've been on Instagram since I was 13, starting my kink account at 15. I began with APDL content, gradually exploring pup play, which I'm currently into. It's disheartening to lose that connection because I've made so many amazing friends over the years and have tons of pictures.

The speaker will launch a GoFundMe on November 2 to recoup severance money they declined. They acknowledge they are not owed anything but believe many are against corporate censorship. The speaker claims that in December 2021, T-Mobile censored text messages by blocking customers from sharing links about vaccine efficacy from The Gateway Pundit. T-Mobile attributed this to a content filter, but the speaker believes it was a cover-up, coinciding with similar censorship on Twitter and Facebook. The speaker states that their statements about T-Mobile would breach their contract. They anticipate criticism for the GoFundMe but emphasize transparency.

Welcome to the first video in my docuseries on John Ledger and T Mobile. It's gonna be a long series with a lot of twists and turns, but let's start with why we're here. Do you remember the days of John Ledger and T Mobile shaking up the industry? Do you remember the loud mouthed CEO who didn't give a shit what people thought? Do you remember the CEO who fought for the frontline and created a cult like following with his employees and customers? I do, because he was my hero. I spent my twenties and thirties being part of the coolest turnaround story in corporate America history, and he was leading the charge. Let me remind you how cool John Ledger was from this CNBC series, The Brave Ones. A lot of people feel that companies themselves are soulless, that CEOs are buttoned down, and that if you do become anything other than that, it's going to hurt your business model. You are a living, breathing example that that's wrong. Hello. Who's this? This is Lisa. Lisa. John. What's up? Oh my god. Can I just tell you you are the best CEO on this planet? Yeah. But that's easy because most CEOs suck. There's a shtick to John, but the shtick is completely in keeping with his company. That's why it's genuine. He's a rebel. He was kind of a cultural alien at the beginning, and he was kind of a rock star in a symphony orchestra. And eventually, the orchestra learned and loved to play rock with him. Legendary. That's the T Mobile I worked for and grew up in. I can still remember being on the Sales floor in March 2011 when I got an email saying AT and T was buying T Mobile. And I was absolutely miserable because I had just left AT and T to go to T Mobile. And then eighteen months later, Mr. John Ledger became the CEO of T Mobile and provided me the opportunity of a lifetime. I started as a seasonal retail sales associate and worked my way up the ladder into multiple positions, eventually made my way into headquarters. I've learned so much in the last seventeen years it's unbelievable. I went from a part time seasonal paycheck to 6 figures, and I also met my wife while I was hustling phones at the T Mobile on Skillman And Abrams. Shout out to the Skillas. To me, that's an example of the American dream. But back to Ledger, my bad, I could go on about this story forever, so make sure you follow, like, and subscribe. Sincerely Ledger, I appreciate you for being who you used to be. I appreciate you for showing me how to have the courage to speak up for the little guy. I couldn't agree more with your statements right here. Them. I am right in your face aggressive to them. But on behalf of people, the assumption is that these high and mighty duopolists that are raping you for every penny you have, if they could do something nice for you, they would. The bitches hate you. I'm telling you. So let's cut the bullshit and get straight to the point of why I'm here. I'm the person you used to be. Magenta is now mine. And to be fair, you did give it up like it was so easy to do. You showed who you really were right there didn't you? The difference between you and me is I bleed magenta. And now I'm going to uncarry your journalism and the news and speak up to the establishment who keeps screwing us little people over. Y'all are making it real hard on me by suspending my ex account, shadow banning me on Instagram, blocking me on Instagram, and whatever else you're doing that I don't know about. People are waking up to the BS and are tired of it. You changed, not me, remember that. You did this to yourself. You changed to team establishment and supported my constitutional rights being violated at T Mobile. You're just like rage against the machine turning into rage for the machine. Nobody in America even cares that my constitutional rights were violated and I was discriminated against The only accountability is me speaking up and it's costing me a lot of money, friends and family I know you left in 2020 but you were still my hero when you turned into the left wing propagandist How did I get it right and all the people that made a lot of money got it wrong? The answer lies within the question Let's see some of the stuff I'm talking about There's wearing a mask because of Covid and then there were people like you who were straight up propagandist for some reason Up. Up. Lot of damage. Certainly an amazing day for a run. Happy Sunday, everybody. Hey. Happy Saturday, everybody. Here's a friendly reminder. Wear a mask. Be a good neighbor. Keep your neighbors safe, and they'll return the favor. And be a leader. Leaders lead. Lead by wearing a mask. That's right. It's slow cooker Sunday. And although I'm home, I'm wearing a mask just to send a message. You serious? I'm keeping these episodes short on purpose to support America's attention span. On the next episode, I'm gonna show you how John Ledger, Steve Aoki, and Blau made millions of dollars hustling NFTs. It's a pretty cool story, especially now knowing 95% of NFTs are worthless and the middle class lost billions while wealthy people made billions. You're an investor collector and NFT strategist yourself. Like, you care. You know, you're in the space. You're a collector. I've seen a picture of your doodle when I walked in. Yeah. And a mutiny. Yeah. And a mutiny. And I've seen a thing you you said recently is that you've made more money off NFTs than you have in your past six albums. Yes. Which is fascinating. Yeah. It's and it's true. And don't worry. I'll give you a quick intro to NFTs on that video, but nothing too detailed.

Thank you for purchasing Twitter. Your acquisition has significantly altered the course of history, especially regarding censorship and narrative control. Before the acquisition, I noticed something was off, particularly when they deplatformed the sitting president for urging calm. This illogical action highlighted a deeper issue of government influence over social media. The ongoing advertiser boycott, driven by left-wing NGOs, has further complicated the situation. The government can target companies like SpaceX with legal actions, creating a chilling effect on free speech. The First Amendment exists to protect against tyranny, yet there's a growing narrative that it enables misinformation. Community notes on Twitter provide a transparent way to counter misinformation, allowing users to engage with source material directly. The government’s interference in social media is concerning, as it undermines constitutional rights and public discourse.

Don Lemon, Joy Reid, Stephen King, and others are leaving X, formerly Twitter, citing inappropriate content. Even the Clifton Suspension Bridge's account has shut down, opting for Instagram instead. Their departure reflects a harsh truth: their opinions were not valued, and their presence became counterproductive, even driving some to support Trump. Under Elon Musk, X has allowed for a more competitive exchange of ideas, exposing the fragility of elite narratives. As these figures exit, it’s clear their influence has diminished. They may try to distance themselves from past controversies, but the reality is that they can't escape accountability. The landscape has shifted, and many may soon find themselves returning to X, as it remains a vital platform for discourse.

I received an email informing me that my LinkedIn account had been shut down. My friends couldn't find me on the platform anymore. LinkedIn stated that my account was restricted for sharing misleading or inaccurate content. The specific offenses were a video where I mentioned the CCP playing the Biden administration, another video discussing the climate religion and its objectives, and a statement that the climate agenda is a lie. LinkedIn claimed I violated their policies on hate speech, misinformation, and violence. This incident highlights the concerning power of tech companies, acting as a hybrid of corporate and state power, to silence speech that the government couldn't censor directly. I will fight to restore free speech and internet freedoms in our country.

The X app has turned into a breeding ground for scams. It's filled with crypto Ponzi schemes, political manipulation, and religious bait. Real users are drowned out by bots and fake accounts, all trapped in a closed loop. This isn't a social network anymore. It's an emotional data farm. They don't care about your opinion. They want your reaction, your outrage, your division. Every post is designed to provoke rage or sell you false hope while pushing an agenda. Nobody's questioning anything. We're stuck in algorithm driven cycles of fear and distraction. This place isn't about connection. It's about wearing you down and manipulating your mind, all while pretending to be the public square. I'm done with it.

I finally decided to let go of my 1.9 million followers on that platform. I hadn’t been posting for a while, especially after it was purchased by a new owner. I held onto the account to prevent someone from misusing the name. Occasionally, I used it to check trending news, but I realized that sifting through the negativity and abuse wasn’t worth it. It became clear that the effort to stay updated was overshadowed by the unpleasant content.

The speaker describes spending an entire year posting on X, finally breaking through by reaching 20,000 followers and being admitted to the creator program last night. Then the account was suspended abruptly. He expresses appreciation to followers for the twelve hours of fame and notes that this is the account now, but he probably won’t be posting much anymore, feeling demoralized. He mentions his name, Ethan Levins, in relation to his Instagram handle, but does not elaborate beyond that.

No white cloth? I wish you could stir just the devil's first bit of twilight. Do you enjoy Broadway musicals? Yeah, but not too much singing. Elon Musk is on Twitter, and we got kicked out in March 2022. Now, we’re back at Twitter HQ, and it’s surreal. Restoring accounts was chaotic; I had to figure everything out while managing Tesla and SpaceX. The Twitter code is complex, and advertisers were uncertain about the changes. We lost $40 million in advertising due to community notes. We aim for Twitter to be the least untruthful place online, promoting a marketplace of ideas. The goal is to balance free speech with advertiser comfort. I believe we can run a profitable free speech platform, focusing on diverse perspectives and transparency.

I was just fired from my job. After six years building the diversity, equity and inclusion department from scratch at Microsoft, I lose my job because a random person reports my posts to my employer and takes my job and security away for a thought, for an opinion. Somebody screenshot all of my TikToks. I made some stupid comments about Charlie Kirk on the day that he was shot, I said some things on blue sky and on threads, and I deleted them when it was requested by my employer. 'and you talk about freedom of speech like you care about it.' 'I felt joy that day.' 'I can't help that. So I don't deserve a job?' 'Fired You from my fucking job.' 'Now I have nothing but this website. I have nothing anymore.'

The algorithm manipulates views and followers to control narratives, promote movements, and sway votes. It pushes certain artists, products, and influencers to influence perceptions. If your content goes against the system, keep going - real support will come.

On January 13th, an article about me was published by Gateway Pundit. I woke up to find a surge in subscribers and discovered that the article highlighted censorship by T-Mobile, which had removed links to Gateway Pundit in text messages. Jim Hoff, who wrote the piece, shared my story, and I was thrilled to see it. It felt like a significant moment for me, and I couldn't help but express my excitement.

It's been a year since we last spoke, and I'm now grateful for my position at NewsNation. They've supported me, even with my brother running for mayor, unlike my past experience where having family in the news was an issue. The media world is treacherous, but I'm excited to bleed for NewsNation. It's comforting to be somewhere that values me. It is frustrating that destroying someone has become the standard, and negativity is the commodity. Digital media is changing the game, shifting power back to the people. Traditional media is struggling to adapt. I'm in the right place now. The commodity is negativity; power is shifting away from establishment media.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a sudden, unexplained YouTube ban impacting Speaker 1’s entire account, including the ability to watch YouTube, with no violations or warnings on the channel and no explanation given. The channel was deleted for not following community standard guidelines, which Speaker 1 notes is surprising given the channel’s focus on personal experiences, scientific conversations, and lack of strikes. Speaker 1 explains the last interview they did was with Jim Sikala, and mentions frequent contact from Harvard University’s neurology department seeking real experiences to place boxes in homes for real scientific data collection, not ufology. He says the interview with Sikala was “the last thing we did” about a week or two prior, and asserts there was no explanation for the termination and ban from the app. Speaker 2 frames this as part of a broader pattern of suppression since they started filming a documentary and releasing it on November 5. They describe their YouTube presence as minimal in size and influence, yet they’ve observed a lack of visibility across Twitter and other platforms, with posts “invisible” or unseen by audiences. They had expected the Rogan mention to boost visibility, given some discussions around the documentary and agent disclosure, but instead experienced continued suppression. Speaker 0 notes that both their channels and individual accounts are not reaching audiences despite heavy cross-promotion, and they question how to generate interest or reach when content remains unseen. They reference a Rogan appearance last night that mentioned Speaker 1, and then the next day Speaker 1’s channel is wiped out, prompting speculation about a possible connection. Speaker 1 acknowledges that several thousand people think the ban is connected to the Rogan mention and Doctor Michael Masters’ discussions, though he emphasizes he does not monetize his channel and aims to help others share experiences. Speaker 1 emphasizes the documentary’s impact on people who feel unable to discuss certain topics in everyday society, noting that the content has helped many to rediscover suppressed ideas and experiences. He describes the emotional and personal toll of the work, including sleep issues and a period of sleepwalking, which he attributes to stress and exposure, and recounts a recent incident of seeing a face in a kitchen window, which turned out to be himself in a mirror-like reflection. Speaker 2 summarizes the sense of ongoing coincidence and timing that feels significant, comparing it to the sense of the phenomenon experienced prior to their first filming. They acknowledge receiving messages from viewers inspired by the documentary, thanking them for the work.

This morning, we lost 5,000 YouTube subscribers, and it’s not just a glitch; many channels are experiencing similar declines. We’re also seeing record cancellations of paid memberships, which are crucial for our operations. This trend is alarming, as it threatens the livelihoods of those in left-wing media. Unlike the right, which organizes and funds effective networks when they face losses, we risk falling into a downward spiral if we disengage. If you’re feeling burnt out, consider taking a break, but please don’t unsubscribe. When people leave, YouTube reduces content recommendations, further diminishing our reach. We must stay engaged and not cede ground to those who want to silence us. I urge you to resubscribe to the channel.

Today, I received an email from YouTube stating that my account and channel had been deleted. I was shocked and thought it might be a scam, but it turned out to be true. The email was vague, so I don't know the exact reason for the takedown. I want to advise two groups of people: creators and individuals. Creators should diversify their platforms to avoid losing all their revenue if something like this happens. As for individuals, we are all targets because we go against the mainstream narratives. I have appealed to YouTube to get my channel back, but I'm also exploring other platforms like x.com and rumble.com. I appreciate the support and will continue creating content regardless of the outcome.

We filed an antitrust lawsuit against companies for organizing an illegal boycott against us. They threatened our future and the freedom of expression on our platform. Users are hurt when ideas are restricted. No group should control monetization. Our users are powerful and essential. We believe in an open platform for all voices. Thank you to everyone on this journey. We are committed to innovation and growth.

I used to be on Twitter, but it has become toxic and not worth my time. I'm trying to find an alternative to it. Social media needs a code of conduct to address issues like spreading false news and racism. The power of social media platforms should be reflected upon by society. The policy of the owner of X is also problematic. This is a problem that future society needs to address, focusing on ethics in social media.

I'm a free speech absolutist, yet my account was suspended and my verification removed. Subscribers can no longer support my work because Elon Musk disagrees with my statements. I didn't dox anyone; I shared publicly available FEC records. My intention was to warn the Trump administration about a significant issue that could lead to impeachment if the Democrats regain control and frame it as big tech buying influence. This is a serious concern that needs attention, especially since the MAGA base is reacting strongly to it.

I'm targeted for exposing Pizzagate, which I've been reporting on for eight years, while Elon Musk, who owns this platform, can discuss it without issues. It’s confusing that he can draw attention to Pizzagate, yet I face demonetization and identity theft. The criminal activity surrounding my name on this platform is extensive. Many claim that this platform is great for independent journalists, but that’s misleading. There’s fraud and scams, and making money here is reserved for a select few. I’ve done thorough research and have evidence to support this. It’s frustrating to see others mislead people about the opportunities here while we face these challenges.

Today, I received an email from YouTube stating that my account and channel had been deleted. I was shocked and thought it was a scam, but it turned out to be true. The email was vague, providing no clarity on why my channel was removed. I suspect the reasons but won't mention them to avoid encouraging similar actions against other creators. I want to share two messages: for creators, diversify your platforms to avoid losing all revenue if one is taken down, and for individuals, be aware that we are targets for going against the norm. While I've appealed to get my channel back, I can't rely solely on YouTube. I'll be posting videos on x.com and rumble.com. Please share and tag YouTube for support. Regardless, I'll continue pursuing my dreams.

I haven't personally presented my case to Mark Zuckerberg or Jack Dorsey, but I did email Jack before January 6th to warn him about a potential coup on his platform. However, I haven't heard from him since. If I had the chance to speak to Mark Zuckerberg, I would first have a private conversation. From my perspective, I'm concerned about the internet being defined by hate, division, and lies. This is not right, especially for those with children. We shouldn't let greed, profit, and growth shape our future. I hope that as human beings, they prioritize people's safety and consider the impact on the internet and future generations.